The TMEM213 antibody is a research tool designed to detect and analyze the transmembrane protein TMEM213, a poorly characterized member of the transmembrane protein family. TMEM213 has been implicated in oncogenesis, immune response modulation, and renal physiology, with emerging roles in cancers such as lung adenocarcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) . Antibodies targeting TMEM213 enable researchers to study its subcellular localization, expression patterns, and functional interactions in disease contexts.
TMEM213 antibodies are employed in multiple experimental workflows:
Subcellular Dynamics: TMEM213 localizes to early endosomes (N-terminus cytoplasmic) and the plasma membrane in some contexts. Antibodies confirmed its membrane-integrated topology via FRAP assays .
Kidney Interstitial Cells: TMEM213 marks Type A intercalated cells in collecting ducts. Antibodies are used to study acid-base homeostasis and polycystic kidney disease .
| Supplier | Product Range | Pricing | Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proteintech | Rabbit polyclonal (24927-1-AP) | ~$100–$300 | Extensive IHC validation, high purity |
| Thermo Fisher | Mouse monoclonal (PA5-62905) | ~$300–$400 | Cross-species reactivity, WB compatibility |
| Assay Genie | Rabbit polyclonal (PACO30566) | ~$200–$300 | IF-validated, subcellular resolution |
TMEM213 (Transmembrane protein 213) is an integral membrane protein encoded by the TMEM213 gene located on chromosome 7q34 in humans. It has a molecular weight of approximately 11,555 Da and exists in four isoforms produced by alternative splicing . Recent studies have identified TMEM213 as a potential prognostic biomarker in certain cancers, particularly lung adenocarcinoma, making it increasingly relevant for oncology research . The protein plays a role in cellular processes and signaling pathways, though its precise molecular function requires further elucidation. The growing interest in TMEM213 stems from its potential implications in disease progression and response to therapy, positioning it as an important research target for understanding membrane protein biology in normal and pathological conditions.
TMEM213 is classified as an integral membrane protein with a cellular component designation as "integral to membrane" . The protein has multiple transmembrane domains, consistent with its role as a membrane-spanning protein. While the complete three-dimensional structure has not been fully resolved, sequence analysis indicates it contains specific functional domains.
The human TMEM213 protein (UniProt code: A2RRL7) shares significant sequence homology with mouse and rat orthologs (90% identity), suggesting evolutionary conservation of function across mammalian species . Four distinct isoforms exist due to alternative splicing, potentially conferring different functional properties. The protein's localization to the membrane suggests it may function in cellular signaling, transport, or membrane organization. Recent functional studies have begun exploring its role in cancer biology, particularly in relation to treatment response in lung adenocarcinoma, indicating a potential function in cellular pathways relevant to cancer progression and therapy response .
Several TMEM213 antibodies are commercially available with different specifications suitable for various research applications. The primary types include:
These antibodies are primarily rabbit polyclonal antibodies that recognize human TMEM213, though some show cross-reactivity with mouse and rat orthologs. The immunogens used for antibody production vary, with some targeting specific amino acid sequences and others using recombinant protein fragments. All are intended for research use only and not for diagnostic procedures .
The optimal experimental conditions for TMEM213 antibodies vary based on the specific application:
For Immunohistochemistry (IHC):
Recommended dilution: 1:20-1:200 for PACO30566 and 1:50-1:200 for Novus Biologicals antibody
Visualization: Typically using standard detection systems compatible with rabbit antibodies
Protocol recommendation: Antigen retrieval may be necessary; specific buffer conditions should be optimized
For Immunofluorescence (IF):
Secondary antibody: Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG(H+L) has been successfully used
Buffer conditions: Standard IF blocking and washing buffers
For ELISA:
Buffer conditions: Standard ELISA coating, blocking, and washing buffers
Detection system: Compatible with rabbit IgG detection systems
Storage and handling recommendations for all TMEM213 antibodies include:
Short-term storage at 4°C
Long-term storage at -20°C with aliquoting to avoid freeze-thaw cycles
Preservation in appropriate buffer (e.g., PBS pH 7.4 with 50% glycerol and preservatives)
Optimization of these conditions for specific experimental setups is recommended, as factors such as tissue type, fixation method, and detection system can influence results.
Researchers can employ multiple validation approaches to ensure the specificity of TMEM213 antibodies:
1. Orthogonal Validation:
Compare protein detection with mRNA expression data
Perform correlation analysis between antibody staining and RNA-seq or qPCR data
This approach evaluates consistency between protein and transcript levels
2. Independent Antibody Validation:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of TMEM213
Compare staining patterns and localization
Consistent results across different antibodies increase confidence in specificity
3. Genetic Approaches:
Use TMEM213 knockout or knockdown models as negative controls
Overexpression systems as positive controls
CRISPR-Cas9 edited cell lines can provide definitive validation
4. Biochemical Validation:
Perform western blotting to confirm molecular weight (expected ~11.5 kDa)
Conduct immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Pre-adsorption with immunizing peptide should abolish specific signal
5. Cross-reactivity Assessment:
Test antibody on tissues/cells known to express or not express TMEM213
Examine reactivity with mouse/rat samples (90% sequence identity) to confirm cross-species specificity
6. Reliability Assessment Framework:
Evaluate antibody according to established reliability criteria
Aim for "Enhanced" validation status that requires multiple validation approaches
Comprehensive validation using multiple approaches provides the highest confidence in antibody specificity and experimental results.
For studying TMEM213 expression in tissue samples, several complementary methodologies are recommended:
Immunohistochemistry (IHC):
Use validated dilution ranges (1:20-1:200) of TMEM213 antibodies
Include appropriate positive controls (such as human testis tissue, which has been validated)
Employ antigen retrieval methods optimized for membrane proteins
Use automated staining platforms for consistency when possible
Quantify expression using digital image analysis software for objectivity
Immunofluorescence (IF):
Particularly useful for co-localization studies with other cellular markers
Use confocal microscopy for precise subcellular localization
Consider multi-color IF to investigate interaction with other proteins
RNA-based Methods:
In situ hybridization to detect TMEM213 mRNA in tissue context
RNAscope® technology for sensitive and specific mRNA detection
qRT-PCR for quantitative assessment of TMEM213 transcript levels
RNA-seq for comprehensive transcriptomic profiling
Tissue Microarrays (TMAs):
Efficient for studying multiple tissue samples simultaneously
Useful for determining expression patterns across different tissue types
Can be combined with IHC or IF methods
Digital Spatial Profiling:
Advanced technique for spatial characterization of TMEM213 expression
Provides quantitative data on expression in the tissue microenvironment
Allows multiplex analysis with other proteins of interest
A combined approach is often most informative, correlating protein expression (IHC/IF) with mRNA levels to provide validation and comprehensive expression profiling of TMEM213 in tissue samples.
Current evidence suggests TMEM213 may serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker, particularly in lung adenocarcinoma. Key findings include:
Prognostic Value in Lung Adenocarcinoma:
Association with Treatment Response:
Validation Approaches:
Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping methods (1,000 replications)
External validation was performed using the online Kaplan-Meier plotter database
These validation approaches strengthened the evidence for TMEM213's prognostic significance
Biological Pathway Associations:
While these findings are promising, further investigation is needed to fully establish TMEM213 as a clinically applicable biomarker. Additional studies with larger cohorts, diverse cancer types, and mechanistic investigations would strengthen the evidence base for TMEM213's utility as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in oncology.
Researchers can employ several sophisticated approaches to integrate TMEM213 expression data with other molecular markers for comprehensive pathway analysis:
1. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA):
Use GSEA software (such as GSEA v2.2.2) to analyze pathway enrichment based on TMEM213 expression levels
Categorize samples into high and low TMEM213 expression groups
Utilize curated gene sets from MSigDB, particularly KEGG pathway collections
Identify significantly enriched pathways associated with TMEM213 expression patterns
2. Multi-omics Integration Approaches:
Correlate TMEM213 protein expression (antibody-based detection) with:
mRNA expression (RNA-seq or microarray data)
Epigenetic profiles (methylation patterns, histone modifications)
Mutation data (whole-exome or targeted sequencing)
Protein interactome data (mass spectrometry-based proteomics)
Employ computational tools specifically designed for multi-omics integration (e.g., iCluster, MOFA)
3. Network Analysis Methods:
Construct protein-protein interaction networks including TMEM213
Identify hub proteins and signaling modules connected to TMEM213
Use tools like Cytoscape with plugins such as ReactomeFI or STRING
Apply network medicine approaches to identify disease modules
4. Machine Learning Integration:
Develop predictive models incorporating TMEM213 with other molecular markers
Use techniques such as random forests, support vector machines, or deep learning
Evaluate feature importance to determine TMEM213's relative contribution
Perform cross-validation to ensure model robustness
5. Single-cell Analysis Integration:
Examine TMEM213 expression at single-cell resolution
Identify cell populations with distinctive TMEM213 expression patterns
Integrate with other markers to define cell states and transitions
Map TMEM213 to specific cellular programs or differentiation trajectories
6. Clinical-Molecular Correlations:
Integrate TMEM213 expression with clinical parameters
Perform multivariate analyses including:
Use nomograms or other predictive tools to visualize integrated prognostic models
These integration approaches provide a comprehensive understanding of TMEM213's biological significance within the context of broader cellular pathways and disease mechanisms.
To investigate TMEM213's functional role in cellular processes, researchers should consider the following experimental designs:
1. Gene Modulation Studies:
Knockdown/Knockout Approaches:
siRNA or shRNA-mediated knockdown for temporary suppression
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for complete knockout
Inducible systems (e.g., Tet-On/Off) for temporal control of expression
Overexpression Systems:
Transient transfection with tagged TMEM213 constructs
Stable cell lines with regulated TMEM213 expression
Domain-specific mutants to investigate structure-function relationships
2. Subcellular Localization and Trafficking:
Advanced Microscopy:
Live-cell imaging with fluorescently tagged TMEM213
Super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization
FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) to assess mobility
Biochemical Fractionation:
Membrane fractionation to confirm integral membrane localization
Density gradient centrifugation to identify specific membrane compartments
Surface biotinylation to quantify plasma membrane expression
3. Protein Interaction Studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation:
Using validated TMEM213 antibodies to pull down interaction partners
Reverse co-IP with antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Proximity Labeling:
BioID or APEX2 approaches to identify proximal proteins
Split-BioID for detecting specific interaction interfaces
Yeast Two-Hybrid or Mammalian Two-Hybrid:
Screening for direct protein-protein interactions
4. Functional Assays Based on Cancer Biology Findings:
Cell Proliferation Assays:
MTT, BrdU incorporation, or real-time cell analysis
Colony formation assays to assess long-term growth effects
Migration and Invasion Assays:
Wound healing, transwell, and 3D invasion assays
Apoptosis and Cell Death:
Annexin V/PI staining, caspase activation assays
Drug Response Assays:
Dose-response studies with chemotherapeutic agents
Combination therapies to assess synergistic effects
5. Pathway Analysis:
Reporter Assays:
Luciferase-based pathway reporters (e.g., MAPK, Wnt, NF-κB)
Phosphorylation-specific antibodies to assess signaling cascades
Transcriptional Profiling:
RNA-seq following TMEM213 modulation
ChIP-seq to identify associated transcription factors
6. In Vivo Models:
Xenograft Models:
Comparing growth of tumors with modified TMEM213 expression
Patient-derived xenografts to maintain tumor heterogeneity
Genetically Engineered Mouse Models:
Conditional knockout/knockin of TMEM213
Tissue-specific expression systems
7. Clinical Correlation Studies:
Tissue Microarrays:
Correlating TMEM213 expression with clinical outcomes
Multi-marker analysis for pathway activation
Liquid Biopsy Approaches:
Examining TMEM213 in circulating tumor cells or exosomes
These experimental approaches provide a comprehensive framework for investigating TMEM213's functional roles, potentially revealing mechanisms behind its association with cancer prognosis and treatment response.
Researchers working with TMEM213 antibodies may encounter several technical challenges. Here are common issues and recommended solutions:
1. Background Staining and Non-specific Binding:
Problem: High background or non-specific staining in IHC or IF applications
Solutions:
Optimize antibody dilution (test range from 1:20-1:200 for IHC and 1:50-1:200 for IF)
Increase blocking time and concentration (5% BSA or normal serum from secondary antibody host)
Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for membrane permeabilization
Use more stringent washing steps (increase number and duration)
Pre-adsorb antibody with non-specific proteins
2. Inconsistent Membrane Protein Detection:
Problem: Variable or weak staining of TMEM213 as a membrane protein
Solutions:
Optimize fixation methods (membrane proteins can be sensitive to overfixation)
Use gentler permeabilization methods
Try different antigen retrieval methods (citrate vs. EDTA-based)
Consider using fresh frozen tissues rather than paraffin-embedded samples
Test detergent concentration carefully to preserve membrane integrity
3. Antibody Specificity Concerns:
Problem: Difficulty confirming antibody specificity
Solutions:
Perform validation using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Include proper controls (tissue known to express or lack TMEM213)
Conduct peptide competition assays with the immunizing peptide
Verify antibody reliability using orthogonal validation approaches
Consider using genetic knockdown/knockout as definitive controls
4. Storage and Stability Issues:
Problem: Loss of antibody activity over time
Solutions:
5. Cross-Reactivity with Related Proteins:
Problem: Antibody binds to proteins other than TMEM213
Solutions:
6. Reproducibility Issues:
Problem: Inconsistent results between experiments
Solutions:
Standardize protocols meticulously (timing, temperature, reagent concentrations)
Use automated staining platforms when possible
Prepare larger batches of working solutions
Document lot numbers and validate new antibody lots against previous results
Consider using positive control samples in each experimental run
Addressing these technical challenges requires systematic optimization and thorough controls, but implementing these solutions can significantly improve the reliability and reproducibility of TMEM213 antibody applications.
When researchers encounter contradictions between TMEM213 protein expression (detected by antibodies) and mRNA levels, a systematic analytical approach is necessary:
Understanding Potential Causes of Discrepancies:
Post-transcriptional Regulation Mechanisms:
Technical and Methodological Factors:
Antibody specificity or sensitivity limitations
Different detection thresholds between protein and mRNA methods
Sampling differences (spatial or temporal)
Fixation artifacts affecting epitope accessibility
Recommended Investigative Approaches:
Validation of Both Measurement Methods:
Temporal Analysis:
Conduct time-course experiments to detect potential delays between transcription and translation
Measure mRNA and protein stability using actinomycin D and cycloheximide chase experiments
Spatial Resolution Analysis:
Perform in situ hybridization alongside IHC on sequential tissue sections
Use single-cell approaches to detect cell-type-specific discrepancies
Consider subcellular localization affecting protein detection
Regulatory Mechanism Investigation:
Perform polysome profiling to assess translation efficiency
Analyze miRNA expression profiles and test potential regulatory miRNAs
Investigate protein degradation rates and ubiquitination status
Integrated Analysis Framework:
Calculate correlation coefficients between mRNA and protein levels across samples
Develop mathematical models accounting for synthesis and degradation rates
Use machine learning approaches to identify patterns in discrepancies
Apply statistical methods specifically designed for integration of multi-omics data
Biological Validation:
Conduct functional experiments with gene modulation (overexpression/knockdown)
Monitor changes in both mRNA and protein levels following perturbation
Investigate response to relevant stimuli that might affect post-transcriptional regulation
It's important to note that genes not detected at the mRNA level but detected at the protein level (or vice versa) are present in all evidence categories, indicating this is a common biological phenomenon rather than simply experimental error . When reporting such discrepancies, researchers should clearly document the methodologies used, consider multiple explanations, and design follow-up experiments to investigate the underlying mechanisms rather than assuming error in either measurement.
When selecting and using TMEM213 antibodies, researchers should evaluate several critical quality control parameters to ensure reliable and reproducible results:
1. Antibody Validation Documentation:
Validation Method Classification:
Validation Methodology:
Specificity Testing:
2. Technical Specifications:
Immunogen Details:
Clonality and Source:
Purification Method:
3. Application-Specific Parameters:
Recommended Dilutions:
Validated Applications:
Confirm the antibody has been specifically tested for your application of interest
Check the specific conditions used in validation (tissue types, cell lines, etc.)
Species Reactivity:
4. Physical Properties and Handling:
Storage Buffer Composition:
Storage Requirements:
Shelf Life:
Check expiration date and stability data
Consider lot-to-lot consistency for long-term studies
5. Performance Documentation:
Positive Controls:
Sensitivity Assessment:
Check detection limit information if available
Assess signal-to-noise ratio in example images
Reproducibility Data:
Look for evidence of lot-to-lot consistency
Check for inter-laboratory validation if available
By systematically evaluating these quality control parameters, researchers can select TMEM213 antibodies with the highest likelihood of generating reliable, specific, and reproducible results in their experimental systems.
Based on current knowledge and preliminary findings, several promising research directions for TMEM213 warrant further investigation:
Cancer Biology and Therapeutic Applications:
Expanded Biomarker Validation Studies:
Therapeutic Target Exploration:
Investigate whether modulating TMEM213 expression affects cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapy
Explore the potential of TMEM213-targeted therapies (antibody-drug conjugates, small molecule modulators)
Study combination approaches with existing cancer treatments
Molecular Mechanism Investigations:
Signaling Pathway Integration:
Map TMEM213's position in key cellular signaling networks
Identify TMEM213 interacting partners through proteomics approaches
Characterize post-translational modifications regulating TMEM213 function
Structure-Function Analysis:
Physiological Role Elucidation:
Tissue-Specific Functions:
Characterize TMEM213 expression patterns across normal tissues and developmental stages
Investigate tissue-specific regulatory mechanisms controlling TMEM213 expression
Develop tissue-specific knockout models to elucidate function in different organ systems
Membrane Biology:
Explore TMEM213's role in membrane organization and dynamics
Investigate potential functions in cellular transport or ion channel regulation
Study subcellular localization and trafficking mechanisms
Emerging Technology Applications:
Single-Cell Analysis:
Apply single-cell transcriptomics and proteomics to map TMEM213 expression at cellular resolution
Identify cell populations with distinctive TMEM213 expression patterns
Correlate with cell states and differentiation trajectories
Advanced Imaging:
Utilize super-resolution microscopy to study TMEM213 distribution in membranes
Apply live-cell imaging to track dynamic changes in TMEM213 localization
Develop new TMEM213 antibody-based imaging probes
Translational Research:
Liquid Biopsy Development:
Investigate TMEM213 detection in circulating tumor cells or exosomes
Develop minimally invasive monitoring approaches for treatment response
Precision Medicine Applications:
Create predictive models incorporating TMEM213 status for treatment selection
Design clinical trials stratifying patients based on TMEM213 expression
Develop companion diagnostics for emerging TMEM213-targeted therapies
These research directions represent opportunities to transform our understanding of TMEM213 from a relatively understudied membrane protein to a well-characterized molecular entity with potential clinical applications in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.
Emerging technologies are revolutionizing protein research and offer significant advantages for studying TMEM213 expression and function:
Advanced Proteomics Technologies:
Mass Spectrometry Innovations:
Targeted proteomics (SRM/MRM) for precise quantification of TMEM213 without antibody dependency
Top-down proteomics for characterizing intact TMEM213 protein and its isoforms
Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to map TMEM213 interaction networks in native membrane environments
Proximity Labeling Technologies:
BioID, APEX2, or TurboID systems fused to TMEM213 to identify proximal proteins
Spatially-resolved proximity labeling to map interaction networks in specific cellular compartments
Split-proximity labeling for detecting specific protein-protein interactions
Advanced Genomic and Transcriptomic Technologies:
CRISPR-Based Technologies:
CRISPR interference/activation for precise modulation of TMEM213 expression
CRISPR screens to identify genetic interactions with TMEM213
Base editing and prime editing for introducing specific mutations
Spatial Transcriptomics:
Visium or Slide-seq for spatial mapping of TMEM213 mRNA in tissue context
Integration with protein detection methods for multi-modal spatial analysis
Single-cell spatial transcriptomics for cellular heterogeneity assessment
Advanced Imaging Technologies:
Super-Resolution Microscopy:
STORM, PALM, or STED microscopy for nanoscale visualization of TMEM213 in membranes
Multi-color super-resolution for co-localization with interaction partners
Live-cell super-resolution for dynamic studies
Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy (CLEM):
Precise localization of TMEM213 in ultrastructural context
Immuno-EM for high-resolution localization studies
Expansion Microscopy:
Physical expansion of specimens for enhanced resolution with standard microscopes
Compatible with multiple rounds of staining for multiplexed analysis
Microfluidics and Organ-on-Chip Technologies:
Cell Culture Advances:
Microfluidic organ-on-chip systems for studying TMEM213 in physiologically relevant conditions
3D organoid cultures for examining TMEM213 function in tissue-like environments
Patient-derived organoids to study TMEM213 in disease contexts
Single-Cell Analysis:
Droplet-based single-cell proteomics for TMEM213 quantification at cellular resolution
Single-cell western blotting for protein heterogeneity assessment
Microfluidic antibody capture for single-cell surface protein analysis
Computational and AI-Based Approaches:
Protein Structure Prediction:
AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold for TMEM213 structure prediction
Molecular dynamics simulations of TMEM213 in membrane environments
Virtual screening for identifying molecules interacting with TMEM213
Multi-Omics Integration:
Machine learning models integrating TMEM213 data across multiple platforms
Network analysis tools for placing TMEM213 in biological pathways
Digital pathology with AI analysis of TMEM213 staining patterns
Antibody Engineering and Alternatives:
Next-Generation Antibodies:
Nanobodies or single-domain antibodies for improved access to membrane protein epitopes
Recombinant antibody fragments with site-specific conjugation for improved consistency
Aptamer Technology:
DNA/RNA aptamers as alternatives to antibodies for TMEM213 detection
Cell-SELEX for generating aptamers against native TMEM213 in cellular context
These emerging technologies can overcome limitations of traditional approaches and provide unprecedented insights into TMEM213 biology, potentially accelerating both fundamental understanding and clinical applications.