TMPRSS2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (12-14 weeks)
Synonyms
TMPRSS2; PRSS10; Transmembrane protease serine 2; Serine protease 10
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
TMPRSS2, a plasma membrane-anchored serine protease, plays a crucial role in proteolytic cascades essential for the normal physiological function of the prostate. Androgen-induced TMPRSS2 activates various substrates, including pro-hepatocyte growth factor/HGF, the protease activated receptor-2/F2RL1 or matriptase/ST14, leading to extracellular matrix disruption and metastasis of prostate cancer cells. Additionally, TMPRSS2 activates trigeminal neurons, contributing to both spontaneous pain and mechanical allodynia. In the context of microbial infection, TMPRSS2 facilitates human coronaviruses SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infections through two independent mechanisms: proteolytic cleavage of the ACE2 receptor, promoting viral uptake, and cleavage of coronavirus spike glycoproteins, activating the glycoprotein for host cell entry. Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, TMPRSS2 enhances syncytia formation by accelerating the fusion process. TMPRSS2 proteolytically cleaves and activates the spike glycoproteins of human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) and human coronavirus EMC (HCoV-EMC), as well as the fusion glycoproteins F0 of Sendai virus (SeV), human metapneumovirus (HMPV), human parainfluenza 1, 2, 3, 4a and 4b viruses (HPIV). TMPRSS2 is essential for the spread and pathogenesis of influenza A virus (strains H1N1, H3N2 and H7N9), involved in proteolytic cleavage and activation of the hemagglutinin (HA) protein, which is critical for viral infectivity.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. TMPRSS2-ERG emerges as a significant regulator of IGF1R gene expression. PMID: 27285981
  2. T2E fusion transcripts are associated with elevated AMACR mRNA levels in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP), indicating a potential risk factor for prostate cancer. PMID: 29277318
  3. TMPRSS2-ERG may play a role in the progression of prostate neoplasms and alterations in the metabolic profile. PMID: 27276682
  4. Epigenetic events are a significant and alternative driver of aggressive disease in TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-negative prostate cancer. PMID: 27814612
  5. Meta-analysis reveals the prevalence of TMPRSS2:ERG fusions in prostate cancer to be highest in men of European descent (49%), followed by Asians (27%) and then African (25%) descent. PMID: 28633309
  6. Tumors displaying TMPRSS2-ERG fusions that retained interstitial genes were less likely to be associated with biochemical recurrence. PMID: 29127096
  7. Inflammation-induced oxidative stress contributes to the formation of DNA breaks, leading to recurrent TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions. The transcriptional status and epigenetic features of the target genes influence this effect. PMID: 27926866
  8. Inhibition of the NOTCH pathway antagonizes the growth and invasion of transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2)-transforming protein ERG (ERG) (T2E) -positive prostate cancer cells. PMID: 28783165
  9. The TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion is the most frequently observed genetic aberration in prostate cancer. PMID: 28845585
  10. PTEN deletion and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion are mutually exclusive in patients with prostate neoplasm. TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion is rare compared to peripheral zone tumors and to PTEN inactivation in T1a transition zone tumors. PMID: 27500376
  11. miR-204 upregulates the androgen receptor (AR) and downregulates TMPRSS2/ERG through direct regulation of their promoter methylation and a set of transcription factors during AR cancer-related reprogramming. PMID: 28050800
  12. Differential expression of TMPRSS2:ERG in urine exosomes is observed in prostate cancer and controls. PMID: 27144529
  13. Evidence exists for the first two common PrCa risk variants differentially associated with TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status. Comprehensive phenotyping of larger studies is necessary to determine complete sets of variants with subtype-specific roles in prostate cancer. PMID: 27798103
  14. Human coronavirus 229E presumably evolved to bypass the endosome by entering the cell via TMPRSS2. PMID: 27733646
  15. Studies indicate that TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene positive prostate cancers cells rewire intracellular signaling cascades and modulate gene and protein networks. PMID: 28364793
  16. TMPRSS2-ERG plays a role in prostate cancer invasiveness and regulation of MMP-9 and plexin B1. PMID: 28004109
  17. Predicting pT3 stage at final histology from TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion at initial core needle biopsy is possible. FISH determination of TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion may be particularly beneficial for patients undergoing a radical prostatectomy to optimize oncological and functional outcomes. PMID: 27377958
  18. Good agreement exists between transcriptional regulator ERG protein (ERG) immunostaining and the presence of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion protein. PMID: 27320318
  19. A combination of high preoperative serum PSA and high expression of TMPRSS2-ERG shows promise in distinguishing aggressive, life-threatening tumors. PMID: 27630329
  20. Urinary TMPRSS2:ERG transcripts appear to be indicative of prostate cancer aggressiveness upon biopsy. [review] PMID: 26774207
  21. Aspirin was associated with a significant reduction in the relative risk of TMPRSS2:ERG (T2E )fusion positive, but not T2E negative prostate cancer. PMID: 26503111
  22. The type II transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2 can activate hemagglutinin for cell entry, suggesting that bat influenza A virus can utilize human proteases for hemagglutinin activation. PMID: 27028521
  23. The relatively low rate of ERG-positive prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia counts in favor of the limited role of chimeric transcript TMPRSS2/ERG in the differential diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. PMID: 26978019
  24. TMPRSS2 isoform 1 is expressed in viral target cells. PMID: 26379044
  25. The TMPRSS2-ERG Gene Fusion Blocks XRCC4-Mediated Nonhomologous End-Joining Repair and Radiosensitizes Prostate Cancer Cells to PARP Inhibition. PMID: 26026052
  26. The potential for TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion, detected by IHC, to modify the role of PTEN loss in lethal progression of prostate cancer. PMID: 26615022
  27. PTEN loss occurs in cooperation with TMPRSS2-ERG fusion in prostate cancer, and the majority of the samples harbor TMPRSS2-ERG fusion as well as PTEN gene deletion. PMID: 26424596
  28. Elucidation of ERG regulation of ABEs in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) may help stratify TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-positive prostate cancer patients for anti-androgen receptor-driven therapies. PMID: 25754347
  29. Androgen-driven events causing TMPRSS2-ERG fusions and other rearrangements of androgen-dependent genes in prostate epithelial cells of young patients preferentially lead to low-grade (and not high-grade) prostate cancer. PMID: 25015038
  30. TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene transcript was found in 63, 55 and 73% of the prostate cancer cases on urine alone, biopsy rinse material alone and paired samples, respectively. PMID: 24997128
  31. Genetic inhibition of TMPRSS2-ERG junction oncogene in prostate cancer by means of siRNA has a strong antineoplastic effect in a mouse model and in vitro. PMID: 25933120
  32. TMPRSS2 expression is not only dramatically increased in the primary cancers of patients but also directly correlated with cancer pain severity. PMID: 25734995
  33. High AR gene copy number emerges during the development of Small cell carcinoma of the prostate, often in association with TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement. PMID: 24777847
  34. Both IHC and qRT-PCR are valuable tools for detecting TMPRSS2:ERG fusions. PMID: 25007891
  35. Membrane-bound meprin Beta is activated by transmembrane serine protease matriptase-2 at the cell surface. PMID: 26251449
  36. Inhibition of transcriptional regulator ERG protein expression in transmembrane protease serine 2 protein (TMPRSS2):ERG-positive prostate cancer cells increased neuroendocrine cell gene expression. PMID: 25263440
  37. TMPRSS2 promotes the growth, invasion, and metastasis of prostate cancer cells via matriptase activation and extracellular matrix disruption. PMID: 26018085
  38. Analysis of prostate cancer tissues revealed a strong correlation between the presence of a TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement and lower levels of NKX3.1 expression, consistent with the role of NKX3.1 as a suppressor of the pathogenic gene rearrangement. PMID: 25977336
  39. The TMPRSS2 Met160Val polymorphism is a genetic risk factor for sporadic prostate cancer in a Japanese population. PMID: 25040002
  40. The expression levels of the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion are associated with a more aggressive phenotype, influencing prognosis and potentially serving as molecular markers of progression for prostate cancer. PMID: 25939480
  41. Data suggests that men with TMPRSS2:ERG positive tumors may experience longer prostate cancer survival after ADT. PMID: 25728532
  42. Recent and maximum BMI are inversely associated with the odds of developing T2E-positive prostate cancer, but no associations were observed for T2E-negative prostate cancer. PMID: 25852077
  43. TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions induce prostate tumorigenesis by modulating microRNA miR-200c. PMID: 24186205
  44. TMPRSS2 activates hepatitis C virus infection at the postbinding and entry stage. PMID: 25203900
  45. Confocal microscopy and FISH effectively identify cell-to-cell differences in common gene fusions, such as TMPRSS2-ERG, that may arise independently within the same tumor focus. PMID: 25175909
  46. TMPRSS2/ERG gene fusions have varying effects on radiosensitivity and chemosensitivity depending on the cell line and fusion type. PMID: 21394739
  47. TMPRSS2-ERG may or may not lead to prostate cancer development. PMID: 24961351
  48. Prognostic value of tissue/urinary TMPRSS2-ERG levels in prostate neoplasms is reported. PMID: 24072184
  49. Concurrent in situ detection of gene expression, point mutations, and gene fusions of the prostate cancer relevant targets TMPRSS2-ERG. PMID: 24931216
  50. TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion synergizes with the VDR to induce CYP24A1 expression, limiting VDR signaling. PMID: 24926821

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 11876

OMIM: 602060

KEGG: hsa:7113

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000381588

UniGene: Hs.439309

Protein Families
Peptidase S1 family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Single-pass type II membrane protein.; [Transmembrane protease serine 2 catalytic chain]: Secreted.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in several tissues that comprise large populations of epithelial cells with the highest level of transcripts measured in the prostate gland. Expressed in type II pneumocytes in the lung (at protein level). Expressed strongly in small intestine.

Q&A

What is TMPRSS2 and why is it significant in research?

TMPRSS2 is a type II transmembrane serine protease that is highly expressed by the epithelium of the human prostate gland and also found in the gastrointestinal tract, stomach, kidney, and lung epithelium . The protein consists of 492 amino acids and contains several functional domains including a type II transmembrane domain, a receptor class A domain, a scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain, and a protease domain . In prostate cancer research, TMPRSS2 is significant due to the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion pair, a common somatic gene rearrangement occurring in approximately 50% of primary prostate cancers, which may contribute to prostate tumor metastasis via the activation of PAR-2 . More recently, TMPRSS2 has gained prominence in viral research as it proteolytically processes the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein, enabling virus-host membrane fusion and infection of the airways, making it a key host cell factor for viral entry and pathogenesis . This dual significance in cancer biology and viral pathogenesis has made TMPRSS2 antibodies essential tools in multiple research fields, enabling detection, quantification, and functional analysis of this protein in various experimental systems.

Which applications are most suitable for TMPRSS2 antibody detection?

TMPRSS2 antibodies can be employed in multiple experimental applications with varying degrees of efficacy depending on the specific research question. Western Blot (WB) analysis is widely validated for TMPRSS2 detection, with recommended dilutions typically ranging from 1:500 to 1:2000, and has been documented in at least 23 publications using certain antibody products . Immunohistochemistry (IHC) applications, typically using dilutions between 1:100 and 1:400, are particularly valuable for examining TMPRSS2 expression patterns in tissue samples, with published positive detection in human colon cancer tissue, human prostate cancer tissue, and mouse kidney tissue . Immunofluorescence (IF) techniques, using dilutions from 1:50 to 1:500, provide high-resolution imaging of TMPRSS2 localization at the subcellular level, with demonstrated effectiveness in human tonsillitis tissue . For optimal results in any application, researchers should conduct titration experiments as antibody performance can be sample-dependent, and antigen retrieval methods may significantly impact detection sensitivity, with some protocols recommending TE buffer at pH 9.0 or alternatively citrate buffer at pH 6.0 for IHC applications . Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) represents another viable application, though specific dilution recommendations may vary based on the particular antibody formulation and assay conditions.

How should researchers select an appropriate TMPRSS2 antibody for their experiments?

Selecting an appropriate TMPRSS2 antibody requires careful consideration of multiple factors to ensure experimental success. First, researchers must determine whether a polyclonal or monoclonal antibody better suits their needs—polyclonal antibodies like the 14437-1-AP offer broader epitope recognition but potentially less specificity, while monoclonal antibodies provide higher specificity for particular epitopes . Species reactivity is a critical selection criterion; for example, some TMPRSS2 antibodies demonstrate tested reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples, while others may have been cited for reactivity with additional species like monkey . The molecular weight detection pattern should align with experimental expectations; TMPRSS2 antibodies may detect different forms of the protein, with observed molecular weights of approximately 70, 54 (calculated weight), and 31 kDa depending on post-translational modifications and processing . Application-specific validation is essential—researchers should verify that their antibody of choice has been successfully used in their intended application (WB, IHC, IF, etc.) through publication records or manufacturer validation data . Finally, researchers should consider the immunogen information to understand which portion of TMPRSS2 the antibody recognizes, particularly important when studying specific domains or when potential cross-reactivity with related serine proteases is a concern.

What are the recommended storage and handling conditions for TMPRSS2 antibodies?

Proper storage and handling of TMPRSS2 antibodies are crucial for maintaining their activity and specificity over time. Most TMPRSS2 antibodies should be stored at -20°C, where they typically remain stable for one year after shipment when maintained in appropriate buffer conditions . Many commercially available antibodies are supplied in PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol at pH 7.3, which helps maintain protein stability during freeze-thaw cycles . For antibodies stored at -20°C, aliquoting is generally unnecessary, though this practice may be advisable for frequently used antibodies to minimize repeated freeze-thaw cycles that could potentially degrade antibody quality . Some smaller antibody preparations (e.g., 20μl sizes) may contain 0.1% BSA as an additional stabilizing agent . When handling the antibody during experiments, it should be kept cold (on ice or at 4°C) and exposed to room temperature for minimal durations to preserve its binding capacity and specificity. Researchers should avoid contamination by using clean pipette tips and sterile technique, particularly important because antibody solutions typically contain no preservatives against bacterial growth apart from sodium azide, which primarily prevents microbial growth during storage rather than active use.

How can researchers optimize TMPRSS2 antibody detection in SARS-CoV-2 research?

Optimizing TMPRSS2 antibody detection in SARS-CoV-2 research requires careful consideration of the specific interaction between TMPRSS2 and viral proteins. Researchers should select antibodies that specifically target the catalytic domain of TMPRSS2 (residues 256-489), including the substrate-binding sites (residues D435, S460, and G462) and catalytically active sites (residues H296, D345, and S441) that are crucial for S protein processing . When designing immunofluorescence experiments to study TMPRSS2 and SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein colocalization, dual staining protocols should include appropriate controls to account for potential antibody cross-reactivity, with sequential rather than simultaneous incubation often yielding cleaner results . For binding inhibition studies, researchers should consider using antibodies that specifically target the region of TMPRSS2 that interacts with the S2′ site in the proprotein convertase (PPC) region of the Spike protein, as demonstrated in studies using Fv-antibodies with binding affinities (KD) of approximately 36.7-39.8 nM . When analyzing TMPRSS2 expression in lung tissue samples from COVID-19 patients, optimization of antigen retrieval methods becomes particularly critical, with some protocols recommending heat-induced epitope retrieval using TE buffer at pH 9.0 for maximum sensitivity . Additionally, researchers should validate antibody specificity in the context of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells, as viral infection may induce changes in TMPRSS2 expression, localization, or post-translational modifications that could affect antibody recognition.

What methodological approaches can be used to study TMPRSS2 inhibition with antibodies?

Several sophisticated methodological approaches can be employed to study TMPRSS2 inhibition using antibodies, particularly in the context of viral infection research. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor technology provides a powerful tool for measuring the binding kinetics between anti-TMPRSS2 antibodies and their target, with studies demonstrating binding affinities (KD) of approximately 36.7-39.8 nM for certain Fv-antibodies . Researchers can assess the inhibitory capacity of antibodies by measuring their half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), which for some anti-TMPRSS2 Fv-antibodies has been reported around 13.3-13.4 nM . For visualization of antibody-TMPRSS2 interactions at the molecular level, computational docking simulations can be employed to analyze the binding interface between antibodies and the active sites of TMPRSS2, providing insights into the structural basis of inhibition . Cell-based infection assays using pseudo-viruses that express the Spike protein of different SARS-CoV-2 variants (such as Wu-1, Delta, and Omicron variants) enable functional evaluation of neutralizing activity for TMPRSS2-targeting antibodies . Additionally, researchers can perform competitive binding assays in which the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein's PPC region is immobilized on an SPR biosensor chip, and the ability of antibodies to prevent TMPRSS2 binding to this region is measured, with effective inhibitors showing significant reduction in SPR signal compared to untreated controls .

How do TMPRSS2 antibodies perform in detecting fusion proteins in prostate cancer research?

TMPRSS2 antibodies play a crucial role in detecting the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion protein, which is found in approximately 50% of primary prostate cancers and represents a significant biomarker for disease characterization . When selecting antibodies for fusion protein detection, researchers should consider whether the antibody recognizes an epitope within the portion of TMPRSS2 that is retained in the fusion protein, as this varies depending on the exact breakpoint of the gene rearrangement . Immunohistochemistry using TMPRSS2 antibodies on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) prostate tissue samples has been successfully employed to identify TMPRSS2-positive tumors, which may exhibit higher risk for metastasis and differential response to hormonal influences compared to negative tumors . For dual detection of both TMPRSS2 and ERG components of the fusion protein, researchers often employ a sequential immunofluorescence approach using antibodies against both proteins, followed by careful colocalization analysis to distinguish fusion-positive from fusion-negative cells. Western blot analysis of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion proteins typically reveals bands of altered molecular weight compared to wild-type TMPRSS2 (which shows bands at 70, 54, and 31 kDa), requiring careful optimization of gel percentage and running conditions to properly resolve these variant proteins . Additionally, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays using TMPRSS2 antibodies can be valuable for studying the altered transcriptional regulation patterns resulting from the fusion event, particularly when investigating androgen-responsive gene expression changes associated with TMPRSS2-ERG positive tumors.

What considerations are important when using TMPRSS2 antibodies in multiplexed detection systems?

Multiplexed detection systems incorporating TMPRSS2 antibodies require careful optimization to ensure specific and sensitive detection alongside other targets. When designing multiplexed immunofluorescence panels, researchers must select antibodies raised in different host species (e.g., rabbit anti-TMPRSS2 with mouse anti-ACE2) to prevent cross-reactivity of secondary detection antibodies, or alternatively use directly conjugated primary antibodies with compatible fluorophores . For multiplexed immunohistochemistry applications, sequential staining protocols with appropriate blocking steps between antibody applications are essential, particularly when targeting TMPRSS2 alongside other serine proteases that may share structural homology . Spectral overlap must be carefully considered when selecting fluorophores for multiplexed immunofluorescence detection of TMPRSS2 alongside other proteins, with appropriate single-stain controls and spectral unmixing algorithms employed to distinguish true signal from autofluorescence or bleed-through . Mass cytometry or imaging mass cytometry techniques using metal-tagged TMPRSS2 antibodies can overcome fluorophore limitations in highly multiplexed experiments, allowing simultaneous detection of dozens of proteins with minimal signal overlap. When performing multiplexed proximity ligation assays to study TMPRSS2 interactions with binding partners such as the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, researchers must validate the specificity of each antibody pair and optimize probe concentrations to minimize background signal while maintaining detection sensitivity .

What are common challenges in detecting multiple molecular weight forms of TMPRSS2?

Detecting multiple molecular weight forms of TMPRSS2 presents several technical challenges that researchers must address for accurate data interpretation. TMPRSS2 can be observed at molecular weights of approximately 70, 54 (calculated weight), and 31 kDa, representing different isoforms, post-translationally modified forms, or proteolytically processed fragments of the protein . For optimal separation of these different molecular weight species in Western blotting, researchers should carefully select gel percentage (typically 10-12% for the 30-70 kDa range) and running conditions (voltage and duration) to achieve sufficient resolution between the bands. Sample preparation methods significantly impact which TMPRSS2 forms are detected; harsher lysis buffers containing ionic detergents like SDS may preserve all forms but can denature conformational epitopes, while milder non-ionic detergent buffers may preserve epitopes but result in incomplete extraction of membrane-bound forms . Differential expression of these TMPRSS2 forms across tissue types and cell lines must be considered when selecting positive controls; for example, COLO 320, Caco-2, and T-47D cells have been documented to express detectable levels of TMPRSS2 by Western blot . When interpreting results showing multiple bands, researchers should perform additional validation experiments, such as siRNA knockdown or recombinant protein expression, to confirm band specificity, particularly important when studying novel tissue types or experimental conditions that might alter TMPRSS2 processing or expression patterns.

How can researchers validate TMPRSS2 antibody specificity to ensure reliable results?

Validating TMPRSS2 antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach to ensure experimental results accurately reflect true TMPRSS2 biology. Genetic validation through siRNA/shRNA knockdown or CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of TMPRSS2 represents the gold standard approach, where the disappearance of antibody signal following gene silencing/deletion provides strong evidence of specificity . Testing the antibody across multiple applications (WB, IHC, IF) with consistent results in terms of localization pattern and molecular weight can provide corroborating evidence of specificity, with properly validated TMPRSS2 antibodies showing reactivity patterns consistent with the known biology of the protein . Peptide competition assays, in which pre-incubation of the antibody with the immunizing peptide/protein blocks signal detection, offer another layer of validation, particularly useful for polyclonal antibodies like the 14437-1-AP . Testing across multiple species should yield results consistent with predicted reactivity based on sequence homology; for example, antibodies with documented reactivity in human, mouse, and rat samples should demonstrate appropriate signal in positive control samples from these species . Comparing results from multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of TMPRSS2 can provide additional confidence, particularly when consistent staining patterns are observed despite differences in the recognized epitopes, though researchers should be aware that epitope accessibility may vary by application and sample preparation method.

What are the most effective antigen retrieval methods for TMPRSS2 immunohistochemistry?

Optimizing antigen retrieval for TMPRSS2 immunohistochemistry is essential for obtaining sensitive and specific detection in fixed tissue samples. Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer at pH 9.0 has been suggested as the primary method for TMPRSS2 antibodies, as the alkaline conditions effectively break protein cross-links formed during formalin fixation without excessive tissue damage . For tissues that prove resistant to standard antigen retrieval, alternative approaches include citrate buffer at pH 6.0, which may provide gentler retrieval conditions for certain sensitive tissues while still enabling TMPRSS2 epitope exposure . Optimization of retrieval duration and temperature is critical; typical protocols involve 15-30 minutes at 95-100°C, but tissue-specific adjustments may be necessary, with lung tissues often requiring shorter times to preserve delicate alveolar architecture while prostate tissues may benefit from extended retrieval . Enzymatic antigen retrieval using proteinases represents another approach, though typically less effective for TMPRSS2 detection than heat-based methods due to the risk of epitope digestion or excessive background. For dual immunofluorescence applications involving TMPRSS2 and other targets, researchers must identify compatible retrieval conditions that preserve epitopes for all antibodies in the panel, potentially necessitating compromise conditions or sequential staining with separate retrieval steps. Careful optimization and standardization of the selected retrieval method is essential for reproducible results, particularly in comparative studies across multiple tissue samples or in clinical research applications.

How should researchers interpret discrepancies in TMPRSS2 antibody results across different techniques?

Interpreting discrepancies in TMPRSS2 antibody results across different techniques requires systematic analysis of multiple factors that could contribute to the observed variations. Different antibody applications (WB, IHC, IF) involve distinct sample preparation methods that can affect epitope accessibility; for example, denaturation in Western blotting may expose epitopes hidden in native conformation studies, potentially explaining why an antibody might perform well in WB but poorly in IF applications where proteins retain their tertiary structure . Cell fixation methods significantly impact TMPRSS2 detection in immunofluorescence applications, with paraformaldehyde, methanol, and acetone fixatives each preserving different aspects of protein structure and potentially yielding discrepant results even with the same antibody. Observed molecular weight discrepancies (e.g., detecting TMPRSS2 at 70, 54, or 31 kDa) may reflect biological realities rather than technical artifacts, representing different isoforms, post-translational modifications, or proteolytic processing events occurring in specific cellular contexts or disease states . Technical variations in protocol execution, including antibody concentration, incubation time, buffer composition, and detection systems can all contribute to discrepancies, necessitating careful standardization across experiments and techniques. When faced with seemingly contradictory results, researchers should consider biological context—for example, TMPRSS2 expression is known to be androgen-regulated in prostate cells but may follow different regulatory patterns in other tissues—and validate findings using complementary approaches such as mRNA analysis, activity-based assays, or alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes .

How can TMPRSS2 antibodies be utilized in SARS-CoV-2 infection models?

TMPRSS2 antibodies serve multiple critical functions in SARS-CoV-2 infection models, enabling researchers to investigate infection mechanisms and potential therapeutic approaches. Immunofluorescence using TMPRSS2 antibodies allows visualization of TMPRSS2 colocalization with ACE2 and viral Spike protein at the cell membrane, providing insights into the spatial organization of the entry complex required for SARS-CoV-2 infection . For therapeutic applications, neutralizing antibodies specifically targeting the TMPRSS2 active site that interacts with the S2′ site in the proprotein convertase region of the Spike protein have shown promise, with certain Fv-antibodies demonstrating neutralizing activity against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants including Wu-1 (D614), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (BA.2 and BA.4/5) . Western blot analysis using TMPRSS2 antibodies allows researchers to quantify changes in TMPRSS2 expression levels in response to infection or treatment with potential modulators, providing mechanistic insights into factors regulating this critical host protein during viral infection . Immunohistochemistry on lung tissue samples from COVID-19 patients or animal models using TMPRSS2 antibodies enables assessment of expression patterns in the context of infection-associated pathology, potentially revealing correlations between TMPRSS2 levels and disease severity . Additionally, TMPRSS2 antibodies can be employed in immunoprecipitation assays to isolate protein complexes formed during viral entry, facilitating proteomic identification of additional host factors involved in the infection process or post-translational modifications of TMPRSS2 that might modulate its activity.

What role do TMPRSS2 antibodies play in studying prostate cancer progression?

TMPRSS2 antibodies provide valuable tools for investigating multiple aspects of prostate cancer biology and progression. Immunohistochemical detection of TMPRSS2 in prostate cancer tissue microarrays allows researchers to correlate expression patterns with clinical parameters such as Gleason score, tumor stage, and patient outcomes, providing insights into its potential value as a prognostic biomarker . For studying the TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion, which occurs in approximately 50% of primary prostate cancers, antibodies targeting TMPRSS2 enable detection of fusion proteins and assessment of their functional consequences on downstream signaling pathways . Western blot analysis with TMPRSS2 antibodies facilitates investigation of androgen-regulated expression patterns in prostate cancer cell lines and tissues, important for understanding hormonal influences on TMPRSS2 levels and potentially informing therapeutic approaches targeting the androgen axis . Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays employing TMPRSS2 antibodies can help elucidate transcriptional regulatory mechanisms controlling TMPRSS2 expression in normal and malignant prostate cells, providing insights into dysregulation events that may contribute to cancer development or progression. Additionally, TMPRSS2 antibodies enable studies of the protease's role in activating PAR-2 (protease-activated receptor 2), a process that may contribute to prostate tumor metastasis through altered cell adhesion, migration, and invasion properties, potentially identifying novel therapeutic targets to prevent disease spread .

How do researchers use TMPRSS2 antibodies to evaluate protease inhibitor efficacy?

TMPRSS2 antibodies provide essential tools for evaluating the efficacy of protease inhibitors targeted against this enzyme in both biochemical and cellular contexts. In biochemical assays, researchers can use TMPRSS2 antibodies to immunoprecipitate the active enzyme from cell or tissue lysates, followed by in vitro activity assays with fluorogenic substrates in the presence of various inhibitors, enabling determination of IC50 values ranging from nanomolar to micromolar potency . For cellular studies, immunofluorescence with TMPRSS2 antibodies allows assessment of inhibitor effects on TMPRSS2 localization or expression levels, which might be altered as part of the compound's mechanism of action or as a cellular response to enzyme inhibition . Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assays incorporating TMPRSS2 antibodies can measure the ability of inhibitors to disrupt specific protein-protein interactions, such as between TMPRSS2 and the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, with effective inhibitors showing measurable decreases in binding signals comparable to those observed with direct antibody blocking . Western blot analysis using TMPRSS2 antibodies enables researchers to monitor changes in the proteolytic processing of TMPRSS2 itself (which may appear at multiple molecular weights of 70, 54, and 31 kDa) in response to inhibitor treatment, providing insights into compound effects on enzyme autoactivation or degradation pathways . Additionally, in the context of SARS-CoV-2 research, TMPRSS2 antibodies facilitate evaluation of inhibitor effects on Spike protein cleavage, a critical step for viral entry that can be assessed through changes in the pattern of S protein fragments detected by Western blot or through altered cellular localization patterns visualized by immunofluorescence .

How are TMPRSS2 antibodies being developed as potential therapeutics?

The development of TMPRSS2 antibodies as potential therapeutics represents an emerging research direction with promising applications, particularly in viral infectious diseases. Fv-antibodies targeting the active site of TMPRSS2 have been screened from antibody libraries with binding affinities (KD) of approximately 36.7-39.8 nM and IC50 values around 13.3-13.4 nM, demonstrating their potential as specific inhibitors of TMPRSS2 proteolytic activity . Through docking simulations, researchers have analyzed the interaction between these therapeutic antibodies and the active sites of TMPRSS2, providing structural insights that can guide further optimization of binding specificity and inhibitory potency . Neutralizing activity of anti-TMPRSS2 antibodies has been demonstrated against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Wu-1 (D614), Delta (B.1.617.2), Omicron (BA.2), and Omicron (BA.4/5), suggesting broad applicability across evolving viral strains . For therapeutic development, researchers are exploring various antibody formats beyond conventional IgG, including single-chain variable fragments (scFvs), antigen-binding fragments (Fabs), and variable heavy-chain domains (VHH nanobodies), each offering different advantages in terms of tissue penetration, manufacturability, and delivery options. Additionally, researchers are investigating combination approaches where TMPRSS2 antibodies are paired with other therapeutic modalities such as ACE2 blockers or direct-acting antivirals, potentially offering synergistic efficacy through simultaneous targeting of multiple steps in the viral infection process.

What novel applications of TMPRSS2 antibodies are emerging in cancer research beyond prostate cancer?

While TMPRSS2 is predominantly studied in prostate cancer due to the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prevalence, novel applications of TMPRSS2 antibodies are expanding into other cancer types based on emerging understanding of its broader oncogenic roles. Immunohistochemical studies using TMPRSS2 antibodies have detected expression in colon cancer tissues, suggesting potential involvement in gastrointestinal malignancies where TMPRSS2 antibodies can serve as tools for investigating its prognostic significance and functional contributions . In lung cancer research, where TMPRSS2 is expressed in the epithelium and may cleave epithelial sodium channels, antibodies enable investigation of its role in tumor development and progression, particularly relevant given the established connection between inflammation and lung carcinogenesis . Researchers are using TMPRSS2 antibodies to explore potential androgen-regulated expression patterns across multiple cancer types, as hormonal influences on TMPRSS2 levels observed in prostate cancer might extend to other malignancies with active androgen receptor signaling. Multiplexed immunofluorescence applications incorporating TMPRSS2 antibodies alongside markers of cancer stem cells, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, or tumor microenvironment components are providing insights into its potential role in tumor heterogeneity and treatment resistance mechanisms. Additionally, TMPRSS2 antibodies are facilitating investigation of its potential involvement in metastatic processes across cancer types through its proteolytic activation of substrates that modulate cell adhesion, migration, and invasion, expanding our understanding of its significance beyond its well-established role in prostate cancer .

How are TMPRSS2 antibodies contributing to the development of advanced diagnostic approaches?

TMPRSS2 antibodies are enabling the development of advanced diagnostic approaches with potential applications in multiple disease contexts. Multiplexed immunohistochemistry panels incorporating TMPRSS2 antibodies alongside other biomarkers such as ERG, PSA, and androgen receptor can enhance prostate cancer subtyping, potentially guiding personalized treatment decisions based on molecular profiles rather than morphological assessment alone . In the context of respiratory viral infections, researchers are developing rapid immunoassays using TMPRSS2 antibodies to detect TMPRSS2 expression levels in patient samples as a potential biomarker for susceptibility to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, based on the enzyme's critical role in viral entry and pathogenesis . Advanced tissue imaging approaches such as imaging mass cytometry using metal-tagged TMPRSS2 antibodies allow simultaneous visualization of dozens of proteins within tissue sections at subcellular resolution, enabling comprehensive characterization of TMPRSS2 expression patterns in relation to complex cellular ecosystems. For liquid biopsy applications, researchers are exploring the use of TMPRSS2 antibodies in extracellular vesicle capture and analysis, potentially enabling non-invasive monitoring of TMPRSS2 status in cancer patients through isolation of tumor-derived exosomes from blood samples. Additionally, proximity ligation assays utilizing TMPRSS2 antibodies paired with antibodies against interaction partners enable visualization and quantification of specific protein-protein interactions in situ, providing functional information beyond mere expression levels that may have diagnostic or prognostic value .

What computational approaches are being integrated with TMPRSS2 antibody research?

Computational approaches are increasingly being integrated with TMPRSS2 antibody research to enhance understanding and application of these important reagents. Docking simulations analyzing the interaction between anti-TMPRSS2 antibodies and the active sites of TMPRSS2 provide structural insights into binding mechanisms and can guide rational design of improved antibodies with enhanced specificity or inhibitory potency . Machine learning algorithms trained on immunohistochemistry images from TMPRSS2 antibody-stained tissue samples are being developed to automate quantification of expression patterns and correlate these with clinical outcomes, potentially identifying subtle expression features not apparent to human observers . Epitope prediction tools that analyze the TMPRSS2 protein sequence for immunogenic regions help researchers select optimal target sequences for developing new antibodies, improving the likelihood of generating reagents with desired specificity and application performance. Network analysis approaches incorporating TMPRSS2 interaction data derived from antibody-based proteomics experiments enable visualization of its functional relationships within broader signaling networks, providing context for interpreting experimental findings and identifying potential new research directions. Additionally, molecular dynamics simulations exploring the conformational changes in TMPRSS2 upon antibody binding offer insights into allosteric effects that might influence enzyme activity or substrate specificity, information that could guide the development of antibody-based therapeutics targeting specific functional states of the protease .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.