TNR Antibody, HRP conjugated is an immunological reagent designed for the detection of Tenascin-R (TNR), a glycoprotein involved in neural development and extracellular matrix interactions. The antibody is chemically linked to horseradish peroxidase (HRP), an enzyme that facilitates chromogenic or chemiluminescent signal amplification in assays such as Western blotting (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) .
| Product Code | Target | Host | Size | Price (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSB-PA340307LB01HU | Human TNR | Rabbit | 100 µL | $230 |
| AC2115 | Goat-anti-Mouse HRP | Goat | 500 µL | $123.03 |
| PA1695-1 | Human/Mouse/Rat TNR | Rabbit | 100 µL | $356.21 |
Sources: Cusabio , Azure Biosystems , Boster Bio
Lyophilization Impact: Freeze-drying HRP post-activation improved conjugate stability and signal intensity in ELISA, enabling detection limits as low as 0.2–13 ng/mL .
Validation Metrics:
TNR Antibody, HRP conjugated is a polyclonal antibody targeting Tenascin-R (also known as Janusin or Restrictin) that has been chemically linked to horseradish peroxidase enzyme . The antibody portion specifically binds to human Tenascin-R protein, while the conjugated HRP enzyme catalyzes the conversion of chromogenic substrates to produce detectable signals in immunological applications .
In immunoassays such as ELISA, the TNR antibody binds to its target antigen, and the attached HRP enzyme catalyzes a reaction that produces a colored precipitate at the site of the antibody-antigen complex . This allows for visualization and quantification of the target protein without requiring a secondary antibody step, thus simplifying protocols and potentially reducing background signal .
For optimal preservation of TNR Antibody, HRP conjugated:
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can degrade both the antibody and the HRP enzyme
The conjugate is typically provided in a storage buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS at pH 7.4, and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative
These storage conditions help maintain the structural integrity of both the antibody binding sites and the enzymatic activity of the HRP molecule, ensuring consistent performance in experimental applications.
Direct detection using HRP-conjugated primary antibodies offers several advantages over indirect methods:
| Parameter | Direct Detection (HRP-conjugated primary) | Indirect Detection (Primary + HRP-secondary) |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol Length | Shorter (one incubation step) | Longer (two or more incubation steps) |
| Signal Strength | Generally lower (approximately 30× less than indirect) | Higher due to signal amplification |
| Background | Reduced non-specific binding | Potential for higher background |
| Species Cross-Reactivity | Minimized | Can be problematic with secondary antibodies |
| Multiplex Capability | Simplified for certain applications | May require careful optimization |
Multiplexing with TNR Antibody, HRP conjugated requires careful optimization to maintain signal integrity while detecting multiple targets simultaneously. When designing multiplexed assays:
Ensure antibody concentration optimization: When combining HRP-conjugated antibodies, maintain saturating concentrations of each conjugate. Using diluted antibodies can result in signal reduction of 30-40% .
Consider using concentrated formulations: For example, when mixing rabbit and mouse antibodies, use a 20× formulation of anti-rabbit HRP antibody conjugate rather than simply mixing ready-to-use (RTU) secondary antibodies, which would halve their effective concentration .
Signal balancing approach: When one target produces significantly stronger signals than others, consider substituting a directly HRP-conjugated primary antibody for the abundant target while using indirect detection for less abundant targets. This approach can help bring signals into comparable ranges for accurate quantification .
Substrate selection: Choose chromogenic or chemiluminescent substrates appropriate for the detection system and sensitivity requirements. Different substrates have varying signal amplification characteristics and dynamic ranges.
Several factors can influence the enzymatic activity of HRP in antibody conjugates:
| Factor | Impact on Activity | Optimization Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| pH | Optimal activity at pH 6.0-6.5 | Buffer selection during reaction steps |
| Temperature | Denaturation above 70°C | Avoid exposure to high temperatures |
| Oxidizing/Reducing Agents | Can modify active site | Exclude from buffers when possible |
| Conjugation Chemistry | Can affect active site accessibility | Select appropriate linking methods |
| Substrate Concentration | Affects reaction kinetics | Determine optimal concentration empirically |
The conjugation process itself is crucial, as modifications to lysine residues on HRP must be carefully controlled to preserve enzymatic activity. Conjugation methods typically focus on linking through the lysines on HRP because there are only six of them, and their modification does not adversely affect enzyme activity when properly performed . Periodate oxidation of carbohydrate moieties is commonly used to generate aldehyde groups on HRP for antibody conjugation, which helps preserve the protein core structure and enzymatic function .
When designing experiments with TNR Antibody, HRP conjugated for neuroscience applications, incorporate these essential controls:
Negative Controls:
Positive Controls:
Specificity Controls:
Technical Controls:
Enzymatic activity control: Include wells/sections with unconjugated HRP to verify substrate functionality
Endogenous peroxidase blocking validation: Ensure complete blocking of endogenous peroxidase activity in tissue samples
Determining the optimal dilution for TNR Antibody, HRP conjugated requires systematic titration:
Initial Dilution Range Determination:
Begin with manufacturer recommendations for the specific application
For ELISA applications, prepare a series of dilutions (e.g., 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2500, 1:5000, 1:10000)
For immunohistochemistry or Western blot, typically start with more concentrated preparations
Signal-to-Noise Optimization Protocol:
Perform the assay with identical target samples across all dilutions
Plot signal intensity versus antibody dilution
Calculate signal-to-noise ratio at each dilution point
Select the dilution that provides maximum specific signal with minimal background
Validation Across Experimental Conditions:
Test the selected dilution against different antigen concentrations
Verify linearity of detection within the expected range of target abundance
Adjust based on substrate sensitivity and detection method
Research has shown that modified conjugation protocols incorporating lyophilization can dramatically improve antibody titer, allowing for effective use at dilutions as high as 1:5000, compared to classical conjugation methods that may only work effectively at 1:25 dilutions .
When targeting low-abundance TNR protein:
Signal Amplification Systems:
Employ tyramide signal amplification (TSA) to enhance HRP-mediated signal generation
Consider using enhanced chemiluminescent substrates with higher sensitivity
Extend substrate incubation time within the linear range of the reaction
Sample Preparation Optimization:
Implement target enrichment through immunoprecipitation prior to detection
Optimize protein extraction protocols for neural tissues to maximize target recovery
Use antigen retrieval techniques for fixed tissue samples
Conjugate Quality Enhancement:
Implement the modified periodate conjugation protocol with lyophilization, which has demonstrated significant improvements in conjugate sensitivity
Research shows this modified approach can increase sensitivity by approximately 200-fold compared to classical conjugation methods (1:5000 vs 1:25 dilution factor)
Detection System Modifications:
Use signal accumulation through prolonged exposure times in imaging systems
Consider cooling CCD cameras to reduce background noise in chemiluminescence detection
Employ photomultiplier tube-based detection for maximum sensitivity
Non-specific binding can significantly impact experimental results. Address this challenge with:
| Problem | Potential Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| High Background | Insufficient blocking | Optimize blocking agent concentration and time |
| Cross-reactivity | Antibody specificity limitations | Pre-absorb with related antigens |
| Edge Effects | Uneven sample drying | Maintain humidity during incubations |
| Diffuse Staining | Excessive antibody concentration | Increase dilution factor |
| Endogenous Enzyme Activity | Incomplete peroxidase quenching | Enhance quenching steps (H₂O₂ treatment) |
Additionally, consider these specialized approaches:
Buffer optimization: Adjust salt concentration and pH to enhance specificity of antibody-antigen interactions
Addition of detergents: Incorporate low concentrations of Tween-20 (0.05-0.1%) to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Carrier protein supplementation: Add irrelevant proteins (BSA, casein) to capture non-specific interactions
Cross-adsorption: Pre-incubate antibody with tissues/proteins known to cause cross-reactivity
Accurate quantification of TNR using HRP-conjugated antibodies requires:
Standard Curve Establishment:
Generate a standard curve using purified recombinant TNR protein
Create serial dilutions covering the expected concentration range
Plot signal intensity against known concentrations
Determine the linear detection range for reliable quantification
Normalization Strategies:
Normalize to total protein content (measured independently)
Include detection of housekeeping proteins as internal controls
When using direct detection with HRP-conjugated anti-GAPDH antibodies, account for the approximately 30× lower signal compared to indirect detection systems
Use digital image analysis software with appropriate background subtraction
Statistical Validation:
Perform replicate measurements (minimum triplicate)
Calculate coefficient of variation between replicates (aim for <10%)
Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution
Consider Bland-Altman analysis when comparing different detection methods
Quality Control Metrics:
Monitor lot-to-lot variation in antibody performance
Include consistent positive controls across experiments
Verify signal linearity within the working range
Document detection limits for each experimental setup
Understanding the chemical modifications during conjugation is essential for proper data interpretation:
Periodate Oxidation Effects:
Sodium meta-periodate oxidizes carbohydrate moieties on HRP to generate aldehyde groups
This process modifies the spectral properties of HRP, causing a shift in its absorption peak
UV-spectroscopy analysis shows unconjugated HRP has a prominent peak at 430 nm, while conjugated HRP shows a reduced peak intensity at this wavelength
Schiff Base Formation:
Structural Changes Assessment:
Functional Impact Evaluation:
Conjugation can affect antibody binding affinity and enzyme kinetics
The carbohydrate modification approach preserves antibody function better than direct amino group modification
Lyophilization of activated HRP before antibody addition enhances conjugation efficiency by increasing molecular collision frequency in reduced reaction volumes
These structural and chemical considerations directly impact data interpretation, especially when comparing results across different conjugation methods or antibody lots.