TOF1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Mechanism and Function

The TFF1 protein is a small, secreted glycoprotein characterized by its trefoil domain, a cysteine-rich motif involved in protein stability and binding. It is expressed in mucosal tissues and functions in maintaining epithelial integrity, promoting wound healing, and suppressing tumor progression . In pathological contexts, TFF1 expression is often downregulated in cancers like gastric carcinoma, where its loss correlates with DNA methylation and tumor aggressiveness .

In yeast, the homologous protein Tof1 (Timeless) regulates DNA replication stress by stabilizing replication forks and recruiting topoisomerases to resolve topological stress . This functional conservation underscores the antibody’s utility in studying conserved mechanisms across species.

Applications

The TFF1 antibody (e.g., Proteintech’s 13734-1-AP) is validated for multiple techniques:

ApplicationDetails
Western Blotting (WB)Detects 9-12 kDa bands in human, mouse, rat lysates .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)Localizes TFF1 in tissue sections, aiding cancer prognosis .
Immunofluorescence (IF/ICC)Visualizes TFF1 in cellular compartments .
ELISAQuantifies TFF1 in biological fluids .

Research Findings

Recent studies highlight TFF1’s role in:

  • Breast Cancer Prognosis: Elevated TFF1 expression correlates with poor outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers, particularly bone metastasis .

  • DNA Replication Stress: Tof1 (yeast homolog) stabilizes replication forks and recruits Top1 to resolve DNA topological stress .

  • Autoimmune Diseases: Anti-TIF1-γ antibodies (unrelated to TFF1) are linked to dermatomyositis and malignancy .

Selected Publications1

TitleSpeciesApplication
TFF1 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Breast CancerHumanIHC, WB
Tof1-Top1 Interaction in DNA ReplicationYeastCo-IP, ChIP
TFF1 in Colorectal CancerHumanSingle-cell RNA-seq

Clinical Relevance

TFF1’s dual role as a tumor suppressor and biomarker positions it as a target for diagnostics and therapeutics. For instance, its upregulation in breast cancer metastasis suggests potential for predictive testing . Conversely, its loss in gastric cancer highlights epigenetic mechanisms in oncogenesis .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
TOF1 antibody; AFR672C antibody; Topoisomerase 1-associated factor 1 antibody
Target Names
TOF1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
TOF1 Antibody forms a fork protection complex (FPC) with CSM3. This complex is essential for chromosome segregation during meiosis and DNA damage repair. The FPC coordinates leading and lagging strand synthesis and moves with the replication fork. Furthermore, it stabilizes replication forks in a configuration that is recognized by replication checkpoint sensors.
Database Links
Protein Families
Timeless family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is TOF1 and why is it significant in DNA replication research?

TOF1 (Timeless in higher eukaryotes) is a highly conserved protein that plays multiple crucial roles in minimizing replication stress and promoting normal DNA replication. It mediates the DNA replication checkpoint (DRC), maintains stable pausing of replication forks at protein fork blocks, couples DNA helicase and polymerase functions during replication stress, and facilitates the preferential resolution of DNA topological stress ahead of the replication fork . Its conservation across species makes it an ideal target for studying fundamental DNA replication mechanisms. Research in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has demonstrated that TOF1 contains distinct N and C terminal regions with separable functions in DRC signaling and resolution of DNA topological stress .

How does TOF1 interact with other replication fork proteins?

TOF1 forms a constitutive complex with its binding partner Csm3 (Tipin in higher eukaryotes), which is essential for most of TOF1's functions . This interaction is critical for stabilizing the replisome during replication stress. Studies have shown that while some functions of TOF1 are closely linked to its stable interaction with Csm3/Tipin, other functions like DRC signaling and resolution of DNA topological stress involve distinct protein regions and potentially different interaction partners . Recent experimental data using truncated versions of TOF1 have helped delineate which regions of the protein are responsible for specific interactions and functions.

What are the key structural domains of TOF1 relevant for antibody recognition?

The TOF1 protein contains functionally distinct N and C terminal regions that mediate different cellular processes. Research using truncated forms of TOF1 (including versions truncated at amino acids 627, 997, and 1182) has demonstrated that these regions have separate roles in checkpoint activation versus stabilization of replication forks . When selecting or generating TOF1 antibodies, researchers should consider which functional domain they wish to target. C-terminal targeting antibodies are useful for studying DRC signaling, while antibodies recognizing the N-terminal regions are more appropriate for investigating TOF1's role in fork stability and DNA topological stress resolution.

What are the primary experimental applications for TOF1 antibodies?

TOF1 antibodies have several important applications in molecular biology research:

  • Immunoprecipitation (IP): Facilitates the isolation of TOF1 protein complexes to study protein-protein interactions at the replication fork

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP): Enables the investigation of TOF1 binding to chromatin during normal replication and under stress conditions

  • Western Blotting: Allows detection and quantification of TOF1 protein expression levels in different cells or conditions

  • Immunofluorescence (IF): Helps visualize the subcellular localization of TOF1 throughout the cell cycle and in response to replication stress

  • Proximity-based labeling: When combined with techniques like BioID or APEX, can identify proteins in close proximity to TOF1 in live cells

Each application requires specific antibody validation and optimization to ensure reliable results in experimental settings.

How can TOF1 antibodies be used to study replication stress responses?

TOF1 antibodies are valuable tools for investigating cellular responses to replication stress. Researchers can use these antibodies to:

  • Monitor changes in TOF1 localization to stalled replication forks following exposure to replication stress agents (e.g., hydroxyurea, aphidicolin)

  • Assess TOF1 recruitment kinetics at sites of DNA damage using ChIP or IF techniques

  • Investigate post-translational modifications of TOF1 that occur during stress response

  • Identify novel TOF1 interaction partners that are specifically recruited during replication stress

  • Compare TOF1 checkpoint activation in wild-type versus mutant cells to understand functional consequences of specific mutations

Studies have demonstrated that TOF1 has distinct activities in checkpoint activation and replisome stability that ensure viable completion of DNA replication following replication stress . TOF1 antibodies enable researchers to distinguish between these separate functions through careful experimental design.

How can domain-specific TOF1 antibodies be used to distinguish its separate functions?

Research has established that TOF1 has structurally and functionally distinct regions with separable roles. Domain-specific antibodies can help distinguish these functions:

TOF1 RegionFunctionAntibody Application
N-terminalFork stabilization, topological stress resolutionDetect protein interactions specific to fork stability
C-terminal (AA 997-1238)DRC signalingMonitor checkpoint activation independent of fork stability
Middle regionCsm3/Tipin bindingStudy complex formation and its functional consequences

By using antibodies specific to different domains, researchers can selectively monitor and disrupt specific TOF1 functions. For example, antibodies targeting the C-terminal region can be used to study checkpoint signaling without affecting fork stabilization functions . This approach has been validated through studies using truncated TOF1 constructs that separate these functions genetically.

What strategies exist for validating TOF1 antibody specificity in experimental systems?

Ensuring antibody specificity is crucial for reliable research outcomes. For TOF1 antibodies, recommended validation strategies include:

  • Genetic controls: Testing antibody reactivity in TOF1-knockout or TOF1-depleted cells should show substantially reduced signal

  • Truncation mutants: Utilizing the characterized TOF1 truncation mutants (e.g., tof1-627, tof1-997, tof1-1182) can confirm epitope location and specificity

  • Peptide competition: Pre-incubating antibodies with specific TOF1 peptides should diminish true TOF1 signal

  • Multiple antibody comparison: Using antibodies raised against different TOF1 epitopes should yield consistent results

  • Recombinant protein: Testing reactivity against purified recombinant TOF1 protein can confirm direct recognition

Studies have successfully used TAP-tagged TOF1 constructs (including truncated versions) to validate antibody specificity and study protein interactions . This approach allows researchers to distinguish between specific and non-specific antibody signals.

How can TOF1 antibodies be used to investigate the interplay between replication and transcription?

TOF1 plays a critical role at the interface of replication and transcription, particularly at sites where these processes collide. Advanced applications of TOF1 antibodies in this area include:

  • Sequential ChIP experiments to detect TOF1 co-localization with transcription machinery at collision sites

  • IF-FISH approaches to visualize TOF1 recruitment to specific genomic loci during transcription-replication conflicts

  • Proximity ligation assays to identify direct interactions between TOF1 and transcription factors

  • Studies of R-loop formation and resolution using TOF1 antibodies in combination with S9.6 antibodies (R-loop specific)

  • Investigation of TOF1's role in replication fork barriers (RFBs) using model systems like the characterized pRS426-RFB plasmid

Research has shown that TOF1 is required for stable pausing of replication forks at protein fork blocks, which is particularly important at sites where replication and transcription machineries might collide . TOF1 antibodies enable precise mapping of these interactions.

What are the optimal fixation and extraction conditions for TOF1 antibody applications?

Optimizing conditions for TOF1 detection depends on the specific application and subcellular compartment being analyzed:

ApplicationRecommended FixationExtraction ConditionsCritical Considerations
Western BlotN/ARIPA or NP-40 buffer with protease inhibitorsInclude phosphatase inhibitors to preserve modifications
IF4% PFA (10-15 min)0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 (5-10 min)Pre-extraction may improve nuclear signal visibility
ChIP1% formaldehyde (10 min)SDS-based sonication bufferCrosslinking time is critical for chromatin-bound proteins
IPN/AGentle NP-40 buffer (0.1-0.5%)Salt concentration affects complex stability

For reproducible results with TOF1 antibodies, researchers should carefully validate each preparation step. Studies have shown that TOF1 interacts with multiple nuclear proteins, and harsh extraction conditions may disrupt these interactions, leading to incomplete or misleading results .

What strategies can overcome challenges in detecting endogenous TOF1 protein?

Detection of endogenous TOF1 can be challenging due to its relatively low abundance and nuclear localization. Effective strategies include:

  • Signal amplification: Using secondary antibody systems like tyramide signal amplification for IF or enhanced chemiluminescence for Western blots

  • Enrichment approaches: Employing nuclear extraction protocols to concentrate the target protein before analysis

  • Epitope retrieval: For fixed samples, optimizing antigen retrieval methods (heat or enzymatic) to improve epitope accessibility

  • Cross-validation: Using multiple detection methods (e.g., both IF and Western blot) to confirm findings

  • Tagged constructs: For challenging systems, creating epitope-tagged TOF1 constructs (like the TAP-tagged versions described in the literature) can improve detection reliability

Researchers have successfully utilized TAP-tagged versions of TOF1 (including truncated variants) to enhance detection while maintaining biological function. These approaches have been validated in yeast models and can be adapted for other experimental systems .

How can TOF1 antibodies be applied in studying the relationship between TOF1 and topoisomerases?

TOF1 (Topoisomerase I-interacting Factor 1) has important functional relationships with topoisomerases that can be investigated using specialized antibody-based approaches:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation: TOF1 antibodies can be used to pull down complexes containing topoisomerases (particularly Top1 and Top2) to study their physical interactions

  • ChIP-sequential approaches: Using TOF1 antibodies followed by topoisomerase antibodies can identify genomic regions where both proteins co-localize

  • Proximity ligation assays: These can visualize direct TOF1-topoisomerase interactions in intact cells with spatial resolution

  • Genetic interaction studies: Comparing TOF1 localization via antibody detection in wild-type versus topoisomerase mutant cells (such as the characterized top2-4 temperature-sensitive mutant)

  • Combined functional assays: Using TOF1 antibodies to monitor recruitment to specific structures like RFBs in the presence or absence of topoisomerase activity

Research has demonstrated genetic interactions between TOF1 truncation mutants and topoisomerase mutants (especially top2-4), providing evidence for their functional relationship in resolving topological stress during DNA replication . Antibody-based approaches can further elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying these genetic interactions.

How should researchers address non-specific binding issues with TOF1 antibodies?

Non-specific binding is a common challenge when working with nuclear proteins like TOF1. Effective approaches include:

  • Optimizing blocking conditions: Testing different blocking agents (BSA, milk, commercial blockers) and concentrations to minimize background

  • Antibody titration: Determining the minimum effective antibody concentration to reduce non-specific binding

  • Increased washing stringency: Adjusting salt concentration and detergent levels in wash buffers to reduce non-specific interactions

  • Secondary antibody controls: Including controls that omit primary antibody to identify secondary antibody contribution to background

  • Pre-adsorption: For polyclonal antibodies, pre-adsorption against nuclear extracts from TOF1-knockout cells can improve specificity

When interpreting antibody-based assay results, researchers should always include appropriate negative controls, such as isotype controls or samples from cells depleted of TOF1 (e.g., tof1Δ yeast strains as described in the literature) .

What are common pitfalls when interpreting TOF1 antibody results in replication stress experiments?

Researchers should be aware of several potential issues when studying TOF1 in replication stress contexts:

  • Cell cycle effects: TOF1 expression and localization change throughout the cell cycle, so cell synchronization or cell cycle markers should be incorporated

  • Stress-induced modifications: Replication stress can trigger post-translational modifications of TOF1 that might affect antibody recognition

  • Complex formation dynamics: Stress can alter TOF1's interaction with partners like Csm3/Tipin, potentially masking or exposing epitopes

  • Genetic background effects: Functions of TOF1 may vary in different genetic backgrounds, particularly in checkpoint mutants (e.g., rad9Δ)

  • Technical artifacts: Fixation methods used in IF can create artifacts that might be misinterpreted as stress-induced changes

Careful experimental design with appropriate controls is essential. Studies have demonstrated that separating the checkpoint and fork stabilization functions of TOF1 requires precise methods and controls, as these functions have distinct but sometimes overlapping phenotypic outcomes .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.