TOF2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Role of Tof2 in Cellular Processes

Tof2 is essential for rDNA stability and mitotic regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Key findings include:

  • rDNA Recombination: Tof2 modulates recombination by interacting with Fob1, a replication fork barrier (RFB)-binding protein. Elevated Tof2 levels enhance Fob1 recruitment to RFBs, increasing recombination rates .

  • Mitotic Exit: Tof2 regulates Cdc14 phosphatase activity, ensuring biphasic release during anaphase. It inhibits condensation during metaphase and activates segregation in anaphase .

  • PolySUMOylation: Post-translational polySUMOylation of Tof2 facilitates its nucleolar delocalization, enabling mitotic exit .

Table 1: Tof2 Functional Domains

DomainRoleReference
N-terminalFob1 interaction
C-terminalCdc14 binding

TOF2 Antibody Applications

The TOF2 Antibody is primarily used in:

  • Immunoprecipitation: To isolate Tof2 complexes for interaction studies .

  • ChIP (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation): Mapping Tof2 binding sites on rDNA .

  • Western Blotting: Quantifying Tof2 protein levels during cell cycle progression .

Table 2: Experimental Techniques Using TOF2 Antibody

TechniquePurposeKey Findings
ChIPrDNA binding analysisTof2 enriches at RFBs during replication stress
ImmunoprecipitationCdc14 interactionTof2 co-purifies with Cdc14 during mitosis
Western BlottingProtein turnoverPolySUMOylation reduces Tof2 stability

Regulatory Mechanisms

Tof2 activity is tightly regulated by:

  • Siz2 (SUMO ligase): Controls Tof2 protein levels through polySUMOylation .

  • Ulp2 (deSUMOylase): Opposes Siz2 to stabilize Tof2 .

  • Fob1: Binds RFBs to promote recombination when Tof2 is enriched .

Table 3: Tof2 Regulatory Pathways

RegulatorMechanismOutcomeReference
Siz2PolySUMOylationTof2 degradation
Ulp2DeSUMOylationTof2 stabilization
Fob1Recruitment to RFBsIncreased recombination

Clinical Relevance

While the TOF2 Antibody is not a therapeutic agent, its insights into rDNA stability and mitotic regulation inform broader cancer biology research. For example:

  • rDNA Instability: A hallmark of genomic stress in cancers .

  • Mitotic Errors: Linked to chromosomal segregation defects in malignancies .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
TOF2 antibody; YKR010C antibody; YK109 antibody; Topoisomerase 1-associated factor 2 antibody
Target Names
TOF2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Gene References Into Functions
  1. Ctf4-dependent recruitment of Dna2/Tof2 couples other processes to DNA synthesis, including rDNA copy-number regulation. PMID: 27397685
  2. Collaborates with Cdc14 specifically in rDNA segregation, presumably by targeting Cdc14 phosphatase activity to the nucleolus during anaphase to support resolution and compaction of this repetitive and highly transcribed DNA locus. PMID: 18595708
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YKR010C

STRING: 4932.YKR010C

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is TOF2 and what is its primary role in cellular function?

TOF2 (Topoisomerase-related Function protein 2) is a critical rDNA silencing protein that plays an essential role in maintaining genomic stability. It functions primarily as a component of regulatory complexes that control gene expression at ribosomal DNA loci. TOF2 interacts with other proteins such as Csm1 through specific binding interfaces to promote rDNA silencing . The protein is subject to post-translational modifications, particularly SUMOylation, which significantly impacts its stability and functional activity in cellular contexts.

TOF2 functions are highly conserved across eukaryotes, highlighting its evolutionary importance in fundamental cellular processes. Research has shown that TOF2 localization to the nucleolus is critical for its function, where it participates in protein complexes that mediate chromatin organization and transcriptional control at rDNA regions.

How does TOF2 contribute to ribosomal DNA silencing mechanisms?

TOF2 contributes to rDNA silencing through direct interaction with the protein Csm1, forming a complex that binds to specific rDNA regions and recruits additional silencing factors. According to crystallographic studies, TOF2 binds to Csm1 through conserved interfaces in Csm1's C-terminal domain . This interaction is crucial for rDNA silencing, as disruption of the Csm1-TOF2 interaction dramatically reduces silencing effectiveness and causes a significant decrease in TOF2 abundance.

The mechanism involves a delicate balance between protein stabilization and degradation. When TOF2 is properly bound to Csm1, it remains protected from degradation pathways. This protection is mediated by the recruitment of a SUMO isopeptidase (Ulp2) that opposes SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase (STUbL) activity . The opposing actions of these enzymes create a regulatory system that controls TOF2 abundance and, consequently, rDNA silencing efficiency.

What interactions between TOF2 and other proteins are critical for its function?

The interaction between TOF2 and Csm1 is one of the most critical protein-protein interactions for TOF2 function. Crystal structures have revealed that Csm1 interacts with TOF2 through a conserved interface in its C-terminal domain . This interaction is not merely structural but has functional significance, as it directly influences rDNA silencing efficacy.

Additionally, TOF2 functions within a complex regulatory network involving SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2 and the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase complex Slx5:Slx8. The Ulp2 isopeptidase is recruited to rDNA through direct interaction with Csm1, placing it in proximity to SUMOylated TOF2, where it can remove SUMO modifications that would otherwise target TOF2 for degradation . This intricate interplay between multiple proteins highlights the complex regulatory mechanisms controlling TOF2 function.

What techniques should be used to validate TOF2 antibody specificity?

Validating TOF2 antibody specificity is crucial for reliable experimental results. Several complementary approaches should be employed:

  • Knockdown/Knockout Validation: Perform siRNA or CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knockdown/knockout of TOF2 and confirm reduced antibody signal by Western blot or immunofluorescence. This approach, similar to that used for COUP-TFII validation, provides strong evidence of specificity .

  • Recombinant Protein Controls: Use purified recombinant TOF2 protein as a positive control in Western blots to confirm the antibody recognizes the correct molecular weight target.

  • Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry: Perform IP with the TOF2 antibody followed by mass spectrometry to confirm the identity of the precipitated protein.

  • Cross-reactivity Testing: Test the antibody against related proteins to ensure it doesn't cross-react with similar epitopes, particularly important when studying protein families with high sequence homology .

  • Multiple Antibody Comparison: Use different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of TOF2 to confirm consistent results across experiments, increasing confidence in observed patterns.

How should researchers optimize immunohistochemistry protocols for TOF2 detection?

Optimizing immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocols for TOF2 detection requires systematic assessment of multiple parameters:

  • Fixation Optimization: Test different fixatives (paraformaldehyde, methanol, acetone) to determine which best preserves TOF2 epitopes while maintaining tissue morphology. Fixation time should also be optimized to prevent over-fixation which can mask epitopes.

  • Antigen Retrieval Methods: Compare heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) versus EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) to determine optimal conditions for TOF2 epitope exposure. This is particularly important for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples .

  • Antibody Dilution Series: Perform a titration series (typically 1:100 to 1:1000) to identify the optimal concentration that provides specific signal with minimal background. Document these findings with representative images showing signal-to-noise ratios at different dilutions.

  • Detection System Selection: Compare amplification systems (e.g., tyramide signal amplification versus conventional HRP-polymer detection) to determine the most appropriate method for TOF2 detection sensitivity.

  • Blocking Optimization: Test different blocking agents (e.g., BSA, normal serum, commercial blocking reagents) to minimize non-specific binding based on tissue type and fixation method.

What are the key considerations for Western blot analysis with TOF2 antibodies?

When performing Western blot analysis with TOF2 antibodies, researchers should consider these critical factors:

  • Protein Extraction Method: TOF2 is a nuclear protein associated with chromatin, requiring appropriate extraction methods. Use specialized nuclear extraction buffers containing detergents like NP-40 or specialized chromatin extraction protocols that effectively solubilize tightly-bound nuclear proteins.

  • Sample Preparation: Given TOF2's susceptibility to post-translational modifications, particularly SUMOylation, include appropriate protease and SUMO protease inhibitors in lysis buffers to prevent degradation and deSUMOylation during sample preparation .

  • Gel Percentage Selection: TOF2 is a relatively large protein, requiring lower percentage gels (6-8%) for optimal separation. Extended running times may be necessary for proper resolution.

  • Transfer Conditions: Use low SDS concentration in transfer buffer and extended transfer times (overnight at low voltage) for efficient transfer of larger proteins like TOF2.

  • Blocking and Antibody Incubation: Test both BSA and non-fat milk as blocking agents, as some antibodies perform better with specific blocking agents. Optimize primary antibody incubation time and temperature (4°C overnight versus room temperature for 1-2 hours).

How does post-translational modification affect TOF2 stability and detection?

Post-translational modifications significantly impact both TOF2 stability and antibody-based detection methods. Research indicates that SUMOylation is particularly important for TOF2 regulation:

  • SUMOylation Effects: SUMOylation of TOF2 acts as a signal for recognition by SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs) like the Slx5:Slx8 complex, which can target TOF2 for proteasomal degradation . This creates a dynamic system where TOF2 abundance is regulated by the balance between SUMOylation and deSUMOylation processes.

  • Detection Challenges: SUMOylated TOF2 may produce higher molecular weight bands on Western blots that could be misinterpreted as non-specific binding. Additionally, some antibody epitopes may be masked by SUMO modifications, leading to reduced signal intensity.

  • Experimental Approaches: To properly study TOF2 post-translational modifications, researchers should:

    • Use SUMO protease inhibitors like N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) in lysis buffers

    • Run parallel samples with and without treatment with SUMO proteases

    • Consider using phosphatase inhibitors, as crosstalk between phosphorylation and SUMOylation pathways is common

    • Implement immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting with anti-SUMO antibodies to confirm SUMOylation status

The balance between SUMO isopeptidase (Ulp2) and STUbL (Slx5:Slx8) activities provides a sophisticated regulatory mechanism for TOF2 stability and function .

What experimental approaches best detect TOF2 interactions with binding partners?

Detecting TOF2 interactions with binding partners requires sophisticated techniques that preserve physiologically relevant interactions while minimizing artifacts:

  • Co-Immunoprecipitation Strategies:

    • Use cell-permeable crosslinking agents like DSP or formaldehyde to stabilize transient interactions before lysis

    • Optimize lysis conditions (salt concentration, detergent type/concentration) to preserve specific interactions

    • Include appropriate controls: IgG control, reverse co-IP, and antibody-only controls

  • Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA): This technique allows visualization of protein-protein interactions in situ, providing spatial information about where TOF2 interactions occur within the cell. PLA is particularly valuable for confirming interactions in their native cellular context.

  • FRET/BRET Approaches: Förster/Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer techniques can detect direct protein interactions in living cells, providing dynamic information about TOF2 interactions under various cellular conditions.

  • BioID or APEX Proximity Labeling: These techniques use enzymatic tagging of proteins in close proximity to TOF2, followed by purification and mass spectrometry identification, enabling unbiased discovery of the TOF2 interactome.

  • Yeast Two-Hybrid Validation: While prone to false positives, Y2H remains useful for confirming direct interactions between TOF2 and putative binding partners, particularly when validated by orthogonal methods.

The Csm1-TOF2 interaction serves as an excellent model system, as crystal structures have confirmed this interaction occurs through adjacent conserved interfaces in Csm1's C-terminal domain .

How can researchers differentiate between specific and non-specific signals in TOF2 antibody applications?

Distinguishing specific from non-specific signals is essential for reliable TOF2 antibody applications. Researchers should implement multiple control strategies:

  • Knockout/Knockdown Controls: The gold standard control is comparing antibody signals between wild-type samples and those where TOF2 has been depleted through RNA interference or CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Complete signal elimination in knockout samples provides strong evidence of specificity .

  • Peptide Competition Assays: Pre-incubating the TOF2 antibody with excess immunizing peptide should block specific binding sites and eliminate true TOF2 signals while non-specific signals persist.

  • Multiple Antibody Validation: Using different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of TOF2 should produce consistent patterns in positive samples if the signal is specific.

  • Recombinant Protein Controls: Overexpression of tagged TOF2 constructs can provide positive controls with known expression patterns to compare against endogenous signals.

  • Signal Distribution Analysis: TOF2's known subcellular localization (primarily nucleolar) should match the observed immunostaining pattern. Signals in unexpected cellular compartments warrant additional validation.

When analyzing Western blot results, researchers should pay particular attention to molecular weight, as SUMOylated TOF2 will appear at higher molecular weights than unmodified protein. A detailed ladder of bands may represent different post-translationally modified forms rather than non-specific binding .

What are the most effective strategies for studying TOF2 function in ribosomal DNA silencing?

Studying TOF2's function in rDNA silencing requires multi-faceted approaches that address both molecular mechanisms and functional outcomes:

  • Silencing Reporter Assays: Develop reporter constructs integrated at rDNA loci to quantitatively measure silencing efficiency under different conditions (TOF2 wild-type, knockout, or mutant backgrounds).

  • ChIP-seq Analysis: Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing can map TOF2 binding sites across the genome, particularly at rDNA regions. This approach should incorporate:

    • Optimized crosslinking conditions for chromatin-associated factors

    • Sonication parameters adjusted for rDNA regions

    • Antibody selection based on validated ChIP-grade TOF2 antibodies

    • Appropriate controls including input DNA and IgG controls

  • Structure-Function Analysis: Generate TOF2 mutants that specifically disrupt interaction with Csm1 or other binding partners to dissect the contribution of individual interactions to rDNA silencing. The critical interaction surfaces identified in crystal structures provide excellent targets for mutagenesis .

  • Quantitative rDNA Expression Analysis: Implement RT-qPCR protocols specifically optimized for highly repetitive rDNA regions to measure transcriptional changes upon TOF2 manipulation.

  • SUMOylation Site Mapping: Identify specific lysine residues in TOF2 that undergo SUMOylation and generate non-SUMOylatable mutants to assess the impact of this modification on TOF2 function and stability .

These approaches should be complemented by genetic interaction studies with components of the SUMO pathway, particularly Ulp2 and the Slx5:Slx8 complex, to understand how post-translational modification regulates TOF2 function in rDNA silencing.

How can biophysics-informed models improve TOF2 antibody design and specificity?

Biophysics-informed modeling approaches represent cutting-edge strategies for designing highly specific TOF2 antibodies:

  • Epitope Accessibility Analysis: Computational prediction of surface-exposed regions of TOF2 can identify optimal epitopes for antibody generation. This approach incorporates:

    • Secondary structure prediction

    • Solvent accessibility calculations

    • Post-translational modification site avoidance

    • Sequence conservation analysis across species

  • Structural-Based Antibody Engineering: Using resolved crystal structures of TOF2 domains or homology models based on related proteins, researchers can design antibodies that target unique structural features rather than just primary sequence .

  • Machine Learning Applications: Training models on experimental antibody selection data can help predict antibody-epitope interactions and optimize antibody sequences for specific binding properties. This approach has been successfully applied to other antibody systems where:

    • Models are trained on phage display experimental data

    • Different binding modes are identified and associated with specific ligands

    • The model disentangles binding modes even for chemically similar epitopes

  • Cross-Reactivity Prediction: Computational screening against proteome databases can identify potential cross-reactive proteins with similar epitopes, allowing researchers to select epitopes that maximize specificity.

  • Antibody-Epitope Binding Simulation: Molecular dynamics simulations can predict binding energetics and stability of antibody-epitope interactions, guiding optimization of antibody sequences for improved affinity and specificity .

These biophysics-informed approaches can generate antibodies with customized specificity profiles, either with high specificity for particular TOF2 epitopes or with controlled cross-reactivity to detect multiple forms of TOF2 .

What are common pitfalls in TOF2 antibody experiments and how can they be addressed?

Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with TOF2 antibodies:

  • Inconsistent Detection: TOF2 detection can vary due to its regulation by post-translational modifications. To address this:

    • Include protease and SUMO protease inhibitors in all buffers

    • Standardize sample collection and processing times

    • Consider cell cycle synchronization, as TOF2 levels may fluctuate during the cell cycle

  • High Background in Immunostaining: High background can obscure specific TOF2 signals. Optimization strategies include:

    • Testing different blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers)

    • Implementing longer blocking times (2+ hours at room temperature)

    • Adding 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to antibody dilution buffers

    • Increasing washing duration and frequency between steps

  • Multiple Bands in Western Blots: TOF2 often appears as multiple bands due to post-translational modifications. To interpret these correctly:

    • Run parallel samples treated with SUMO proteases to identify SUMOylated forms

    • Include molecular weight markers to accurately identify band sizes

    • Consider using gradient gels for better resolution of different modified forms

    • Implement siRNA knockdown controls to confirm which bands represent authentic TOF2

  • Epitope Masking: Some TOF2 epitopes may be masked by protein interactions or chromatin association. Solutions include:

    • Testing different extraction methods and buffers

    • Implementing various antigen retrieval methods for fixed samples

    • Using multiple antibodies targeting different TOF2 regions

  • Reproducibility Issues: Batch-to-batch variability in antibodies can affect results. Mitigating approaches include:

    • Purchasing larger antibody lots for long-term studies

    • Validating each new antibody lot against previous lots

    • Maintaining detailed records of antibody performance characteristics

How can researchers optimize immunoprecipitation protocols for TOF2 studies?

Immunoprecipitation (IP) of TOF2 requires careful optimization for successful results:

  • Lysis Buffer Composition:

    • Use buffers containing 0.1-0.5% NP-40 or Triton X-100 to solubilize membrane-associated proteins

    • Include 150-300mM NaCl to disrupt weak non-specific interactions while preserving specific ones

    • Add protease inhibitors, phosphatase inhibitors, and SUMO protease inhibitors (NEM)

    • For chromatin-associated TOF2, consider including nuclease treatment (Benzonase or DNase I)

  • Antibody Selection and Coupling:

    • Test different TOF2 antibodies recognizing distinct epitopes

    • Compare direct antibody addition versus pre-coupling to beads

    • For consistent results, consider covalently coupling antibodies to beads using crosslinkers

  • Incubation Conditions:

    • Optimize between shorter room temperature incubations (1-2 hours) versus overnight 4°C incubation

    • Test different rotation speeds to ensure mixing without damaging complexes

    • Consider a two-step IP approach for weakly interacting partners

  • Washing Stringency Gradient:

    • Implement a gradient washing approach with decreasing salt concentrations

    • Initial washes with higher stringency (300-500mM NaCl) followed by physiological buffer conditions

    • Test detergent concentration effects on maintaining specific interactions

  • Elution Methods:

    • Compare different elution approaches: SDS buffer, low pH glycine, immunizing peptide competition

    • For mass spectrometry applications, consider on-bead digestion instead of elution

A systematic approach testing these variables will yield an optimized protocol specific to TOF2 experimental needs.

How does TOF2 research inform our understanding of ribosomal DNA regulation mechanisms?

TOF2 research provides critical insights into fundamental mechanisms of rDNA regulation:

  • Nucleolar Organization: TOF2's role in rDNA silencing informs our understanding of nucleolar organization and the spatial regulation of ribosome biogenesis. The protein's interaction with Csm1 helps establish chromatin domains that control rDNA expression patterns .

  • Silencing Mechanisms: Studies of TOF2 have revealed that rDNA silencing involves complex protein interaction networks rather than simple repressive mechanisms. The requirement for specific protein-protein interactions, as seen between TOF2 and Csm1, suggests these complexes may form specialized silencing compartments within the nucleolus .

  • Regulatory Balance Through Opposing Enzymatic Activities: The opposing actions of SUMO isopeptidase (Ulp2) and SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase (Slx5:Slx8) in regulating TOF2 abundance reveals a sophisticated mechanism for dynamic control of silencing complex stability . This enzymatic opposition likely represents a broader paradigm for regulating chromatin-associated factors.

  • Evolutionary Conservation: TOF2's function appears to be highly conserved, suggesting that similar mechanisms may operate across diverse eukaryotic species. This conservation highlights the fundamental importance of proper rDNA regulation for cellular viability.

  • Connection to Genome Stability: TOF2-mediated rDNA silencing likely contributes to genomic stability by preventing inappropriate recombination between highly repetitive rDNA sequences, which could lead to genomic instability.

What emerging technologies might enhance TOF2 antibody applications in the future?

Several cutting-edge technologies show promise for advancing TOF2 antibody applications:

  • Single-Cell Antibody-Based Proteomics: Emerging technologies like CITE-seq and REAP-seq combine antibody detection with single-cell RNA sequencing, enabling correlation between TOF2 protein levels and transcriptional states at single-cell resolution.

  • Nanobody Development: Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) derived from camelid immune systems offer advantages for TOF2 research, including:

    • Smaller size for better tissue penetration

    • Recognition of epitopes inaccessible to conventional antibodies

    • Improved performance in live-cell imaging applications

    • Potential for intracellular expression as functional inhibitors

  • Spatially-Resolved Antibody Detection: Technologies like Imaging Mass Cytometry and CODEX allow simultaneous detection of dozens of proteins in tissue sections, enabling complex analysis of TOF2 in relation to other nuclear proteins with spatial context preserved.

  • Biophysics-Informed Antibody Design: As demonstrated with other antibody systems, computational approaches that integrate structural information, binding kinetics, and machine learning can generate antibodies with customized specificity profiles . These approaches could yield TOF2 antibodies with dramatically improved performance characteristics.

  • Antibody-Oligonucleotide Conjugates: DNA-barcoded antibodies enable highly multiplexed protein detection through sequencing readouts rather than imaging or blotting. This approach could facilitate comprehensive analysis of TOF2 alongside hundreds of other proteins in the same sample.

The integration of these technologies with traditional antibody applications will significantly expand our ability to study TOF2 in complex biological systems.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.