Methodological Answer:
Approach 1: Use multiple allelic mutants (e.g., tpr2-1 and tpr2-2) to confirm phenotype consistency .
Approach 2: Perform epistasis analysis by crossing TPR2 mutants with overexpression lines (e.g., AFP2-ox/tpr2) to assess genetic interactions .
Approach 3: Control for environmental variables (e.g., photoperiod) that influence flowering time.
Key Findings:
tpr2 mutants flowered ~25% earlier than wild-type under long-day conditions .
AFP2-ox/tpr2 double mutants reversed the late-flowering phenotype of AFP2-ox, confirming TPR2’s necessity for AFP2 function .
Methodological Answer:
Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Subcellular Localization: Combine antibody-based detection with confocal microscopy in transgenic lines expressing TPR2-GFP fusions.
Methodological Answer:
Strategy 1: Perform time-course experiments to track TPR2 protein stability (e.g., cycloheximide chase assays) .
Strategy 2: Use tissue-specific promoters to restrict TPR2 expression and analyze spatial effects.
Strategy 3: Integrate transcriptomic data to identify downstream targets regulated by TPR2.
Critical Consideration:
TPR2’s role in flowering involves modulating CONSTANS (CO) stability, requiring simultaneous measurement of CO protein levels in tpr2 mutants .
Methodological Answer:
Solution 1: Pre-adsorb the antibody with tpr2 mutant lysates to remove nonspecific binders.
Solution 2: Optimize blocking conditions (e.g., 5% nonfat milk vs. BSA) and antibody dilution (test 1:500–1:2000) .
Solution 3: Validate with secondary antibody-only controls.
Methodological Answer: