traD Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
traD antibody; Protein TraD antibody
Target Names
traD
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is TraD protein and why is it significant in microbiological research?

TraD is a conjugative coupling protein (CP) that plays a critical role in bacterial type IV secretion systems (T4SSs). It functions as a key component in horizontal gene transfer, facilitating the transport of DNA and proteins across bacterial membranes . This protein is particularly important in F plasmid conjugation systems, where it forms oligomeric complexes that act as molecular motors coupling ATP hydrolysis to substrate transport . Studying TraD provides insights into bacterial evolution, pathogenesis mechanisms, and the spread of antibiotic resistance genes, making it a significant target for antibody-based research .

What is the structural organization of TraD and how does this inform antibody design?

TraD exhibits a complex structural organization that directly influences antibody design strategies:

DomainApproximate PositionFunctionAntibody Design Consideration
N-terminalResidues 1-151Membrane anchoring, dimerizationLimited accessibility in native state
Transmembrane segmentsResidues ~1-130Membrane insertionPoor immunogenicity
C-terminal cytoplasmicResidues ~135-576ATP binding, oligomerizationHighly accessible, ideal for antibody targets

Research demonstrates that TraD spontaneously forms back-to-front homodimers that further assemble into hexameric ring structures with assistance from other F-plasmid proteins . Computational modeling based on the TrwBΔN70 structure (PDB: 1GL6) has provided valuable insights into these oligomeric arrangements . When designing antibodies, the large C-terminal cytoplasmic domain represents an optimal target due to its accessibility and size.

What are the most effective methodological approaches for generating antibodies against bacterial membrane proteins like TraD?

Generating high-quality antibodies against membrane proteins presents unique challenges that require specialized approaches:

  • Recombinant fragment immunization: Express and purify the large C-terminal domain (residues 135-576) as a soluble protein for immunization, avoiding transmembrane regions .

  • Synthetic peptide strategy: Design peptides corresponding to exposed hydrophilic loops or the C-terminal domain, conjugate to carrier proteins, and use for immunization .

  • Genetic tagging approach: The insertional mutagenesis method used in TraD research demonstrates how introducing epitope tags (such as the i31 insertion) can facilitate detection with established antibodies . This approach produced 13 in-frame insertions that yielded functional tagged versions of TraD .

  • Fusion protein strategy: Creating fusions between TraD fragments and highly immunogenic proteins can enhance antibody production while maintaining relevant epitopes .

The approach selection should be guided by the specific experimental requirements and the region of TraD being targeted.

What validation protocols are essential to confirm TraD antibody specificity?

Rigorous validation is critical for ensuring antibody specificity and reliability in experimental systems:

Validation MethodExperimental DesignExpected OutcomeResearch Example
Western blottingCompare wild-type bacteria with TraD deletion mutants (F′ΔD)Signal at ~65kDa only in wild-type samplesTraD-specific antisera validation
ImmunoprecipitationPrecipitate proteins from wild-type and mutant strains, analyze by mass spectrometryTraD peptides identified only in wild-type samplesCoIP experiments with TraD antibodies
Cross-reactivity testingTest antibodies against related coupling proteins from other conjugation systemsMinimal or no signal with non-target proteinsSpecificity confirmation studies
Epitope mappingTest antibody binding to truncated TraD variantsBinding only to fragments containing target epitopeCharacterization of insertional mutants

Researchers have successfully employed these validation strategies to confirm the specificity of both polyclonal TraD antisera and antibodies against epitope-tagged versions (TraD-i31) .

How can traD antibodies be optimally employed in coimmunoprecipitation studies?

Coimmunoprecipitation (coIP) protocols for TraD require careful optimization to maintain membrane protein complexes:

  • Membrane solubilization: Use mild detergents (0.01% dodecyl maltoside in KK buffer: 50 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl) to preserve protein-protein interactions .

  • Protein labeling strategy: For sensitive detection, employ pulse-labeling with 5-minute radioactive pulses followed by 15-20 minute chases to track protein dynamics .

  • Antibody selection: Both polyclonal TraD antisera and antibodies against epitope tags inserted into TraD (such as i31) have proven effective in coIP experiments .

  • Precipitation method: Use IgGsorb for efficient immune complex precipitation after incubation with primary antibodies .

  • Analysis approach: Analyze precipitates by SDS-PAGE under both reducing and non-reducing conditions to evaluate oligomeric states .

This methodology has successfully revealed that TraD forms oligomeric complexes in bacterial membranes and has identified interaction partners within the conjugation machinery .

What are the critical parameters for optimizing Western blot analysis of TraD?

Western blot detection of TraD requires attention to several key parameters:

ParameterOptimized ConditionRationaleReference
Sample preparationTwo-step centrifugation: 3,000×g (10 min) followed by 128,000×g (1 hr)Removes aggregates and efficiently pellets membranes
Gel percentage8-10% SDS-PAGEOptimal resolution for full-length TraD (~65 kDa)
Transfer conditionsOvernight at 4°C, 300 mA in buffer with 20% methanol, 3 mM Na₂CO₃, 10 mM NaHCO₃Ensures complete transfer of membrane proteins
Blocking agent5% non-fat milk in TBSTReduces background without affecting epitope recognition
Primary antibodyAnti-TraD (1:1000) or anti-i31 (1:1000) in TBSTOptimal dilution for specific detection
ControlsF′ΔD strain lysatesEssential negative control for antibody specificity

Following these optimized conditions has enabled successful detection of both wild-type TraD and mutant variants in experimental systems .

How can protein cross-linking be combined with antibody detection to analyze TraD oligomerization?

Cross-linking methodologies provide powerful tools for capturing transient protein interactions in their native environment:

  • In vivo cross-linking protocol: Researchers have successfully employed dithiobis(succinimidylpropionate) (DSP) at 10 mM (from freshly prepared stock in DMSO) with intact bacterial cells for 30 minutes at room temperature .

  • Reaction quenching: The cross-linking reaction can be effectively quenched with 200 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4) for 15 minutes .

  • Reversible cross-linking analysis: DSP contains a disulfide bond that can be cleaved with reducing agents (50 mM dithiothreitol), allowing comparison between cross-linked and cleaved samples .

  • Sample analysis: Samples should be resolved on 8% SDS-PAGE gels under non-reducing conditions (to preserve cross-links) or reducing conditions (to cleave cross-links) .

  • Detection methodology: Western blotting with TraD-specific or i31-specific antisera allows visualization of cross-linked complexes .

This approach has provided compelling evidence for TraD oligomerization in vivo, revealing specific higher-order structures that correspond to the predicted hexameric arrangement .

What analytical strategies can reconcile contradictory results from different TraD antibody detection methods?

When confronted with seemingly contradictory results, systematic troubleshooting approaches are essential:

  • Epitope accessibility analysis: Different experimental conditions may affect epitope exposure. Test multiple antibodies targeting distinct regions of TraD to identify epitope masking effects .

  • Detergent comparison studies: Systematically evaluate multiple detergents (CHAPS, DDM, digitonin) at varying concentrations to determine optimal solubilization conditions that preserve physiologically relevant interactions .

  • Native vs. denatured comparison: Parallel analysis under native (BN-PAGE) and denaturing (SDS-PAGE) conditions can reveal conformational dependencies in antibody recognition .

  • Cross-linking gradient analysis: Employ increasing cross-linker concentrations to capture the progression from monomers through intermediate states to complete oligomers .

  • Complementary biophysical techniques: Supplement antibody-based detection with analytical ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion chromatography, or mass spectrometry to independently verify oligomeric states .

Research on TraD has demonstrated that apparent contradictions often reflect different assembly states captured under varying experimental conditions rather than true inconsistencies .

How can researchers distinguish between bacterial TraD and similarly named mammalian proteins?

The search results reveal potential confusion between bacterial TraD and mammalian proteins with similar designations:

ProteinAlternative NamesFunctionMolecular WeightCellular LocationReference
Bacterial TraD-Conjugative coupling protein~65 kDaBacterial membrane
RAD51DRAD51L3, TRADDNA repair, homologous recombination~35 kDaMammalian nucleus
KALRNKalirin, HAPIP, TRADRhoGEF, neuronal plasticity~190-340 kDaMammalian cytoplasm

To ensure antibody specificity:

  • Sequence analysis: Conduct thorough bioinformatic comparison between bacterial TraD and potentially cross-reactive mammalian proteins (RAD51D and KALRN) .

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Test antibodies against mammalian cell lysates expressing RAD51D or KALRN to confirm absence of cross-reactivity .

  • Size discrimination: TraD (~65 kDa), RAD51D (~35 kDa), and KALRN (~190-340 kDa) differ significantly in size, enabling discrimination by molecular weight .

  • Subcellular localization: Immunofluorescence microscopy can differentiate between bacterial membrane localization (TraD), nuclear localization (RAD51D), and cytoplasmic/neuronal distribution (KALRN) .

These approaches ensure accurate target identification despite nomenclature similarities in the literature.

How might single-domain antibody technology benefit TraD research?

Recent advances in single-domain antibody technology present promising opportunities for TraD research:

Single-domain antibodies (sdAbs), including shark-derived antibodies and their humanized equivalents, offer unique advantages for targeting membrane proteins like TraD:

  • Enhanced epitope accessibility: The small size (~13 kDa) and extended complementarity-determining regions of sdAbs enable binding to cryptic epitopes in membrane proteins that are inaccessible to conventional antibodies .

  • Improved stability: sdAbs exhibit exceptional thermal and chemical stability, making them ideal for harsh experimental conditions often required for membrane protein work .

  • Versatile engineering platforms: Recent advancements in antibody engineering, including AI-driven approaches like RFdiffusion for antibody design , could be applied to generate highly specific sdAbs against TraD epitopes.

Researchers working with challenging membrane proteins like ion channels and GPCRs have successfully employed sdAb technology to overcome limitations of traditional antibodies , suggesting potential applications for TraD research.

What methodology would be suitable for applying AI-based antibody design to TraD research?

Recent breakthroughs in AI-driven antibody design offer promising approaches for generating TraD-specific antibodies:

  • Structure-based design: Computational models of TraD based on the TrwBΔN70 structure (PDB: 1GL6) could be used with platforms like RFdiffusion to design antibodies with atomic precision targeting specific functional domains.

  • Antibody loop optimization: Fine-tuned AI models can specifically design antibody binding loops that recognize TraD epitopes with high affinity and specificity, similar to the approach described for human-like antibodies .

  • Implementation methodology:

    • Generate a detailed structural model of TraD using existing homology data

    • Identify accessible epitopes, particularly in the C-terminal domain

    • Apply RFdiffusion or similar AI tools to design optimal binding interfaces

    • Express and validate the designed antibodies using the experimental approaches described earlier

This methodology leverages computational design to overcome the challenges inherent in generating antibodies against complex membrane proteins like TraD, potentially yielding research tools with unprecedented specificity and utility.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.