trm4b Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
trm4b antibody; SPAC23C4.17 antibody; Multisite-specific tRNA:(cytosine-C(5))-methyltransferase trm4b antibody; EC 2.1.1.- antibody; tRNA antibody; cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase trm4b antibody
Target Names
trm4b
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
tRNA cytosine C(5)-methyltransferase that catalyzes the methylation of cytosine to 5-methylcytosine (m5C) in tRNAs at positions 49 and 50. Trm4a and trm4b exhibit specificity for distinct sets of tRNAs. Additionally, trm4b methylates cytosine to m5C at positions 60, 61, and 62 in tRNA(Asp).
Database Links
Protein Families
Class I-like SAM-binding methyltransferase superfamily, RsmB/NOP family, TRM4 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is TRM4B and what is its role in RNA modification?

TRM4B is an RNA methyltransferase responsible for 5-methylcytosine (m5C) modifications in various RNA types, including tRNAs, mRNAs, and non-coding RNAs. It is a homolog of NSUN2 in mammals and Trm4 in yeast . In plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana, TRM4B catalyzes the methylation of cytosine at positions C48, C49, and C50 in tRNAs, as well as at various positions in mRNAs and other non-coding RNAs . These m5C modifications play crucial roles in RNA stability, translation efficiency, and stress responses.

TRM4B is particularly important for:

  • Root development through regulation of genes like SHY2 and IAA16

  • Oxidative stress response

  • tRNA stability, especially under stress conditions

  • Mobile mRNA regulation in plants

TRM4B loss-of-function mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana display several distinct phenotypes:

  • Shorter primary roots: trm4b mutants exhibit a short-root phenotype compared to wild-type plants due to reduced cell division in the root apical meristem . This phenotype can be rescued by complementation with a TRM4B genomic DNA construct .

  • Increased oxidative stress sensitivity: trm4b mutants show greater sensitivity to oxidative stress conditions compared to wild-type plants .

  • Altered RNA stability: Loss of TRM4B affects the stability of certain RNAs, particularly tRNAs. For example, reduced stability of tRNA Asp(GTC) has been observed in trm4b mutants .

  • Loss of specific methylation marks: trm4b mutants lose methylation at positions C48, C49, and C50 in tRNAs, as well as at specific sites in mRNAs and other non-coding RNAs .

  • Altered gene expression: TRM4B loss-of-function mutants showed down-regulated expression of genes involved in root development, such as short hypocotyl 2 (SHY2) and indoleacetic acid-induced protein 16 (IAA16) .

Which tissues and conditions affect TRM4B expression in plants?

TRM4B expression patterns vary across tissues and environmental conditions:

  • Tissue-specific expression: Transcriptome-wide bisulfite sequencing revealed quantitative differences in methylated sites between siliques, seedling shoots, and roots, suggesting tissue-specific regulation of m5C by TRM4B .

  • Response to cold stress: A marginal increase in expression of TRM4B was observed under cold stress in Arabidopsis .

  • Response to heat stress: TRM4B showed decreased expression under heat stress conditions in Arabidopsis .

  • Response in rice: Interestingly, the expression level of TRM4B was not altered in rice under abiotic stresses, indicating potential species-specific regulation .

These expression patterns suggest complex regulatory mechanisms that control TRM4B activity in response to developmental and environmental cues.

What RNA types are modified by TRM4B?

TRM4B modifies cytosine residues in multiple RNA types:

  • tRNAs: TRM4B methylates cytosines at positions C48, C49, and C50 in various tRNAs, including tRNA Asp(GTC), tRNA Val(AAC), and tRNA Gly(GCC) .

  • mRNAs: TRM4B mediates m5C modifications in many mRNAs, with most sites located in coding sequences. For example, cytosine C3349 in the coding sequence of MAG5/MAIGO5 mRNA is methylated by TRM4B in Arabidopsis .

  • Non-coding RNAs: TRM4B also methylates various non-coding RNAs, including:

    • Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs)

    • Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs)

    • Small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs)

    • Natural antisense transcripts

This broad substrate range indicates the widespread importance of m5C modifications in regulating RNA functions across different RNA classes.

How do I design experiments to study the specificity of TRM4B-mediated m5C modifications?

Designing comprehensive experiments to study TRM4B specificity requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Transcriptome-wide mapping and comparative analysis:

    • Generate TRM4B knockout lines (trm4b) alongside wild-type controls

    • Perform RNA bisulfite sequencing on rRNA-depleted RNA from different tissues

    • Compare methylation patterns between wild-type and mutant samples

    • Identify TRM4B-dependent sites using statistical cutoffs (e.g., FDR ≤ 0.3)

  • Validation of specific targets:

    • Select candidate sites with significant methylation differences

    • Perform targeted bisulfite amplicon sequencing (bsRNA-amp-seq)

    • Quantify methylation levels at individual cytosine positions

    • Research by David et al. used this approach to validate several TRM4B-dependent sites, confirming methylation in wild-type tissues and loss or reduction in trm4b mutants

  • Target site characterization:

    • Perform motif analysis to identify potential consensus sequences

    • Note that LOGO motif analysis has previously failed to identify a consensus sequence for TRM4B targeting, suggesting that sequence alone is insufficient

    • Test the role of RNA structure using structure probing techniques

  • Transgenic reporter systems:

    • A 50-nucleotide sequence flanking m5C C3349 in MAIGO5 mRNA was found to be sufficient to confer TRM4B-dependent methylation of a transgene reporter in Nicotiana benthamiana

    • This approach can be used to test minimal sequence requirements for TRM4B targeting

What mechanisms underlie the relationship between TRM4B and mobile mRNA transport in plants?

The relationship between TRM4B-mediated m5C modifications and mobile mRNA transport in plants represents a fascinating area of research:

How can I distinguish between TRM4B and other RNA methyltransferases when analyzing m5C modifications?

Distinguishing between different RNA methyltransferases requires careful experimental design and analysis:

  • Use of specific mutant lines:

    • Generate single and combined mutants for different methyltransferases (e.g., trm4b, trdmt1, trm4a)

    • Perform transcriptome-wide bisulfite sequencing on these mutants

    • Compare methylation patterns to identify enzyme-specific sites

    • Research has shown that trm4b mutants lose methylation at specific sites (e.g., positions C48-C50 in tRNAs) while trdmt1 and trm4a mutants do not affect these sites

  • Analyze substrate specificity:

    • Different methyltransferases target different RNA types and positions:

      • TRM4B: Primarily positions C48-C50 in tRNAs, plus various sites in mRNAs and ncRNAs

      • TRDMT1 (DNMT2): Position C38 in specific tRNAs (Asp, Gly, Val)

      • NSUN6: Position C72 at the acceptor stem of cysteine and threonine tRNAs

  • Examine tissue and condition-specific patterns:

    • TRM4B expression changes under certain stress conditions (e.g., increased in cold stress, decreased in heat stress)

    • Compare methylation patterns across different tissues and conditions to identify enzyme-specific regulation

  • Antibody-specific approaches:

    • Use antibodies specific to different methyltransferases (e.g., anti-TRM4B, anti-TRDMT1)

    • Perform immunoprecipitation followed by RNA sequencing to identify enzyme-specific targets

    • Commercial antibodies are available for TRM4B from various species

How do environmental stresses affect TRM4B activity and subsequent RNA modifications?

Environmental stresses significantly impact TRM4B activity and m5C modification patterns:

  • Changes in TRM4B expression:

    • Cold stress: Marginal increase in TRM4B expression in Arabidopsis

    • Heat stress: Decreased expression of TRM4B in Arabidopsis

    • Species differences: Expression level of TRM4B was not altered in rice under abiotic stresses

  • Functional consequences:

    • trm4b mutants show increased sensitivity to oxidative stress

    • m5C modifications are required for oxidative stress responses

    • The stability of tRNAs is affected by m5C modifications under stress conditions

  • Experimental approaches to study stress effects:

    • Perform RNA bisulfite sequencing on plants exposed to different stresses (cold, heat, drought, oxidative)

    • Compare m5C patterns between stressed and non-stressed conditions

    • Analyze changes in target transcript stability under stress in wild-type versus trm4b mutants

    • Assess the physiological response to stress in plants with altered TRM4B levels

    • Use ribosome profiling to determine how m5C affects translation during stress

What are the current technical limitations in studying TRM4B-mediated RNA modifications?

Several technical challenges remain in studying TRM4B-mediated RNA modifications:

  • RNA bisulfite sequencing limitations:

    • Incomplete bisulfite conversion can lead to false positives

    • RNA degradation during bisulfite treatment can reduce coverage

    • Structured RNA regions may be resistant to complete denaturation

    • Current protocols showed approximately 0.5% non-conversion rate compared to ~22% for non-bisulfite treated RNA-seq libraries

  • Antibody specificity issues:

    • Anti-m5C antibody specificity is affected by various factors

    • Cross-reactivity with other modifications may occur

    • Important to include unmodified and modified control RNA to determine antibody specificity

  • Target recognition determinants:

    • LOGO motif analysis failed to identify a consensus sequence for TRM4B targeting

    • Role of RNA structure in target recognition is poorly understood

    • Lack of clear structural information on TRM4B-RNA interactions

  • Distinguishing direct vs. indirect effects:

    • Changes in RNA stability or expression in trm4b mutants may be due to direct loss of m5C or downstream effects

    • Need for methods to directly link specific m5C sites to particular phenotypes

  • Low abundance of some m5C modifications:

    • Some m5C sites show low methylation levels (≥1% was used as a cutoff in some studies)

    • Detection of these sites requires high sequencing depth

    • Validation of low-abundance sites is challenging

Future technological advances, such as improved antibody specificity, direct RNA sequencing methods, and structural studies of TRM4B-RNA complexes, will help overcome these limitations.

What characteristics should I look for when selecting a TRM4B antibody for research?

When selecting a TRM4B antibody for your research, consider these critical factors:

  • Species specificity:

    • Ensure the antibody recognizes TRM4B from your species of interest

    • Available antibodies target TRM4B from various species including:

      • Arabidopsis thaliana

      • Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast)

      • Brassica species

  • Antibody type and clonality:

    • Polyclonal antibodies offer broader epitope recognition but may have batch-to-batch variability

    • Most commercial TRM4B antibodies are polyclonal (e.g., Rabbit anti-Schizosaccharomyces pombe TRM4B Polyclonal Antibody)

  • Validated applications:

    • Ensure the antibody is validated for your specific application

    • Common applications include:

      • Western blotting (WB)

      • ELISA

      • Immunoprecipitation (IP)

  • Purification method:

    • Antigen-affinity purified antibodies typically offer higher specificity

    • Some available TRM4B antibodies are immunogen affinity purified

  • Recognition region:

    • Consider whether the antibody targets a conserved or variable region of TRM4B

    • This is particularly important for cross-species applications

What methods can I use to validate TRM4B antibody specificity?

Validating TRM4B antibody specificity is crucial for reliable experimental results:

  • Use of genetic controls:

    • Test the antibody on samples from wild-type and trm4b knockout/knockdown plants

    • A specific antibody should show significantly reduced or absent signal in knockout samples

  • Blocking peptide competition:

    • Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide

    • This should compete for antibody binding and reduce or eliminate specific signals

  • Cross-reactivity testing:

    • Test the antibody against recombinant proteins of related methyltransferases (e.g., TRM4A, TRDMT1)

    • This can confirm specificity within the methyltransferase family

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry:

    • Perform IP with the TRM4B antibody

    • Analyze the precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry

    • Verify that TRM4B is the predominant protein detected

  • Western blot validation:

    • Confirm that the detected protein band matches the expected molecular weight of TRM4B

    • Arabidopsis TRM4B is encoded by AT2G22400

    • Compare multiple antibodies if available

How can TRM4B antibodies be used to investigate RNA-protein interactions?

TRM4B antibodies can be powerful tools for studying RNA-protein interactions:

  • RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP):

    • Cross-link RNA-protein complexes in vivo

    • Immunoprecipitate with anti-TRM4B antibody

    • Extract and analyze bound RNAs by RT-qPCR or sequencing

    • This approach can identify RNA targets directly bound by TRM4B

  • Photoactivatable ribonucleoside-enhanced crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (PAR-CLIP):

    • Incorporate photoreactive nucleoside analogs into cellular RNA

    • UV crosslink RNA-protein complexes

    • Immunoprecipitate with TRM4B antibody

    • This provides higher resolution mapping of binding sites

  • Immunofluorescence combined with RNA FISH:

    • Use TRM4B antibodies for protein localization

    • Combine with fluorescent in situ hybridization to detect target RNAs

    • This reveals co-localization of TRM4B with specific RNAs in cells or tissues

  • Proximity ligation assay (PLA):

    • Use TRM4B antibody together with antibodies against potential interacting proteins

    • PLA signal indicates close proximity of the two proteins

    • This can help identify protein complexes involved in RNA modification

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP):

    • Although TRM4B primarily functions in RNA modification, it may associate with chromatin

    • ChIP using TRM4B antibodies can detect potential associations with nascent RNA or co-transcriptional RNA modification

What approaches can resolve contradictory results in TRM4B-related m5C modification research?

Resolving contradictory results in TRM4B research requires systematic approaches:

  • Standardize detection methods:

    • Different m5C detection methods (bisulfite sequencing, antibody-based methods, direct RNA sequencing) may yield different results

    • Compare results across multiple detection methods

    • Research has shown that Oxford Nanopore Technology's Tombo m5C model provides reliable coverage of sites identified by bisulfite sequencing (>75%) and antibody-based methods (~33%)

  • Control for tissue and developmental specificity:

    • m5C modifications show tissue-specific patterns

    • Ensure comparisons are made between equivalent tissues and developmental stages

    • Studies have revealed quantitative differences in methylated sites between siliques, seedling shoots, and roots

  • Consider stress and environmental conditions:

    • TRM4B expression and activity change under different stress conditions

    • Control and report environmental conditions precisely

    • Compare stress-induced changes in TRM4B activity across studies

  • Genetic background effects:

    • Different Arabidopsis ecotypes or mutant backgrounds may influence results

    • Use multiple independent trm4b mutant alleles when possible

    • Include genetic complementation to confirm phenotypes are due to TRM4B loss

  • Quantitative considerations:

    • m5C modification levels can be quantitative (partial methylation)

    • Define clear thresholds for calling a site as methylated (e.g., ≥1% methylation)

    • Use statistical approaches appropriate for quantitative comparisons (FDR ≤ 0.3)

What emerging technologies will advance our understanding of TRM4B function?

Several emerging technologies hold promise for advancing TRM4B research:

  • Direct RNA sequencing technologies:

    • Nanopore direct RNA sequencing can detect m5C modifications without chemical conversion

    • Future improvements in base-calling algorithms will increase accuracy

    • This approach preserves RNA integrity and provides full-length transcript information

  • CRISPR-based approaches:

    • CRISPR/Cas9 can generate precise mutations in TRM4B or its target sites

    • CRISPR-based RNA targeting can be used to study site-specific functions of m5C

    • Targeted deaminase technology could potentially alter m5C sites directly

  • Cryo-EM and structural biology:

    • Structural studies of TRM4B-RNA complexes will reveal molecular details of target recognition

    • Understanding the conformational changes during catalysis

    • Structure-guided design of specific inhibitors or activators

  • Spatial transcriptomics:

    • Mapping m5C modifications with spatial resolution in tissues

    • Correlating m5C patterns with developmental zones and cell types

    • This would help understand tissue-specific functions of TRM4B

  • Single-molecule approaches:

    • Real-time observation of TRM4B activity on individual RNA molecules

    • Studying the kinetics and processivity of m5C modification

    • Understanding how m5C affects RNA structure and protein interactions at the single-molecule level

How might TRM4B research impact our understanding of plant adaptation to environmental stresses?

TRM4B research has significant implications for understanding plant stress adaptation:

  • Stress-specific RNA modification patterns:

    • TRM4B expression changes under different stresses (increased in cold, decreased in heat)

    • Mapping stress-specific m5C patterns could reveal adaptation mechanisms

    • Different plant species show different TRM4B responses to stress (e.g., rice vs. Arabidopsis)

  • Engineering stress tolerance:

    • Modulating TRM4B activity could potentially enhance stress tolerance

    • trm4b mutants show increased sensitivity to oxidative stress

    • Targeting specific mRNAs for m5C modification might stabilize stress-protective transcripts

  • Evolutionary adaptation:

    • Comparing TRM4B activity and targets across plant species adapted to different environments

    • Understanding how RNA modification contributes to evolutionary adaptation

    • Identifying conserved and species-specific targets

  • Cross-talk with other stress response pathways:

    • Investigating how TRM4B-mediated m5C modifications interact with other stress response mechanisms

    • Integration with hormone signaling pathways

    • Connection to epigenetic adaptation mechanisms

  • Long-distance signaling:

    • m5C modifications are enriched in mobile mRNAs

    • This suggests a role in systemic stress responses

    • Understanding how TRM4B influences plant-wide communication during stress

These research directions could lead to innovative approaches for improving crop resilience to environmental challenges in the face of climate change.

What is the evolutionary significance of TRM4B conservation across species?

The evolutionary conservation of TRM4B across diverse species has important implications:

  • Functional conservation:

    • TRM4B homologs in different species include NSUN2 (mammals), Trm4 (yeast), and TRM4B (plants)

    • These enzymes share similar functions in mediating m5C modifications in RNA

    • Similar target sites (e.g., positions 48-50 in tRNAs) are conserved across species

  • Adaptations to cellular environments:

    • Despite functional conservation, there are species-specific targets and regulatory mechanisms

    • This suggests adaptation to different cellular environments and requirements

    • For example, rice TRM4B shows different stress responses compared to Arabidopsis TRM4B

  • Co-evolution with RNA processing machinery:

    • TRM4B likely co-evolved with other components of the RNA processing machinery

    • Understanding this co-evolution could reveal functional networks

    • The relationship between m5C and RNA-binding proteins may have evolved differently across species

  • Biological role diversification:

    • In mammals, NSUN2 is involved in stem cell self-renewal and cancer

    • In plants, TRM4B is crucial for root development and stress responses

    • These diverse roles suggest functional diversification during evolution

  • Potential for horizontal gene transfer:

    • RNA modification enzymes may have been subject to horizontal gene transfer during evolution

    • Comparing TRM4B sequences and functions across distantly related species could reveal evolutionary patterns

Studying the evolutionary aspects of TRM4B provides insights into fundamental mechanisms of RNA regulation that have been conserved or diversified during the evolution of different lineages.

What are the most robust protocols for studying TRM4B-mediated m5C modifications?

Based on the current literature, these protocols offer the most robust approaches for studying TRM4B-mediated m5C modifications:

  • For genome-wide mapping of m5C sites:

    • RNA bisulfite sequencing (RNA-BisSeq) with rRNA depletion

    • Include appropriate controls for bisulfite conversion efficiency

    • Validate with independent methods (e.g., m5C-RIP-qPCR)

    • Use statistical cutoffs (FDR ≤ 0.3, ≥1% methylation)

  • For validation of specific sites:

    • Targeted bisulfite amplicon sequencing (bsRNA-amp-seq)

    • PCR amplification, cloning, and Sanger sequencing

    • m5C RNA immunoprecipitation followed by qRT-PCR

  • For functional studies:

    • Generate and characterize multiple independent trm4b mutant alleles

    • Include complementation with TRM4B genomic constructs

    • Compare phenotypes across different tissues and conditions

    • Use reporter systems to test specific m5C sites (e.g., the 50-nucleotide sequence from MAIGO5)

  • For protein studies:

    • Validate antibody specificity using trm4b mutants

    • Use recombinant protein for in vitro methylation assays

    • Perform protein-RNA interaction studies (RIP, PAR-CLIP)

  • For evolutionary studies:

    • Compare TRM4B function across multiple species

    • Analyze conservation of target sites and regulatory mechanisms

These protocols, when properly implemented and controlled, provide reliable and reproducible results for studying TRM4B-mediated m5C modifications.

How should researchers integrate TRM4B findings with other epitranscriptomic modifications?

Integration of TRM4B/m5C research with other epitranscriptomic modifications requires multifaceted approaches:

  • Comprehensive modification mapping:

    • Perform parallel analyses of multiple modifications (m5C, m6A, Ψ, etc.) on the same samples

    • Look for patterns of co-occurrence or mutual exclusion

    • Analyze modification crosstalk at the transcriptome level

  • Multi-omics integration:

    • Combine epitranscriptomic data with transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data

    • Correlate m5C patterns with RNA abundance, translation efficiency, and protein levels

    • Use systems biology approaches to model the integrated effects of multiple modifications

  • Functional studies of modification crosstalk:

    • Generate mutants affecting multiple RNA modification pathways

    • Analyze epistatic relationships between different modifications

    • For example, study the relationship between TRM4B (m5C) and other modifications like m6A

  • Reader protein interactions:

    • Identify proteins that recognize different modifications

    • Study potential competition or cooperation between readers

    • Current research has identified ALYREF and YBX1 as m5C readers that mediate nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling and mRNA stabilization, respectively

  • Biological context integration:

    • Analyze how different modifications respond to the same stimuli or developmental cues

    • Understand their relative contributions to specific biological processes

    • For example, compare the roles of different modifications in stress responses

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.