TUBG2 antibody is a specialized immunological reagent targeting gamma-tubulin 2 (TUBG2), a protein critical for microtubule nucleation and mitotic spindle formation . This antibody is widely used in research to study TUBG2’s role in cellular processes, including centrosome function, neuronal development, and disease mechanisms . Validated across multiple applications—Western Blot (WB), Immunohistochemistry (IHC), Immunofluorescence (IF/ICC), and Flow Cytometry (FC)—it exhibits reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples .
A de novo missense variant (TUBG2 c.747G>A, p.Met249Ile) was identified in a child with polymicrogyria, microcephaly, and refractory seizures . Functional studies revealed:
Reduced Protein Stability: Mutant TUBG2 showed lower expression levels in transfected cells compared to wild-type .
Enhanced GCP2 Binding: The mutant protein increased interaction with GCP2, potentially disrupting γ-tubulin complex dynamics .
No Compensatory TUBG1 Upregulation: TUBG1 mRNA levels remained unchanged, suggesting TUBG2-specific dysfunction .
In γ-tubulin 1-depleted U2OS cells, exogenous TUBG2 restored microtubule aster formation and mitotic progression, confirming its functional redundancy with TUBG1 . Live-cell imaging showed γ-tubulin 2’s capacity to nucleate microtubules in interphase cells, though with reduced efficiency compared to TUBG1 .
The antibody’s performance varies by application. Below are optimized protocols from leading vendors:
TUBG2 (tubulin, gamma 2) is one of two gamma-tubulin genes in humans, with a calculated molecular weight of 51 kDa. While TUBG1 represents the ubiquitous gamma-tubulin found in most cells, TUBG2 shows more specific expression patterns. Despite their differences in expression, research demonstrates that TUBG2 can nucleate microtubules and substitute for TUBG1 in cellular functions. Both proteins share similar subcellular localization to centrosomes and can interact with gamma-tubulin complex proteins (GCPs) . The critical functional distinction appears in their response to certain inhibitors, as compounds like L12 selectively target TUBG1 without affecting TUBG2 .
The TUBG2 antibody (such as 28009-1-AP) has been validated for multiple research applications with specific recommended dilutions:
Western Blot (WB): 1:1000-1:4000 dilution
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): 1:50-1:500 dilution
Immunofluorescence (IF)/ICC: 1:250-1:1000 dilution
Flow Cytometry (FC): 0.40 μg per 10^6 cells in 100 μl suspension
These applications allow researchers to detect and quantify TUBG2 in various experimental contexts, from protein expression analysis to cellular localization studies.
The TUBG2 antibody shows confirmed reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples . This cross-species reactivity makes it valuable for comparative studies across mammalian models. Research has successfully used these antibodies to detect TUBG2 in various cell types including HeLa cells, T-47D cells, HepG2 cells, and tissue samples such as mouse and rat cerebellum tissue and human lung cancer tissue .
For optimal TUBG2 detection in IHC applications, it is recommended to perform antigen retrieval with TE buffer at pH 9.0. If this doesn't yield satisfactory results, an alternative approach using citrate buffer at pH 6.0 may be employed . These conditions have been specifically validated for TUBG2 detection in human lung cancer tissue. Researchers should note that antigen retrieval conditions may need further optimization depending on tissue fixation methods, preservation duration, and specific tissue types being examined.
When studying TUBG2 expression and localization, researchers should include:
Positive tissue controls: Mouse or rat cerebellum tissue samples have shown reliable TUBG2 expression
Negative controls: Primary antibody omission or isotype controls (Rabbit IgG)
Subcellular markers: Include pericentrin antibody as a centrosome marker to confirm proper TUBG2 localization
TUBG1 comparisons: Include parallel TUBG1 detection to distinguish isoform-specific patterns
For rescue experiments, researchers should consider controls with both FLAG-tagged or TagRFP-tagged mouse TUBG1 and human TUBG2 proteins .
Distinguishing between these highly similar isoforms requires careful experimental design:
RNA analysis: Use RT-qPCR with isoform-specific primers that target unique regions of TUBG1 and TUBG2 mRNAs
Protein analysis: Employ 2D-PAGE to separate the isoforms based on their slight differences in isoelectric points
RNAi approach: Design siRNAs specific to either TUBG1 or TUBG2 to selectively deplete each isoform
Differential inhibition: Utilize compounds like L12 that selectively target TUBG1 without affecting TUBG2
Expression patterns: Examine tissue-specific expression, as TUBG2 shows differential expression compared to TUBG1, particularly during embryogenesis
To study microtubule nucleation using TUBG2 antibodies:
Live-cell imaging: Combine TUBG2 antibody staining with EB1-GFP tracking to visualize microtubule plus-end growth in real-time
Microtubule regrowth assays: Use nocodazole treatment followed by washout to monitor TUBG2-dependent microtubule regrowth
MTOC analysis: Co-stain with centrosomal markers like pericentrin to evaluate TUBG2 recruitment to microtubule organizing centers
Rescue experiments: Deplete endogenous TUBG1 using RNAi and express exogenous tagged TUBG2 to assess functional complementation
Quantitative analysis: Measure microtubule nucleation rates, density, and organization in control versus TUBG2-manipulated cells
Research has demonstrated that TUBG2 can nucleate microtubules and substitute for TUBG1 in TUBG1-depleted U2OS cells, indicating functional conservation between these isoforms in microtubule organization .
To effectively study TUBG2 interactions with gamma-tubulin complex proteins:
Coimmunoprecipitation: Use FLAG-tagged TUBG2 constructs and antibodies against GCP2 (γTuSC marker) and GCP4 (γTuRC marker), including appropriate negative controls (e.g., FLAG-tagged Fyn kinase)
Reciprocal precipitation: Confirm interactions by performing reverse co-IPs with antibodies against GCP2 or GCP4
Specific buffer conditions: Use conditions that preserve protein complexes while minimizing non-specific interactions
Validation approaches: Combine co-IP with proximity ligation assays or FRET to confirm direct interactions
Functional analysis: Assess the impact of GCP mutations on TUBG2 recruitment to centrosomes
Research has confirmed that FLAG-tagged TUBG2 interacts with both GCP2 and GCP4, similar to TUBG1, indicating that both γ-tubulin isoforms can incorporate into γ-tubulin complexes .
To investigate TUBG2 function in mitotic progression:
RNAi knockdown: Deplete TUBG1 using specific siRNAs or shRNAs in U2OS cells and rescue with exogenous TUBG2
Live-cell imaging: Track cell cycle progression using phase contrast or fluorescent markers in TUBG1-depleted cells with or without TUBG2 rescue
Spindle analysis: Immunostain for α-tubulin to assess spindle formation and organization
Mitotic checkpoint markers: Evaluate checkpoint activation status using antibodies against BubR1, Mad2, or phospho-histone H3
Quantification parameters: Measure mitotic index, duration of mitosis, and frequency of mitotic abnormalities
Studies have shown that exogenous expression of both mouse and human TUBG2 can rescue normal mitotic division in TUBG1-depleted cells, restoring proper metaphase and anaphase spindle arrangements .
To minimize non-specific binding with TUBG2 antibodies:
Optimize antibody dilution: Titrate the antibody within the recommended range (WB: 1:1000-1:4000; IHC: 1:50-1:500; IF/ICC: 1:250-1:1000) to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Blocking optimization: Test different blocking solutions (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers) and durations
Washing stringency: Increase the number and duration of washing steps with appropriate buffers
Secondary antibody controls: Include controls with secondary antibody only to identify non-specific binding
Antigen competition: Pre-incubate antibody with excess TUBG2 recombinant protein to validate specificity
Cross-reactivity assessment: Validate using TUBG2-knockdown samples to confirm specificity over TUBG1
For accurate interpretation of TUBG2 expression data:
Multi-method validation: Confirm expression patterns using complementary techniques (WB, IHC, IF, qPCR)
Reference gene selection: Carefully choose appropriate reference genes for normalization, as TUBG2 expression varies across tissues and developmental stages
Single-cell analysis: Consider techniques like single-cell RNA-seq or imaging cytometry to account for cell-to-cell variability
Developmental timing: Acknowledge that TUBG2 expression changes during development, particularly in early embryogenesis
Context comparison: Include multiple cell types or tissues to establish relative expression patterns
TUBG1/TUBG2 ratio: Calculate the ratio between isoforms as this may be more informative than absolute levels
Research has demonstrated that TUBG2 expression is downregulated in early mouse embryogenesis compared to TUBG1, highlighting the importance of developmental context when studying this protein .
TUBG2's role in the E2F-RB1 network appears complex and warrants careful investigation:
Nuclear localization studies: Examine TUBG2 nuclear translocation using fractionation and IF techniques
Promoter binding analysis: Perform ChIP assays to assess TUBG2 binding to E2F-binding sites
Expression correlation analysis: Evaluate the relationship between TUBG2 and RB1 expression across cancer cell lines and patient samples
Differential response to inhibitors: Investigate why compounds like L12 target TUBG1 in the E2F-RB1 pathway but not TUBG2
Procaspase 3 regulation: Assess whether TUBG2, like TUBG1, modulates E2F1-mediated expression of procaspase 3
Research indicates an inverse correlation between TUBG expression and RB1 in various tumor types, with TUBG proteins potentially binding to E2F-binding sites on promoter regions . Understanding the distinct role of TUBG2 in this network could reveal insights into cancer cell survival mechanisms.
To differentiate between TUBG2's centrosomal and potential nuclear functions:
Domain mutation analysis: Create constructs with mutations in specific TUBG2 domains to selectively disrupt centrosomal or nuclear functions
Subcellular targeting: Use fusion proteins with localization signals to force TUBG2 to specific compartments
Cell synchronization: Analyze TUBG2 distribution and interactions at defined cell cycle stages
High-resolution microscopy: Employ super-resolution techniques (STED, STORM) to precisely locate TUBG2 within nuclear substructures
Proximity labeling: Use BioID or APEX2 fusions to identify compartment-specific interaction partners
Research has shown that TUBG proteins have dual functions - the well-established centrosomal role in microtubule nucleation and a nuclear role potentially involving E2F regulation . Distinguishing these functions requires careful experimental design.
To assess functional redundancy between TUBG1 and TUBG2:
Cell type-specific expression profiling: Quantify relative expression levels across differentiated cell types
Selective depletion: Design isoform-specific knockdown strategies followed by phenotypic rescue experiments
CRISPR-based approaches: Generate isoform-specific knockout cell lines or animal models
Protein engineering: Create chimeric proteins to identify domains responsible for isoform-specific functions
Interactome analysis: Compare protein interaction networks of TUBG1 versus TUBG2 using IP-MS approaches
Research has demonstrated that while TUBG2 can rescue TUBG1 depletion in U2OS cells , the existence of two isoforms suggests potential specialized functions in certain contexts. Notably, studies show that TUBG1 and TUBG2 differ in their response to inhibitors like L12, indicating distinct roles in the E2F-RB1 network in cancer cells .