TXNL4A (Thioredoxin-like protein 4A) is a member of the U5 small ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) that plays a crucial role in pre-mRNA splicing. It contains a thioredoxin-like fold and interacts with multiple proteins, including the polyglutamine tract-binding protein 1 (PQBP1). The protein is implicated in RNA processing pathways and has been associated with Burn-McKeown syndrome, a rare disorder characterized by craniofacial dysmorphisms, cardiac defects, and hearing loss . Recent research has identified TXNL4A as a potential prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma and other cancers .
TXNL4A has a calculated molecular weight of approximately 16.8 kDa (16,786 Da). It belongs to the DIM1 protein family and has a thioredoxin-like fold structural motif. This structure facilitates its interaction with other proteins involved in RNA splicing complexes. The protein is encoded by the TXNL4A gene, which produces multiple transcript variants through alternative splicing .
| Property | Information |
|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | 16,786 Da |
| Protein Family | DIM1 family |
| Structural Motif | Thioredoxin-like fold |
| Alternative Names | DIM1 protein homolog, BMKS, DIB1, SNRNP15, U5-15kD |
When selecting a TXNL4A antibody for research applications, consider these critical factors:
Species reactivity: Ensure the antibody reacts with your species of interest (e.g., human, mouse).
Clonality: Determine whether a polyclonal or monoclonal antibody is more suitable for your application.
Validated applications: Verify that the antibody has been validated for your intended application (WB, IHC, ICC, etc.).
Immunogen information: Check the immunogen used to generate the antibody to ensure it will recognize your target region.
Validation data: Review western blot images and other validation data to confirm specificity.
Storage requirements: Confirm you can meet the proper storage conditions (-20°C long-term, 4°C short-term) .
Always review published literature to identify antibodies that have been successfully used in experiments similar to yours.
To validate the specificity of a TXNL4A antibody:
Positive and negative controls: Use tissues or cell lines known to express or not express TXNL4A.
Knockdown/knockout validation: Compare antibody reactivity in wild-type versus TXNL4A knockdown/knockout samples.
Multiple antibody comparison: Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of TXNL4A.
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide to block specific binding.
Western blot analysis: Confirm single band detection at the expected molecular weight (16.8 kDa).
Cross-reactivity testing: Test antibody against related proteins to ensure specificity .
Document all validation steps thoroughly to support the reliability of your experimental findings.
For optimal Western blot results with TXNL4A antibodies:
Sample preparation:
Use RIPA or NP-40 buffer with protease inhibitors
Load 20-40 μg of total protein per lane
Electrophoresis conditions:
12-15% SDS-PAGE gel (optimal for low molecular weight proteins)
Include positive control (e.g., HepG2 cell lysate for hepatocellular samples)
Transfer conditions:
PVDF membrane (0.22 μm pore size)
100V for 60-90 minutes at 4°C
Antibody dilution:
Primary antibody: 1:500-1:2000 dilution in 5% BSA/TBST
Incubate overnight at 4°C
Detection method:
Expected result: Single band at approximately 16.8 kDa with minimal background.
To investigate TXNL4A's role in RNA splicing:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use TXNL4A antibody to pull down splicing complexes
Identify interacting partners through mass spectrometry
Analyze splicing complex formation under different conditions
RNA-Immunoprecipitation (RIP):
Cross-link protein-RNA complexes
Immunoprecipitate with TXNL4A antibody
Identify bound RNAs through sequencing
Immunofluorescence microscopy:
Visualize co-localization with other splicing factors
Track dynamic changes during cell cycle or stress responses
Splicing reporter assays:
These approaches enable comprehensive analysis of TXNL4A's functional interactions within the splicing machinery.
When encountering weak or non-specific signals:
| Problem | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal | - Degraded antibody - Low target expression - Inefficient transfer | - Use fresh aliquot - Use positive control lysate - Verify transfer efficiency with staining |
| Weak signal | - Insufficient antibody concentration - Inadequate incubation time - Low protein loading | - Increase antibody concentration - Extend incubation time - Increase protein amount |
| Multiple bands | - Non-specific binding - Protein degradation - Cross-reactivity | - Increase blocking time/concentration - Add fresh protease inhibitors - Increase antibody specificity |
| High background | - Insufficient blocking - Too concentrated antibody - Inadequate washing | - Optimize blocking conditions - Dilute antibody further - Increase washing steps/duration |
For optimal results, always use freshly prepared buffers and follow the manufacturer's recommended storage conditions (-20°C long-term, 4°C for up to one month) .
To maintain optimal TXNL4A antibody reactivity:
Long-term storage:
Store at -20°C in small aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Original formulation typically contains 50% glycerol as cryoprotectant
Short-term storage:
Store at 4°C for up to one month for frequent use
Avoid exposure to light for fluorescently-labeled antibodies
Handling precautions:
Allow antibody to equilibrate to room temperature before opening
Centrifuge briefly before opening to collect solution at the bottom
Use sterile technique when removing aliquots
Return to proper storage temperature immediately after use
Avoid degradation factors:
Proper storage and handling significantly extend antibody shelf-life and maintain consistent experimental results.
Advanced research techniques for investigating TXNL4A in HCC include:
Tissue microarray (TMA) immunohistochemistry:
Compare TXNL4A expression across tumor stages and grades
Correlate expression with patient survival data
Analyze co-expression with other cancer biomarkers
Single-cell RNA sequencing integration:
Combine scRNA-seq data with TXNL4A protein expression
Identify cell populations with altered TXNL4A expression
Analyze correlation with CD8+ T cell infiltration profiles
ChIP-sequencing approaches:
Investigate transcriptional regulation of TXNL4A
Identify potential therapeutic targets affecting TXNL4A expression
Multiplexed imaging:
Simultaneously visualize TXNL4A with immune markers
Analyze spatial relationships within the tumor microenvironment
Functional studies:
Recent studies have shown TXNL4A is highly expressed in HCC and correlates with clinical features, making it a promising target for further investigation.
To study TXNL4A's immunological interactions:
Multiplex immunofluorescence imaging:
Co-stain for TXNL4A, immune cell markers (CD8, CD4, etc.)
Quantify spatial relationships between TXNL4A+ cells and immune infiltrates
Analyze tumor-immune boundaries and interaction zones
Mass cytometry (CyTOF):
Profile TXNL4A expression alongside immune markers
Create high-dimensional maps of immune populations
Single-cell analysis:
Integrate scRNA-seq with TXNL4A protein data
Correlate TXNL4A expression with immune cell states
Identify cell clusters with significant associations
Functional immune assays:
Co-culture TXNL4A-modulated cancer cells with immune cells
Assess changes in immune cytotoxicity and activation
Measure cytokine production and immune signaling
In vivo models:
Research has demonstrated correlation between TXNL4A expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration in HCC, suggesting important immunomodulatory functions.
When encountering contradictory findings regarding TXNL4A expression:
Consider tissue-specific context:
TXNL4A may have divergent roles across different tissues
Analyze tissue-specific splicing requirements and partners
Examine methodological differences:
Compare antibody clones and epitopes used across studies
Assess detection methods (WB vs. IHC vs. RNA-seq)
Evaluate normalization strategies and reference genes
Account for tumor heterogeneity:
Subtype-specific expression patterns may exist
Single-cell analysis may reveal population-specific expressions
Consider microenvironmental influences on expression
Statistical considerations:
Evaluate sample sizes and statistical power
Review patient cohort characteristics and selection criteria
Assess the robustness of findings through meta-analysis
Functional validation:
Current evidence shows TXNL4A is highly expressed in most tumors including HCC, BLCA, BRCA, CHOL, COAD, ESCA, KICH, LUAD, LUSC, PRAD, and UCEC, but expression patterns and prognostic significance may vary.
For integrating TXNL4A proteomic and transcriptomic data:
Multi-omics correlation analysis:
Calculate protein-mRNA correlation coefficients
Identify discordant expression patterns suggesting post-transcriptional regulation
Apply linear and non-linear modeling approaches
Pathway enrichment integration:
Perform GSEA on both protein and transcript datasets
Identify convergent and divergent pathway activations
Apply weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)
Splicing-aware integration:
Analyze alternative splicing events in RNA-seq data
Connect protein isoform detection with transcript isoform abundance
Integrate spliceosome complex protein interactions
Machine learning approaches:
Train predictive models using combined proteomic-transcriptomic features
Identify feature importance in cancer classification
Apply transfer learning across tumor types
Visualization techniques:
These approaches can reveal functional consequences of TXNL4A alterations across biological levels and identify potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.