tyr-1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
tyr-1 antibody; C02C2.1/C02C2.2 antibody; Putative tyrosinase-like protein tyr-1 antibody
Target Names
tyr-1
Uniprot No.

Q&A

Here’s a structured FAQ collection focused on TYR-1 antibody research, derived from academic literature and tailored for scientific rigor:

How do researchers validate the specificity of TYR-1 antibodies in experimental workflows?

Methodological considerations:

  • Epitope mapping: Use peptide arrays or alanine scanning mutagenesis to confirm binding regions (e.g., TYR residues 1–377 ).

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Validate against homologs (e.g., mouse TYR) via Western blot or ELISA .

  • Functional assays: Pair with enzymatic activity assays (e.g., tyrosinase activity inhibition) to confirm biological relevance .

What controls are critical for TYR-1 antibody-based experiments?

  • Negative controls: Knockout cell lines or tissues with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TYR deletion .

  • Isotype controls: Unconjugated rabbit IgG for immunoprecipitation (IP) to rule out nonspecific binding .

  • Competition assays: Pre-incubation with recombinant TYR protein to block antibody-antigen interaction .

How does tyrosine sulfation in antibody CDRs influence TYR-1 binding dynamics?

Key findings:

  • CDRL1 sulfation: Enhances affinity for IL-4 by introducing electrostatic interactions with antigenic basic patches .

  • Functional impact: Sulfated TYR-1 antibodies show 4–500× increased binding affinity in anti-HIV-1 gp120 models .

Sulfation SiteAntigen TargetAffinity ChangeMechanism
CDRL1 (Y31)IL-42–3× increaseCharge complementarity
CDRH3 (Y100)HIV-1 gp120100–500× increaseSalt-bridge stabilization

Methodological approach:

  • Mass spectrometry: Detect sulfation using UVPD-MS or LC-MS/MS .

  • Mutagenesis: Replace Tyr with Phe to abolish sulfation and compare binding kinetics (SPR/BLI) .

How to resolve contradictory data on TYR-1 sulfation’s functional role?

Case example:

  • Contradiction: Some studies report sulfation increases affinity , while others show no effect .
    Resolution strategies:

  • Structural analysis: Compare cryo-EM structures of sulfated vs. unsulfated antibody-antigen complexes .

  • Context-dependent factors: Evaluate sulfation efficiency (e.g., CHO cell culture conditions) and antigen charge distribution .

What in silico tools optimize TYR-1 antibody engineering?

  • RosettaAntibody: Design mutations to stabilize CDR loops (e.g., improve H-bond networks in CDRH3) .

  • MD simulations: Predict sulfation-induced conformational changes using GROMACS or AMBER .

How to analyze TYR-1 antibody-antigen binding thermodynamics?

  • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC): Measure ΔG, ΔH, and ΔS of interaction .

  • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): Quantify kon/koff rates under varying pH/salt conditions .

Why do some TYR-1 antibodies exhibit batch-dependent variability?

Root causes:

  • Post-translational modifications: Sulfation levels vary with host cell type (e.g., CHO vs. HEK293) .

  • Glycosylation: N-linked glycans in the Fc region may sterically hinder antigen binding .

Mitigation:

  • PTM profiling: Use PNGase F digestion and LC-MS to characterize glyco/sulfation patterns .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.