UBE2A: Encoded on the X chromosome, involved in post-replicative DNA damage repair and linked to X-linked intellectual disability (Nascimento syndrome) .
UBE2B: Associated with aggressive systemic mastocytosis and cancer progression (e.g., colorectal, breast) .
Shared Pathways: Innate Immune System, Class I MHC antigen processing .
DNA Damage Repair: UBE2A/UBE2B collaborates with RNF168 to recruit BRCA1 and 53BP1 to DNA damage sites, facilitating repair .
Radioresistance: High UBE2B expression correlates with radioresistance in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, as shown in HCT-116-R models .
Ubiquitination Mechanism: UBE2A/UBE2B forms a catalytic module with UBR4, an E3 ligase, to mediate substrate ubiquitination via K48-linked chains .
Survival Analysis: High UBE2B expression predicts poor prognosis in CRC patients:
Mechanistic Role: UBE2B inhibition (e.g., via TZ-9) increases γ-H2AX foci (DNA damage marker) and delays 53BP1/Rad51 recruitment, sensitizing cells to irradiation .
UBE2A and UBE2B are paralogue ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) that play critical roles in the ubiquitin pathway, particularly in protein degradation and cellular signaling. These proteins have emerged as significant research targets due to their involvement in:
Understanding these proteins requires specific and validated antibodies for various experimental applications across multiple research disciplines.
Selection of appropriate UBE2A/UBE2B antibodies requires careful consideration of several factors:
Specificity considerations: Due to high sequence homology between UBE2A and UBE2B, many commercially available antibodies cross-react with both proteins. As noted in research literature, "in case of UBE2A it is even described in the respective antibody data sheet that the UBE2A antibodies recognize UBE2B as well, making it impossible to identify knockout cells" .
Application compatibility: Verify the antibody has been validated for your specific application (Western blot, IHC, IF, etc.)
Species reactivity: Confirm reactivity with your experimental model species
Epitope location: Consider whether the epitope is accessible in your experimental conditions
Proper validation is essential due to the high homology between UBE2A and UBE2B. Recommended validation approaches include:
Genetic knockout/knockdown controls:
Complete knockout of UBE2A or UBE2B can be challenging. Research teams have reported: "In case of UBE2A, UBE2B and UBE2D1 we tried several times to generate knockout cells and used even different gRNAs but were not able to identify knockout cells" .
siRNA knockdown (>90% reduction at mRNA level) provides a viable alternative when knockout is not feasible .
Parallel detection methods:
Cross-reactivity testing:
When possible, test antibody against recombinant UBE2A and UBE2B proteins
For polyclonal antibodies, consider pre-absorption with the non-target protein
Positive and negative tissue controls:
Based on published research methodologies, the following optimized protocol is recommended:
Tissue/cell preparation:
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Antibody incubation:
Detection considerations:
The following protocol has been validated in research studies:
Sample preparation:
Antibody staining:
Primary antibody: Rabbit anti-human UBE2A (cat. no. ab31917, 1:200 dilution; Abcam)
Incubation: Overnight at 4°C
Secondary antibody: HRP-conjugated anti-mouse/rabbit secondary antibody
Incubation: 30 min at room temperature
Visualization: DAB staining for 1 min followed by hematoxylin counterstaining
Scoring and evaluation:
For studying interactions between UBE2A/UBE2B and E3 ligases like UBR4, researchers should consider:
Immunoprecipitation strategies:
Functional interaction assays:
Mutational analysis:
Specific residues can be targeted to understand mechanism:
Quantitative gel-based autoubiquitination assays using fluorescently labeled ubiquitin can assess the effects of these mutations
UBE2A/UBE2B have been implicated in cancer progression, making their study valuable in oncology research:
Prognostic marker studies:
Investigation methodology:
Therapeutic target validation:
Given the challenges in antibody specificity and protein function overlap, essential controls include:
Genetic controls:
Antibody controls:
No primary antibody control
Isotype control
Preabsorption with recombinant protein when available
Functional controls:
When studying UBE2A/UBE2B involvement in specific pathways (e.g., integrated stress response), co-depletion of both proteins may be necessary to observe phenotypes
For mechanotransduction studies, appropriate mechanical stimulation controls should be included when using UBE2A/B antibodies to detect translocation or activation
While UBE2A and UBE2B are paralogues with significant homology, research has revealed important distinctions:
Catalytic activity:
Structural considerations:
Pathway involvement:
Researchers frequently encounter challenges when using UBE2A/UBE2B antibodies:
Cross-reactivity issues:
Low signal strength:
Background issues in immunohistochemistry:
UBE2A/B has been identified as a force- and contact inhibition-sensing factor in mechanotransduction :
Experimental approaches:
Methodological considerations:
When investigating mechanotransduction, researchers should combine antibody-based detection with functional assays
Controls for mechanical stimulation are essential
Consider both localization changes and post-translational modifications of UBE2A/B
Research applications:
Recent research has identified UBE2A/UBE2B involvement in the integrated stress response (ISR):
Experimental evidence:
Study methodology:
Co-depletion approaches (rather than single protein depletion) may be necessary to observe phenotypes
Western blotting for stress response markers like ATF4 can help quantify ISR activation
Both genetic approaches (siRNA, CRISPR) and chemical inhibition can be used to study UBE2A/B functions
Research applications:
Understanding UBE2A/B roles in ISR could provide insights into cellular stress management
Potential therapeutic applications for stress-related conditions and cancer treatments