Unknown protein from spot 415 of 2D-PAGE of etiolated coleoptile Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
Unknown protein from spot 415 of 2D-PAGE of etiolated coleoptile antibody; Fragments antibody
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is 2D-PAGE and how is it used in protein identification?

Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) is a powerful analytical technique that separates proteins based on two distinct properties: isoelectric point (pI) in the first dimension and molecular weight in the second dimension. This method generates a two-dimensional protein "spot map" where each protein appears as an individual spot with specific coordinates. The technique allows researchers to separate thousands of proteins within a sample, creating a visual representation of the proteome that can be analyzed for differential expression between conditions or samples. After separation, spots of interest can be excised, digested with proteolytic enzymes, and identified through techniques such as peptide mass fingerprinting using mass spectrometry .

The process typically involves protein extraction, sample preparation, first-dimension separation by isoelectric focusing, second-dimension separation by SDS-PAGE, gel staining for visualization, image analysis to identify spots of interest, spot excision, protein digestion, and finally mass spectrometric analysis for protein identification. This comprehensive approach enables researchers to identify unknown proteins based on their characteristic migration patterns on the gel .

What does "etiolated coleoptile" refer to in maize research?

In plant biology research, "etiolated coleoptile" refers specifically to the protective sheath that covers the emerging shoot in young maize (Zea mays) seedlings that have been grown in complete darkness. Etiolation is a developmental response to absence of light, resulting in distinctive morphological characteristics including elongated stems, reduced leaf expansion, absence of chlorophyll (appearing pale or yellowish), and altered metabolism.

Etiolated coleoptiles are frequently used as experimental systems in plant physiology research because they represent a controlled developmental state with specific protein expression patterns. The proteome of etiolated coleoptiles provides valuable insights into plant development in the absence of photomorphogenesis, making it an excellent model for studying fundamental aspects of plant growth regulation, hormone responses, and cellular differentiation pathways .

How are protein spots numbered and identified in 2D-PAGE analysis?

The numbering system for protein spots in 2D-PAGE is typically established during the image analysis phase of the workflow. After gels are stained and digitally imaged, specialized software packages convert these gel images into vectors of matched spot volumes. The numbering follows these general principles:

  • Spots are assigned arbitrary numerical identifiers (such as "spot 415") based on their detection sequence or position on reference gels

  • Reference maps are created where consistent numbering schemes are maintained across multiple gel analyses

  • Landmark spots (highly abundant, consistently present proteins) often serve as registration points

  • Numbering may follow patterns based on pI/MW coordinates or abundance rankings

The identification process then involves excising these numbered spots from the gel, enzymatic digestion (typically with trypsin), and subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry techniques such as MALDI-TOF MS or ESI-QqTOF MS/MS. The resulting peptide mass fingerprints or sequence data are searched against protein databases to determine the protein identity .

It's important to note that a single numbered spot may contain multiple proteins or proteoforms, as recent research has shown that each "spot" can potentially contain several hundred different forms of proteins rather than just one or two .

What are the standard applications for antibodies against unknown proteins identified in 2D-PAGE?

Antibodies raised against unknown proteins identified from 2D-PAGE, such as the Unknown protein from spot 415 of etiolated coleoptile, serve several critical research applications:

  • Protein Detection and Verification: ELISA and Western Blot (WB) are the primary tested applications for these antibodies, allowing researchers to verify the presence and expression levels of the target protein in various samples .

  • Protein Localization: Immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry techniques enable researchers to determine the subcellular or tissue-specific localization of the unknown protein, providing clues to its function.

  • Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: Co-immunoprecipitation experiments using these antibodies can help identify binding partners of the unknown protein, elucidating potential functional pathways.

  • Expression Analysis: Antibodies facilitate the tracking of protein expression changes under different experimental conditions, developmental stages, or in response to environmental stimuli.

  • Protein Purification: Immunoaffinity chromatography using these antibodies allows for purification of the target protein for further functional analysis or structural studies.

For the specific case of the Unknown protein from spot 415, the antibody (CSB-PA305337XA01ZAX) is a rabbit-raised polyclonal antibody that has been affinity-purified and validated for ELISA and Western Blot applications with Zea mays samples .

What statistical models are most appropriate for analyzing differentially expressed proteins in 2D-PAGE when dealing with detection limit issues?

When analyzing differentially expressed proteins in 2D-PAGE data, standard statistical approaches often fail to adequately address the detection limit challenges inherent to the technology. A more sophisticated approach involves using likelihood-based mixture models that explicitly account for non-detected proteins. These models classify non-detected proteins into two distinct categories:

  • Proteins that are genuinely not expressed in at least one replicate

  • Proteins that are expressed but fall below the limit of detection

The likelihood model proposed in the literature extends previous approaches by specifically accommodating case-control experimental designs. This model incorporates parameters for:

  • Group-specific probability of protein expression

  • Mean expression intensities when proteins are expressed

  • Variance components that account for biological and technical variability

The mathematical framework enables maximum likelihood estimation of these parameters, with differentially expressed proteins identified using a Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) .

Statistical ApproachHandles Missing ValuesDistinguishes Causes of Missing ValuesApplicable to Case-Control DesignRisk of False Negatives
Standard t-testsNoNoYesHigh
ANOVANoNoYesHigh
Missing value imputationYesNoYesMedium
Likelihood mixture modelYesYesYesLow

This statistical framework is particularly valuable when studying proteins like the Unknown protein from spot 415, which might be conditionally expressed or present at varying detection levels across different experimental conditions .

How do post-translational modifications affect the identification of unknown proteins in 2D-PAGE?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) significantly complicate the identification of unknown proteins from 2D-PAGE by altering both their migration patterns and peptide mass fingerprints. This is particularly relevant for plant proteins from systems like etiolated coleoptiles, which undergo extensive regulatory modifications during development.

Multiple forms of the same protein (proteoforms) can appear as distinct spots on 2D gels due to PTMs that alter their isoelectric point (pI), molecular weight (MW), or both. For example, phosphorylation typically shifts proteins toward a more acidic pI, while glycosylation can increase apparent molecular weight. This phenomenon explains why proteins like the unknown protein from spot 415 may be part of a pattern of related spots representing various modified forms of the same gene product .

The identification process must accommodate these variations through:

  • Expanded mass tolerance in database searches: Allowing for mass shifts characteristic of common PTMs

  • PTM-specific enrichment: Prior to 2D-PAGE to concentrate modified forms

  • Multiple spot analysis: Examining patterns of related spots to identify PTM relationships

  • MS/MS analysis: Beyond peptide mass fingerprinting to confirm specific modification sites

Evidence from studies of various proteomes demonstrates that what appears as a single spot on 2D gels can contain numerous proteoforms. For instance, research has shown cases where proteins with similar pI and MW values, such as transaldolase B (pI 4.99, Mr 35.4) and elongation factor Ts (pI 5.15, Mr 30.4), co-migrate to the same position on gels despite being distinct proteins with different functions .

What are the advantages and limitations of peptide mass fingerprinting for identifying proteins from 2D-PAGE spots?

Peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a cornerstone technique for identifying proteins from 2D-PAGE spots. Its application to unknown proteins like spot 415 from etiolated coleoptile presents specific advantages and limitations:

Advantages:

  • High throughput: PMF allows rapid analysis of numerous protein spots from 2D gels

  • Cost-effectiveness: Compared to sequence-based MS/MS approaches, PMF requires less instrument time and resources

  • Minimal sample requirement: Works with the small protein quantities typically recovered from gel spots

  • Compatibility with strain-specific databases: Can achieve identification rates exceeding 95% when appropriate databases are available

  • Simplicity of data interpretation: Pattern matching algorithms are well-established and robust

Limitations:

  • Database dependency: Effectiveness is heavily contingent on protein database coverage and quality

  • Challenges with unsequenced organisms: Cross-species identification has significantly lower success rates (57% vs. 97% with strain-specific databases)

  • Poor performance with protein mixtures: When spots contain multiple proteins, identification accuracy decreases

  • Limited for novel proteins: Proteins without database entries or from incompletely sequenced organisms are difficult to identify

  • PTM complications: Modifications alter peptide masses, reducing matching efficiency

  • Sensitivity to protein concentration: Low-abundance proteins often yield insufficient peptide signals

For optimal results when working with plant proteins like the Unknown protein from spot 415, researchers should combine PMF with complementary approaches such as MS/MS sequencing for ambiguous cases, and utilize organism-specific databases when available .

How does the reliability of protein identification from 2D-PAGE compare between strain-specific databases versus public protein databases?

The choice of protein database significantly impacts identification success rates in 2D-PAGE proteomics studies. Comparative analysis demonstrates substantial differences in reliability between strain-specific databases constructed from raw genome sequences and public protein databases:

Database TypeIdentification Success RateAdvantage for Novel/Uncommon ProteinsImplementation Complexity
Strain-specific (e.g., ProtKpn)95-97%HighModerate
Public databases (NCBInr, SWISS-PROT/TrEMBL)57% for high-expressed proteinsLowLow

A study examining Klebsiella pneumoniae proteomics revealed that 95.7% of protein spots could be successfully identified using only PMF data when searched against a strain-specific database (ProtKpn). In stark contrast, cross-species searching in public databases identified only 57% of highly expressed protein spots. Most notably, 10 proteins essential for anaerobic glycerol metabolism (dha regulon) were successfully identified using the strain-specific database, while none could be identified through cross-species searching .

The limitations of public databases are particularly pronounced when dealing with:

  • Species-specific proteins with limited homology to model organisms

  • Proteins from non-model organisms with incomplete database representation

  • Novel proteins or those with unusual post-translational modifications

  • Proteins with limited sequence conservation across species

These findings have direct implications for research involving unknown proteins like spot 415 from maize etiolated coleoptile. For optimal identification reliability, researchers should prioritize the development or use of maize-specific protein databases derived from genomic data rather than relying exclusively on general public databases .

How can researchers address protein co-migration issues in 2D-PAGE analysis?

Protein co-migration in 2D-PAGE presents a significant challenge for accurate identification and characterization of unknown proteins. Research has demonstrated that what appears as a single spot can contain multiple distinct proteins or proteoforms. For example, studies have identified cases where spots contained two different proteins with similar pI and MW values, such as transaldolase B (pI 4.99, Mr 35.4) and elongation factor Ts (pI 5.15, Mr 30.4) .

To address this complexity, researchers can implement a systematic approach:

  • Higher resolution separation techniques:

    • Narrow-range IPG strips for first-dimension separation

    • Gradient gels for enhanced second-dimension resolution

    • Alternative separation methods like DIGE (Difference Gel Electrophoresis)

  • Advanced mass spectrometry approaches:

    • LC-MS/MS analysis of digested spot contents

    • Data-dependent acquisition to maximize protein identification

    • Quantitative MS approaches to determine relative abundance of co-migrating proteins

  • Computational strategies:

    • Deconvolution algorithms for complex MS spectra

    • Database search parameters optimized for multiple protein identification

    • Machine learning approaches to predict co-migration patterns

  • Validation experiments:

    • Targeted Western blotting with specific antibodies

    • Immunoprecipitation followed by MS analysis

    • Recombinant expression of candidate proteins for migration pattern comparison

When dealing with unknown proteins like spot 415 from etiolated coleoptile, researchers should anticipate potential co-migration issues and incorporate these strategies into their experimental design to ensure accurate identification and characterization of the target protein .

What are the optimal storage and handling conditions for antibodies against 2D-PAGE-identified proteins?

Proper storage and handling of antibodies against unknown proteins identified from 2D-PAGE, such as the Unknown protein from spot 415 of etiolated coleoptile Antibody, are critical for maintaining antibody functionality and experimental reproducibility. Based on manufacturer recommendations and standard practices in antibody research:

Storage Conditions:

  • Temperature: Store at -20°C or -80°C for long-term preservation of activity

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles: Aliquot antibodies upon receipt to minimize freeze-thaw damage

  • Buffer composition: The antibody is supplied in a protective buffer containing:

    • 50% Glycerol (cryoprotectant)

    • 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4 (physiological buffering)

    • 0.03% Proclin 300 (preservative)

Handling Guidelines:

  • Thawing protocol: Thaw antibodies on ice or at 4°C rather than at room temperature

  • Working dilutions: Prepare fresh working dilutions on the day of use

  • Contamination prevention: Use sterile technique when handling antibody solutions

  • Transport considerations: Ship on dry ice for external collaborations

  • Documentation: Maintain detailed records of storage conditions, freeze-thaw cycles, and lot numbers

These practices will ensure optimal antibody performance in applications such as ELISA and Western blotting, which are the validated applications for this particular antibody against the unknown protein from spot 415 .

What are the best practices for validating the identity of proteins discovered in 2D-PAGE studies?

Comprehensive validation of protein identities from 2D-PAGE studies requires a multi-faceted approach that combines bioinformatic, biochemical, and functional verification methods. For unknown proteins like spot 415 from etiolated coleoptile, this validation strategy is particularly crucial:

Bioinformatic Validation:

  • Database search stringency: Implement high confidence thresholds (p < 0.05) for peptide matches

  • Multiple search algorithms: Compare results from different algorithms (MASCOT, SEQUEST, X!Tandem)

  • False discovery rate (FDR) calculation: Maintain FDR < 1% using decoy database approaches

  • Sequence coverage assessment: Higher coverage percentages increase identification confidence

Biochemical Validation:

  • Complementary MS approaches: Combine PMF with MS/MS sequencing of selected peptides

  • Orthogonal separation techniques: Confirm using alternative separation methods

  • Antibody-based verification: Develop and use specific antibodies for Western blotting

  • Recombinant expression: Express the putative protein and compare migration properties

  • pI/MW correlation: Compare experimental and theoretical values (see table below)

Validation ParameterExpected Range for Reliable IdentificationCommon Issues When Parameters Fall Outside Range
Sequence coverage>20%Insufficient peptide detection, wrong identification
Matched peptides>5 unique peptidesAmbiguous identification, false positives
MW discrepancy<10% differencePost-translational modifications, proteolysis
pI discrepancy<0.5 pH unitsCharge-altering modifications, isoforms

Functional Validation:

  • Gene expression correlation: Compare protein abundance with transcript levels

  • Knockdown/overexpression: Examine phenotypic effects of modulating the protein level

  • Interaction studies: Identify binding partners to confirm predicted functions

  • Enzymatic assays: For proteins with predicted enzymatic functions

For proteins like the unknown from spot 415, complete validation typically requires multiple approaches rather than relying on a single identification method .

How can researchers effectively design experiments to characterize unknown proteins identified in 2D-PAGE?

Designing comprehensive experiments to characterize unknown proteins such as spot 415 from etiolated coleoptile requires a strategic, multidisciplinary approach that progressively builds knowledge about the protein's structure, expression, localization, and function:

Phase 1: Baseline Characterization

  • Expression profiling: Quantify protein levels across:

    • Developmental stages

    • Tissue types

    • Stress conditions

    • Light/dark transitions (particularly relevant for etiolated tissues)

  • Subcellular localization: Determine cellular compartment using:

    • Fluorescence microscopy with antibody-based detection

    • Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting

    • Predictive algorithms based on sequence motifs

  • Post-translational modification mapping: Identify:

    • Phosphorylation sites

    • Glycosylation patterns

    • Other modifications affecting function

Phase 2: Functional Analysis

  • Gene expression modulation:

    • CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing

    • RNAi knockdown

    • Overexpression studies

  • Protein-protein interaction network:

    • Yeast two-hybrid screening

    • Co-immunoprecipitation with anti-spot 415 antibody

    • Proximity labeling approaches

  • Structural studies:

    • Recombinant expression and purification

    • X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM

    • NMR for dynamic regions

Phase 3: Integrated Systems Analysis

  • Pathway integration:

    • Metabolomics to identify affected pathways

    • Transcriptomics to identify co-regulated genes

  • Phenotypic characterization:

    • Growth and development assays

    • Response to environmental stimuli

    • Stress resistance profiling

Experimental Design Considerations:

  • Include appropriate biological and technical replicates

  • Incorporate relevant controls for antibody specificity

  • Design time-course experiments to capture dynamic changes

  • Consider comparative studies with related plant species

This systematic approach allows researchers to build a comprehensive understanding of previously unknown proteins, moving from basic characterization to functional insights that place the protein within broader biological contexts .

How has the understanding of proteoforms changed the interpretation of 2D-PAGE data?

The concept of proteoforms has fundamentally transformed how researchers interpret 2D-PAGE data, moving from a "one spot, one protein" paradigm to recognizing the substantial complexity hidden within each gel spot. Recent advances in this understanding have significant implications for research involving proteins like spot 415 from etiolated coleoptile:

Recent research has revealed that what was traditionally viewed as a single protein spot on 2D gels can actually contain hundreds of different proteoforms - distinct molecular forms of proteins produced from a single gene through various mechanisms including genetic variations, alternative splicing, and post-translational modifications. This discovery has far-reaching implications for proteomics research and biomarker discovery .

Professor Xianquan Zhan's pioneering work demonstrated this remarkable complexity when investigating human growth hormone, where 24 different proteoforms were successfully identified from what appeared to be discrete spots on 2D gels. This finding challenged the conventional understanding of protein spot composition and highlighted the necessity for more sophisticated analytical approaches .

The implications for plant proteomics are equally significant, suggesting that unknown proteins like spot 415 from etiolated coleoptile likely represent complex mixtures of related proteoforms that may have distinct functional properties. This understanding necessitates a reevaluation of previous 2D-PAGE data interpretations and calls for enhanced analytical techniques that can resolve and characterize these proteoform mixtures .

Modern approaches now integrate:

  • High-resolution mass spectrometry to distinguish closely related proteoforms

  • Targeted enrichment strategies for specific classes of modifications

  • Computational approaches that can deconvolute complex proteoform mixtures

  • Functional assays that distinguish between activities of different proteoforms

This evolving understanding has transformed 2D-PAGE from a purely protein identification technique to a powerful approach for studying protein diversity and complexity at the proteoform level .

What are the emerging technologies that complement 2D-PAGE for characterizing unknown proteins?

While 2D-PAGE remains a powerful technique for protein separation and visualization, several emerging technologies now complement this approach to provide deeper insights into unknown proteins. These advanced methods enhance the characterization of proteins like spot 415 from etiolated coleoptile:

Top-down Proteomics:

  • Analyzes intact proteins rather than peptide fragments

  • Preserves information about proteoforms and modifications

  • Enables complete characterization of combinatorial PTM patterns

  • Particularly valuable for distinguishing closely related protein variants

High-resolution Mass Spectrometry:

  • Orbitrap and FTICR-MS technologies provide exceptional mass accuracy

  • Ion mobility MS adds separation based on protein/peptide structure

  • Enables detection of subtle mass differences between proteoforms

  • Facilitates identification of previously undetectable modifications

Protein Microarrays:

  • Complement 2D-PAGE by enabling functional characterization

  • Allow testing of multiple interactions simultaneously

  • Provide insights into binding partners and potential functions

  • Help place unknown proteins within biological pathways

Cryo-electron Microscopy:

  • Enables structural characterization of purified proteins

  • Reveals conformational states relevant to function

  • Can visualize protein complexes in near-native states

  • Provides insights not obtainable from sequence data alone

Single-cell Proteomics:

  • Reveals cell-to-cell variation in protein expression

  • Enables tracking of protein localization at subcellular resolution

  • Provides spatial context for protein function

  • Particularly valuable for developmental studies in plant systems

Computational Approaches:

  • Machine learning algorithms for predicting protein function

  • Molecular dynamics simulations of protein behavior

  • Network analysis to position unknown proteins in interaction webs

  • Integrative multi-omics approaches that combine proteomics with genomics and transcriptomics

The integration of these technologies with traditional 2D-PAGE creates a powerful platform for comprehensive characterization of unknown proteins, enabling researchers to move beyond identification to develop detailed functional and structural understanding .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.