UMPS Antibody, FITC conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Structure and Conjugation Mechanism

UMPS Antibody, FITC conjugated, consists of:

  • Antibody Backbone: A rabbit-derived polyclonal IgG antibody raised against recombinant human UMPS (amino acids 314–444) .

  • FITC Conjugation: Covalent attachment of FITC to primary amines (e.g., lysine residues) via isothiocyanate chemistry, forming stable thiourea linkages .

ParameterDetail
Conjugation Ratio3–6 FITC molecules per antibody to avoid solubility issues/quenching
Reaction BufferAnhydrous DMSO for dissolving FITC; reaction buffer (pH 7.3–7.4)
F/P Ratio DeterminationAbsorbance at 280 nm (protein) and 495 nm (FITC)

Applications and Performance

This antibody is validated for diverse techniques, with optimized dilutions and tested reactivity:

ApplicationDilutionTested ReactivityKey Findings
Western Blot (WB)1:500–1:2000 Human, MouseDetects UMPS isoforms (52 kDa, 45 kDa, 43 kDa)
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)1:20–1:200 Human Colon Cancer TissueRequires antigen retrieval (TE buffer pH 9.0 or citrate pH 6.0)
Immunoprecipitation (IP)0.5–4.0 µg per 1–3 mg lysate HEK-293 CellsConfirmed binding specificity in pull-down assays
ELISANot explicitly statedHuman Used to quantify UMPS levels in solution-phase assays

Research Findings and Disease Relevance

UMPS Antibody, FITC conjugated, has been instrumental in studying pyrimidine metabolism and its role in disease:

  • Cancer Metabolism: UMPS upregulation is linked to gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer and pyrimidine synthesis in hypoxic tumors .

  • Lung Cancer Prognosis: UMPS expression correlates with thymidylate synthase levels, influencing chemotherapy responses .

  • Hereditary Disorders: Defects in UMPS cause orotic aciduria, a metabolic disorder .

Key Publications:

  1. Pancreatic Cancer: UMPS-mediated pyrimidine release inhibits gemcitabine efficacy .

  2. Lung Cancer: UMPS/thymidylate synthase co-expression predicts adjuvant chemotherapy outcomes .

  3. Hypoxic Tumors: UMPS coordinates glutamine carbon/nitrogen metabolism under low oxygen .

Preparation and Optimization

For custom conjugation (e.g., bulk production):

  1. Antibody Preparation: Dialyze UMPS antibody into reaction buffer (e.g., PBS pH 7.3) to remove sodium azide .

  2. FITC Loading: Dissolve FITC in anhydrous DMSO (10 mg/mL) and titrate to achieve 10–400 µg FITC/mg antibody .

  3. Purification: Use gel filtration (e.g., PD-10 columns) to remove unreacted FITC .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship products within 1-3 business days of receiving your order. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributors for specific delivery timeframes.
Synonyms
ODC antibody; OMPdecase antibody; OPRT antibody; OPRTase antibody; Orotate phosphoribosyl transferase and orotidine 5' decarboxylase antibody; Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase antibody; Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase phosphoribosyltransferase antibody; Orotidine 5' phosphate decarboxylase antibody; Orotidine 5''-phosphate decarboxylase antibody; RP11-71H17.9 antibody; UMP synthase antibody; Umps antibody; UMPS_HUMAN antibody; Uridine 5' monophosphate synthase antibody; Uridine monophosphate synthetase antibody
Target Names
UMPS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Gene References Into Functions
  1. Partial UMPS deficiency should be considered in the differential diagnosis of mild orotic aciduria. PMID: 28205048
  2. The UMPS 638 CC genotype may be a potential biomarker for predicting toxicity in patients receiving tegafur-uracil/leucovorin-based preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. PMID: 28347333
  3. OPRT transition state analogues are valuable tools for identifying crucial components of potent inhibitors targeting OPRT enzymes. PMID: 24158442
  4. The observed mutations, aberrant splicing, and downregulation of UMPS represent novel mechanisms for acquired 5-FU resistance in colorectal cancer. PMID: 22249354
  5. [review] It has been confirmed that the type I defect in hereditary orotic aciduria is caused by a loss of uridine monophosphate (UMP) synthase activity. PMID: 19562503
  6. OPRT expression in colorectal carcinoma tissues is not correlated with the toxicity of 5-FU, but OPRT expression in normal tissues can help predict the toxicity associated with 5-FU. PMID: 22931617
  7. While no association was detected between UMPS variants and gastrointestinal cancer risk in Caucasians, polymerase chain reaction-RFLP with BsrI digestion and DHPLC set up at 59 degrees C are reliable and cost-effective methods for genotyping UMPS. PMID: 21631301
  8. Novel phosphoribosyltransferase transition states have been identified. PMID: 20527751
  9. The orotate phosphoribosyl transferase/DPD ratio is related to cancer staging and survival rate. PMID: 20647710
  10. Increased orotate phosphoribosyltransferase expression is associated with bladder cancers. PMID: 20112501
  11. Expression of the OPRT gene and the OPRT/dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase ratio may serve as predictive parameters for the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. PMID: 14562021
  12. Thymidylate synthase and orotate phosphoribosyl transferase, but not dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, are more highly expressed in prostate cancer than in benign prostatic hyperplasia. PMID: 15999119
  13. Orotate phosphoribosyl transferase plays a role in lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer. PMID: 16142362
  14. The investigated SNPs of OPRT may not have a major influence on 5-FU sensitivity. PMID: 16328050
  15. The OPRT Gly213Ala polymorphism appears to be a useful marker for predicting toxicity to bolus 5-FU chemotherapy. PMID: 16818689
  16. Overexpression of the OPRT gene plays a significant role in the antiproliferative effect of 5-FU. PMID: 17237621
  17. High expression of OPRT is associated with the response to adjuvant chemotherapy in human pancreatic cancer. PMID: 17549346
  18. Data suggest that OPRT is involved in early events of pancreatic and gallbladder carcinogenesis and invasion of hepatocellular carcinomas. PMID: 17607371
  19. Decreased sensitivities of cultured tumor cells to 5-FU were observed. These findings suggest that the OPRT expression level in tumors is an additional determinant of the efficacy of 5-FU. PMID: 17854773
  20. OPRT activity levels in tumor tissue may be a prognostic factor for survival in colorectal carcinoma with radical resection and 5-FU chemotherapy; postoperative survival was significantly better in patients with high OPRT activity. PMID: 18597678
  21. Determination of OPRT levels in gastric carcinoma tissue enables prediction of the response to S-1-based neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. PMID: 18633253
  22. Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase is involved in the invasion and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma. PMID: 18949394
  23. Decreased activity of OPRT plays a significant role in the acquired resistance of gastric cancer cells towards 5-FU. PMID: 19020740
  24. Head & neck, gastric, colorectal, breast, lung & pancreatic cancer were examined; findings show mRNA expression & protein level of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase & orotate phosphoribosyltransferase differed according to cancer type. PMID: 19020767
  25. Immunohistochemical staining for Orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT) revealed strong expression of OPRT in prostate cancer cells. A significant correlation was observed between OPRT mRNA expression levels and the tumor pathological grade. PMID: 19082440
  26. High orotate phosphoribosyltransferase gene expression is associated with complete response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. PMID: 19307741

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 12563

OMIM: 258900

KEGG: hsa:7372

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000232607

UniGene: Hs.2057

Involvement In Disease
Orotic aciduria 1 (ORAC1)
Protein Families
Purine/pyrimidine phosphoribosyltransferase family; OMP decarboxylase family

Q&A

What is UMPS and why is it an important research target?

UMPS, also known as OPRT (Orotate Phosphoribosyltransferase) and ODC (Orotidine 5'-phosphate decarboxylase), plays a crucial role in pyrimidine synthesis by converting orotic acid to uridine 5′ monophosphate . This bifunctional enzyme comprises two enzymatic activities: orotate phosphoribosyltransferase and orotidine 5'-phosphate decarboxylase. UMPS exists in four isoforms with molecular weights of approximately 53 kDa, 43 kDa, 33 kDa, and 23 kDa . Dysregulation of this pathway has been implicated in various diseases, including cancer and metabolic disorders, making it an important target for research in fields ranging from biochemistry to drug development .

What does FITC conjugation mean in the context of antibodies?

FITC conjugation refers to the chemical attachment of the fluorescent dye Fluorescein Isothiocyanate to an antibody molecule. This process typically involves crosslinking the antibody with the FITC fluorophore using established protocols that target primary amine groups on the antibody . The conjugation allows researchers to visualize the antibody-antigen interaction through fluorescence detection methods. The FITC molecule has excitation and emission maxima around 495 nm and 525 nm, respectively, producing a green fluorescence that can be detected using appropriate filters in various imaging and analytical instruments .

What are the standard applications for FITC-conjugated antibodies?

FITC-conjugated antibodies are versatile tools in biomedical research with several key applications:

  • Flow Cytometry: Most commonly used for identifying and quantifying specific cell populations based on marker expression

  • Immunofluorescence: For visualization of protein localization in fixed cells or tissue sections

  • Monitoring Extracellular pH: FITC conjugates can be used to track pH changes in cellular microenvironments

  • Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: When combined with other techniques like FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer)

  • Cell Sorting: For isolation of specific cell populations using FACS (Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting)

FITC-conjugated antibodies are particularly useful in multicolor flow cytometry experiments, where they can be combined with other fluorophores that have distinct spectral properties .

How should FITC-conjugated UMPS antibodies be stored to maintain activity?

For optimal preservation of FITC-conjugated UMPS antibodies:

Storage RecommendationRationale
Store at -20°C to -80°CLow temperatures minimize degradation of both antibody and fluorophore
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cyclesEach cycle can lead to protein denaturation and loss of fluorescence intensity
Store in the darkFITC is photosensitive and continuous exposure to light causes gradual loss of fluorescence
Use glycerol-containing bufferTypically 50% glycerol with PBS at pH 7.4 and preservatives (e.g., 0.03% Proclin 300)
Consider aliquotingDividing into single-use volumes prevents repeated freeze-thaw cycles

When preparing to use the antibody, thaw it slowly on ice and protect from light throughout the experimental procedure.

What are the optimal conditions for using UMPS Antibody, FITC conjugated in flow cytometry experiments?

When designing flow cytometry experiments with FITC-conjugated UMPS antibodies:

  • Antibody Titration: Always perform titration experiments to determine the optimal concentration. Start with the manufacturer's recommended dilution (typically around 1:500 to 1:2000 for polyclonal antibodies) , then test serial dilutions to find the concentration that gives the highest signal-to-noise ratio.

  • Cell Preparation:

    • Use single-cell suspensions with viability >90%

    • Block with appropriate serum (10% fetal bovine serum in PBS is commonly used)

    • Include anti-CD16/CD32 antibodies to reduce non-specific binding if working with Fc receptor-expressing cells

  • Staining Protocol:

    • Maintain cells at 4°C during staining to prevent internalization of surface antigens

    • Stain in buffers containing EDTA to prevent cell clumping

    • Use appropriate washing steps to remove unbound antibody

    • Include a viability dye to exclude dead cells from analysis

  • Controls:

    • Unstained cells to establish autofluorescence baseline

    • Isotype control (e.g., FITC-conjugated IgG for polyclonal antibodies)

    • Single-color controls for compensation when performing multicolor experiments

  • Instrument Settings:

    • Use appropriate excitation (488 nm laser) and emission filters (530/30 nm bandpass)

    • Set voltage based on unstained and positive control samples

    • Consider compensation when using multiple fluorophores

How can background fluorescence be minimized when using FITC-conjugated antibodies?

Background fluorescence is a common challenge when working with FITC-conjugated antibodies. To minimize it:

  • Optimize Blocking Conditions:

    • Use 10% serum from the same species as the secondary antibody

    • Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for intracellular staining

    • Consider using commercial blocking solutions specifically designed for immunofluorescence

  • Antibody Concentration:

    • Use the lowest effective concentration determined by titration experiments

    • Over-concentration often leads to increased non-specific binding

  • Fixation Considerations:

    • Some fixatives (particularly aldehyde-based ones) can increase autofluorescence

    • Consider using methanol fixation which typically produces less autofluorescence

    • If using formaldehyde/paraformaldehyde, treat with sodium borohydride to quench autofluorescence

  • Washing Steps:

    • Include additional and more stringent washing steps

    • Consider using PBS with 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 for more effective removal of unbound antibody

  • Anti-FITC Antibody Quenching:

    • For experiments measuring only intracellular signals, adding anti-FITC antibodies can quench extracellular fluorescence

  • Optical Considerations:

    • Use high-quality filters with narrow bandpass to minimize spectral overlap

    • Adjust PMT voltage to optimize signal-to-noise ratio

How does FITC conjugation affect the binding affinity and specificity of UMPS antibodies?

The conjugation of FITC to antibodies can potentially affect their binding properties through several mechanisms:

What controls should be included when working with FITC-conjugated UMPS antibodies?

A robust experimental design requires appropriate controls for accurate interpretation of results:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Isotype ControlAssesses non-specific binding due to antibody classUse FITC-conjugated antibody of same isotype (e.g., IgG) but different specificity
Blocking Peptide ControlConfirms antibody specificityPre-incubate antibody with excess UMPS peptide before staining
Unstained ControlEstablishes baseline autofluorescenceProcess cells through all steps except antibody addition
Single-color ControlsFor compensation in multicolor experimentsSamples stained with only one fluorophore
Secondary-only ControlFor indirect immunofluorescenceOmit primary antibody but include FITC-conjugated secondary
Positive ControlConfirms assay is working properlyCell line or tissue known to express UMPS (e.g., HeLa, Jurkat, HEK-293T cells)
Negative ControlConfirms specificityCell line with low/no UMPS expression or UMPS knockout cells
Fluorophore Stability ControlAssesses photobleachingMonitor FITC signal over time under experimental conditions

Additionally, when monitoring potential release of FITC conjugates from cellular compartments, anti-fluorescein antibody can be used to quench extracellular fluorescence, ensuring observed signals are genuinely intracellular .

Can UMPS Antibody, FITC conjugated be used effectively in multi-color flow cytometry, and what considerations are important?

FITC-conjugated antibodies can be effectively incorporated into multi-color flow cytometry panels with careful planning:

  • Spectral Considerations:

    • FITC has excitation/emission maxima around 495/525 nm

    • Avoid fluorophores with significant spectral overlap such as PE (phycoerythrin) without proper compensation

    • Compatible fluorophores include:

      • APC (allophycocyanin) - minimal overlap

      • PE-Cy5 or PerCP - minimal overlap

      • Pacific Blue - excited by different laser

  • Panel Design Principles:

    • Place FITC on abundant targets or those requiring less sensitivity (FITC is relatively bright but not the brightest fluorophore)

    • Consider using brighter fluorophores (PE, APC) for low-abundance targets

    • Account for antigen density when assigning fluorophores

  • Compensation Requirements:

    • Prepare single-color controls for each fluorophore

    • Use compensation beads for consistent signal intensity

    • Modern flow cytometers allow for automated compensation but manual verification is recommended

  • Data Analysis Approach:

    • Use appropriate gating strategies based on isotype controls

    • Consider fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls for setting accurate gates

    • Analyze compensation matrices carefully to ensure proper correction of spectral overlap

  • FITC-Specific Limitations:

    • FITC is pH-sensitive (fluorescence decreases at lower pH)

    • Relatively rapid photobleaching compared to some other fluorophores

    • Consider using alternatives like Alexa Fluor 488 for experiments requiring higher photostability

What troubleshooting steps should be taken if weak or no signal is detected when using FITC-conjugated UMPS antibodies?

When encountering signal issues with FITC-conjugated UMPS antibodies, follow this systematic approach:

  • Antibody-Related Factors:

    • Check storage conditions – improper storage can lead to fluorophore degradation

    • Verify antibody hasn't been exposed to prolonged light

    • Test a new lot or aliquot of antibody

    • Increase antibody concentration (but be cautious of increasing background)

  • Sample Preparation Issues:

    • Ensure proper fixation and permeabilization for intracellular targets

    • Verify antigen retrieval steps if working with tissue sections

    • Check for excessive wash steps that might remove antibody

    • Assess if target protein is expressed at detectable levels

  • Instrumentation Considerations:

    • Verify laser alignment and proper functioning

    • Check filter sets are appropriate for FITC (excitation ~495 nm, emission ~525 nm)

    • Adjust PMT voltage/gain settings to optimize detection

    • Ensure instrument has been properly calibrated

  • Protocol Modifications:

    • Extend incubation time with primary antibody (e.g., overnight at 4°C)

    • Reduce washing stringency

    • Try alternative fixation methods

    • Consider signal amplification methods

  • Experimental Controls to Implement:

    • Test antibody on positive control samples

    • Perform parallel staining with unconjugated primary followed by FITC-conjugated secondary

    • Test antibody in a different application (e.g., if not working in IF, try flow cytometry)

  • FITC-Specific Considerations:

    • Check pH of buffers (FITC fluorescence is optimal at pH 8-9)

    • Avoid using procedures or buffers that might quench fluorescence

    • Consider photobleaching – minimize exposure to light during all steps

How can FITC-conjugated UMPS antibodies be used to study pyrimidine metabolism in cancer cells?

FITC-conjugated UMPS antibodies provide valuable tools for investigating alterations in pyrimidine metabolism in cancer research:

  • Expression Pattern Analysis:

    • Flow cytometry can quantify UMPS expression levels across different cancer cell populations

    • Correlation of UMPS expression with clinical parameters or treatment responses

    • Identification of cancer subtypes based on UMPS expression profiles

  • Subcellular Localization Studies:

    • Immunofluorescence microscopy to determine if UMPS localization changes in cancer cells

    • Co-localization studies with organelle markers to track potential translocation events

    • Live-cell imaging to monitor dynamic changes in UMPS localization during cell cycle or in response to treatments

  • Therapeutic Response Monitoring:

    • Assessment of UMPS expression changes following treatment with anticancer agents

    • Correlation between UMPS levels and sensitivity to pyrimidine analogs (e.g., 5-fluorouracil)

    • Identification of patient subgroups likely to respond to pyrimidine metabolism-targeting therapies

  • Combination with Other Techniques:

    • FACS sorting of UMPS-high vs. UMPS-low populations followed by functional assays

    • Integration with metabolomic analyses to correlate UMPS expression with metabolite levels

    • Dual staining with proliferation markers to assess relationship between UMPS and cell cycle

  • Experimental Design Considerations:

    • Include multiple cancer cell lines representing different tissue origins and mutation profiles

    • Pair with normal cell counterparts as controls

    • Validate findings from FITC-conjugated antibody experiments with orthogonal methods (e.g., qPCR, Western blot)

What methodological approaches should be used when developing FITC-conjugated antibody-based flow cytometry assays for intracellular targets like UMPS?

Developing robust flow cytometry assays for intracellular proteins like UMPS requires careful methodological considerations:

  • Cell Preparation Protocol:

    • Fixation: Use 4% paraformaldehyde (10-15 minutes) or 70-90% methanol (30 minutes at -20°C)

    • Permeabilization: Apply 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 or saponin-based buffers

    • Blocking: Incubate with 5-10% serum from the same species as the secondary antibody

  • Staining Optimization:

    • Titrate antibody concentration using a minimum of 5 dilutions

    • Test different incubation times and temperatures (e.g., 1 hour at room temperature vs. overnight at 4°C)

    • For dual surface/intracellular staining, perform surface staining before fixation/permeabilization

  • Signal Validation Approach:

    • Perform parallel experiments with unconjugated primary antibody plus FITC-secondary antibody

    • Compare staining patterns between conjugated and unconjugated systems

    • Use siRNA knockdown or CRISPR knockout cells as specificity controls

  • Data Analysis Considerations:

    • Use median fluorescence intensity (MFI) rather than mean for more robust measurement

    • Calculate staining index: (MFI positive - MFI negative) / (2 × SD of negative)

    • Consider multiparametric analysis to correlate UMPS expression with cell cycle phase or other markers

  • Protocol Documentation:

    ParameterRecommended Documentation
    FixationAgent, concentration, time, temperature
    PermeabilizationAgent, concentration, time, temperature
    BlockingSolution composition, incubation conditions
    AntibodyClone, concentration, incubation conditions
    WashingBuffer composition, number of washes, volumes
    InstrumentCytometer model, laser configuration, filter sets
    AnalysisSoftware, gating strategy, compensation matrix

How can researchers distinguish between specific binding and non-specific interactions when using FITC-conjugated antibodies in their experiments?

Distinguishing specific from non-specific binding is critical for accurate data interpretation:

  • Control-Based Approaches:

    • Isotype controls: Match the isotype, concentration, and fluorophore of the test antibody

    • Blocking peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with excess target peptide

    • Genetic controls: Use knockout/knockdown cells lacking the target protein

    • Fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls: Include all fluorophores except the one being controlled

  • Signal Pattern Analysis:

    • Specific binding typically shows distinct subcellular localization patterns

    • Non-specific binding often appears as diffuse staining or high background

    • Compare staining pattern with published literature on UMPS localization

  • Antibody Validation Techniques:

    • Western blot validation to confirm antibody recognizes a protein of the expected molecular weight (52 kDa for UMPS)

    • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify bound proteins

    • Testing on multiple cell types with varying levels of target expression

  • Optimizing Experimental Conditions:

    • Add 0.1-0.5% BSA to staining buffers to reduce non-specific binding

    • Include mild detergents (0.05% Tween-20) in wash buffers

    • Extend washing steps to remove weakly bound antibodies

  • Advanced Analytical Methods:

    • Competitive binding assays with unlabeled antibody

    • Dilution linearity analysis: signal should decrease proportionally with antibody dilution

    • Correlation with orthogonal measurements of protein expression

  • Addressing Conjugation-Specific Issues:

    • Research has shown that protein-oligonucleotide conjugates can induce non-specific interactions with cell surfaces that must be carefully controlled

    • Optimize the degree of conjugation (DoC) to maintain specificity while providing sufficient signal

What are the emerging applications of FITC-conjugated antibodies in combination with other technologies?

Recent advances have expanded the utility of FITC-conjugated antibodies:

  • Antibody-Conjugated Nanoparticles:

    • FITC-labeled antibodies can be conjugated to nanoparticles for enhanced imaging capabilities

    • These hybrid products combine the small size and special properties of nanoparticles with the specificity of antibodies

    • Applications include targeted drug delivery, thermal therapy, and magnetic targeting

  • Multi-Modal Imaging Systems:

    • FITC-antibodies combined with MRI contrast agents or radiotracers

    • Allows correlation between microscopic and macroscopic imaging modalities

    • Facilitates translation between in vitro and in vivo research

  • Advanced Flow Cytometry Integration:

    • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) using antibodies labeled with both fluorophores and metal isotopes

    • Spectral flow cytometry allowing separation of highly overlapping fluorophores

    • Imaging flow cytometry combining the quantitative power of flow cytometry with spatial information

  • Single-Cell Analysis Platforms:

    • FITC-antibody staining paired with single-cell RNA sequencing

    • Integration with spatial transcriptomics to correlate protein localization with gene expression

    • Combination with metabolomics for comprehensive single-cell phenotyping

  • Click Chemistry Applications:

    • Two-step labeling using click chemistry for in situ conjugation

    • FITC-antibodies modified with DBCO for copper-free click chemistry reactions

    • Enables more flexible experimental designs and reduced background

How might artificial intelligence and machine learning impact the analysis of data generated using FITC-conjugated antibodies?

AI and machine learning are transforming analysis of immunofluorescence and flow cytometry data:

  • Automated Image Analysis:

    • Deep learning algorithms for automated segmentation of cellular compartments

    • Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for classification of staining patterns

    • Generative adversarial networks (GANs) for noise reduction and image enhancement

  • Flow Cytometry Data Analysis:

    • Unsupervised clustering algorithms (e.g., FlowSOM, PhenoGraph) for identifying cell populations

    • Dimension reduction techniques (e.g., t-SNE, UMAP) for visualizing high-dimensional data

    • Anomaly detection for identifying rare cell populations

  • Cross-Platform Data Integration:

    • Machine learning models to correlate FITC-antibody signals with genomic or proteomic data

    • Natural language processing to extract relevant information from literature for experimental design

    • Transfer learning to apply knowledge gained from one experimental system to another

  • Quality Control Applications:

    • Automated detection of batch effects in large-scale experiments

    • Algorithms to identify optimal compensation matrices

    • Predictive models for antibody performance based on sequence and structure

  • Experimental Design Optimization:

    • Bayesian optimization for antibody titration experiments

    • Reinforcement learning for developing optimal staining protocols

    • Predictive models for antibody-antigen interactions based on physicochemical properties

  • Practical Implementation Considerations:

    • Requirement for standardized data formats and metadata annotation

    • Need for sufficient training data from well-validated experiments

    • Importance of explainable AI models for scientific interpretation

Through these advanced analytical approaches, researchers can extract more information from experiments using FITC-conjugated UMPS antibodies, leading to deeper insights into pyrimidine metabolism and related biological processes.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.