UOX antibodies are polyclonal or monoclonal immunoglobulins designed to bind specifically to urate oxidase, an enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of uric acid to allantoin. These antibodies are validated for applications including ELISA, Western Blot (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunoprecipitation (IP) .
Target: Urate oxidase (UOX), also termed uricase
Conjugation Options: Unconjugated, HRP, biotin, or fluorophores
UOX antibodies are pivotal in both basic research and clinical studies:
A 2023 study compared PAT101 (recombinant human albumin-conjugated UOX) to existing therapies:
| Parameter | PAT101 | Pegloticase | Rasburicase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Half-life in TG mice | >2× pegloticase | Baseline | N/A |
| Uric acid reduction | 3.0 ± 0.9 mg/dL | 2.1 ± 0.1 mg/dL | N/A |
| Immunogenicity (T-cell) | Low | Moderate | High |
| Survival rate in Uox KO | 86% (4 weeks) | Comparable to PAT101 | 24% (4 weeks) |
PAT101 demonstrated prolonged half-life and reduced immunogenicity due to albumin conjugation, addressing limitations of PEGylated therapies .
In obesity-linked male infertility models, UOX antibodies identified testicular UOX overexpression, correlating with oxidative stress mitigation after intervention (e.g., body weight attenuation, p < 0.0001) .
UOX (Urate Oxidase) is an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of uric acid to allantoin. Knockout of this gene can lead to severe hyperuricemia, making it a crucial target for research on gout and related conditions . UOX antibodies are essential tools for detecting and studying this enzyme in experimental models, particularly in validating gene knockout strategies and investigating uric acid metabolism disorders.
In humans, the UOX gene is naturally inactivated during evolution, which makes humans susceptible to hyperuricemia and gout. Mouse models with UOX gene deletion have been developed to create "human-like" hyperuricemia models with serum uric acid levels approximately 5.5-fold higher than wild-type mice (1351.04±276.58μmol/L vs. 248.19±100.59μmol/L) .
Several types of UOX antibodies are available for research applications, varying in host species, target epitopes, and conjugations:
Antibodies targeting different epitopes of UOX are valuable for confirming experimental results through multiple detection methods. The choice of conjugation depends on the specific application, with fluorescent conjugates preferred for microscopy and HRP conjugates for Western blotting and ELISA .
Proper validation of UOX antibodies is essential for ensuring experimental reliability:
Genetic controls: Use UOX knockout tissues or cells as negative controls to confirm antibody specificity
Peptide competition: Pre-incubate the antibody with purified antigen or immunizing peptide to block specific binding sites
Multiple epitope targeting: Compare results using antibodies targeting different regions of UOX
Cross-reactivity testing: Verify reactivity against predicted species (mouse and rat UOX show high homology)
Orthogonal validation: Correlate antibody detection with UOX mRNA expression or enzyme activity measurements
For Western blot validation, researchers should observe a band at approximately 35 kDa for mouse UOX, with normalization against housekeeping proteins such as β-tubulin .
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of UOX represents a powerful approach for generating hyperuricemia models. UOX antibodies play critical roles in validating and characterizing these models:
Knockout confirmation: Western blot analysis using UOX-specific antibodies at 1:500 dilution against UOX with β-tubulin (1:10000) as loading control can verify complete protein absence
Off-target effect assessment: Immunohistochemistry with UOX antibodies can detect unexpected UOX expression patterns in non-targeted tissues
Phenotype correlation: Comparing UOX protein levels with serum uric acid measurements:
Tissue-specific expression analysis: Immunofluorescence using fluorophore-conjugated UOX antibodies can map UOX expression across tissue types before and after gene modification
When analyzing CRISPR/Cas9-generated UOX knockout models, researchers should consider potential frameshift mutations and ensure that deletions cover critical exons (exons 2-4 account for about 46% of the entire UOX protein coding gene) .
When investigating UOX interactions with other proteins (such as ubiquitin-mediated regulation), researchers should follow these methodological principles:
Denaturing lysis conditions: Use denaturing buffers to remove non-covalently interacting proteins from UOX and inactivate cellular deubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs)
Metal affinity purification: For His-tagged ubiquitin experiments:
Stepwise renaturation: Dialyze purified proteins to gradually restore native conditions for functional studies
Reducing conditions: Include DTT (dithiothreitol) to prevent oxidation of catalytic cysteine residues in interaction partner proteins
Immunoblotting specificity: Detect UOX using specific antibodies, while ubiquitylated proteins can be detected with ubiquitin-specific or His-tag-specific antibodies
UOX antibodies are vital tools in developing novel therapeutics for hyperuricemia treatment, particularly for recombinant UOX variants with extended half-lives:
Therapeutic variant characterization: UOX antibodies can detect and quantify novel conjugates like PAT101 (recombinant human albumin (rHA)-conjugated Aspergillus flavus UOX)
Pharmacokinetic profiling: Antibodies help measure circulating levels of therapeutic UOX:
Immunogenicity assessment: UOX antibodies can help detect anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in samples, and in CD4+/CD8+ T-cell activation analysis, PAT101 showed lower immune response compared to rasburicase
Site-specific conjugation optimization: When developing albumin-conjugated UOX variants, antibodies can verify successful incorporation of non-natural amino acids (NNAAs) and subsequent bioorthogonal conjugation through inverse electron demand Diels-Alder reaction (IEDDA)
In vivo efficacy monitoring: UOX antibodies support tissue distribution studies and correlation with pharmacodynamic effects in UOX KO animal models
For successful Western blot detection of UOX, researchers should follow these methodological guidelines:
Sample preparation:
Homogenize tissues in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors
Centrifuge lysates at 12,000g for 15 minutes at 4°C
Quantify protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assay
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Separate 20-50 μg protein on 10-12% SDS-PAGE
Transfer to PVDF membrane at 100V for 1-2 hours or 30V overnight
Antibody incubation:
Detection and analysis:
Troubleshooting:
For weak signals: Increase protein loading or primary antibody concentration
For multiple bands: Optimize lysis conditions or try different antibody
For high background: Increase washing time or decrease antibody concentration
Each measurement should be performed in triplicate, and all results should be normalized against β-tubulin to account for loading variations .
For optimal immunofluorescence detection of UOX in tissues and cells:
Tissue preparation:
Fix tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours
Process and embed in paraffin or OCT for frozen sections
Cut sections at 4-6 μm thickness
Antigen retrieval and blocking:
For paraffin sections: Perform heat-mediated antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
Block with 5% normal serum from secondary antibody host species for 1 hour
Antibody incubation:
Nuclear counterstaining and mounting:
Counterstain with DAPI (1:1000) for 5 minutes
Mount with anti-fade mounting medium
Imaging parameters:
It's essential to include both positive controls (wild-type mouse liver) and negative controls (UOX knockout tissues) to validate antibody specificity .
When working with UOX knockout models, proper sample preparation is crucial for reliable results:
Animal handling and sample collection:
Genotyping protocols:
Tissue preservation for protein analysis:
For protein extraction: Snap-freeze tissues in liquid nitrogen and store at -80°C
For immunohistochemistry: Fix tissues in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours, then process
RNA analysis protocols:
Experimental treatment groups:
| Group | Treatment | Route | Dosage (mg/kg) | Interval | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | None (KO only) | - | - | - | Control |
| G2 | Allopurinol | Oral | 25 | Daily | Single treatment |
| G3 | Allopurinol + UOX therapy | Oral + I.P. | 25 + 6 | Daily + Weekly | Combination therapy |
| G4 | Allopurinol + pegloticase | Oral + I.P. | 25 + 2 | Daily + Weekly | Comparison therapy |
This experimental design allows for comprehensive evaluation of UOX replacement therapies compared to standard-of-care treatments .
UOX antibodies can contribute to the emerging field of antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates (AOCs), which represent a promising approach for targeted delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics:
Conjugation chemistry optimization:
UOX antibodies can be used as model systems for developing conjugation methods
Typical protocols use partial reduction of antibody interchain disulfide bonds with TCEP followed by conjugation with maleimide linker-oligonucleotides
Purification via ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction chromatography yields conjugates with controlled drug-to-antibody ratios (DAR)
Linker chemistry selection:
Efficacy measurements:
Structure-activity relationship studies:
Several cutting-edge technologies are enhancing UOX antibody research:
Machine learning and active learning approaches:
Bioorthogonal conjugation chemistry:
Advanced immunogenicity prediction:
Near-infrared-fluorescence amplification:
People Also Ask (PAA) data mining:
When researchers encounter contradictory results with UOX antibodies, systematic troubleshooting is essential:
Antibody validation discrepancies:
Cross-validate using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Verify antibody lot-to-lot consistency with standardized positive controls
Perform epitope mapping to ensure the recognized region is present in your samples
Species-specific considerations:
Experimental conditions optimization:
For Western blotting: Adjust reducing conditions, sample preparation method, and blocking agents
For immunohistochemistry: Compare different fixation methods and antigen retrieval protocols
For ELISA: Optimize coating concentration, blocking buffer, and detection system
Resolving knockout model inconsistencies:
Different UOX knockout strategies may yield varying phenotypes:
Combining orthogonal techniques:
When troubleshooting contradictory results, researchers should document all experimental conditions meticulously and contact antibody manufacturers for technical support with specific lot numbers and detailed protocols.