USP17L6P (Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 17-like protein 6) is a deubiquitinating enzyme that removes conjugated ubiquitin from specific proteins to regulate various cellular processes. These include cell proliferation, progression through the cell cycle, cell migration, and the cellular response to viral infection. Current research indicates that USP17L6P appears to be non-functional in the regulation of apoptosis, suggesting a specialized role in cellular homeostasis. As a member of the ubiquitin-specific processing protease family, it plays a critical role in protein turnover and cellular signaling pathways mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system.
The USP17L6P Antibody, HRP conjugated has been specifically tested and validated for ELISA applications. The HRP (horseradish peroxidase) conjugation enables direct detection without the need for secondary antibodies, which can be particularly advantageous when working with complex experimental designs. While validated specifically for ELISA, researchers may potentially adapt this antibody for other applications where HRP-conjugated antibodies are commonly used, such as western blotting and immunohistochemistry, though additional validation would be required.
The HRP conjugation provides several methodological advantages:
Direct detection capability, eliminating the need for secondary antibodies
Compatibility with multiple detection methods including:
Chemiluminescent detection (producing light emission)
Colorimetric detection (producing colored precipitates)
Fluorescent detection (with appropriate substrates)
HRP catalyzes the oxidation of substrates in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, resulting in either a colored precipitate or light emission, depending on the substrate used. This enzymatic amplification significantly enhances detection sensitivity compared to non-enzymatic labeling methods.
The performance of HRP-conjugated antibodies is significantly influenced by buffer composition. For optimal results when working with USP17L6P Antibody, HRP conjugated, consider the following buffer parameters:
The antibody should be stored in conditions that avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles to maintain conjugate integrity. Upon receipt, store at -20°C or -80°C. Working solutions should avoid components that can interfere with HRP activity or antibody binding, including sodium azide, which inhibits HRP activity.
ELISA optimization requires systematic evaluation of multiple experimental variables. Based on experimental design techniques, researchers should consider:
Critical primary factors:
Substrate incubation time (significant impact on signal development)
Enzyme label lot (source of variability between experiments)
Antibody dilution (requiring optimization for signal-to-noise ratio)
Important interactions:
A methodical approach involves:
Initial screening of 8-10 potential variables using fractional factorial design
Follow-up factorial experiments focusing on the 3-4 most critical factors identified
Evaluation using multiple performance criteria, including:
Standard curve reproducibility
Assay detection limits
Signal-to-background ratio
This systematic approach can reduce optimization time from years to months while providing robust, reproducible results.
The choice of substrate depends on the desired detection method and sensitivity requirements:
Colorimetric Detection:
Diaminobenzidine (DAB) + H₂O₂: Produces a brown water-insoluble precipitate
TMB (3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine): Produces a blue color that turns yellow when stopped with acid
ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)): Produces a green-blue soluble product
Chemiluminescent Detection:
Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrates provide higher sensitivity for low-abundance targets
Luminol-based systems are most common and compatible with standard imaging equipment
Fluorescent Detection:
Each substrate system offers different sensitivity ranges and stability characteristics. For quantitative applications, chemiluminescent substrates generally offer superior sensitivity and dynamic range.
Inconsistent results with HRP-conjugated antibodies can stem from multiple sources. A systematic troubleshooting approach should consider:
Conjugate Stability Issues:
Experimental Variables:
Substrate incubation time variability between experiments
Antibody dilution inconsistency
Temperature fluctuations during incubation steps
Methodological Approach:
Technical Recommendations:
Prepare fresh working dilutions for each experiment
Maintain consistent timing between experiments
Consider using automated systems to reduce technical variability
Detection of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) like USP17L6P presents unique challenges compared to other protein families:
Expression Dynamics:
USP17L6P expression is often tightly regulated and may be transiently expressed during specific cellular processes
Detection requires careful timing of sample collection to capture expression windows
Specificity Considerations:
Cellular Localization:
Consider subcellular fractionation protocols to enrich for compartments where USP17L6P is predominantly active
Whole cell lysates may dilute signal if expression is compartmentalized
Activity vs. Expression:
Distinguish between detecting protein presence (expression) and enzyme activity (function)
Consider complementary activity-based probes when studying functional aspects
When investigating USP17L6P's role in cell cycle processes:
Synchronization Protocols:
Cell populations should be synchronized to specific cell cycle phases
Consider double-thymidine block, serum starvation, or nocodazole treatment depending on the phase of interest
Time-Course Experimental Design:
USP17L6P expression may fluctuate during cell cycle progression
Design sampling intervals to capture potential transient expression patterns
Multiplexed Detection:
Co-stain for established cell cycle markers (cyclins, CDKs) to correlate USP17L6P expression with cell cycle phase
Consider sequential probing protocols to avoid cross-reactivity
Quantification Methods:
Implement quantitative image analysis for immunocytochemistry
Use flow cytometry to correlate USP17L6P levels with DNA content
Substrate Identification:
Consider co-immunoprecipitation approaches to identify potential substrates
Validate interactions with ubiquitination status analysis
Quality control for this antibody includes:
Antibody Specificity:
Purification Method:
Conjugation Quality:
HRP activity verification
Protein:enzyme ratio optimization
Functional testing in ELISA formats
Storage Considerations:
The USP17 family contains several highly similar proteins. To validate specificity:
Recombinant Protein Panel Testing:
Test against purified recombinant proteins of USP17C, USP17D, and USP17N
Quantify relative binding affinities using concentration-dependent ELISA
Cellular Expression Systems:
Use cells with knockout/knockdown of specific USP17 family members
Compare signal intensity between wild-type and modified cells
Peptide Competition Assays:
Pre-incubate antibody with peptides representing unique regions of different USP17 family members
Measure reduction in signal to identify epitope specificity
Western Blot Migration Pattern:
Different USP17 family members may show subtle molecular weight differences
Compare migration patterns with predicted molecular weights
USP17L6P is involved in cellular responses to viral infection. Research applications include:
Temporal Expression Analysis:
Monitor USP17L6P expression at various time points post-infection
Correlate with viral replication kinetics
Subcellular Redistribution:
Track potential changes in USP17L6P localization during infection
Co-stain with viral proteins to identify potential interactions
Signaling Pathway Integration:
Examine USP17L6P in relation to innate immune signaling components
Focus on interferon regulatory pathways and NF-κB signaling
Viral Antagonism:
Investigate whether specific viral proteins target USP17L6P function
Compare expression and activity across infections with different viruses
Methodological Approach:
Implement time-course ELISA to quantify expression changes
Consider cell type-specific differences in USP17L6P regulation
Multiplexed detection requires careful optimization:
Compatible Detection Systems:
HRP can be combined with other enzyme systems (alkaline phosphatase, β-galactosidase)
Choose substrates with non-overlapping spectral properties
Sequential Detection Protocols:
Consider order of detection to avoid masking low-abundance targets
Implement complete stripping protocols between detection cycles
Cross-Reactivity Mitigation:
Validate antibody specificity in the presence of other detection reagents
Include appropriate blocking steps to minimize background
Signal Separation Strategies:
Use mathematical deconvolution for overlapping signals
Implement reference standards for each target in the multiplex panel
Technical Implementation:
Design plate layouts with appropriate controls for each detection system
Consider automated liquid handling to maintain consistent timing across steps
The role of USP17L6P in multiple cellular processes positions it as relevant to several emerging research domains:
Cancer Biology:
Cell cycle dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer
USP17L6P's role in proliferation suggests potential involvement in oncogenic processes
Immunotherapy Development:
Deubiquitinating enzymes are increasingly recognized as immunomodulators
USP17L6P may influence immune cell activation or exhaustion
Viral Pathogenesis:
The involvement in viral infection responses suggests potential as a therapeutic target
May serve as a biomarker for specific viral infection stages
Drug Discovery:
DUBs represent an emerging class of druggable targets
High-throughput screening assays utilizing this antibody could identify inhibitors
Systems Biology:
Integration of USP17L6P into ubiquitin-proteasome system models
Network analysis of deubiquitinating enzyme coordination in cellular processes