Os01g0587000 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Gene and Protein Overview

The Os01g0587000 gene (GenBank: NP_001043429.1) encodes subunit D of the V-ATPase V0 sector, homologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Vma6p and human ATP6V0D1 . Key features include:

PropertyValue
Gene IDOs01g0587000
ProteinH+-transporting V0 sector ATPase subunit D
Molecular Weight~39 kDa (predicted)
Functional RoleProton translocation, pH regulation
Cellular LocalizationVacuolar membrane

Antibody Development and Cross-Reactivity

While no commercial antibodies specific to Os01g0587000 are documented, studies on homologous proteins provide insights:

  • Antibody 5F10: Targets a 39-kDa insect allatostatin propeptide, demonstrating cross-reactivity with invertebrate neural tissues . Though unrelated phylogenetically, this highlights methodologies for detecting 39-kDa proteins.

  • Anti-ATP6V0D1 Antibodies: Human and yeast subunit D antibodies (e.g., NP_004682.2, NP_013552.3) show cross-species epitope conservation . For example, S. cerevisiae Vma6p antibodies detect plant V-ATPase subunits in immunoblots .

Research Applications

Hypothetical uses for an Os01g0587000-specific antibody include:

Protein Localization

  • Immunofluorescence: Mapping V-ATPase distribution in rice root cells under salt stress.

  • Western Blotting: Confirming subunit D expression in transgenic rice lines (e.g., ~39 kDa band) .

Functional Studies

  • Knockdown Validation: Verifying Os01g0587000 suppression in CRISPR/Cas9 mutants.

  • Stress Response: Correlating protein levels with drought or heavy metal tolerance.

Challenges and Considerations

  • Sequence Variability: Rice subunit D shares ~60% amino acid identity with Arabidopsis AT3G28710 , necessitating epitope specificity testing.

  • Commercial Gaps: No rice-specific V-ATPase antibodies are listed in major databases . Custom production using recombinant Os01g0587000 protein (e.g., residues 80–159 with GST tag ) is likely required.

Future Directions

  • Antibody Validation: Develop monoclonal antibodies using peptide immunogens (e.g., residues APSGAQRLYGFGL ).

  • Comparative Studies: Leverage cross-reactive antibodies (e.g., human ATP6V0D1 ) for preliminary rice V-ATPase analyses.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
Os01g0587000 antibody; LOC_Os01g40470 antibody; OsJ_02396 antibody; P0700A11.10 antibody; Probable V-type proton ATPase subunit d antibody; V-ATPase subunit d antibody; Vacuolar proton pump subunit d antibody
Target Names
Os01g0587000
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a subunit of the integral membrane V0 complex of vacuolar ATPase. Vacuolar ATPase plays a critical role in acidifying various intracellular compartments within eukaryotic cells. This acidification process provides the essential energy for transport mechanisms within the vacuolar system.
Database Links

KEGG: osa:4327660

STRING: 39947.LOC_Os01g40470.1

UniGene: Os.8078

Protein Families
V-ATPase V0D/AC39 subunit family

Q&A

What is Os01g0587000 Antibody and what are its basic specifications?

Os01g0587000 Antibody (product code CSB-PA840419XA01OFG) is a rabbit-derived polyclonal antibody raised against recombinant Oryza sativa subsp. japonica (Rice) Os01g0587000 protein. The antibody is provided in liquid form in a storage buffer consisting of 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), and 0.03% Proclin 300 as preservative. It is purified using antigen affinity methods and is suitable for ELISA and Western blot applications .

The antibody is intended for research use only and should not be used for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Upon receipt, the manufacturer recommends storage at -20°C or -80°C, avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles to maintain antibody integrity .

How should Os01g0587000 Antibody be stored and handled to maintain its efficacy?

Storage Recommendations:

  • Store the antibody at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can degrade antibody performance

  • For short-term use, antibodies containing 50% glycerol may be kept at 4°C for up to two weeks

Handling Guidelines:

  • Always wear appropriate personal protective equipment when handling antibodies

  • Before use, allow the antibody to equilibrate to room temperature

  • Mix gently by inversion or mild vortexing rather than vigorous shaking

  • Centrifuge briefly if droplets are present on the walls or cap of the container

  • Return to appropriate storage conditions immediately after use

For maximum antibody stability and performance, it's advisable to aliquot the original antibody stock into smaller volumes before freezing to minimize freeze-thaw cycles that can lead to protein denaturation .

What validation methods confirm the specificity of Os01g0587000 Antibody?

The specificity of Os01g0587000 Antibody should be determined through multiple validation approaches:

1. Genetic Validation Approaches:

  • CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell testing: Using wild-type rice cells alongside genetically identical CRISPR knockout cells lacking the Os01g0587000 gene provides the most rigorous validation standard

  • RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown: This approach can demonstrate reduced antibody signal corresponding to reduced protein expression

  • Overexpression systems: Comparing signal in cells with and without recombinant Os01g0587000 expression

2. Orthogonal Validation Approaches:

  • Mass spectrometry correlation with antibody detection levels

  • RNA-seq or qPCR expression data compared with protein detection levels

Research indicates that antibodies validated using genetic approaches (especially knockout models) demonstrate higher reliability rates compared to those validated using only orthogonal approaches. Studies show that for Western blotting applications, 89% of antibodies recommended based on genetic validation strategies could successfully detect their intended targets compared to 80% of those validated through orthogonal methods alone .

What controls should be included when using Os01g0587000 Antibody in Western blot experiments?

Essential Controls for Western Blot Experiments:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Positive ControlConfirms antibody functionalityUse known positive sample (e.g., recombinant Os01g0587000 protein)
Negative ControlValidates specificityUse samples lacking target (knockout cells or non-rice samples)
Loading ControlEnsures equal protein loadingProbe for housekeeping protein (actin, tubulin, etc.)
Secondary Antibody ControlDetects non-specific bindingOmit primary antibody but apply secondary antibody
Blocking Peptide ControlConfirms epitope specificityPre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide

Implementing these controls helps distinguish between true positive signals and experimental artifacts. For Os01g0587000 research specifically, negative controls using knockout rice cells or non-Oryza sativa samples are particularly valuable for confirming antibody specificity in Western blot applications .

How can Os01g0587000 Antibody performance be optimized across different experimental applications?

Optimizing Os01g0587000 antibody performance requires application-specific adjustments:

For Western Blot Applications:

  • Sample preparation: Use freshly prepared protein extracts with appropriate protease inhibitors

  • Optimization matrix: Test multiple antibody dilutions (1:500-1:5000) against varying protein loads (10-50μg)

  • Blocking conditions: Compare BSA-based vs. milk-based blocking buffers at 3-5% concentrations

  • Detection method adjustment: For low-abundance Os01g0587000 protein, employ enhanced chemiluminescence or fluorescent secondary antibodies

  • Membrane type: PVDF membranes typically provide better protein retention than nitrocellulose

For ELISA Applications:

  • Coating buffer optimization: Test carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) vs. PBS (pH 7.4)

  • Antibody titration: Generate a dilution series (1:500-1:10,000) to determine optimal working concentration

  • Incubation conditions: Compare room temperature (1-2 hours) vs. 4°C (overnight) incubation

  • Detection system: HRP-conjugated vs. AP-conjugated secondary antibodies with appropriate substrates

Validation studies indicate that even highly specific antibodies may require application-specific optimization. Research demonstrates that antibody performance can vary significantly between applications, with only 38% of antibodies recommended for immunofluorescence successfully validated using knockout controls, despite higher success rates in other applications .

What factors might contribute to inconsistent results when using Os01g0587000 Antibody in rice research?

Common Factors Affecting Antibody Performance in Rice Research:

Factor CategorySpecific FactorsMitigation Strategies
Sample PreparationProtein degradation, Incomplete extractionUse fresh samples, Optimize extraction buffers with appropriate protease inhibitors
Developmental StageExpression variability across growth stagesStandardize sampling timepoints, Document developmental stage
Tissue SpecificityDifferential expression across tissuesCreate tissue-specific controls, Normalize to tissue-specific references
Post-translational ModificationsPhosphorylation, Glycosylation affecting epitope accessibilityUse multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Environmental FactorsStress-induced expression changesMaintain consistent growth conditions, Document environmental parameters

Antibody-specific factors may also contribute to inconsistency, including lot-to-lot variation and storage degradation. Research indicates that antibody validation using knockout controls provides the most reliable confirmation of specificity, but the efficiency of this approach can be affected by the timing of protein knockdown assessment and the potential for compensatory cellular mechanisms .

How can multiplexed approaches enhance research using Os01g0587000 Antibody?

Multiplexed detection strategies offer significant advantages when incorporating Os01g0587000 Antibody into complex experimental designs:

Microsphere-Based Multiplexing:
Microsphere arrays provide a powerful platform for multiplexed antibody analysis, offering several key benefits over traditional single-plex assays:

  • Efficiency improvements:

    • Reduced sample volume requirements (critical for limited rice samples)

    • Decreased technical variability through simultaneous detection

    • Higher throughput capability with multiple targets analyzed concurrently

  • Technical implementation:

    • Antigen-mediated capture: Immobilize Os01g0587000 protein on microspheres to capture antibodies from experimental samples

    • Antibody-mediated capture: Immobilize anti-immunoglobulin antibodies to capture Os01g0587000-specific antibodies for affinity estimation

  • Quantitative advantages:

    • Semi-quantitative determination of antibody titer

    • Assessment of antibody binding kinetics

    • Estimation of antibody affinity through concentration-dependent binding analysis

Research has demonstrated that multiplexed microsphere assays provide results identical to single-plex formats while offering significant advantages in speed, sample conservation, and quantitative analysis compared to traditional ELISA-based methods .

What strategies should be employed to validate Os01g0587000 Antibody in flow cytometry applications?

Although the Os01g0587000 Antibody is not explicitly recommended for flow cytometry applications, researchers may wish to explore this application. A comprehensive validation workflow should include:

1. Orthogonal Approach Validation:

  • Compare antibody staining intensity with known mRNA expression levels across different cell populations

  • Cell tracker dyes can be utilized to pre-stain cell lines with different expression levels, allowing for mixed-sample antibody labeling and direct comparison

2. Cell Treatment Approach:

  • Identify treatments that modify Os01g0587000 expression

  • Confirm treatment effect through RT-qPCR or Western blotting

  • Demonstrate corresponding changes in antibody labeling by flow cytometry

3. Genetic Modification Approach:

  • Utilize overexpression systems in cell lines lacking endogenous Os01g0587000

  • Implement knockdown/knockout systems in cells expressing Os01g0587000

  • Confirm genetic modification efficacy through orthogonal methods

4. Independent Antibody Confirmation:

  • Compare staining patterns using additional antibodies targeting different epitopes of Os01g0587000

  • Different antibody clones should produce similar labeling patterns in positive samples

Research demonstrates that combining multiple validation approaches offers the most robust confirmation of antibody specificity for flow cytometry. For low-abundance targets like some plant proteins, researchers have successfully validated antibodies by combining overexpression systems with orthogonal approaches and cell treatments .

How can Os01g0587000 Antibody be incorporated into large-scale proteomic studies of rice genetics?

Integrating Os01g0587000 Antibody into large-scale proteomic research requires systematic planning:

1. Antibody Registry and Resource Sharing:
Before beginning large-scale studies, researchers should:

  • Register the Os01g0587000 Antibody in antibody databases

  • Document validation data in repositories like Antibodypedia

  • Share experimental protocols through platforms such as protocols.io

2. Multi-omics Integration Strategy:

  • Correlate antibody-based protein detection with transcriptomic data

  • Generate protein interaction networks involving Os01g0587000

  • Map post-translational modifications using complementary approaches

3. High-throughput Implementation:

  • Automated liquid handling for consistent antibody application

  • Standardized image analysis pipelines for consistent quantification

  • Statistical methods for handling large datasets and accounting for batch effects

4. Data Management Framework:

  • Structured database for organizing antibody validation results

  • Consistent metadata annotation standards

  • Version control for tracking protocol modifications

Studies employing antibody validation at scale have demonstrated that approximately 50% of commercial antibodies can be successfully validated using knockout-based approaches. By applying rigorous validation methods and standardized protocols, researchers can confidently incorporate Os01g0587000 Antibody into large-scale studies while maintaining data quality and reproducibility .

What experimental design considerations are critical when planning studies with Os01g0587000 Antibody?

Effective experimental design with Os01g0587000 Antibody requires careful planning across multiple parameters:

1. Preliminary Validation Phase:

  • Antibody titration to determine optimal working concentration

  • Cross-reactivity testing against related rice proteins

  • Positive and negative control identification and preparation

2. Experimental Variables Management:

Variable TypeConsiderationsImplementation
Independent VariablesTreatment conditions, Time points, Genetic backgroundsUse blocking and randomization to control confounding factors
Dependent VariablesSignal intensity, Localization pattern, Co-localization metricsDefine quantification methods before data collection
Control VariablesGrowth conditions, Sample preparation protocols, Imaging settingsStandardize and document all procedures

3. Statistical Design Elements:

  • Power analysis to determine appropriate sample size

  • Selection of appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution

  • Planning for technical and biological replicates

4. Protocol Optimization Strategy:

  • Develop a systematic approach to optimize critical parameters

  • Document all optimization steps for reproducibility

  • Validate optimized protocol with known controls

Research in experimental design for antibody-based studies emphasizes the importance of rigorous controls and systematic optimization approaches. Especially for plant antibodies like Os01g0587000, where commercial validation may be limited, researcher-led validation is essential before main experiments begin .

How can researchers troubleshoot non-specific binding issues with Os01g0587000 Antibody?

Non-specific binding is a common challenge when working with antibodies. A systematic troubleshooting approach includes:

1. Signal-to-Noise Ratio Optimization:

IssuePotential CausesSolution Strategies
High BackgroundInsufficient blocking, Over-diluted primary antibodyIncrease blocking time/concentration, Optimize antibody dilution
Multiple BandsCross-reactivity, Protein degradationUse alternative blockers, Add protease inhibitors
No SignalInsufficient antigen, Antibody degradationIncrease protein load, Use fresh antibody aliquot
Weak SignalLow protein expression, Insufficient incubationIncrease exposure time, Extend antibody incubation

2. Blocking Optimization Protocol:

  • Test multiple blocking agents:

    • 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST

    • 3% BSA in TBST

    • Commercial blocking buffers

  • Evaluate blocking temperatures (4°C, RT) and durations (1h, overnight)

  • Consider additives to reduce background (0.1-0.5% Tween-20, 0.05% NP-40)

3. Antibody Incubation Refinement:

  • Compare various dilution ratios (1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000)

  • Test different incubation temperatures (4°C, RT)

  • Evaluate incubation times (1h, 2h, overnight)

4. Wash Protocol Enhancement:

  • Increase wash buffer stringency (0.1% to 0.5% Tween-20)

  • Extend wash duration or number of wash steps

  • Consider alternative wash buffers (TBST vs. PBST)

Research indicates that polyclonal antibodies like Os01g0587000 Antibody may require more extensive optimization to minimize non-specific binding compared to monoclonal alternatives. Studies analyzing antibody validation methods found that even antibodies passing initial validation may exhibit non-specific binding under different experimental conditions, requiring application-specific optimization .

What are the most effective strategies for quantifying Os01g0587000 protein expression using the antibody?

Accurate quantification of Os01g0587000 protein requires appropriate methods and controls:

1. Western Blot Quantification Methods:

MethodAdvantagesLimitationsImplementation
DensitometryWidely accessible, Simple workflowNarrow linear range, Subjective band selectionUse digital imaging and analysis software
Fluorescent DetectionWider linear range, Multiplexing capabilityRequires specialized equipment, Higher costUse fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies
Capillary WesternAutomated, Highly reproducibleExpensive, Limited sample typesSpecialized instruments (e.g., Jess, Wes systems)

2. Normalization Strategy:

  • Select appropriate loading controls:

    • Housekeeping proteins (actin, tubulin, GAPDH)

    • Total protein staining (Ponceau S, SYPRO Ruby)

  • Validate loading control stability under your experimental conditions

  • Normalize target signal to loading control signal

3. Standard Curve Approach:

  • Generate recombinant Os01g0587000 protein standards

  • Create a dilution series spanning expected expression range

  • Develop a standard curve relating antibody signal to protein quantity

  • Interpolate unknown sample values from the standard curve

4. Multiplexed Quantification:
For more advanced quantification, microsphere-based approaches offer:

  • Semi-quantitative determination of protein abundance

  • Expanded dynamic range compared to traditional methods

  • Reduced sample requirement for multiple measurements

Research demonstrates that antibody-based quantification methods can effectively determine relative protein expression levels when properly validated and controlled. Studies using microsphere-based approaches have shown particular promise for quantitative analysis, offering advantages in speed, sample size requirements, and quantification accuracy over standard ELISA-based methods .

How should researchers interpret contradictory results between antibody-based detection of Os01g0587000 and gene expression data?

Discrepancies between antibody-based protein detection and gene expression data are common in biological research. A structured approach to resolving these contradictions includes:

1. Biological Explanations for Discrepancies:

MechanismExplanationVerification Method
Post-transcriptional RegulationmiRNA inhibition of translation, RNA stability differencesSmall RNA sequencing, RNA stability assays
Post-translational ModificationsModifications affecting epitope recognitionPhosphoproteomic analysis, Treatment with modifying enzymes
Protein Degradation RatesDifferences in protein turnoverPulse-chase experiments, Proteasome inhibitors
Temporal DynamicsTime lag between transcription and translationTime-course sampling

2. Technical Factors Contributing to Discrepancies:

  • Antibody specificity limitations

  • Non-linear relationship between signal and protein abundance

  • RNA extraction or quantification biases

  • Different sensitivities of detection methods

3. Verification Approaches:

  • Use orthogonal protein detection methods (mass spectrometry)

  • Employ genetic validation approaches (knockout/knockdown)

  • Conduct time-course studies to capture dynamic relationship

  • Test alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes

What resources and repositories can researchers use to find validation data for Os01g0587000 Antibody?

Researchers can leverage multiple resources to access and contribute validation data:

Available Antibody Resources and Repositories:

Resource TypeExamplesFunctionData Types Available
General Antibody DatabasesAntibodypedia, CiteAbSearch engines for antibodiesCitations, user reviews, validation data
Validation RepositoriesAntibody Registry, Only Good AntibodiesStore validation informationGenetic validation results, application-specific data
Target-Specific ResourcesRice Protein Database, UniProtProtein information sourcesSequence data, domain information, PTMs
Literature DatabasesPubMed, Google ScholarResearch article searchPublished validation and applications
Vendor ResourcesManufacturer websites, technical supportProduct-specific informationValidation images, protocols, FAQs

Submission Guidelines for Contributing Validation Data:

  • Document complete methodology (sample preparation, dilutions, incubation conditions)

  • Include positive and negative controls

  • Provide unedited original images

  • Describe observed limitations and failures

  • Specify lot number and source of antibody

Research demonstrates that community-driven antibody validation initiatives can significantly improve research reliability. For specialized antibodies like Os01g0587000 Antibody, which may have limited commercial validation, researcher contributions to validation repositories are particularly valuable for advancing the field .

How can researchers distinguish between true negative results and technical failures when using Os01g0587000 Antibody?

Distinguishing genuine negative results from technical failures requires a systematic approach:

1. Positive Control Implementation Strategy:

  • Include known Os01g0587000-expressing samples in each experiment

  • Use recombinant Os01g0587000 protein as absolute positive control

  • Include samples with confirmed expression by orthogonal methods

2. Technical Verification Protocol:

Verification StepPurposeImplementation
Antibody Activity CheckVerify antibody functionalityTest against known positive sample
Protocol ValidationConfirm procedure effectivenessRun established positive controls
Detection System TestVerify reagent functionalityUse generic primary/secondary antibody pairs
Sample Quality AssessmentConfirm protein integrityCoomassie staining, housekeeping protein detection

3. Systematic Troubleshooting Workflow:

  • Start with simple technical checks (buffer preparation, reagent expiration)

  • Progress to protocol modifications (increased antibody concentration, extended incubation)

  • Test alternative detection methods (different visualization techniques)

  • Consider biological factors (developmental regulation, tissue-specific expression)

4. Decision Matrix for Result Interpretation:

  • True negative: Positive controls work, multiple protocol variations tested

  • Technical failure: Positive controls fail, protocol issues identified

  • Inconclusive: Contradictory results between replicates or methods

Research indicates that distinguishing between true negatives and failures is particularly important for plant proteins, which may have tissue-specific or condition-dependent expression patterns. Studies show that validation using knockout controls provides the most definitive confirmation, but these may not always be available for specialized plant antibodies .

How might advanced antibody engineering improve Os01g0587000 detection and research applications?

Emerging antibody technologies offer opportunities to enhance Os01g0587000 research:

1. Next-Generation Antibody Formats:

TechnologyAdvantages for Os01g0587000 ResearchImplementation Challenges
Single-Chain AntibodiesSmaller size, Better tissue penetrationLower stability, Complex production
NanobodiesEnhanced access to cryptic epitopesLimited commercial availability
Recombinant Antibody FragmentsConsistent production, Reduced backgroundRequires molecular biology expertise
Bispecific AntibodiesSimultaneous detection of multiple targetsComplex validation requirements

2. Novel Production Platforms:

  • Plant-based expression systems for agricultural antibodies

  • Cell-free production methods for rapid customization

  • Yeast display technologies for affinity maturation

3. Enhanced Conjugation Strategies:

  • Site-specific conjugation to improve orientation and activity

  • Enzyme-mediated labeling for controlled stoichiometry

  • Click chemistry approaches for modular functionalization

4. Emerging Applications:

  • Intrabodies for in vivo tracking of Os01g0587000

  • Antibody-based biosensors for dynamic expression monitoring

  • Engineered antibodies for protein degradation (PROTAC-like approaches)

Research in antibody engineering has demonstrated significant improvements in specificity, affinity, and versatility through these advanced approaches. For specialized targets like plant proteins, these technologies may overcome limitations of traditional antibody methods .

What are the emerging trends in antibody validation that might impact Os01g0587000 Antibody research?

The field of antibody validation is rapidly evolving with several trends that will impact Os01g0587000 research:

1. Standardization Initiatives:

  • Development of minimum validation requirements for publication

  • Vendor-independent validation scoring systems

  • Application-specific validation guidelines

2. Advanced Validation Methodologies:

MethodologyImplementationBenefits for Os01g0587000 Research
CRISPR ScreensSystematic target knockoutGold-standard specificity confirmation
Super-Resolution ImagingEnhanced localization analysisMore precise spatial distribution data
Single-Cell ProteomicsCorrelative antibody validationCell-specific expression profiling
AI-Assisted AnalysisAutomated evaluation of staining patternsReduced subjective interpretation

3. Community-Driven Validation:

  • Collaborative validation efforts across laboratories

  • Pre-publication validation repositories

  • Open-access antibody characterization data

4. Multi-Parameter Validation:

  • Integration of multiple validation approaches

  • Weighted scoring systems for validation quality

  • Standardized reporting of validation parameters

Research on antibody validation has shown that combining multiple validation approaches significantly improves confidence in antibody specificity. Studies examining validation methods found that knockout-based validation provides the most reliable results, with 89% of antibodies validated by genetic approaches performing as expected compared to lower rates for other methods .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.