VGLL4 is a transcription cofactor that acts as a specific coactivator for mammalian TEFs (transcription enhancer factors). With a molecular weight of approximately 31 kDa, VGLL4 contains two Tondu (TDU) domains that are critical for its function .
VGLL4 has several important biological functions:
Tumor suppression: VGLL4 inhibits YAP-induced cell proliferation and tumorigenesis by competing with YAP for binding to TEADs, the core components of the Hippo pathway .
Immune regulation: VGLL4 regulates tumor PD-L1 expression and immune surveillance. It interacts with IRF2BP2 and promotes its protein stability through inhibiting proteasome-mediated protein degradation .
Transcriptional regulation: VGLL4 can trigger TEAD4 condensation by inducing its oligomerization, leading to DNA aggregation and transcriptional repression .
VGLL4 antibodies are utilized in multiple research applications, including:
Western Blot (WB): For detecting VGLL4 protein expression levels in cell and tissue lysates .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For examining VGLL4 localization and expression patterns in tissue sections .
Immunofluorescence (IF): For subcellular localization studies, particularly to differentiate between nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution .
Immunoprecipitation: For studying protein-protein interactions, particularly with TEADs and IRF2BP2 .
Different applications require specific antibody characteristics, so researchers should select antibodies validated for their particular experimental approach.
VGLL4 is widely expressed across many tissue types. According to immunohistochemistry studies on normal human tissues:
Normal lung tissue demonstrates high nuclear VGLL4 expression, with 92.6% (25 out of 27) of samples showing strong nuclear staining .
VGLL4 demonstrates predominantly nuclear localization in normal tissues, but a more diffused cytoplasmic pattern in cancer tissues, particularly lung adenocarcinomas .
VGLL4 is also expressed in heart tissue, where it was initially characterized as a regulator of TEF-1-dependent promoters .
Understanding this normal expression pattern is critical for comparative studies with diseased tissues.
For optimal VGLL4 detection by immunohistochemistry:
Antibody selection: Choose antibodies specifically validated for IHC applications. For example, product HPA038225 is recommended at dilutions of 1:50-1:200 for IHC applications .
Antigen retrieval: Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) is generally effective for VGLL4 detection.
Dilution optimization: Perform a titration experiment using different antibody dilutions (starting with manufacturer recommendations) on known positive control tissues.
Controls:
Detection system: A polymer-based detection system generally provides better sensitivity and lower background compared to ABC methods.
Counterstaining: Light hematoxylin counterstaining allows for better visualization of nuclear VGLL4 localization.
For successful Western blot detection of VGLL4:
Protein extraction: Use RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors to prevent degradation during extraction.
Sample preparation:
Gel selection: Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels, as VGLL4 has a calculated molecular weight of 31 kDa.
Transfer conditions:
Semi-dry or wet transfer at 100V for 60-90 minutes.
Use PVDF membrane for better protein retention.
Blocking:
Antibody dilution:
Detection: ECL-based detection systems with exposure times around 60 seconds are generally sufficient .
Controls: Include positive control lysates from cells known to express VGLL4 (such as normal lung tissue extracts).
To investigate VGLL4's role in cancer immune evasion, consider these methodological approaches:
Syngeneic tumor models:
Use murine syngeneic models (like LLC lung cancer or MB49 bladder cancer cells) that comprise intact immune systems .
Compare tumor growth in Vgll4-knockdown versus control cells in both immune-competent and immune-compromised mice to distinguish between direct growth effects and immune-mediated effects .
T-cell infiltration analysis:
T-cell depletion experiments:
Deplete specific T-cell populations (CD4+, CD8+, or both) using blocking antibodies to determine which T-cell subset mediates tumor regression in VGLL4-deficient tumors .
The experimental data shows that "depletion of both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells yielded much larger tumor formation" in mice with Vgll4-knockdown tumors .
PD-L1 expression analysis:
Promoter activity assays:
To investigate VGLL4's interaction with the Hippo pathway components:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use VGLL4 antibodies to pull down protein complexes and probe for TEAD family members.
Alternatively, use TEAD antibodies for immunoprecipitation and detect VGLL4 in the precipitates.
Include YAP in the analysis to examine competitive binding between YAP and VGLL4 to TEADs.
Domain mapping:
Transcriptional activity assays:
Use TEAD-responsive luciferase reporters to measure how VGLL4 affects YAP/TEAD-mediated transcription.
Compare wild-type VGLL4 with mutant versions that cannot bind TEADs.
Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) analysis:
ChIP-seq analysis:
Map TEAD4 genomic binding sites in the presence and absence of VGLL4.
Examine how VGLL4 affects the recruitment of transcriptional machinery to TEAD target genes.
To effectively investigate VGLL4's subcellular localization patterns:
Subcellular fractionation:
Separate nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions biochemically.
Analyze VGLL4 protein levels in each fraction by Western blot.
Include proper loading controls for each fraction (e.g., histone H3 for nuclear, GAPDH for cytoplasmic).
Immunofluorescence microscopy:
Tissue microarray analysis:
Compare VGLL4 localization across multiple normal and cancer tissue samples.
Use quantitative image analysis to score nuclear versus cytoplasmic staining intensity.
In lung adenocarcinoma studies, "92.6% of patients (25 out of 27) exhibited high nuclear VGLL4 expression in their normal lungs, whereas only 22.1% of patients (17 out of 77) had high nuclear expression of VGLL4 in their lung ADCs" .
Correlation with disease progression:
Analyze how VGLL4 localization changes with cancer stage and grade.
Correlate localization patterns with patient outcomes.
Discrepancies between VGLL4 mRNA and protein levels can occur for several reasons:
Post-transcriptional regulation:
Post-translational modifications:
Technical limitations:
Antibody specificity: Some antibodies may not detect all VGLL4 isoforms.
Protein extraction efficiency: Nuclear proteins can be more difficult to extract completely.
Biological compartmentalization:
To address these discrepancies, researchers should:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Validate findings with orthogonal methods (e.g., mass spectrometry)
Consider analyzing both total and subcellular fraction levels
To minimize non-specific binding with VGLL4 antibodies:
Antibody validation:
Use VGLL4 knockout or knockdown samples as negative controls.
Test antibodies on tissues known to express different levels of VGLL4.
Verify specificity using peptide competition assays, where the antibody is pre-incubated with the immunogen peptide.
Blocking optimization:
Test different blocking agents: BSA, casein, normal serum from the secondary antibody host species.
Extend blocking time to 2 hours or overnight at 4°C for difficult samples.
Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 in blocking buffer for intracellular antigens.
Antibody dilution:
Washing protocols:
Increase number and duration of washes.
Use TBS with 0.1% Tween-20 for more stringent washing.
Consider adding 0.05-0.1% SDS to wash buffer for very sticky antibodies.
Secondary antibody considerations:
Pre-adsorb secondary antibodies against tissues from the species being studied.
Use highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies.
Consider using fluorescent secondaries for better signal-to-noise ratio in immunofluorescence.
When facing contradictory findings about VGLL4's role in cancer:
To study VGLL4's involvement in liquid-liquid phase separation:
In vitro phase separation assays:
FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching):
Tag TEAD4 and VGLL4 with fluorescent proteins.
Measure protein dynamics within condensates.
Compare recovery rates with and without VGLL4.
DNA interaction studies:
Mutational analysis:
Chromatin organization:
Investigate how VGLL4-induced TEAD4 condensation affects chromatin accessibility.
Examine changes in histone modifications and transcriptional activity.
Research found that the "CTGF gene showed weaker CTCF, Pol II and H3K27ac signals in HEK293FT cells transfected with VGLL4 than in the negative control" .
VGLL4 research presents several therapeutic opportunities:
Cancer immunotherapy enhancement:
Hippo pathway modulation:
Transcriptional condensate targeting:
Biomarker development:
Combinatorial approaches: