vhp-1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
vhp-1 antibody; F08B1.1Tyrosine-protein phosphatase vhp-1 antibody; EC 3.1.3.48 antibody; Vh1 dual specificity phosphatase family protein 1 antibody
Target Names
vhp-1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
VHP-1 antibody acts preferentially on the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPKs. It plays a crucial role in the heavy metal stress response and in axon regeneration by negatively regulating the kgb-1 (JNK-like) and the pmk-1 (p38-type) MAPK signaling pathways.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. VHP-1 mediates a novel JNK-like signaling pathway in stress response. PMID: 15116070
Database Links

STRING: 6239.F08B1.1a.3

UniGene: Cel.8018

Protein Families
Protein-tyrosine phosphatase family, Non-receptor class dual specificity subfamily
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in the pharynx, intestine, neurons and vulval hypodermal cells.

Q&A

What is VHP-1 and what are its primary functions in C. elegans?

VHP-1 is a dual-specificity MAPK phosphatase (MKP) in Caenorhabditis elegans that preferentially dephosphorylates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPKs. VHP-1 plays a pivotal role in regulating stress responses to heavy metals by negatively regulating the KGB-1 MAPK pathway, which consists of MLK-1 (MAPKKK), MEK-1 (MAPKK), and KGB-1 (MAPK) . Loss-of-function mutations in vhp-1 cause larval arrest during development, demonstrating its essential role in normal developmental progression . The genetic evidence suggests that this developmental arrest is caused by hyperactivation of the KGB-1 pathway, as mutations in pathway components can suppress the vhp-1 defect .

How is VHP-1 structurally characterized?

VHP-1 contains an N-terminal rhodanase homology domain with an MAPK-interacting motif, and an extended active-site sequence motif Ile/Val-His-Cys-X-X-Gly-X-Ser-Arg-Ser (where X represents any amino acid) that is conserved across all MKPs . Within this catalytic motif, three amino acids (Cys-262, Ser-269, and Asp-231) are critical participants in the dual-specificity phosphatase activity mechanism . The vhp-1 gene in C. elegans has seven exons, and the protein shows highest homology to mammalian MKP-7, which also preferentially targets JNK and p38 MAPKs .

How does VHP-1 substrate specificity compare to other phosphatases?

VHP-1 demonstrates clear substrate preferences among MAPK family members. Biochemical studies have shown that VHP-1 efficiently dephosphorylates JNK2 and p38α but not ERK2 . This contrasts with LIP-1, another C. elegans phosphatase that specifically dephosphorylates ERK2 but shows minimal activity toward JNK2 or p38α . These substrate specificities align with their developmental functions, as summarized in the table below:

MAPKVHP-1 DephosphorylationLIP-1 DephosphorylationBiological Significance
JNK2EfficientInefficientStress response regulation
p38αEfficientInefficientImmune response regulation
ERK2InefficientEfficientOocyte meiotic arrest regulation

What expression systems are most effective for studying VHP-1 localization?

For studying VHP-1 expression and localization patterns, translational fusions between vhp-1 (including both promoter and coding sequences) and green fluorescent protein (GFP) have proven effective . Researchers have successfully generated vhp-1∷gfp constructs that maintain functional activity in C. elegans . When expressed in transgenic worms, VHP-1∷GFP fusion proteins reveal expression throughout development in multiple tissues including the pharynx, intestine, neurons, and vulval hypodermal cells . This approach allows for both spatial and temporal analysis of VHP-1 expression while confirming functionality through rescue experiments.

How can VHP-1 phosphatase activity be assayed in vitro?

To assess VHP-1 phosphatase activity in vitro, researchers typically employ immunoprecipitation of tagged VHP-1 followed by in vitro dephosphorylation assays. A proven methodology involves:

  • Expression of epitope-tagged VHP-1 (e.g., Myc-VHP-1) in an appropriate expression system

  • Immunoprecipitation of the tagged protein using anti-epitope antibodies

  • Preparation of phosphorylated MAPK substrates (JNK2, p38α) using activating kinases

  • Incubation of phosphorylated MAPKs with the immunoprecipitated VHP-1

  • Analysis of phosphorylation status by immunoblotting with antibodies that specifically recognize phosphorylated forms of each MAPK

This approach has successfully demonstrated VHP-1's preferential activity toward JNK and p38 MAPKs compared to ERK2 .

What genetic approaches are most informative for VHP-1 functional analysis?

The most informative genetic approaches for VHP-1 functional analysis include:

  • Null mutations: The vhp-1(km20) deletion mutation removes 876 base pairs encoding a section of the catalytic domain, creating a presumptive null allele that causes larval arrest .

  • Suppressor screens: Screening for suppressors of the vhp-1(km20) larval arrest phenotype has successfully identified components of the KGB-1 pathway, including mutations in kgb-1, mek-1, and mlk-1 .

  • RNAi knockdown: Partial depletion of VHP-1 through RNAi produces phenotypes distinct from the null mutation, including poor health, exploded vulva, and sluggish behavior .

  • Double mutant analysis: Combining vhp-1 mutations with mutations in potential interacting genes helps establish genetic hierarchies, as demonstrated with the CEH-37 transcription factor and components of the MAPK pathways .

How does VHP-1 function in pathogen resistance mechanisms?

VHP-1 plays a critical role in pathogen resistance through regulation of the PMK-1/p38 MAPK pathway. The homeodomain transcription factor CEH-37 affects PMK-1 activation by regulating VHP-1 levels . In ceh-37(ok272) mutant animals, vhp-1 transcript levels are significantly elevated, resulting in decreased phosphorylation of PMK-1 and increased susceptibility to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection . Knockdown of vhp-1 in ceh-37(ok272) mutants restores pathogen resistance to wild-type levels, confirming that CEH-37 regulates pathogen resistance through VHP-1-mediated control of PMK-1 activity .

The genetic interactions are summarized in the following table:

GenotypeVHP-1 LevelsPMK-1 PhosphorylationPathogen Resistance
Wild-typeBaselineNormalNormal
ceh-37(ok272)IncreasedDecreasedDecreased
vhp-1 RNAiDecreasedIncreasedIncreased
ceh-37(ok272) + vhp-1 RNAiRestored to normalRestored to normalRestored to normal

How do mutations in the VHP-1 pathway affect stress response and development?

Mutations in VHP-1 and related pathway components reveal intricate relationships between stress response and development. The key genetic interactions include:

GenotypePhenotypeImplication for Research
vhp-1(km20)Larval arrestVHP-1 is essential for development beyond L2/L3 stage
vhp-1(km20); kgb-1(km21)Suppression of larval arrestKGB-1 hyperactivation causes vhp-1 phenotype
vhp-1(km20); mek-1(ks54)Suppression of larval arrestMEK-1 acts upstream in the same pathway
vhp-1(km20); mlk-1(km701)Suppression of larval arrestMLK-1 is the MAPKKK in this pathway
kgb-1, mek-1, mlk-1 mutantsHypersensitivity to heavy metalsPathway mediates stress protection

These genetic interactions demonstrate that VHP-1 negatively regulates the MLK-1/MEK-1/KGB-1 pathway, and that the hyperactivation of this pathway in vhp-1 mutants leads to developmental arrest, while regulated activation is required for normal stress responses .

What is the significance of the CEH-37/VHP-1/PMK-1 regulatory axis?

The CEH-37/VHP-1/PMK-1 regulatory axis represents a critical immune regulatory mechanism in C. elegans. CEH-37 functions as a transcriptional regulator of vhp-1, with ceh-37 mutants showing elevated vhp-1 transcript levels . This elevation leads to increased VHP-1 phosphatase activity, resulting in decreased PMK-1 phosphorylation and compromised immune responses . The relationship is unidirectional, as ceh-37 mRNA levels are not affected in vhp-1 RNAi animals, while vhp-1 transcript levels are significantly increased in ceh-37 mutants .

This finding provides a model in which CEH-37 decreases VHP-1 phosphatase activity, allowing increased stimulation of PMK-1/p38 MAPK signaling and enhanced resistance to pathogen infection . This regulatory axis demonstrates how transcriptional control of phosphatases can fine-tune immune signaling pathways.

How can researchers distinguish between direct and indirect effects of VHP-1 on MAPK pathways?

Distinguishing direct from indirect effects of VHP-1 on MAPK pathways requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • In vitro dephosphorylation assays: Using purified VHP-1 and phosphorylated MAPKs to demonstrate direct enzymatic activity, as shown with JNK2 and p38α .

  • Phosphatase-dead VHP-1 mutants: Creating catalytically inactive VHP-1 by mutating critical residues (Cys-262, Ser-269, or Asp-231) to distinguish between catalytic and scaffold functions .

  • Temporal analysis: Measuring the kinetics of MAPK dephosphorylation after acute manipulation of VHP-1 levels.

  • Substrate-trapping mutants: Developing VHP-1 variants that bind but don't release substrates to identify direct targets in vivo.

  • Phosphoproteomics: Comparing phosphorylation profiles between wild-type and vhp-1 mutants to identify direct and indirect targets across the proteome.

What methodological challenges exist in developing specific antibodies against VHP-1?

Development of specific antibodies against VHP-1 presents several methodological challenges:

  • Epitope selection: Identifying unique regions of VHP-1 that don't cross-react with other phosphatases, particularly those with similar catalytic domains.

  • Validation strategies: Confirming specificity using vhp-1 null mutants as negative controls and testing for cross-reactivity with related phosphatases.

  • Post-translational modifications: Determining whether VHP-1 undergoes modifications that might affect antibody recognition in different cellular contexts.

  • Structural considerations: The catalytic domains of phosphatases share structural similarities, requiring careful epitope selection to avoid cross-reactivity.

  • Application-specific validation: Ensuring antibodies work in multiple applications (Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunohistochemistry) relevant to VHP-1 research.

How might VHP-1 research in C. elegans translate to understanding mammalian MKP function?

VHP-1 research in C. elegans provides valuable insights into mammalian MKP function through several translational approaches:

  • Comparative analysis: VHP-1 is most similar to mammalian MKP-7, suggesting potential conservation of regulatory mechanisms and functions .

  • Genetic pathways: The VHP-1/KGB-1 pathway in C. elegans may have parallels to mammalian JNK regulation by MKP-7, potentially informing therapeutic approaches for diseases involving JNK dysregulation.

  • Developmental roles: The essential developmental function of VHP-1 suggests investigation into potential developmental roles for MKP-7 in mammals.

  • Transcriptional regulation: The CEH-37/VHP-1 regulatory axis may have mammalian counterparts, where homeodomain transcription factors regulate MKP expression .

  • Drug discovery platform: C. elegans VHP-1 mutants provide a genetically tractable system for identifying and testing modulators of MAPK phosphatase activity that might have therapeutic potential in mammalian systems.

What controls are essential when using VHP-1 antibodies in immunoblotting experiments?

When conducting immunoblotting experiments with VHP-1 antibodies, researchers should implement these essential controls:

  • Negative control: Lysates from vhp-1 null mutants to verify antibody specificity .

  • Positive control: Lysates from animals overexpressing VHP-1 or recombinant VHP-1 protein.

  • Loading control: Probing for a housekeeping protein to ensure equal loading across samples.

  • Specificity control: Testing potential cross-reactivity with other phosphatases, particularly those with similar catalytic domains.

  • Treatment validation: Including samples with known modulators of VHP-1 expression or activity, such as CEH-37 mutants that affect VHP-1 levels .

How can researchers optimize immunoprecipitation protocols for VHP-1 functional studies?

For optimal immunoprecipitation of VHP-1 in functional studies, researchers should consider:

  • Buffer optimization: Testing different lysis and wash buffers to maintain VHP-1 phosphatase activity.

  • Tagged constructs: Using epitope-tagged VHP-1 (e.g., Myc-VHP-1) for efficient immunoprecipitation .

  • Binding conditions: Optimizing antibody binding conditions to maximize pull-down efficiency while minimizing non-specific interactions.

  • Activity preservation: Including phosphatase inhibitors selectively to prevent sample autodephosphorylation while preserving VHP-1 activity for in vitro assays.

  • Substrate co-immunoprecipitation: Examining interactions with known substrates like KGB-1 or PMK-1 to confirm physiological relevance .

These optimized protocols enable researchers to reliably study VHP-1 enzymatic activity and protein-protein interactions that regulate MAPK signaling pathways.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.