VN1R1 is a member of the vomeronasal receptor family, primarily localized in the olfactory mucosa. It plays a role in detecting pheromones, influencing behaviors such as mating and social interaction . The VN1R1 antibody (e.g., PACO61145, PA5-34308) is a polyclonal reagent produced in rabbits, designed to target human VN1R1 with high specificity. It is widely used in Western blot (WB), immunofluorescence (IF), and ELISA .
Western Blotting: Detects VN1R1 in lysates from HeLa, A549, and PC-3 cell lines .
Immunofluorescence: Localizes VN1R1 in fixed/permeabilized cells (e.g., Hela cells) .
Immunohistochemistry: Identifies VN1R1 expression in human kidney, breast carcinoma, and olfactory mucosa .
Specificity: No cross-reactivity with other human proteins confirmed via BLAST analysis .
Functional Studies: Used to demonstrate VN1R1’s response to volatile compounds like Hedione, suggesting its role in hormonal modulation .
VN1R1 is expressed in the olfactory mucosa and weakly in the brain, lung, and kidney .
A 2019 study linked VN1R1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to gender-specific sociosexual behavior .
The VN1R1 antibody’s efficacy stems from combinatorial diversity in immunoglobulin genes, including:
Somatic hypermutation: Enhances antigen affinity in mature B cells .
These processes enable the production of high-specificity polyclonal antibodies against VN1R1’s variable regions .
Current research focuses on:
VN1R1 (vomeronasal 1 receptor 1) is recognized as the only functional pheromone receptor in humans. This receptor belongs to the G-protein coupled receptor family and responds to water-soluble chemical signals (pheromones) that elicit neuroendocrine and physiological changes within the same species . The protein is primarily localized to the olfactory mucosa and functions within chemosensory signal transduction pathways .
Two allelic variants (1a and 1b) have been identified in the human population at frequencies of 26.35% and 73.65% respectively, present in both males and females, suggesting these allelic differences are not gender-specific . These variants potentially cause minor conformational changes in the protein structure and transmembrane domains, as demonstrated by TMHMM software simulation, though these differences appear unlikely to contribute to distinct gender-specific behaviors .
VN1R1 antibodies have demonstrated utility across multiple experimental techniques:
When selecting application methods, researchers should consider that VN1R1 is a transmembrane protein with approximately 40 kDa molecular weight . For optimal results, preliminary titration experiments are recommended to determine ideal antibody concentrations for specific experimental conditions.
Validation of VN1R1 antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach:
Positive and negative controls: Utilize tissue or cell lines with confirmed VN1R1 expression (olfactory mucosa) as positive controls, while using non-expressing tissues as negative controls.
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide before application. Signal reduction/elimination confirms specificity to the target epitope. Synthetic peptide immunogens derived from human VN1R1 (amino acid range 150-230) can be utilized for this purpose .
Knockdown validation: Employ siRNA or CRISPR techniques to reduce VN1R1 expression, then confirm corresponding reduction in antibody signal.
Multiple antibody comparison: Test antibodies raised against different epitopes of VN1R1 to confirm consistent detection patterns.
Western blot migration pattern: Verify appropriate molecular weight (approximately 40 kDa) and band pattern consistent with expected protein size and potential post-translational modifications.
The allelic variants of VN1R1 (1a and 1b) introduce conformational changes that may affect antibody recognition, particularly for conformation-dependent epitopes. Studies using TMHMM software simulation have demonstrated that these allelic differences potentially alter protein conformation and transmembrane domain structures .
When selecting antibodies for research involving populations with mixed genotypes:
Epitope mapping: Choose antibodies targeting conserved regions between allelic variants. For example, commercially available antibodies targeting the C-terminal epitope "SSDLNENQHP" may provide more consistent results across variants .
Cross-reactivity testing: Validate antibody performance against recombinant proteins representing both 1a and 1b alleles to ensure equivalent detection sensitivity.
Population considerations: In studies involving the Hellenic population, account for the documented allele frequencies (26.35% for 1a and 73.65% for 1b) when interpreting quantitative results.
For critical applications, researchers may need to genotype samples to correctly interpret antibody binding patterns or develop allele-specific antibodies for differential detection.
Distinguishing functional VN1R1 from pseudogenes in primates requires specialized methodology:
Functional expression analysis: Heterologous expression systems (e.g., HEK293 cells) coupled with calcium imaging or electrophysiology can assess receptor functionality upon ligand exposure.
Sequence integrity assessment: PCR amplification and sequencing to identify hallmarks of pseudogenization (premature stop codons, frameshift mutations) as observed in chimpanzee and orangutan V1RL1 genes, which are pseudogenes, while the gorilla ortholog remains potentially functional .
Transcriptional activity: RT-PCR and RNA-Seq analysis to detect active transcription, noting that transcription alone doesn't guarantee functional protein production.
Evolutionary analysis: Computational comparison of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates (dN/dS) to identify selective pressure patterns indicative of functional maintenance or pseudogenization.
Tissue-specific expression: In situ hybridization to localize expression to relevant sensory tissues. While human VN1R1 expresses in olfactory mucosa, other primates may have expression in the vomeronasal organ if present and functional .
Research indicates that primate V1R gene families have evolved independently, with each species relying on VNO-mediated sensory function possessing unique functional vomeronasal genes .
VN1R1 detection presents several technical challenges researchers should anticipate:
Membrane protein solubilization: As a seven-transmembrane domain protein, VN1R1 requires specialized detergents for efficient extraction while maintaining native conformation. Recommended approaches include:
Non-ionic detergents (e.g., Triton X-100, NP-40) at 0.5-1% concentration
Sample heating limited to 37°C to prevent aggregation
Addition of reducing agents to maintain disulfide bonds
Low endogenous expression: VN1R1 typically exhibits low expression levels, necessitating:
Signal amplification techniques for immunodetection
Concentration of protein samples before analysis
Extended exposure times for Western blots
Cross-reactivity with related receptors: The V1R family contains multiple members with sequence homology, requiring:
Careful antibody selection targeting unique epitopes
Validation in knockout/knockdown systems
Absorption controls with related proteins
Fixation optimization for microscopy:
4% paraformaldehyde recommended for immunocytochemistry
Methanol fixation may better preserve transmembrane epitopes
Antigen retrieval often necessary for formalin-fixed tissues
Alternative splice variant detection: Since an alternate splice variant is thought to exist , researchers should consider:
Using antibodies targeting common regions
Employing multiple antibodies to different domains
RT-PCR validation of specific transcript variants
Immunoprecipitation (IP) of VN1R1 requires specialized protocols to maintain protein structure and interacting partners:
Cell/tissue preparation:
Harvest cells/tissues in cold PBS with protease inhibitors
Homogenize tissues in buffers containing 1% digitonin or 0.5% DDM (n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside) to preserve membrane protein complexes
Maintain samples at 4°C throughout processing
Antibody selection and immobilization:
Washing and elution:
Use gentle detergent concentrations (0.1%) in wash buffers
Consider native elution with excess immunizing peptide
For denaturing elution, use 0.1M glycine pH 2.5 followed by immediate neutralization
Co-IP verification:
Confirm interactions by reciprocal IP when possible
Validate with alternative techniques (proximity ligation assay, FRET)
Include negative controls (IgG, unrelated membrane protein)
Mass spectrometry preparation:
Filter samples through PVDF membrane to remove detergent
Perform on-bead digestion to minimize protein loss
Include GPCR-specific peptide identification parameters in analysis
When investigating VN1R1 expression patterns:
Tissue selection: Prioritize olfactory mucosa samples where VN1R1 is primarily localized . Secondary tissues to consider include:
Olfactory bulb
Brain regions associated with pheromone processing
Endocrine tissues potentially responsive to pheromone signaling
Species considerations: Remember that VN1R1 functionality varies across primates:
Detection methodology matrix:
| Method | Advantages | Limitations | Recommended Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| qRT-PCR | High sensitivity, quantitative | Doesn't confirm protein expression | No-RT controls, reference genes |
| Western Blot | Confirms protein size | Limited spatial information | Blocking peptide control |
| IHC/ICC | Cellular/subcellular localization | Fixation artifacts | Secondary-only, peptide competition |
| In situ hybridization | mRNA localization in tissue context | Doesn't confirm translation | Sense probe control |
| RNA-Seq | Comprehensive transcript analysis | Bulk tissue dilutes signal | Tissue-matched controls |
Allele-specific considerations: In population studies, consider the distribution of 1a (26.35%) and 1b (73.65%) alleles and their potential impact on expression quantification.
When facing inconsistent VN1R1 antibody staining results:
Antibody validation hierarchy:
Prioritize antibodies with multiple validation methods (WB, IHC, ICC)
Consider polyclonal antibodies that recognize multiple epitopes for initial screening
Follow with monoclonal antibodies for confirming specific domains
Epitope accessibility analysis:
Different fixation methods may mask or expose specific epitopes
Compare membrane permeabilization techniques (saponin vs. Triton X-100)
Test antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced vs. enzymatic)
Cross-reactivity investigation:
Perform peptide competition with specific and related peptides
Include positive controls from tissues with confirmed expression
Test in systems with genetic manipulation of VN1R1 expression
Technical variables standardization:
Standardize tissue processing time
Control antibody lot variations
Normalize exposure/development times
Data integration approach:
Consider convergent validity from multiple antibodies
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression
Validate with orthogonal techniques (e.g., mass spectrometry)
For rigorous quantitative analysis of VN1R1 expression:
Western blot densitometry:
Normalize VN1R1 band intensity to established loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH)
Use standard curves with recombinant VN1R1 protein for absolute quantification
Employ statistical tests appropriate for data distribution (typically non-parametric for protein expression)
Immunohistochemistry quantification:
Measure staining intensity using calibrated optical density
Count positive cells as percentage of total population
Assess subcellular localization changes using colocalization coefficients
qRT-PCR analysis:
Select appropriate reference genes for the tissue being studied
Apply 2^-ΔΔCt method for relative quantification
Consider allele-specific primers to distinguish 1a and 1b variants
Statistical considerations:
Data visualization:
Present individual data points alongside means/medians
Use log scales for expression data with wide dynamic ranges
Include representative images alongside quantitative graphs
When mRNA and protein expression of VN1R1 don't correlate:
Post-transcriptional regulation assessment:
Examine miRNA targeting VN1R1 mRNA (in silico prediction followed by experimental validation)
Analyze mRNA stability using actinomycin D chase experiments
Investigate alternative splicing patterns affecting antibody recognition sites
Translational efficiency analysis:
Perform polysome profiling to determine translation rates
Examine regulatory elements in 5' and 3' UTRs
Assess codon optimization and rare codon usage
Protein stability evaluation:
Conduct cycloheximide chase experiments to determine protein half-life
Investigate proteasomal and lysosomal degradation pathways
Examine post-translational modifications affecting stability
Technical validation:
Confirm primer specificity for distinguishing functional VN1R1 from pseudogenes
Validate antibody specificity through multiple approaches
Use absolute quantification methods for both mRNA and protein
Biological interpretation framework:
Consider temporal delays between transcription and translation
Evaluate tissue-specific regulation mechanisms
Assess potential technical limitations in detecting membrane proteins
To investigate VN1R1 signaling mechanisms:
Expression system selection:
HEK293 cells provide good GPCR expression and minimal endogenous background
Olfactory/nasal cell lines offer more physiologically relevant contexts
Primary olfactory neurons for highest physiological relevance, though technically challenging
Functional readout methods:
| Signaling Aspect | Methodology | Temporal Resolution | Spatial Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| G-protein coupling | BRET/FRET biosensors | Milliseconds-seconds | Subcellular |
| Calcium signaling | Fura-2, Fluo-4, GCaMP | Milliseconds | Cellular/subcellular |
| cAMP production | EPAC-based FRET sensors | Seconds | Subcellular |
| Arrestin recruitment | BRET, protein complementation | Seconds-minutes | Cellular |
| Receptor internalization | pHluorin-tagged receptors | Minutes | Subcellular |
Signal pathway dissection:
Pharmacological inhibitors of specific G-protein subtypes
Dominant negative constructs for pathway components
CRISPR-mediated knockout of signaling proteins
Receptor mutagenesis strategy:
Data integration:
Combine live-cell imaging with biochemical assays
Correlate signaling dynamics with downstream transcriptional responses
Validate in heterologous systems with in vivo findings
For optimal co-localization analysis with VN1R1:
| Issue | Possible Causes | Recommended Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal in Western blot | Insufficient protein extraction | Use stronger detergents (1% SDS); avoid boiling transmembrane proteins |
| Epitope masking | Try reducing and non-reducing conditions; different blocking agents | |
| Low expression levels | Increase protein loading; use concentrated samples | |
| High background in IHC/ICC | Non-specific binding | Optimize blocking (try 5% BSA, normal serum); increase washing duration |
| Autofluorescence | Use Sudan Black B treatment; employ spectral unmixing | |
| Cross-reactivity | Pre-absorb antibody; use more specific antibodies | |
| Multiple bands in Western blot | Splice variants | Compare with predicted molecular weights; verify with RT-PCR |
| Glycosylation | Treat with deglycosylation enzymes before SDS-PAGE | |
| Degradation | Add additional protease inhibitors; process samples quickly | |
| Inconsistent results between antibodies | Epitope accessibility | Try multiple fixation methods; test different epitope retrieval techniques |
| Differential specificity | Validate each antibody with peptide competition; use multiple antibodies | |
| Lot-to-lot variation | Purchase larger lots for long-term studies; validate each new lot |
Effective extraction of VN1R1 requires tissue-specific considerations:
Olfactory tissue protocol:
Harvest tissue in ice-cold PBS with protease inhibitors
Homogenize in buffer containing 1% digitonin or 0.5% DDM
Include phosphatase inhibitors to preserve signaling-dependent modifications
Consider using sucrose density gradient for membrane enrichment
Cell culture optimization:
Collect cells by gentle scraping rather than trypsinization
Lyse in buffer with 1% Triton X-100 and 0.1% SDS
Sonicate briefly (3-5 seconds) to shear DNA without damaging proteins
Centrifuge at 15,000g to separate membrane fractions
Protein solubilization matrix:
| Detergent | Concentration | Best For | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| DDM | 0.5-1% | Native conformation | Expensive, can interfere with some assays |
| Digitonin | 1% | Preserving protein complexes | Variable purity between lots |
| CHAPS | 0.5-1% | Mass spectrometry compatibility | Less efficient for some membranes |
| Triton X-100 | 1% | General purpose extraction | May disrupt some protein interactions |
| SDS | 0.1-0.5% | Maximum extraction efficiency | Denatures proteins, disrupts interactions |
Sample processing considerations:
Maintain samples at 4°C throughout preparation
Use siliconized tubes to prevent protein adhesion
Consider adding 10% glycerol to stabilize proteins during storage
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles (aliquot before freezing)
Verification methods:
Assess extraction efficiency with Western blot for VN1R1
Verify membrane fraction enrichment with Na+/K+ ATPase markers
Perform extraction protocol validation with known controls before critical experiments
Emerging methodologies with potential to advance VN1R1 research:
Single-cell transcriptomics/proteomics:
Enables identification of VN1R1-expressing cell subpopulations
Reveals co-expression patterns with signal transduction machinery
Allows trajectory analysis of developmental expression patterns
CRISPR-based technologies:
Precise genome editing to introduce reporter tags at endogenous loci
Creation of conditional knockout models to study tissue-specific functions
Base editing to recapitulate and study natural VN1R1 variants (1a/1b)
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy (STORM/PALM) for nanoscale localization
Expansion microscopy to physically enlarge samples for improved resolution
Lattice light-sheet microscopy for long-term live imaging with minimal phototoxicity
Structural biology approaches:
Cryo-EM for membrane protein structure determination
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for mapping ligand interaction sites
In silico molecular dynamics simulations based on structural data
Functional genomics integration:
Multi-omics approaches combining genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data
Functional validation using high-throughput screening platforms
Precision animal models with humanized VN1R1 sequences
The potential implications of VN1R1 allelic variation for personalized medicine:
Sensory perception differences:
Investigate whether 1a/1b variants correlate with olfactory discrimination capabilities
Examine potential associations with susceptibility to specific olfactory disorders
Study the influence on pheromone-mediated behavioral responses
Pharmacogenomic considerations:
Determine if allelic variants show differential responses to olfactory-targeting therapeutics
Investigate variant-specific interactions with odorant-binding proteins
Develop allele-specific targeting strategies for potential therapeutic applications
Population-based approaches:
Clinical research applications:
Study correlations between variants and neuroendocrine conditions
Investigate potential relationships with social behavior disorders
Examine associations with developmental timing of puberty and reproductive biology
Methodological considerations:
Develop high-throughput genotyping assays specific for 1a/1b variants
Create allele-specific antibodies for protein-level differentiation
Design functional assays sensitive to conformational differences between variants