51 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
51 antibody; Putative protein p51 antibody
Target Names
51
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What experimental strategies validate the specificity of antibodies targeting phosphorylated residues like Ser51 in eIF2α?

Basic Research Focus
Validation requires multi-modal approaches combining genetic and biochemical controls. For phospho-specific antibodies (e.g., Phospho-eIF2α Ser51), use:

  • CRISPR-Cas9 knockout (KO) cell lines to confirm signal loss in target-deficient models .

  • Peptide competition assays with phosphorylated vs. non-phosphorylated peptides to verify epitope dependency .

  • Time-course treatments with phosphatase inhibitors (e.g., calyculin A) to assess phosphorylation-dependent signal modulation .

Data Example:

Validation MethodPhospho-eIF2α Signal (KO vs. WT)Specificity Score
Western BlotUndetectable in KO cells100% Specific
ImmunofluorescenceNuclear localization retained89% Specific

Key Consideration: Cross-reactivity with homologous phosphorylation sites (e.g., Thr52 in ATF2) must be ruled out via mutagenesis .

How can researchers resolve discrepancies in thermal stability data between in-silico designed antibodies and traditional therapeutic antibodies?

Advanced Research Focus
Discrepancies often arise from differences in hydrophobic core packing or VH:VL domain interactions. To address this:

  • Perform differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to compare melting temperatures (Tm) between groups .

  • Use molecular dynamics simulations to identify unstable regions in CDR loops .

  • Validate with accelerated stability studies (4°C, 25°C, 40°C) over 28 days .

Case Study:
Lab I reported Fab Tm = 68°C for in-silico antibodies vs. Tm = 65°C for clinical-stage antibodies, while Lab II observed tighter stability distributions (CV < 5%) . Contradictions may stem from transient transfection variability or backbone engineering (e.g., IgG1KO(LALA) vs. native isotypes) .

What methodological safeguards prevent unintended immune stimulation during in vivo studies using 51Cr-labeled antibodies?

Basic Research Focus
51Cr labeling can trigger antibody production against RBC antigens. Mitigation strategies include:

  • Pre-screening serum for pre-existing alloantibodies via monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) .

  • Limiting RBC infusion volumes to ≤1 mL and monitoring titer changes over 7–9 months .

  • Using autologous RBCs or ABO-matched donors to minimize antigenic rechallenge .

Data Contradiction:

Patient GroupAntibody Titer IncreaseMMA Positivity Rate
Pre-51Cr0/60%
Post-51Cr3/6 (>10 score)17% (1/6)

How do germline-encoded motifs influence antibody binding to public epitopes near residue 51?

Advanced Research Focus
Germline-encoded amino acid-binding (GRAB) motifs in VH/VL domains drive recurrent recognition of epitopes like EBV gp51 . Structural analysis reveals:

  • K/R51 in CDR-H2 forms salt bridges with acidic residues (e.g., D39 in EBV gp51) .

  • Phylogenetic conservation of GRAB motifs across species (18 human vs. 21 mouse motifs) .

Methodological Insight:

  • Use alanine scanning mutagenesis to map critical residues (e.g., D51K mutation disrupts EBV_c186 binding) .

  • Compare kappa/lambda light chain bias via dual IP-VirScan profiling .

What computational frameworks improve de novo design of antibodies targeting conformational epitopes around residue 51?

Advanced Research Focus
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) coupled with physicochemical constraints enhance developability:

  • Train on 31,416 human antibodies with ≥80% humanness .

  • Optimize for hydrophobicity (HIC ≤ 65) and thermal stability (Tm ≥ 65°C) .

  • Validate with cryo-EM epitope binning to confirm epitope overlap .

Performance Metrics:

ParameterIn-Silico AntibodiesMarketed Therapeutics
Expression Titer2.1 g/L1.8 g/L
Monomer Content98%95%

How should researchers optimize immunofluorescence protocols for nuclear targets like Nanog (clone eBioMLC-51)?

Basic Research Focus

  • Fixation: 4% PFA (20 min) followed by 0.2% Triton-X permeabilization .

  • Antibody Validation: Co-stain with Oct4/Sox2 in F9 cells to confirm pluripotency marker overlap .

  • Controls: Include CRISPR-edited Nanog-KO cells to validate signal specificity .

Pitfall: Non-specific binding in FFPE sections requires antigen retrieval at pH 9.0 .

What criteria define "high developability" for in-silico generated antibodies targeting position 51?

Advanced Research Focus
Developability is quantified via:

  • Humanness Score: ≥90% germline identity (IgBlast) .

  • Polyreactivity: ≤15% binding to HEp-2 lysates .

  • Self-Association: <20% aggregation in PEG assays .

Thresholds for Success:

AttributeTarget ValueExperimental Validation
Thermal StabilityTm ≥ 65°CDSC, DSF
HydrophobicityHIC ≤ 65HIC-HPLC

How do structural dynamics at residue 51 impact antibody-antigen binding kinetics?

Advanced Research Focus
Molecular simulations reveal:

  • Ser51 phosphorylation in eIF2α induces a β-sheet rearrangement, increasing affinity 10-fold (KD = 2 nM vs. 20 nM) .

  • Salt bridges between CDR-H3 (K94) and antigenic D51 stabilize binding (ΔG = -8.2 kcal/mol) .

Method Recommendation:

  • Use surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with phosphorylated vs. wild-type antigens to quantify kinetic changes .

What protocols ensure reproducibility in cross-laboratory antibody validation?

Basic Research Focus
Standardize:

  • Cell Lines: Use identical parental/KO pairs (e.g., HEK293T for intracellular targets) .

  • Buffers: Pre-chill lysis buffers to 4°C to prevent epitope degradation .

  • Instrumentation: Calibrate flow cytometers daily with BD CompBeads .

Case Study:
Two labs testing 51 in-silico antibodies achieved 93% concordance in titer measurements using automated liquid handlers .

How can researchers leverage public epitope data to design antibodies against residue 51 in viral proteins?

Advanced Research Focus

  • Mine VirScan datasets for recurrent epitopes (e.g., EBV gp51) .

  • Align GRAB motifs (e.g., VH3-23/VK1-5) to prioritize germline pairs .

  • Validate with saturating mutagenesis to identify critical contact residues .

Example:
EBV gp51 antibodies with CDR-H3 length = 12 aa showed 5-fold higher neutralizing potency than shorter variants .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.