VPS4B (Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 4B) is an AAA-ATPase involved in the late steps of the endosomal multivesicular bodies (MVB) pathway. It recognizes membrane-associated ESCRT-III assemblies and catalyzes their disassembly, possibly in combination with membrane fission. This protein redistributes ESCRT-III components to the cytoplasm for further rounds of MVB sorting, enabling the degradation of membrane proteins like growth factor receptors, lysosomal enzymes, and lipids . VPS4B also functions in topologically equivalent membrane fission events including cytokinetic abscission and enveloped virus budding (particularly HIV-1 and other lentiviruses). Additionally, VPS4A/B are required for the exosomal release of proteins such as SDCBP, CD63, and syndecan .
VPS4B Antibody, FITC conjugated is typically a polyclonal antibody derived from rabbit hosts. The antibody specifications generally include:
Applications: Western Blot (WB), Immunofluorescence on paraffin-embedded tissues (IF/IHC-P), Immunofluorescence on frozen tissues (IF/IHC-F), Immunocytochemistry (ICC), and ELISA
Reactivity: Human, Mouse, Fish (with predicted reactivity to Rat, Cow, and Pig)
Source: KLH-conjugated synthetic peptide derived from human VPS4B (immunogen range: 301-400/444) or recombinant Human VPS4B protein (aa 1-117)
Storage: Recommended at -20°C in an aqueous buffered solution containing components such as TBS (pH 7.4), BSA, Proclin300, and 50% Glycerol
FITC (Fluorescein isothiocyanate) conjugation provides several experimental advantages:
Direct detection without secondary antibodies, reducing experimental time and potential cross-reactivity issues
Excitation/emission peaks at approximately 495nm/519nm, compatible with standard fluorescence microscopy filter sets
Elimination of potential background from secondary antibody non-specific binding
Compatibility with multi-color immunofluorescence experiments when combined with appropriate antibodies conjugated to spectrally distinct fluorophores
Convenience for flow cytometry applications where direct detection improves sensitivity and reduces protocol complexity
For optimal immunofluorescence results:
Fixation:
Test multiple fixation methods (4% paraformaldehyde, methanol, or acetone) to determine which best preserves VPS4B epitopes
Maintain consistent fixation times (typically 10-20 minutes at room temperature)
Permeabilization:
Use gentle detergents (0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 or 0.1% saponin) to maintain subcellular structures
Optimize permeabilization time based on cell/tissue type (typically 5-15 minutes)
Blocking:
Implement thorough blocking (5% normal serum, 3% BSA) for at least 30 minutes to reduce non-specific binding
Include 0.1% Tween-20 in blocking buffer to reduce background
Antibody concentration:
Titrate antibody concentration starting from 1:50-1:200 dilutions
Incubate at 4°C overnight for optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Controls:
Quantification approaches include:
Fluorescence microscopy quantification:
Capture images using identical exposure settings across all samples
Use automated image analysis software to define regions of interest (ROIs)
Measure mean fluorescence intensity within ROIs
Subtract background fluorescence from regions without cells/tissue
Normalize to cell number using nuclear counterstains
Flow cytometry quantification:
Use standardized fluorescent beads to establish calibration curves
Report results as molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF)
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Gate populations based on morphological parameters and viability markers
Analysis considerations:
Comprehensive validation should include:
Western blot analysis:
Confirm single band of expected molecular weight (~44 kDa)
Compare results in samples with varying VPS4B expression levels
Peptide competition assay:
Pre-incubate antibody with excess immunogenic peptide
Verify signal reduction in pre-absorbed samples compared to non-blocked antibody
Knockout/knockdown confirmation:
Test antibody in VPS4B knockout or siRNA-treated samples
Verify signal reduction proportional to protein depletion
Paralog specificity:
To investigate ESCRT-dependent processes:
Co-localization studies:
Perform dual immunofluorescence with other ESCRT components (CHMP4B, TSG101)
Use confocal or super-resolution microscopy to assess spatial relationships
Quantify co-localization using Pearson's correlation coefficient
Temporal dynamics:
Implement live-cell imaging in cells expressing fluorescently-tagged ESCRT components
Compare fixed-cell timepoints using VPS4B Antibody, FITC conjugated
Quantify recruitment kinetics during ESCRT-mediated processes
Functional studies:
Combine with expression of dominant-negative VPS4B mutants
Assess changes in VPS4B localization following ESCRT-III depletion
Correlate VPS4B recruitment with membrane scission events
Comparative analysis:
Integrated approaches include:
Combined biochemical and immunological methods:
Use the Transcreener ADP2 Assay to measure VPS4B ATPase activity
Correlate activity measurements with expression levels detected by immunofluorescence
Optimize reaction conditions: 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl₂, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM DTT, and 0.01% Triton at 37°C
High-throughput screening:
Implement 96, 384, or 1536-well formats for inhibitor screening
Validate hits using immunofluorescence to assess effects on VPS4B localization
Leverage the robust Z' value (0.81) for reliable screening results
Structure-function analysis:
To differentiate between these paralogs:
Functional distinctions:
VPS4A depletion causes more severe abscission delay than VPS4B depletion
VPS4A appears involved in earlier stages of abscission
Different phenotypic outcomes suggest non-redundant functions
Experimental approaches to distinguish functions:
Use paralog-specific siRNAs/shRNAs to selectively deplete each protein
Perform rescue experiments with one paralog in cells depleted of the other
Compare localization patterns during different cellular processes (e.g., cytokinesis)
Molecular tools:
Frequent challenges and resolutions include:
Weak or no signal:
Increase antibody concentration
Optimize antigen retrieval (test citrate buffer pH 6.0 vs. EDTA buffer pH 9.0)
Extend primary antibody incubation (overnight at 4°C)
Verify sample preparation (fixation time, permeabilization efficiency)
High background:
Dilute antibody further
Extend washing steps (use at least 3 washes of 5-10 minutes each)
Implement additional blocking (normal serum matching secondary host)
Use more selective permeabilization conditions
Photobleaching:
Minimize exposure to light during preparation
Use anti-fade mounting media
Capture images immediately after preparation
Consider using lower intensity excitation
Inconsistent results:
Essential controls include:
Specificity controls:
Isotype control (rabbit IgG-FITC at same concentration)
Peptide competition/pre-absorption control
Knockdown/knockout samples (if available)
Technical controls:
Unstained samples to assess autofluorescence
Single-color controls for spectral compensation in multi-color experiments
Secondary-only controls (for protocols using additional antibodies)
Biological controls:
Tissues/cells with known VPS4B expression patterns
Samples treated with conditions known to alter VPS4B (e.g., ESCRT inhibition)
Comparison with alternative VPS4B antibodies
Quantification controls:
For effective dual-staining:
Fluorophore selection:
Choose secondary fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap with FITC (e.g., Cy3, Cy5)
Consider brightness differentials if targets have varying expression levels
Account for potential FRET if targets are in close proximity
Protocol optimization:
Test sequential vs. simultaneous incubation of antibodies
Determine optimal fixation method compatible with all antibodies
Implement appropriate blocking to prevent cross-reactivity
Imaging considerations:
Use narrow bandpass filters to minimize bleed-through
Perform sequential scanning for confocal microscopy
Consider spectral unmixing for closely overlapping fluorophores
Controls for dual-staining:
For viral budding research:
Visualization approaches:
Co-stain infected cells for VPS4B and viral proteins
Use time-course experiments to track VPS4B recruitment to budding sites
Implement super-resolution microscopy to visualize budding neck structures
Functional analysis:
Compare VPS4B localization in cells infected with wild-type vs. late domain mutant viruses
Assess VPS4B recruitment following expression of dominant-negative ESCRT components
Quantify co-localization coefficients between VPS4B and viral structural proteins
Mechanistic insights:
To investigate cytokinetic functions:
Temporal analysis:
Synchronize cells and immunostain at defined stages of cytokinesis
Co-stain with midbody markers (MKLP1, CEP55)
Quantify VPS4B recruitment kinetics during abscission
Comparative studies:
Analyze differences in VPS4A vs. VPS4B recruitment to the midbody
VPS4A depletion causes more severe abscission delay than VPS4B
Assess potential functional redundancy through rescue experiments
Mechanistic investigations:
For exosome applications:
Characterization approaches:
Immunostain isolated exosomes for VPS4B presence
Perform immuno-electron microscopy to visualize VPS4B on exosomes
Compare VPS4B levels in exosomes from different cellular sources
Mechanistic studies:
Track VPS4B association with multivesicular bodies during exosome biogenesis
Assess impact of VPS4B depletion on exosomal markers (CD63, syndecan)
Compare wild-type vs. ATPase-deficient VPS4B effects on exosome production
Co-localization analysis: