VSTM2L Antibody, HRP conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
We typically dispatch orders for VSTM2L Antibody, HRP conjugated within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the shipping method and destination. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery timelines.
Synonyms
C20orf102 antibody; dJ1118M15.2 antibody; Uncharacterized protein C20orf102 precursor antibody; V set and transmembrane domain containing 2 like antibody; V set and transmembrane domain containing protein 2 like protein antibody; V-set and transmembrane domain-containing protein 2-like protein antibody; VSTM 2L antibody; Vstm2l antibody; VTM2L_HUMAN antibody
Target Names
VSTM2L
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is VSTM2L and why is it important in research?

VSTM2L, also known as C20orf102, is a secreted protein that functions as an antagonist of Humanin (HN), a neuroprotective peptide. It was first identified as a modulator of HN neuroprotective activity and is selectively expressed in the central nervous system . VSTM2L colocalizes with HN in distinct brain areas and in primary cultured neurons, where it influences neuronal viability . Recent research has expanded its significance to various cancers:

  • In rectal cancer: High VSTM2L expression correlates with resistance to chemoradiotherapy and poor prognosis

  • In cholangiocarcinoma: Functions as both a therapeutic target and potential soluble biomarker

  • In prostate cancer: Protects cancer cells against ferroptosis through interaction with VDAC1

Understanding VSTM2L's varied functions makes it an important target for both neurological and cancer research applications.

How does HRP conjugation to antibodies work, and what are its applications in VSTM2L research?

HRP conjugation to antibodies involves creating a covalent linkage between horseradish peroxidase enzyme and the antibody while preserving both the enzymatic activity and the antibody's binding capability. The conjugation process typically involves:

  • Activation of HRP carbohydrate moieties using chemicals like sodium meta-periodate to generate aldehyde groups

  • Reaction of these aldehyde groups with amino groups on the antibody to form Schiff's bases

  • Stabilization of the conjugate through reduction using sodium cyanoborohydride

Applications in VSTM2L research include:

  • Western blotting for expression analysis in various tissues and cell lines

  • Immunohistochemistry for localization studies

  • ELISA for quantitative detection of soluble VSTM2L in biological fluids

  • Analysis of protein-protein interactions in co-immunoprecipitation studies

The advantage of HRP conjugation is the significant signal amplification it provides, enhancing sensitivity in detecting potentially low levels of VSTM2L expression .

What considerations should researchers make when selecting a VSTM2L antibody for HRP conjugation?

When selecting a VSTM2L antibody for HRP conjugation, researchers should consider:

Antibody characteristics:

  • Species reactivity (ensure it recognizes human VSTM2L if working with human samples)

  • Clonality (polyclonal antibodies provide multiple epitope recognition but may have higher background; monoclonal antibodies offer higher specificity)

  • Validated applications (confirm the antibody has been validated for your intended application)

  • Immunogen sequence (ensure it covers the region of interest in VSTM2L)

Conjugation factors:

  • Antibody concentration (typically 1 mg/ml is optimal for conjugation procedures)

  • Antibody purity (higher purity yields better conjugation efficiency)

  • Buffer compatibility (antibody should be in a buffer free of primary amines)

  • Preservation of antibody function post-conjugation (some epitopes may be affected by the conjugation process)

Researchers should validate the conjugated antibody in their specific experimental system before conducting full-scale experiments, especially when studying VSTM2L in different cancer contexts .

How can I verify the success of VSTM2L antibody-HRP conjugation?

Verification of successful VSTM2L antibody-HRP conjugation can be performed through multiple complementary methods:

Spectrophotometric analysis:

  • UV-Visible spectroscopy scanning from 280-800 nm

  • Successful conjugates show a characteristic peak at 280 nm (antibody) and a smaller peak around 430 nm (HRP)

SDS-PAGE analysis:

  • Run conjugated and unconjugated samples under reducing and non-reducing conditions

  • Successfully conjugated antibody-HRP complexes show higher molecular weight bands compared to unconjugated antibodies

Functional verification:

  • Direct ELISA using purified VSTM2L protein or recombinant VSTM2L

  • Western blot analysis with VSTM2L-expressing and non-expressing cell lysates

  • Compare signal intensities with unconjugated primary antibody plus HRP-secondary antibody detection

A successfully conjugated VSTM2L antibody-HRP should maintain both antigen recognition capability and enzymatic activity of HRP, providing specific detection with enhanced sensitivity.

What methodological approaches can enhance the sensitivity of VSTM2L detection using HRP-conjugated antibodies?

Enhanced sensitivity in VSTM2L detection with HRP-conjugated antibodies can be achieved through several methodological refinements:

Improved conjugation techniques:

  • Lyophilization of activated HRP before antibody addition enhances conjugation efficiency

  • This modification allows for higher HRP:antibody molar ratios without losing specificity

  • Enhanced conjugates can achieve detection sensitivity at dilutions up to 1:5000 compared to 1:25 for classical methods

Signal amplification strategies:

  • Tyramine signal amplification (TSA) - utilizing HRP to catalyze deposition of biotinylated tyramide

  • Use of poly-HRP systems - multiple HRP molecules linked to a polymer backbone

  • Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrates optimized for sensitivity

Sample preparation optimization:

  • For tissue samples: Antigen retrieval methods specifically optimized for VSTM2L epitopes

  • For blood or serum: Enrichment steps to concentrate soluble VSTM2L before detection

Validation data comparing classical vs. enhanced HRP conjugation methods:

Conjugation MethodWorking Dilutionp-valueSignal-to-Noise Ratio
Classical method1:25-Baseline
Enhanced method (with lyophilization)1:5000<0.001>200× improved

This methodology has been demonstrated to significantly improve detection of low abundance targets in complex samples, which is particularly relevant for soluble VSTM2L detection in patient samples .

How should researchers approach the detection of soluble VSTM2L in biological fluids using HRP-conjugated antibodies?

Detection of soluble VSTM2L in biological fluids presents unique challenges requiring specific methodological considerations:

Sandwich ELISA optimization:

  • Capture antibody: Use antibodies recognizing different epitopes than the HRP-conjugated detection antibody

  • Sample preparation: Consider pre-clearing samples of high-abundance proteins that may interfere

  • Standard curve: Use recombinant VSTM2L protein (25-204 a.a.) for accurate quantification

  • Blocking: 2% BSA or skim milk to reduce background without interfering with VSTM2L detection

Western blot analysis of biological fluids:

  • Sample concentration: May be necessary for low-abundance VSTM2L

  • Loading controls: Consider using total protein staining methods

  • Size verification: VSTM2L appears at approximately 22 kDa

Clinical validation:
Recent research has demonstrated that soluble VSTM2L can be detected in whole blood samples from cholangiocarcinoma patients at significantly higher levels than healthy donors using both sandwich ELISA and Western blot analysis . This supports its potential as a soluble biomarker for cancer diagnosis and monitoring.

Correlation with clinical outcomes:
When implementing VSTM2L detection in patient samples, correlate findings with clinical parameters such as:

  • Disease stage

  • Treatment response

  • Survival outcomes

This approach has been validated in studies showing that high VSTM2L expression correlates with poor prognosis in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy .

What are the specific challenges in using HRP-conjugated VSTM2L antibodies for immunohistochemistry in cancer tissue samples?

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with HRP-conjugated VSTM2L antibodies in cancer tissues presents several methodological challenges:

Tissue-specific optimization requirements:

  • Fixation effects: VSTM2L epitopes may be differentially affected by formalin fixation across tissue types

  • Antigen retrieval: Different cancer tissues may require specific pH and heat conditions for optimal VSTM2L retrieval

  • Endogenous peroxidase: Thorough quenching is essential, particularly in tissues with high peroxidase activity

Differential expression patterns:
VSTM2L shows variable expression across cancer types:

  • In rectal cancer: Expression correlates with tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

  • In cholangiocarcinoma: Expression affects aggressiveness and prognosis

  • In prostate cancer: VSTM2L regulates ferroptosis through VDAC1 interaction

Validation approaches:

  • Positive controls: Include tissues known to express VSTM2L (e.g., central nervous system tissues)

  • Absorption controls: Pre-incubation of antibody with recombinant VSTM2L should abolish staining

  • Comparison with RNA expression: Correlate IHC results with qPCR or RNA-seq data

  • Specificity verification: Test in VSTM2L-transfected versus non-transfected cell lines

Scoring and interpretation:

  • Establish clear scoring criteria for VSTM2L positivity

  • Consider both cytoplasmic and membrane staining patterns

  • Correlate with clinical parameters using standardized statistical approaches

How can researchers troubleshoot non-specific binding and background issues when using HRP-conjugated VSTM2L antibodies?

Non-specific binding and background issues with HRP-conjugated VSTM2L antibodies can be addressed through systematic troubleshooting:

Common sources of background and their solutions:

IssuePossible CauseSolution
High background in all samplesInsufficient blockingIncrease blocking time; try alternative blocking agents (BSA, casein, normal serum)
Non-specific bands in Western blotCross-reactivityUse more stringent washing conditions; optimize antibody dilution
High background in IHC/ICCEndogenous peroxidase activityMore thorough peroxidase quenching (3% H₂O₂, 15-30 min)
Signal in negative controlsSecondary antibody cross-reactivityInclude isotype controls; use species-adsorbed secondary antibodies
Inconsistent resultsConjugate degradationStore conjugate with stabilizers; avoid freeze-thaw cycles

VSTM2L-specific considerations:

  • VSTM2L is secreted and may bind to other proteins in the extracellular matrix, causing diffuse staining

  • Its interaction with Humanin may cause co-localization patterns that could be misinterpreted

  • Expression levels vary significantly between tissues and cancer types

Advanced optimization strategies:

  • Titration series to determine optimal antibody concentration

  • Addition of detergents (0.1-0.3% Triton X-100) to reduce hydrophobic interactions

  • Pre-adsorption of antibodies against tissues/cells lacking VSTM2L

  • Use of signal enhancement systems with lower primary antibody concentrations

  • Implementation of automated staining platforms for consistency

Detailed validation using multiple detection methods is recommended to confirm specificity of signals in each experimental system.

What approaches should be used to validate experimental findings when studying VSTM2L expression across different cancer types using HRP-conjugated antibodies?

Validation of VSTM2L expression findings across cancer types requires multiple complementary approaches:

Multi-technique validation:

  • Protein detection: Western blot, IHC, and immunofluorescence using the same HRP-conjugated antibody

  • mRNA confirmation: qRT-PCR and RNA-seq to correlate with protein levels

  • Functional validation: siRNA/shRNA knockdown or CRISPR-Cas9 knockout to confirm specificity of antibody signals and biological effects

Cancer-specific validation considerations:
Different cancer types may require specific validation approaches due to tissue heterogeneity and VSTM2L's varied roles:

Cancer TypeValidation ConsiderationsKey Findings
Rectal cancerCorrelate with treatment response dataHigh VSTM2L expression correlates with resistance to chemoradiotherapy (p=0.03)
CholangiocarcinomaCompare with soluble VSTM2L in bloodSignificantly higher soluble VSTM2L in patient blood vs. healthy donors
Prostate cancerAssess VDAC1 co-localizationVSTM2L protects against ferroptosis via VDAC1 interaction

Patient-derived models:

  • Patient-derived organoids have been effectively used to validate VSTM2L's role in rectal cancer

  • High VSTM2L expression reduced γ-H2AX expression in patient-derived organoids treated with chemoradiotherapy

Bioinformatic validation:

This multi-dimensional validation approach ensures robust and reproducible findings when studying VSTM2L across different cancer contexts.

How can HRP-conjugated VSTM2L antibodies be employed in studying the relationship between VSTM2L and tumor immune microenvironment?

Recent research has revealed important connections between VSTM2L and the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), which can be investigated using HRP-conjugated antibodies through several methodological approaches:

Multiplex immunohistochemistry:

  • Simultaneous staining for VSTM2L and immune cell markers (CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, etc.)

  • Sequential HRP labeling with different chromogens or fluorophores

  • Spatial relationship analysis between VSTM2L-expressing cells and immune infiltrates

Immune cell correlation studies:
Research has shown that VSTM2L expression correlates with tumor-infiltrating immune cells in many cancers :

  • Positive correlation with B cells (r=0.38, p=0.0239), macrophages (r=0.46, p=0.0059), and neutrophils (r=0.48, p=0.0033) in cholangiocarcinoma

  • Positive correlation with CD4+ T cells (r=0.33, p=7.78E-14), neutrophils (r=0.32, p=4.54E-13), and dendritic cells (r=0.34, p=5.57E-14) in lung squamous cell carcinoma

  • Negative correlation with immune cells in lower-grade glioma and testicular germ cell tumors

Immunomodulator relationship analysis:
VSTM2L expression correlates with immunomodulator genes in various cancers:

  • Positive association with immune checkpoint markers in bladder cancer, breast cancer, esophageal cancer, head and neck cancer, lung squamous cell carcinoma, stomach adenocarcinoma, and thyroid cancer

  • Negative association in kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma and lower-grade glioma

Methodology for co-expression studies:

  • Serial tissue sections stained with HRP-conjugated VSTM2L antibodies and immune markers

  • Digital image analysis for quantification of co-localization

  • Correlation analysis between VSTM2L expression and immune/stromal scores

  • Flow cytometry for simultaneous detection in cell suspensions

These approaches can provide crucial insights into how VSTM2L influences the tumor immune microenvironment and potentially affects response to immunotherapy.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.