KEGG: dre:561317
UniGene: Dr.16338
How should researchers validate a new si:dkey-18l1.1/vwa8 antibody for zebrafish research?
Antibody validation is critical for ensuring reproducibility in research. For si:dkey-18l1.1/vwa8 antibodies, validation should include:
Specificity testing:
Sensitivity assessment:
Titration experiments to determine optimal working concentration
Detection limits in samples with varying expression levels
Application-specific validation:
For immunohistochemistry: confirmation of expected tissue distribution pattern
For immunoprecipitation: confirmation of successful pull-down with mass spectrometry
Cross-reactivity testing:
Testing on closely related proteins
Confirmation of specificity across developmental stages
Reproducibility assessment:
Testing across multiple batches of antibody
Testing by multiple researchers
Each validation approach contributes to building confidence in antibody performance and specificity, which is essential for generating reliable research data .
What experimental approaches can be used to study si:dkey-18l1.1/vwa8 function in notochord development?
Since vwa8 is predicted to act upstream of or within notochord development , several methodological approaches can be employed:
Spatiotemporal expression analysis:
Immunohistochemistry with si:dkey-18l1.1/vwa8 antibodies during developmental stages
Co-staining with notochord markers to determine precise localization
Loss-of-function studies:
CRISPR-Cas9 knockout of vwa8
Morpholino-mediated knockdown
Documenting phenotypic effects on notochord formation and function
Domain-function analysis:
Creating mutations in specific domains (e.g., von Willebrand factor A domains or AAA+ ATPase domains)
Testing which functional aspects of the protein are essential for notochord development
Protein interaction mapping:
Immunoprecipitation with si:dkey-18l1.1/vwa8 antibodies followed by mass spectrometry
Identifying interaction partners in the notochord development pathway
Live imaging:
Tagging vwa8 with fluorescent proteins
Time-lapse imaging during notochord development
Correlating with antibody staining to validate tag functionality
Rescue experiments:
Reintroducing wild-type or mutant vwa8 into knockouts
Testing which forms restore normal notochord development
These approaches would provide mechanistic insights into how vwa8 contributes to notochord formation in zebrafish .
How can si:dkey-18l1.1/vwa8 antibodies be applied in studying potential links to human retinitis pigmentosa?
Zebrafish vwa8 has been identified as orthologous to human VWA8, which has associations with retinitis pigmentosa 97 . This connection enables several research approaches:
Comparative expression analysis:
Using si:dkey-18l1.1/vwa8 antibodies to map protein expression in zebrafish retina
Comparing patterns with human VWA8 expression in normal and diseased retinal tissues
Disease modeling:
Creating zebrafish with mutations mimicking those found in human retinitis pigmentosa
Using antibodies to track changes in protein expression, localization, or interactions
Analyzing retinal degeneration phenotypes
Functional studies:
Examining vwa8 function in zebrafish retinal development and maintenance
Correlating with potential mechanisms in human disease
Documenting phenotypes in visual function tests
Drug screening:
Using zebrafish vwa8 models and antibody-based assays to screen compounds
Identifying molecules that might restore normal protein function or expression
Testing promising candidates in more advanced models
Mitochondrial function assessment:
This translational approach leverages the experimental advantages of zebrafish while providing insights potentially relevant to human retinal disease mechanisms .
What is the optimal protocol for Western blotting with si:dkey-18l1.1/vwa8 antibodies in zebrafish samples?
Based on available information on related antibodies and considering the properties of vwa8, the following protocol is recommended:
Sample preparation:
Harvest appropriate tissues (liver, kidney, spleen recommended based on expression data)
Homogenize in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors
Centrifuge at 14,000×g for 15 minutes at 4°C
Quantify protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assay
SDS-PAGE:
Use 6-8% gels (optimal for large proteins like vwa8, ~214.8 kDa)
Load 20-50 μg protein per lane
Include molecular weight markers covering high molecular weight range
Transfer:
Transfer to PVDF membrane (preferred for high molecular weight proteins)
Use wet transfer at 30V overnight at 4°C for efficient transfer of large proteins
Verify transfer with reversible stain (e.g., Ponceau S)
Immunoblotting:
Block with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with primary antibody diluted 1:500-1:1000 in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C
Wash 3× with TBST, 10 minutes each
Incubate with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000) for 1 hour
Wash 3× with TBST, 10 minutes each
Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence detection system
Controls:
Positive control: Tissue with known vwa8 expression (e.g., liver)
Negative control: Samples from vwa8 knockdown or knockout if available
Loading control: Anti-β-actin or anti-GAPDH
This protocol may require optimization based on the specific antibody characteristics and sample types .
What protein interaction methods can be combined with si:dkey-18l1.1 antibodies?
Several complementary techniques can be used with si:dkey-18l1.1/vwa8 antibodies to study protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use si:dkey-18l1.1 antibodies to precipitate vwa8 and associated proteins
Identify binding partners via Western blot or mass spectrometry
Perform reciprocal Co-IP with antibodies against suspected interacting partners
Example protocol parameters: 2-5 μg antibody per 500 μg protein lysate, overnight incubation at 4°C
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):
Combine si:dkey-18l1.1 antibodies with antibodies against potential interacting partners
Generates fluorescent signals only when proteins are within 40 nm
Allows visualization of interactions directly in tissues or cells
Immunofluorescence co-localization:
Double staining with si:dkey-18l1.1 antibodies and antibodies against potential partners
Use confocal microscopy for high-resolution imaging
Quantify co-localization using Pearson's correlation coefficient or Manders' overlap coefficient
Cross-linking coupled with immunoprecipitation:
Stabilize transient interactions with membrane-permeable crosslinkers
Use si:dkey-18l1.1 antibodies to isolate crosslinked complexes
Identify interacting proteins by mass spectrometry
ELISA-based interaction assays:
These methods provide complementary data on protein interactions, with each technique offering different advantages in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and ability to detect transient or weak interactions .
How should researchers design experiments to study the mitochondrial functions of vwa8 using si:dkey-18l1.1 antibodies?
Since vwa8 is predicted to localize to mitochondria , the following experimental approaches are recommended:
Subcellular localization confirmation:
Perform subcellular fractionation to isolate mitochondria
Western blot with si:dkey-18l1.1 antibodies to confirm presence in mitochondrial fraction
Compare with established mitochondrial markers (e.g., VDAC, COX IV)
| Fraction | vwa8 | VDAC (mito marker) | GAPDH (cytosolic marker) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total lysate | + | + | + |
| Cytosolic | +/- | - | + |
| Mitochondrial | + | + | - |
Co-localization studies:
Perform immunofluorescence with si:dkey-18l1.1 antibodies and mitochondrial dyes
Use super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization
Quantify degree of co-localization under different conditions
Mitochondrial function correlation:
Manipulate vwa8 expression (knockdown/overexpression)
Measure changes in:
Oxygen consumption rate
ATP production
Mitochondrial membrane potential
ROS production
Correlate functional changes with vwa8 levels detected by antibodies
Mitochondrial dynamics:
Track vwa8 during mitochondrial processes (fusion, fission, mitophagy)
Use live-cell imaging with tagged vwa8 validated by antibody staining
Examine co-localization with dynamics machinery proteins
ATPase activity studies:
These approaches would provide comprehensive data on the mitochondrial functions of vwa8 in zebrafish, potentially revealing its role in mitochondrial biology and disease mechanisms .
What technical considerations are important when using si:dkey-18l1.1 antibodies in developmental studies of zebrafish?
When studying vwa8 expression during zebrafish development, researchers should consider:
Developmental stage selection:
Based on notochord development timeline
Include stages before, during, and after notochord formation
Consider time points at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-fertilization
Tissue processing optimization:
Fixation: Test multiple fixatives (4% PFA, Dent's fixative) for optimal epitope preservation
Permeabilization: Carefully optimize to maintain tissue integrity while allowing antibody access
Antigen retrieval: May be necessary for some fixation methods
Background reduction strategies:
Use appropriate blocking (5-10% normal serum matching secondary antibody host)
Include detergents (0.1-0.3% Triton X-100) to reduce non-specific binding
Consider autofluorescence quenching for fluorescent detection
Controls:
Developmental series of wild-type embryos
vwa8 knockdown or knockout embryos as negative controls
Secondary antibody-only controls
Pre-absorption controls with immunizing peptide
Quantification methods:
Standardize image acquisition parameters
Use appropriate software for quantitative analysis
Normalize to internal controls
Correlation with expression data:
Compare antibody staining patterns with mRNA expression
Validate findings with multiple techniques (e.g., in situ hybridization)
By addressing these considerations, researchers can generate reliable data on vwa8 expression and function during zebrafish development, particularly in relation to its predicted role in notochord development .