The HRP-conjugated format is optimized for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), enabling quantitative detection of WDR35 in biological samples such as tissue homogenates and cell lysates . Sensitivity ranges for ELISA kits incorporating this antibody include 0.06 ng/mL, with a detection range of 0.16–10 ng/mL .
While primarily marketed for ELISA, the antibody’s utility in Western blotting is supported by its recognition of WDR35’s 133 kDa isoform . Recommended dilutions for WB range from 1:500 to 1:1000 .
HRP-conjugated antibodies are often used in chromogenic IHC for tissue sections. While direct evidence for this antibody’s use in IHC is limited, its reactivity with human samples suggests potential compatibility .
The antibody exhibits high specificity for human WDR35, with no significant cross-reactivity reported . Sequence alignment analyses suggest potential reactivity with orthologs in other species, including mouse, rat, and zebrafish (92% identity) .
WDR35 is a core component of the IFT-A complex, critical for retrograde ciliary transport . Mutations in WDR35 impair IFT-A stability, leading to ciliary dysfunction . The antibody has been used to confirm WDR35’s localization at the ciliary base and its role in vesicle trafficking .
In cranioectodermal dysplasia (CED), WDR35 mutations disrupt ciliogenesis . Antibody-based detection of WDR35 in patient samples aids in diagnosing such disorders .
The table below contrasts the HRP-conjugated WDR35 antibody with other commonly used formats:
The WDR35 antibody, HRP conjugated, is a versatile tool for studying ciliary function and disease. Its use in ELISA enables high-throughput screening of WDR35 expression levels, while Western blotting provides complementary protein detection. Future studies could leverage this antibody to investigate WDR35’s interactions with other IFT components or its role in signaling pathways .
WDR35 (WD Repeat Domain 35) contains minimally conserved regions of approximately 40 amino acids typically bracketed by gly-his and trp-asp (GH-WD) sequences. These WD repeats facilitate formation of heterotrimeric or multiprotein complexes, making WDR35 significant in protein interaction studies. The protein functions in various cellular mechanisms, with antibodies against specific amino acid sequences (such as AA 871-1170 or AA 71-120) enabling researchers to study its expression and interactions in various biological systems . Methodologically, researchers should select antibodies targeting specific regions depending on their experimental goal, as different epitopes may yield distinct insights into protein function.
WDR35 antibody-HRP conjugates are primarily employed in immunoassay techniques including ELISA, immunohistochemistry, and western blotting. These conjugates enable direct detection of WDR35 protein without requiring secondary antibody incubation steps . For western blotting, recommended dilution starts at 1 μg/mL in 5% skim milk/PBS buffer, with HRP-conjugated anti-Rabbit IgG diluted at 1:50,000-100,000 when using unconjugated primary antibodies . In ELISA applications, WDR35 antibody-HRP conjugates can detect the protein in various samples including serum, plasma, and cell culture supernatants with sensitivity levels reaching 0.062 ng/ml in optimized sandwich assay formats .
Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugation provides several methodological advantages that make it preferred for many research applications:
HRP is a relatively small (44 kDa) glycoprotein with 6 lysine residues available for conjugation, allowing efficient coupling without significant steric hindrance
The enzyme enables visualization through multiple chromogenic reactions using substrates like DAB, ABTS, TMB, and TMBUS, providing flexibility in detection methods
Direct conjugation eliminates cross-species reactivity concerns and reduces laborious wash and separation steps in time-consuming protocols
Enhanced conjugation methods involving lyophilization dramatically improve sensitivity, with conjugates prepared using this modified approach functioning at dilutions of 1:5000 compared to traditional methods requiring 1:25 dilutions
The enhanced protocol for HRP-antibody conjugation involves:
Activation of HRP using sodium meta periodate to generate aldehyde groups through oxidation of carbohydrate moieties on HRPO
Critical improvement step: Lyophilization of the activated HRPO
Mixing the lyophilized, activated HRPO with antibodies at 1 mg/ml concentration
Confirmation of chemical modification via UV-spectroscopy and SDS-PAGE
This modified approach significantly enhances the antibody's ability to bind more HRPO molecules, resulting in substantially improved sensitivity compared to classical conjugation methods (p<0.001) .
Buffer composition critically impacts conjugation efficiency. For optimal results:
Avoid buffers containing primary amines (e.g., Tris) as they compete with the conjugation reaction
Minimize protein additives like BSA or gelatin which can interfere with the conjugation chemistry
Maintain pH between 7.0-7.4 for optimal reaction conditions
Remove sodium azide and other preservatives that may inhibit HRP activity
Consider commercial buffer systems specifically formulated for antibody-HRP conjugation
After conjugation, implement stabilization measures using proprietary multi-component reagent systems like LifeXtend™ to protect antibody-HRP conjugates from degradation factors, especially for room temperature applications .
Rigorous validation requires multiple analytical approaches:
UV-spectroscopy to confirm chemical modification through characteristic absorbance pattern changes
SDS-PAGE to visualize molecular weight shifts between unconjugated antibodies and HRP-conjugates
Functional validation through direct ELISA with known positive and negative controls
Dilution series testing to determine optimal working concentrations
For western blotting validation, test the conjugate against human samples at 1 μg/mL concentration in 5% skim milk/PBS buffer, comparing signal to unconjugated primary antibody detection systems .
Non-specific binding can significantly impact experimental results. Methodological solutions include:
Optimize blocking protocols using 5% skim milk or BSA in PBS buffer
Adjust antibody concentration - start with higher dilutions (1:5000) for conjugates prepared using enhanced methods
Increase washing stringency with detergent-containing buffers (0.05% Tween-20)
Validate antibody specificity through peptide competition assays
Implement negative controls lacking primary antibody to establish background signal levels
Consider cross-adsorption against potential cross-reactive proteins
Remember that polyclonal antibodies against WDR35 may show varying degrees of non-specific binding compared to monoclonal antibodies due to their heterogeneous epitope recognition.
ELISA sensitivity for WDR35 detection depends on several methodological factors:
Antibody quality and specificity - polyclonal antibodies targeting specific amino acid regions (AA 871-1170 or AA 71-120) affect epitope recognition
Conjugation method - lyophilization-enhanced conjugation dramatically improves sensitivity (1:5000 vs 1:25 dilution)
Detection system - substrate selection affects signal-to-noise ratio
Sample preparation - proper processing preserves target protein integrity
Assay format - sandwich ELISA using dual antibodies provides superior specificity and sensitivity compared to competitive formats
Commercial ELISA systems for WDR35 can achieve detection ranges of 0.156-10 ng/ml with sensitivity as low as 0.062 ng/ml when using optimized sandwich assay formats .
Determining optimal dilution requires systematic titration:
Prepare serial dilutions starting from manufacturer recommendations (1:5000 for enhanced conjugates, 1:25 for traditional methods)
Test against known positive samples and appropriate negative controls
Calculate signal-to-noise ratios for each dilution
Select the dilution providing maximum specific signal with minimal background
Validate across multiple sample types relevant to your research
Consider application differences - western blotting may require different dilutions than ELISA or IHC
Table 1: Comparison of Traditional vs. Enhanced HRP-Antibody Conjugation Methods
| Parameter | Traditional Method | Enhanced Method (with Lyophilization) |
|---|---|---|
| Working Dilution | 1:25 | 1:5000 |
| Sensitivity | Lower | Higher (p < 0.001) |
| Protocol Complexity | Standard | Additional lyophilization step |
| Binding Efficiency | Standard | Enhanced ability to bind more HRP molecules |
| Application Range | Limited by sensitivity | Broader due to higher sensitivity |
Substrate selection significantly affects detection outcomes:
Table 2: Common Substrates for HRP-Conjugated WDR35 Antibody Detection
| Substrate | Reaction Product | Application | Sensitivity | Methodological Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAB (Diaminobenzidine) | Water-insoluble brown pigment | IHC | Moderate | Permanent, non-fading signal; requires H₂O₂ |
| ABTS | Soluble green product | ELISA | High | Water-soluble, suitable for quantitative analysis |
| TMB | Blue product (yellow with acid) | ELISA, WB | Very High | Highest sensitivity; requires stopping solution |
| TMBUS | Stabilized form of TMB | ELISA | Very High | Extended stability; reduced background |
Researchers should select substrates based on application requirements, detection method, and desired sensitivity threshold .
Recent methodological advances include:
Lyophilization during conjugation process, significantly enhancing antibody-binding capacity and resulting sensitivity (1:5000 vs 1:25 dilution)
Development of multi-component stabilizer systems that protect antibody-HRP conjugates from degradation factors, extending functional shelf-life
Implementation of signal amplification systems for ultra-sensitive detection below standard thresholds
Optimized sandwich ELISA formats using dual antibody systems for enhanced specificity and sensitivity
Use of proprietary conjugation kits like Lightning-Link® that simplify the conjugation process while maintaining high performance
For low-abundance targets, researchers should consider combining enhanced conjugation methods with signal amplification techniques.
Sample-specific optimization strategies include:
Table 3: Sample-Specific Optimization for WDR35 Detection
| Sample Type | Preparation Method | Special Considerations | Detection Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum | Direct application after dilution | Validated for use in sandwich ELISA | 0.156-10 ng/ml range |
| Plasma | Validated for citrated/EDTA samples | Avoid heparin as anticoagulant | 0.062 ng/ml limit |
| Cell Culture Supernatant | Direct application | Account for culture media components | Depends on expression level |
| Tissue Lysates | Optimize extraction buffers | Remove detergents before assay | Requires validation |
When working with complex biological samples, researchers should validate potential interference factors and develop sample-specific protocols for optimal detection .
Emerging technologies with potential application include:
Site-specific conjugation methods targeting specific amino acids to ensure uniform orientation
Nanoparticle-based signal enhancement systems for ultra-sensitive detection
Automated microfluidic platforms for precise conjugation under controlled conditions
Computational modeling to predict optimal conjugation conditions based on antibody and target properties
Development of enhanced stabilization systems specifically designed for HRP-antibody conjugates
Current evidence suggests modified protocols incorporating lyophilization offer significant improvements, but further exploration across a wider range of IgG antibodies is necessary .
Methodological approaches for multiplexed systems include:
Combination with differently-labeled antibodies targeting related proteins in WDR family
Development of sequential detection protocols with substrate clearing between steps
Integration with microarray or bead-based multiplexing platforms
Combination with orthogonal detection technologies (fluorescence, chemiluminescence)
Implementation of spatial separation techniques for simultaneous detection
These approaches would enable researchers to simultaneously assess WDR35 alongside other biomarkers, providing more comprehensive data from limited sample volumes.