The YAR035C-A antibody (Product Code: CSB-PA844761XA01SVG) is a polyclonal or monoclonal reagent designed to detect the YAR035C-A protein, encoded by the YAR035C-A gene in S. cerevisiae. This gene is annotated as a putative open reading frame (ORF) with uncharacterized function, commonly studied in yeast genomics and proteomics .
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Target Protein | YAR035C-A (UniProt: Q8TGV0) |
| Host Species | Derived from immunized animals (exact host unspecified) |
| Applications | Western blot, ELISA, Immunoprecipitation, Immunofluorescence |
| Available Formats | 2 mL (pre-purified) or 0.1 mL (affinity-purified) |
The antibody production process follows standard protocols :
Immunogen Preparation: Recombinant YAR035C-A protein or peptide sequences.
Animal Immunization: Likely rabbits or mice, adjuvanted to enhance immune response.
Hybridoma Generation (if monoclonal): Fusion of spleen cells with myeloma cells.
Purification: Protein A/G affinity chromatography for IgG isolation .
Specificity validated via knockout yeast strains or peptide blocking assays.
Batch consistency ensured through ELISA titering and SDS-PAGE purity checks .
Though direct studies on YAR035C-A are scarce, analogous yeast antibodies are employed in:
Gene Function Studies: Localization and interaction profiling of uncharacterized ORFs.
Protein Networks: Co-immunoprecipitation to map binding partners.
Stress Response Analysis: Quantifying expression under metabolic or environmental stress.
For example, antibodies against yeast proteins like YKU70 or YCK1 have elucidated DNA repair and kinase signaling pathways .
| Product Code | Target | UniProt ID | Host Species | Size Options |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSB-PA844761XA01SVG | YAR035C-A | Q8TGV0 | S. cerevisiae | 2 mL / 0.1 mL |
| CSB-PA326388XA01SVG | YCK2 | P23292 | S. cerevisiae | 2 mL / 0.1 mL |
| CSB-PA339296XA01SVG | YKU70 | P32807 | S. cerevisiae | 2 mL / 0.1 mL |
Storage: Stable at -20°C; avoid freeze-thaw cycles.
Specificity Challenges: Cross-reactivity with homologous yeast proteins requires rigorous validation .
Functional Insights: CRISPR-mediated gene knockout paired with YAR035C-A antibody could clarify its role in yeast biology.
Engineering Opportunities: Fc modifications (e.g., YTE mutation) might extend half-life for in vivo studies .
Validation of antibody specificity is critical for experimental reliability. For YAR035C-A antibody, implement a multi-step validation protocol:
Western blot analysis comparing wild-type samples with YAR035C-A knockout/deletion controls
Testing against recombinant YAR035C-A protein and negative controls
Confirming molecular weight specificity (looking for a single specific band)
Cross-validating with another antibody targeting a different epitope
Similar to Protein A antibody validation, where specificity is confirmed by testing against both recombinant Protein A and negative controls (such as Protein G), your validation should demonstrate clear specificity for the target protein . Western blotting under reducing conditions, using appropriate controls, allows you to confirm binding to the expected molecular weight while ensuring absence of non-specific binding.
To preserve antibody activity, implement these storage protocols:
Store at -20°C to -70°C for long-term preservation (up to 12 months from receipt)
For short-term use (up to 1 month), store at 2-8°C under sterile conditions after reconstitution
For medium-term storage (up to 6 months), store at -20°C to -70°C under sterile conditions after reconstitution
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can denature the antibody
Do not store in frost-free freezers which undergo temperature fluctuations
For antibodies supplied in liquid form, maintain the original buffer composition and avoid introducing contaminants during handling.
Rigorous experimental controls are essential when working with YAR035C-A antibody:
Positive control: Sample known to express YAR035C-A protein
Negative control: Sample known to lack YAR035C-A expression (knockout/knockdown)
Secondary antibody-only control: To detect non-specific binding of the secondary antibody
Isotype control: Using an irrelevant antibody of the same isotype to identify non-specific binding
Blocking peptide control: Pre-incubating the antibody with excess target peptide to verify specificity
For Western blotting applications, consider using established cell lines as positive controls similar to how HeLa cells are utilized for validating Aurora-A kinase antibodies . For immunoprecipitation experiments, include an "IgG pull-down" control using non-specific IgG of the same isotype.
Optimization of Western blot conditions for YAR035C-A antibody requires systematic adjustment of multiple parameters:
Sample preparation: Use appropriate lysis buffers with protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Protein loading: Test 10-50 μg of total protein per lane
Antibody dilution: Begin with 1:500 to 1:1000 dilution and adjust based on signal strength
Blocking conditions: Test both 5% non-fat milk and 5% BSA in TBST as blocking agents
Incubation time: Test both 1-hour room temperature and overnight 4°C primary antibody incubation
Detection method: Compare chemiluminescence and fluorescence-based detection systems
Similar to Aurora-A kinase antibody applications, optimize reducing conditions and buffer composition to ensure proper epitope exposure . After transfer, verify protein loading using Ponceau S staining before antibody incubation.
For immunoprecipitation of YAR035C-A protein:
Prepare cell lysate in a non-denaturing lysis buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and protease inhibitors
Pre-clear lysate with Protein A/G beads for 1 hour at 4°C
Incubate 1-5 μg of YAR035C-A antibody with 500-1000 μg of pre-cleared lysate overnight at 4°C
Add Protein A/G beads and incubate for 2-4 hours at 4°C
Wash beads 4-5 times with lysis buffer
Elute bound proteins by boiling in SDS sample buffer
Analyze by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
This approach is similar to immunoprecipitation protocols used for other nuclear proteins where maintaining protein-protein interactions during extraction is critical . For co-immunoprecipitation experiments, consider crosslinking to stabilize transient interactions.
To study YAR035C-A interactions with chromatin using ChAP methodology:
Cross-link proteins to DNA using 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature
Lyse cells and sonicate chromatin to generate fragments of 200-500 bp
Immunoprecipitate using YAR035C-A antibody
Wash complexes stringently to remove non-specific interactions
Reverse cross-links and purify DNA
Analyze by qPCR for specific genomic regions or perform ChAP-seq for genome-wide analysis
This approach is adapted from the ChAP method described for studying small molecule interactions with chromatin . For genome-wide analysis, following the ChAP-on-chip protocol with LM-PCR amplification and hybridization to whole genome tiling arrays would provide comprehensive binding profiles .
For determining binding kinetics:
Use Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) to measure real-time binding interactions
Immobilize purified YAR035C-A antibody on a sensor chip
Flow varying concentrations of recombinant target protein over the surface
Measure association rate (ka), dissociation rate (kd), and calculate equilibrium dissociation constant (KD)
Compare with isotype control antibodies to establish specificity
This approach is similar to the kinetic analysis performed for Sir2-AAR interactions, where precise measurement of association and dissociation constants provides insights into binding affinity . The resulting data can be presented in tabular format:
| Interaction | ka (1/Ms) | kd (1/s) | KD (M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| YAR035C-A Ab - Target | x.xx × 10^x | x.xx × 10^-x | x.xx × 10^-x |
| Isotype Control - Target | x.xx × 10^x | x.xx × 10^-x | x.xx × 10^-x |
For live-cell imaging applications with YAR035C-A antibody:
Consider creating a fluorescently tagged Fab fragment to minimize interference with protein function
Validate that antibody binding doesn't alter normal protein localization or interactions
Optimize antibody concentration to minimize background while maintaining specific signal
Use appropriate controls including unrelated antibody fragments of similar size
Consider photobleaching characteristics of your fluorophore for long-term imaging
Similar to monitoring Aurora-A kinase during mitosis, careful timing and imaging parameters must be established to capture dynamic localization changes without affecting normal cellular processes . Time-lapse imaging with minimal laser exposure will reduce phototoxicity while capturing authentic protein dynamics.
For antibody-based interactome analysis:
Perform immunoprecipitation with YAR035C-A antibody under native conditions
Include appropriate negative controls (IgG, knockout/knockdown samples)
Elute proteins using non-denaturing methods to preserve interactions
Analyze by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
Filter identified proteins against common contaminant databases
Validate key interactions through reciprocal IP, proximity ligation assay, or FRET
This approach parallels techniques used to identify interaction partners of chromatin-associated proteins, where specificity is critical for distinguishing genuine interactions from background . For proteins with transient interactions, consider using crosslinking agents or proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID) as complementary approaches.
When facing reproducibility issues:
Standardize lysate preparation methods, ensuring consistent protein extraction and concentration determination
Validate antibody performance with each new lot using positive and negative controls
Monitor and control incubation times and temperatures precisely
Prepare fresh working dilutions of antibody for each experiment
Consider the impact of post-translational modifications on epitope recognition
Document experimental conditions meticulously, including reagent sources and lot numbers
For Western blotting applications, inconsistent results might be addressed by optimizing transfer conditions and blocking agents, similar to optimization strategies recommended for Aurora-A kinase antibody applications . For immunofluorescence, consistent fixation methods and antigen retrieval protocols are critical for reproducibility.
To reduce background in immunofluorescence:
Optimize fixation method (test paraformaldehyde, methanol, and acetone fixation)
Extend blocking time using 5-10% normal serum from the species of your secondary antibody
Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 in blocking buffer to reduce non-specific hydrophobic interactions
Increase washing duration and frequency (minimum 3 × 10 minutes with gentle agitation)
Dilute primary antibody further (test serial dilutions from 1:100 to 1:1000)
Include 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 in antibody dilution buffer
Prepare secondary antibody by pre-adsorption against fixed cells lacking the target protein
These approaches mirror optimization strategies for other nuclear protein antibodies, where distinguishing specific signal from background is particularly challenging in the nuclear compartment .
When immunoprecipitation fails:
Confirm antibody epitope accessibility in native conditions (epitopes may be masked by protein interactions)
Test different lysis buffers with varying salt concentrations and detergents
Verify target protein expression in input samples via Western blotting
Increase antibody amount (try 2-10 μg per mg of protein lysate)
Extend incubation time to overnight at 4°C
Test different antibody immobilization methods (direct coupling to beads vs. protein A/G capture)
Consider whether post-translational modifications affect antibody recognition
Similar to other nuclear protein immunoprecipitations, extraction conditions are critical for maintaining protein solubility while preserving native conformation . For low-abundance targets, consider scaling up starting material or implementing signal enhancement methods.
When working with different yeast strains:
Verify conservation of the epitope sequence across strains
Adjust lysis protocols to account for cell wall differences between strains
Validate antibody specificity in each strain using appropriate controls
Consider strain-specific post-translational modifications that might affect epitope recognition
Optimize protein extraction methods for each strain (spheroplasting conditions, mechanical disruption parameters)
Similar to studies of Sir2 and associated proteins in different yeast strains, genetic background can significantly influence protein expression levels and modification patterns . For quantitative comparisons between strains, include loading controls and consider normalizing to total protein rather than single housekeeping genes.
For cell cycle analysis:
Synchronize cells using established methods (alpha-factor arrest, nocodazole block, or elutriation)
Collect samples at defined time points throughout the cell cycle
Perform Western blotting or immunofluorescence with YAR035C-A antibody
Co-stain with cell cycle markers (e.g., tubulin, cyclin proteins) for precise cell cycle staging
Quantify signal intensity changes relative to cell cycle phase
This approach parallels studies of Aurora-A kinase, which shows dynamic expression patterns through prophase to late metaphase . For studying rapid changes in localization, combine with live-cell imaging of synchronized populations expressing fluorescent cell cycle markers.