SPAC5H10.07 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Structure and Classification

Antibodies (immunoglobulins) are Y-shaped glycoproteins composed of two heavy chains and two light chains, forming antigen-binding (Fab) and crystallizable (Fc) regions . Key structural features include:

ComponentDescription
Heavy ChainsDetermine antibody class (IgG, IgM, IgA, etc.); molecular weight ~50–70 kDa .
Light ChainsTwo types (κ or λ); molecular weight ~25 kDa .
Variable RegionsHypervariable complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) enable antigen specificity .
Fc RegionMediates effector functions (e.g., phagocytosis, complement activation) .

Functional Mechanisms of Antibodies

Antibodies neutralize pathogens and toxins through:

  • Opsonization: IgG1/IgG3 enhance phagocyte recognition .

  • Neutralization: Block viral/bacterial entry (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 spike protein neutralization by antibody 5H10) .

  • Complement Activation: IgM/IgG trigger the classical pathway, leading to pathogen lysis .

  • Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC): NK cells target antibody-opsonized cells .

High-Throughput Antibody Discovery

Modern techniques for identifying therapeutic antibodies include:

  • Single-Cell Sequencing: Used to isolate potent antibodies like Abs-9 against Staphylococcus aureus SpA5 .

  • Epitope Mapping: Luminex-based assays and competitive binding experiments resolve antigenic sites (e.g., RSV F protein study) .

  • Affinity Measurements: Biolayer interferometry quantifies binding kinetics (KD values) .

Case Study: Antibody 5H10 Against SARS-CoV

While not SPAC5H10.07, the human monoclonal antibody 5H10 exemplifies antibody engineering:

  • Target: Proteolytic cleavage site (PLKPTKRSFIEDLLF) in SARS-CoV spike protein .

  • Mechanism: Inhibits viral fusion by blocking the S protein’s trypsin-sensitive site (R797) .

  • Efficacy: Neutralized SARS-CoV in vitro (EC50 = 5 µg/mL) and reduced pathology in macaques .

Challenges in Antibody Development

  • Specificity: Cross-reactivity or redundancy in epitope binding can limit therapeutic utility .

  • Resistance: Pathogens like S. aureus evolve drug-resistant strains, necessitating rapid antibody discovery .

  • Glycosylation: Post-translational modifications (e.g., O-mannosylation) influence antibody stability and function .

Future Directions

Emerging strategies include:

  • Structure-Guided Design: Alphafold2 and molecular docking predict epitope-antibody interactions .

  • Multispecific Antibodies: Target multiple antigens to prevent immune evasion.

  • Transcriptomic Profiling: Identifies cell-wall remodeling pathways in antibody-resistant mutants .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPAC5H10.07 antibody; Uncharacterized protein C5H10.07 antibody
Target Names
SPAC5H10.07
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is SpA5 and why is it a significant target for antibody development?

SpA5 refers to the pentameric form of Staphylococcus aureus protein A, a critical virulence factor that facilitates immune evasion. The significance of targeting SpA5 stems from the urgent need to address drug-resistant S. aureus infections. As antibiotic resistance continues to rise, antibody-based approaches targeting SpA5 offer promising alternatives for preventing and treating S. aureus infections that no longer respond to conventional antibiotics .

How are memory B cells producing anti-SpA5 antibodies isolated from clinical samples?

The methodological approach for isolating anti-SpA5 antibody-producing memory B cells involves:

  • PBMC isolation using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation (2000 rpm, 20 min)

  • Collection and washing of white cell layer with PBS

  • Resuspension in RPMI medium with 10% FBS

  • Cryopreservation at 1×10^7 cells/mL in liquid nitrogen

  • Thawing and blocking with 5% rat serum

  • Incubation with biotinylated SpA5 protein (4°C, 25 min)

  • Flow cytometric sorting using gating strategy: CD19+CD20+IgG+CD3-CD14-CD56-

  • Collection of sorted cells in 20% DMEM medium

This protocol enables specific isolation of memory B cells that recognize SpA5, facilitating downstream antibody sequencing and production.

What techniques provide the most comprehensive characterization of anti-SpA5 antibody binding properties?

A multi-technique approach provides the most reliable characterization:

  • ELISA: Initial screening and relative affinity determination

  • Biolayer Interferometry: Precise measurement of binding kinetics

    • Example: Abs-9 demonstrated KD=1.959×10^-9 M (Kon=2.873×10^-2 M^-1, Koff=5.628×10^-7 s^-1)

  • Mass Spectrometry: Confirmation of binding specificity using immunoprecipitation from bacterial lysates

  • Competitive Binding Assays: Validation of epitope specificity

Each technique provides complementary data, with Biolayer Interferometry offering the most precise quantification of binding affinity.

What high-throughput methodologies have proven most effective for discovering novel anti-SpA5 antibodies?

The most powerful approach combines:

  • Single-cell RNA and VDJ sequencing: Applied to memory B cells from immunized volunteers

  • Computational analysis: Identification of expanded clonotypes indicating antigen-specific responses

  • Expression vector construction: Cloning of BCR sequences into pcDNA3.1(+) vectors

  • Recombinant expression: Production in 293F cells using optimized transfection conditions (heavy chain 0.5 μg/mL, light chain 0.67 μg/mL, PEI 2.3 μg/mL)

  • Protein A purification: Capturing expressed antibodies using affinity chromatography

This integrated approach enabled researchers to identify 676 antigen-binding IgG1+ clonotypes from 64 vaccinated volunteers, with subsequent selection of TOP10 sequences for expression and characterization, ultimately leading to identification of Abs-9 as a highly potent candidate .

How can researchers validate the specificity of anti-SpA5 antibodies against potential cross-reactivity with other bacterial proteins?

A rigorous specificity validation workflow includes:

  • Bacterial lysate immunoprecipitation:

    • Ultrasonic fragmentation and centrifugation of bacterial fluid (e.g., MRSA252)

    • Overnight incubation of supernatant with antibody

    • Protein A bead binding

    • Elution and mass spectrometry analysis

  • Competitive binding assays:

    • Pre-incubation of antibody with varying concentrations of potential cross-reactive antigens

    • Assessment of inhibition patterns

  • Multiple strain testing:

    • Evaluation of binding to proteins from diverse S. aureus strains with sequence variations in SpA5

For Abs-9, mass spectrometry confirmed specific binding to SpA5 without significant cross-reactivity, demonstrating the effectiveness of this validation approach.

What computational methods have proven effective for predicting and validating SpA5 antibody epitopes?

The research demonstrates a successful computational pipeline:

  • Structure Prediction:

    • AlphaFold2 for generating 3D theoretical structures of both antibody and SpA5

    • Example output: Detailed 3D models of Abs-9 antibody and SpA5 protein

  • Molecular Docking:

    • Discovery Studio 2019 software for complex structure prediction

    • Identification of 36 amino acid residues involved in the binding interface

  • Epitope Validation:

    • Synthesis and KLH-coupling of predicted epitope (N847-S857)

    • ELISA confirmation of epitope binding

    • Competitive inhibition assays with full-length SpA5

This approach successfully identified a key epitope (N847-S857) on the α-helix structure of SpA5 that binds Abs-9, validating the computational prediction methodology.

How do in vitro binding characteristics correlate with in vivo prophylactic efficacy for anti-SpA5 antibodies?

The research revealed important correlations:

  • Binding Affinity:

    • Nanomolar affinity of Abs-9 (KD=1.959×10^-9 M) correlated with strong protective effects

    • Tight binding likely ensures effective neutralization of SpA5 in vivo

  • Epitope-Specific Protection:

    • Targeting the specific N847-S857 epitope appeared critical for efficacy

    • Not all anti-SpA5 antibodies would provide equal protection, despite similar affinities

  • Immune Modulation:

    • Prophylactic protection correlated with upregulation of immune mediators (CCL3 and TNF-α)

    • Suggests effective antibodies work through both direct neutralization and immune response modulation

These findings indicate that candidate selection should consider both binding characteristics and epitope specificity.

What animal models are most appropriate for evaluating prophylactic efficacy of anti-SpA5 antibodies?

The research employed a standardized mouse sepsis model with these key parameters:

  • Animal Selection:

    • Female BALB/c mice (6-8 weeks old)

    • Standardized weight ranges

  • Treatment Protocol:

    • Pre-treatment with antibody (24 hours before bacterial challenge)

    • Precise dosing based on body weight

  • Bacterial Challenge:

    • Lethal doses of diverse S. aureus strains:

      • MRSA252 (methicillin-resistant)

      • Multiple drug-resistant clinical isolates

  • Assessment Parameters:

    • Survival monitoring

    • Bacterial burden quantification

    • Cytokine level measurement (focusing on CCL3 and TNF-α)

This model provided robust demonstration of Abs-9's ability to protect against lethal challenges with multiple drug-resistant S. aureus strains.

What methodological approach should researchers use to validate computationally predicted SpA5 antibody epitopes?

A comprehensive validation protocol includes:

  • Epitope Peptide Preparation:

    • Synthesis of predicted epitope sequence (e.g., N847-S857)

    • Conjugation to carrier protein (keyhole limpet hemocyanin)

    • Preparation at 2 μg/mL in coating buffer

  • ELISA Validation:

    • Plate coating with KLH-epitope conjugate (4°C overnight)

    • Blocking with sealing solution (37°C, 2h)

    • Serial dilution of test antibody starting at 2 μg/mL

    • Appropriate controls:

      • Full-length SpA5 (positive control)

      • KLH alone (negative control)

      • PBST (blank control)

  • Competitive Inhibition Testing:

    • Pre-incubation of antibody with serial dilutions of full-length antigen

    • Assessment of binding inhibition to epitope-KLH conjugate

    • Detection with HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG Fc (1:10,000 dilution)

This systematic approach provided strong validation of the N847-S857 epitope prediction for Abs-9.

What are the critical considerations when designing expression systems for recombinant anti-SpA5 antibodies?

Successful expression requires attention to these factors:

  • Vector Construction:

    • Selection of appropriate expression vector (e.g., pcDNA3.1+)

    • Cloning at NotI/XbaI restriction sites

    • Verification of sequence integrity

  • Expression Host Optimization:

    • 293F cells maintained at 10^6 cells/mL

    • Transfection ratio optimization:

      • Heavy chain: 0.5 μg/mL

      • Light chain: 0.67 μg/mL

      • PEI: 2.3 μg/mL

  • Culture Conditions:

    • 37°C, 5% CO2, shaking incubation

    • 5-day culture period

  • Purification Strategy:

    • Protein A affinity chromatography

    • Elution with appropriate buffers

    • Concentration and buffer exchange

    • Protein quantification

This expression system successfully produced fully human antibodies with proper folding and binding activity.

How should researchers analyze single-cell sequencing data to identify promising anti-SpA5 antibody candidates?

The analytical workflow involves:

  • Quality Control and Processing:

    • Filtering low-quality sequencing reads

    • Paired heavy and light chain sequence assembly

    • V(D)J gene segment assignment

  • Clonotype Identification:

    • Clustering of related BCR sequences

    • Identification of expanded clonotypes

    • Analysis of somatic hypermutation patterns

  • Candidate Selection Criteria:

    • High expression levels

    • Evidence of affinity maturation

    • VH gene family analysis (e.g., VH3-48 for SpA5)

    • CDR3 sequence characteristics

This approach successfully identified 676 antigen-binding IgG1+ clonotypes from vaccinated volunteers, from which researchers selected the TOP10 sequences for expression and validation.

What parameters are most critical when evaluating the therapeutic potential of anti-SpA5 antibodies?

Comprehensive evaluation should consider:

  • Binding Characteristics:

    • Affinity (KD value; nanomolar or better preferred)

    • Association and dissociation kinetics

    • Epitope specificity

  • Protective Efficacy:

    • Survival rates in animal models

    • Protection against multiple S. aureus strains

    • Dose-response relationship

  • Mechanistic Insights:

    • Direct neutralization capacity

    • Immune modulation effects (cytokine changes)

    • Potential for synergy with other treatments

  • Developability Factors:

    • Human germline derivation (e.g., VH3-48 gene for Abs-9)

    • Expression levels and stability

    • Immunogenicity risk assessment

For Abs-9, comprehensive evaluation across these parameters demonstrated exceptional promise, with nanomolar affinity, broad strain protection, and immune-enhancing effects.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.