yaeR Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
yaeR antibody; b0187 antibody; JW0182 antibody; Uncharacterized protein YaeR antibody
Target Names
yaeR
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the yaeR protein and why is it significant for E. coli research?

The yaeR protein (P52096) is a conserved bacterial protein found in E. coli K12 strains. While its specific function is still being characterized, it belongs to the extensive proteome of E. coli, which is described as "the most intensively studied and best understood organism on the planet" . E. coli proteins like yaeR are critical for understanding bacterial metabolism, stress responses, and potentially pathogenesis mechanisms. Research indicates that even highly conserved proteins in E. coli may play important roles in bacterial adaptation and evolution, as demonstrated in the E. coli long-term evolution experiment .

What experimental applications are appropriate for yaeR antibody research?

Based on antibody characterization studies, yaeR antibodies can be utilized in several experimental contexts:

ApplicationValidation RequirementsKey Considerations
Western blottingKO cell line controlsUse gradient gels for optimal separation
ImmunoprecipitationSpecificity testing against recombinant proteinOptimize lysis conditions to maintain protein interactions
ImmunofluorescenceKO controls with background staining assessmentRequires special permeabilization for intracellular bacterial proteins
ELISAStandard curve with recombinant proteinOptimize blocking to prevent non-specific binding

Recent antibody characterization studies emphasize that knockout cell lines are superior controls, particularly for Western blots and immunofluorescence, where approximately 50-75% of commercially available antibodies perform adequately in controlled tests .

How should researchers validate yaeR antibody specificity in experimental systems?

Proper validation is essential as research has shown that approximately 50% of commercial antibodies fail to meet basic standards for characterization . For yaeR antibody validation:

  • Genetic validation: Use yaeR knockout E. coli strains as negative controls

  • Biochemical validation: Test against purified recombinant yaeR protein

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against closely related E. coli proteins

  • Multi-method validation: Compare results across Western blot, IP, and IF

YCharOS studies revealed that an alarming average of ~12 publications per protein target included data from antibodies that failed to recognize the relevant target protein . This underscores the critical importance of thorough validation before experimental use.

What controls are necessary for rigorous yaeR antibody experiments?

A comprehensive control strategy includes:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Positive controlConfirm antibody functionalityWild-type E. coli K12 lysate
Negative controlAssess non-specific bindingyaeR knockout E. coli strain
Specificity controlVerify target recognitionPre-adsorption with purified yaeR
Technical controlEvaluate backgroundSecondary antibody only
Biological controlCompare expressionE. coli strains from different conditions

The use of these controls is supported by antibody characterization approaches that have been refined through initiatives like YCharOS, which has tested over 1,000 antibodies and published 96 antibody characterization reports .

How can researchers optimize Western blotting protocols specifically for yaeR detection?

Western blotting optimization for bacterial proteins like yaeR requires specific considerations:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Use bacterial lysis buffers containing appropriate detergents (0.1% SDS or 1% Triton X-100)

    • Include DNase (10 μg/ml) to reduce viscosity from bacterial DNA

    • Add protease inhibitor cocktails specifically formulated for bacterial samples

  • Electrophoresis conditions:

    • Use 12-15% gels for optimal resolution of yaeR protein

    • Include molecular weight markers appropriate for bacterial proteins

    • Consider native PAGE if studying protein complexes involving yaeR

  • Detection optimization:

    • Test antibody dilutions systematically (1:500 to 1:5000 range)

    • Optimize exposure times for chemiluminescence detection

    • Consider fluorescent secondary antibodies for quantitative analysis

Recent studies emphasize that recombinant antibodies generally outperform both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies in Western blotting applications .

What are the methodological approaches for studying yaeR in the context of E. coli pathogenesis?

To investigate potential roles of yaeR in pathogenesis:

  • Expression analysis across pathotypes:

    • Compare yaeR expression between commensal and pathogenic strains

    • Examine expression during infection-relevant conditions using RT-qPCR

    • Correlate expression with virulence factor production

  • Functional studies:

    • Generate yaeR knockout strains and assess phenotypic changes

    • Complement with wild-type gene to confirm specificity

    • Test knockout strains in infection models

  • Host-interaction studies:

    • Investigate if yaeR localizes differently during host cell contact

    • Determine if yaeR interacts with host proteins using co-immunoprecipitation

    • Test if antibodies against yaeR alter bacterial behavior

Understanding potential virulence roles is relevant as E. coli pathotypes cause diverse intestinal and extraintestinal diseases through various virulence factors encoded on genetic elements such as plasmids, bacteriophage, transposons, and pathogenicity islands .

How can researchers integrate yaeR antibody data with multi-omics approaches?

Modern bacterial research requires integration of multiple data types:

Omics ApproachIntegration with Antibody DataMethodological Considerations
TranscriptomicsCorrelate protein levels with mRNA expressionAccount for post-transcriptional regulation
ProteomicsValidate mass spectrometry identificationUse antibody for targeted validation of MS results
InteractomicsIdentify protein-protein interactionsCompare IP-MS with predicted interaction networks
MetabolomicsConnect protein function to metabolic changesLink metabolite levels to protein activity

These integrated approaches can reveal how yaeR fits within broader bacterial cellular networks and potentially identify novel functions based on guilt-by-association principles.

What strategies exist for resolving contradictory antibody data in yaeR research?

When facing contradictory results, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Methodological assessment:

    • Compare experimental protocols in detail (buffer compositions, incubation times)

    • Evaluate antibody sources, lots, and storage conditions

    • Review sample preparation methods for potential differences

  • Validation approaches:

    • Test multiple antibodies against the same target

    • Employ orthogonal methods to confirm results (e.g., mass spectrometry)

    • Use genetic approaches (knockouts, tagged proteins) as definitive controls

  • Biological explanations:

    • Consider strain-specific differences in yaeR expression or modification

    • Evaluate if growth conditions affect protein conformation or epitope accessibility

    • Investigate potential post-translational modifications that affect antibody binding

A YCharOS study found that vendors proactively removed ~20% of antibodies that failed to meet expectations and modified the proposed applications for ~40% after rigorous testing . This highlights the importance of thorough validation.

How do researchers design experiments to study potential post-translational modifications of yaeR?

Investigating potential PTMs requires specialized approaches:

  • Modification-specific detection:

    • Use antibodies targeting common bacterial PTMs (phosphorylation, acetylation)

    • Employ enzymatic treatments (phosphatases, deacetylases) before antibody detection

    • Compare mobility shifts in Western blots under different conditions

  • Mass spectrometry approaches:

    • Immunoprecipitate yaeR for targeted PTM analysis

    • Use enrichment strategies for specific modifications

    • Compare modification patterns under different growth conditions

  • Functional validation:

    • Generate site-directed mutants of potential modification sites

    • Compare phenotypes between wild-type and modification-site mutants

    • Assess if environmental conditions affect modification states

PTM studies can reveal regulatory mechanisms controlling yaeR function in different environmental contexts or during bacterial-host interactions.

How might advances in antibody technology enhance yaeR research?

Recent developments in antibody technology offer new opportunities:

  • Recombinant antibody approaches:

    • Single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) for improved intracellular targeting

    • Nanobodies for accessing sterically restricted epitopes

    • Bispecific antibodies that can simultaneously target yaeR and interaction partners

  • Advanced imaging applications:

    • Super-resolution microscopy compatible antibody formats

    • Proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX) for identifying neighboring proteins

    • Live-cell imaging with cell-permeable antibody fragments

  • Therapeutic possibilities:

    • Development of antibodies targeting bacterial proteins for diagnostic or therapeutic use

    • Exploration of antibody fragments for bacterial protein inhibition

    • Integration with phage display technology for rapid antibody evolution

The YAbS database currently catalogs over 2,900 antibody candidates in clinical development and all approved antibody therapeutics , demonstrating the rapidly evolving antibody technology landscape.

What computational approaches can improve yaeR antibody experimental design?

Computational methods can enhance experimental planning and interpretation:

  • Epitope prediction:

    • Analyze protein structure to identify accessible regions

    • Predict antigenic determinants for optimal antibody generation

    • Model antibody-antigen interactions to understand binding mechanisms

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Identify similar proteins across bacterial species

    • Predict potential off-target binding

    • Design experiments to test predicted cross-reactivity

  • Data integration platforms:

    • Utilize antibody databases and search engines to identify validated reagents

    • Access repositories containing validation data for similar bacterial proteins

    • Employ machine learning to predict antibody performance in different applications

These computational approaches can save time and resources by improving experimental design and reducing the need for extensive trial-and-error optimization.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.