SPBC18E5.14c Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Nomenclature and Identifier Analysis

The identifier "SPBC18E5.14c" follows a pattern observed in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) gene nomenclature, where "SPBC" denotes a chromosomal locus. For example:

  • SPBC1773.16c: A fission yeast protein targeted by custom antibodies .

  • SPBC776.06c: Another fission yeast gene product with available antibodies .

  • Structural antibody databases (SAbDab, AbDb) .

  • Clinical or experimental studies .

  • Commercial antibody repositories .

Biological Context of Similar Antibodies

Antibodies targeting Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteins are primarily used in basic research to study cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, and fungal biology. Examples include:

Antibody NameTarget ProteinApplicationSource
SPBC1773.16c AntibodyHypothetical proteinWestern blot, IF/ICCCusabio
SPBC776.06c AntibodyUncharacterized proteinImmunoprecipitationCusabio

These antibodies are typically produced as custom reagents for niche research needs . No functional or structural data exist for "SPBC18E5.14c" in this context.

Potential Explanations for the Absence of Data

  • Hypothetical or Obsolete Identifier: The identifier may refer to a deprecated or unannotated gene in fission yeast.

  • Typographical Error: Similar valid identifiers (e.g., SPBC18E5.14) exist but lack associated antibodies.

  • Proprietary or Unpublished Antibody: The antibody might be part of an undisclosed research project or commercial pipeline.

Guidance for Further Investigation

To address this gap, consider:

  1. Re-validate the Identifier: Cross-check gene databases (e.g., PomBase) for "SPBC18E5.14c".

  2. Custom Antibody Production: Platforms like Cusabio offer bespoke antibody services for uncharacterized targets .

  3. Explore Structural Databases: SAbDab contains 1,624 antibody structures but no entries for this target .

Antibody Validation Best Practices

If pursuing custom development:

  • Use orthogonal methods (e.g., knockout validation, epitope mapping) .

  • Ensure applications match validated protocols (e.g., Western blot dilution ranges) .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPBC18E5.14c; Uncharacterized membrane protein C18E5.14c
Target Names
SPBC18E5.14c
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein. Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is SPBC18E5.14c and why are antibodies against it important for research?

SPBC18E5.14c is an uncharacterized membrane protein found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972/24843), commonly known as fission yeast. It is classified as a sequence orphan, meaning it lacks significant sequence homology with known characterized proteins . Antibodies against this protein are particularly valuable for studying membrane protein dynamics in S. pombe and potentially identifying novel functions within this model organism. The development of specific antibodies enables researchers to investigate protein localization, expression levels, and potential interaction partners, which are essential steps toward functional characterization of this understudied protein.

What are the main experimental applications for SPBC18E5.14c Antibody?

The primary validated applications for SPBC18E5.14c Antibody include ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) and Western Blot analysis . These techniques allow researchers to:

  • Detect and quantify SPBC18E5.14c protein in yeast lysates

  • Monitor expression levels under various experimental conditions

  • Verify protein size and potential post-translational modifications

  • Investigate protein-protein interactions through co-immunoprecipitation experiments

While not explicitly validated in the literature, researchers may also explore immunofluorescence microscopy applications to determine subcellular localization, following appropriate validation protocols.

How should researchers determine the appropriate dilution for SPBC18E5.14c Antibody in different applications?

Determining optimal antibody dilution requires systematic titration experiments for each application:

ApplicationRecommended Starting Dilution RangeOptimization Approach
Western Blot1:500 - 1:2000Serial dilutions with constant antigen amount
ELISA1:1000 - 1:5000Checkerboard titration with varied antibody and antigen concentrations
Immunofluorescence1:100 - 1:500Start conservative, then reduce concentration if background is high

For Western blots, researchers should prepare multiple identical membranes with the same samples and test different antibody dilutions to identify conditions that maximize specific signal while minimizing background. Include positive and negative controls to assess specificity at each dilution. Similar approaches using serial dilutions should be employed for ELISA applications, potentially using a competition binding format similar to the CBASQE approach described for other antibody systems .

What is the recommended protocol for using SPBC18E5.14c Antibody in Western blot applications?

For optimal Western blot results with SPBC18E5.14c Antibody:

  • Sample Preparation:

    • Harvest S. pombe cells in mid-log phase

    • Extract proteins using mechanical disruption in the presence of protease inhibitors

    • Solubilize membrane fractions using appropriate detergents (e.g., 1% NP-40 or 0.5% Triton X-100)

  • Electrophoresis and Transfer:

    • Separate proteins on 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels

    • Transfer to PVDF membranes (preferred for membrane proteins)

    • Verify transfer efficiency with reversible staining

  • Immunoblotting:

    • Block membranes with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature

    • Incubate with SPBC18E5.14c Antibody (1:1000 dilution) overnight at 4°C

    • Wash extensively with TBST (4 × 10 minutes)

    • Incubate with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:5000) for 1 hour

    • Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence

  • Controls:

    • Include wild-type S. pombe lysates (positive control)

    • Include SPBC18E5.14c deletion strain lysates (negative control)

    • Use loading controls (e.g., anti-tubulin) to normalize expression levels

This protocol may require optimization based on specific laboratory conditions and equipment.

How can researchers validate the specificity of SPBC18E5.14c Antibody for their experiments?

Thorough validation is essential before using SPBC18E5.14c Antibody in critical experiments:

  • Genetic Validation:

    • Compare signal between wild-type and SPBC18E5.14c knockout/knockdown strains

    • Perform rescue experiments with tagged SPBC18E5.14c constructs

  • Molecular Validation:

    • Conduct pre-adsorption tests by pre-incubating antibody with purified antigen

    • Verify signal reduction/elimination in pre-adsorption controls

  • Technical Validation:

    • Confirm reproducibility across multiple antibody lots

    • Test specificity across related S. pombe strains

    • Perform peptide competition assays similar to the competition binding approach described for other antibody systems

  • Cross-Reactivity Assessment:

    • Test reactivity against related proteins or organisms

    • Analyze potential cross-reactivity through bioinformatic epitope prediction

Thorough validation data should be documented and included in publications to enhance reproducibility.

What controls are essential when using SPBC18E5.14c Antibody in immunoprecipitation experiments?

For rigorous immunoprecipitation experiments with SPBC18E5.14c Antibody:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Input ControlVerify presence of target protein before IPReserve 5-10% of lysate before immunoprecipitation
No-Antibody ControlDetect non-specific binding to beadsPerform IP procedure without adding SPBC18E5.14c Antibody
Isotype ControlIdentify non-specific bindingUse non-relevant rabbit IgG at equivalent concentration
Negative Sample ControlConfirm specificityProcess SPBC18E5.14c knockout strain in parallel
Denaturing ControlDistinguish direct vs. indirect interactionsCompare results under native vs. denaturing conditions

Additionally, researchers should consider reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation experiments and validation with differently tagged versions of the protein when studying protein-protein interactions.

How can competition binding assays be adapted for studying SPBC18E5.14c Antibody epitope specificity?

Competition binding assays can provide valuable insights into antibody epitope specificity. Based on the CBASQE (CSP-based assay for serological quantification and equivalency) methodology described in the literature , researchers can develop a similar approach for SPBC18E5.14c:

  • Assay Development:

    • Generate a panel of peptides spanning different regions of SPBC18E5.14c

    • Label peptides with distinct reporter molecules

    • Establish baseline binding profiles for SPBC18E5.14c Antibody

  • Competition Format:

    • Pre-incubate SPBC18E5.14c Antibody with unlabeled competitors

    • Measure displacement of labeled peptides

    • Calculate IC50 values for different epitope regions

  • Data Analysis:

    • Convert IC50 values to absolute concentrations using standard curves

    • Compare binding profiles across different experimental conditions

    • Map epitope regions with highest competition efficiency

This approach would enable precise epitope mapping and could help identify functional domains within the SPBC18E5.14c protein.

What strategies can be employed for generating domain-specific antibodies against SPBC18E5.14c?

For researchers interested in developing domain-specific antibodies:

  • Computational Analysis:

    • Perform sequence analysis to identify predicted domains

    • Use AlphaFold2 or similar tools to predict protein structure

    • Identify surface-exposed regions likely to be immunogenic

  • Peptide Design:

    • Generate peptides corresponding to specific domains

    • Ensure peptides are sufficiently long (15-25 amino acids) for immunogenicity

    • Consider coupling to carrier proteins for enhanced immune response

  • Screening Approaches:

    • Implement high-throughput single-cell RNA and VDJ sequencing of B cells from immunized animals

    • Screen antibody clones against individual domains

    • Validate domain specificity through competition assays

  • Validation:

    • Confirm domain specificity using truncated protein constructs

    • Perform epitope mapping using peptide arrays

    • Validate functional implications through domain-specific inhibition studies

This approach would generate valuable reagents for dissecting SPBC18E5.14c function at the domain level.

How can high-throughput technologies improve SPBC18E5.14c Antibody characterization?

Modern high-throughput approaches can significantly enhance antibody characterization:

  • Single-Cell Sequencing:

    • Apply high-throughput single-cell RNA and VDJ sequencing to identify optimal antibody clones

    • Select clonotypes with highest specificity and affinity

    • Express and characterize multiple candidates simultaneously

  • Epitope Binning:

    • Use surface plasmon resonance or bio-layer interferometry arrays

    • Determine epitope coverage across the protein

    • Identify non-competing antibody pairs for sandwich assays

  • Affinity Determination:

    • Employ high-throughput kinetic analysis

    • Quantify kon and koff rates for multiple antibody candidates

    • Select clones with optimal binding properties

  • Cross-Reactivity Profiling:

    • Screen against protein arrays containing related membrane proteins

    • Identify and eliminate cross-reactive antibodies

    • Generate specificity profiles for each candidate

These approaches would generate comprehensive characterization data to support advanced research applications.

What are common issues when using SPBC18E5.14c Antibody in Western blot and how can they be resolved?

IssuePotential CausesSolutions
No signalInsufficient protein, degradation, antibody dilution too highIncrease protein loading, add fresh protease inhibitors, optimize antibody concentration
Multiple bandsCross-reactivity, protein degradation, post-translational modificationsUse knockout controls, optimize lysis conditions, validate with alternative methods
High backgroundInsufficient blocking, antibody concentration too high, inadequate washingExtend blocking time, dilute antibody further, increase washing duration and volume
Inconsistent resultsAntibody batch variation, protein extraction inconsistencyUse consistent antibody lots, standardize extraction protocol, implement internal controls

For membrane proteins like SPBC18E5.14c, consider using specialized detergents (CHAPS, DDM) that better preserve membrane protein integrity and optimize sample heating conditions to prevent aggregation.

How should researchers address potential cross-reactivity with other S. pombe membrane proteins?

Cross-reactivity is a significant concern with antibodies against uncharacterized proteins:

  • Bioinformatic Analysis:

    • Perform BLAST searches to identify proteins with sequence similarity

    • Predict epitopes and cross-reference against other membrane proteins

    • Generate a list of potential cross-reactive proteins for experimental validation

  • Experimental Validation:

    • Test antibody against purified potential cross-reactive proteins

    • Overexpress candidate cross-reactive proteins and assess signal increase

    • Deplete or knockout potential cross-reactive proteins and assess signal change

  • Epitope Refinement:

    • Develop competition assays with specific peptides to block cross-reactive binding

    • Generate new antibodies against unique regions if cross-reactivity is confirmed

    • Consider using monoclonal alternatives if polyclonal exhibits excessive cross-reactivity

  • Documentation:

    • Explicitly document known cross-reactivity in experimental methods

    • Implement appropriate controls to distinguish specific from non-specific signals

    • Consider multiple antibody approach for critical findings

These strategies ensure experimental rigor when working with antibodies against uncharacterized proteins.

How can SPBC18E5.14c Antibody contribute to understanding membrane protein function in S. pombe?

SPBC18E5.14c Antibody can facilitate several research approaches:

  • Localization Studies:

    • Determine subcellular distribution under different conditions

    • Track localization changes during cell cycle or stress

    • Identify potential functional compartmentalization

  • Protein Interactions:

    • Identify binding partners through immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

    • Validate interactions through reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation

    • Map interaction domains through deletion constructs

  • Expression Regulation:

    • Monitor protein levels under various physiological conditions

    • Correlate protein expression with transcriptional changes

    • Investigate post-translational regulation mechanisms

  • Functional Characterization:

    • Combine with genetic approaches (knockout/knockdown)

    • Test phenotypic consequences of blocking specific domains with the antibody

    • Develop functional assays based on localization and interaction data

These approaches would significantly advance understanding of this uncharacterized protein's role in yeast biology.

What emerging technologies could enhance SPBC18E5.14c Antibody-based research?

Several cutting-edge technologies offer promising applications:

  • Proximity Labeling:

    • Convert SPBC18E5.14c Antibody to a BioID or APEX2 conjugate

    • Map proximal proteins in the native cellular environment

    • Identify transient or weak interactions not captured by traditional methods

  • Super-Resolution Microscopy:

    • Employ techniques like STORM or PALM with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies

    • Achieve nanometer-scale resolution of protein localization

    • Visualize membrane microdomains containing SPBC18E5.14c

  • Cryo-Electron Tomography:

    • Use antibody labeling to identify SPBC18E5.14c in cellular tomograms

    • Visualize native membrane context at molecular resolution

    • Integrate with structural prediction methods like AlphaFold2

  • Single-Molecule Tracking:

    • Conjugate quantum dots or photoswitchable fluorophores to Fab fragments

    • Track single SPBC18E5.14c molecules in living cells

    • Determine diffusion properties and confinement zones

These technologies could provide unprecedented insights into SPBC18E5.14c function and dynamics.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.