The YCL065W gene is located on chromosome III (left arm) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene nomenclature follows the yeast ORF (Open Reading Frame) system:
Y: Yeast
C: Chromosome III
L: Left arm
065: ORF number
W: Watson (coding) strand
While its exact biological role remains underexplored in the provided sources, YCL065W has been studied in chromatin remodeling contexts. For example, it was analyzed in mutant strains (arp6Δ, htz1Δ) to assess transcriptional changes linked to histone H2A variant Htz1 (source ).
In a study analyzing chromatin-associated proteins (source ), YCL065W expression was monitored in htz1Δ mutants using ChIP with anti-Htz1 antibodies. While the YCL065W Antibody itself was not directly mentioned, such reagents are critical for:
Localization assays: Tracking protein distribution under genetic perturbations.
Interaction studies: Identifying binding partners via co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP).
Antibody reliability is a recurring theme in yeast research. For example:
YCharOS initiatives (source ) highlight that ~12% of published antibodies fail to recognize their targets, emphasizing the need for rigorous validation (e.g., KO cell lines).
Commercial antibodies for yeast proteins often require application-specific optimization (e.g., WB vs. IF) (source ).
Western Blot: Use 1:1,000–1:10,000 dilutions with chemiluminescent substrates (source ).
ChIP: Pair with chromatin shearing and stringent wash buffers to reduce background noise (source ).
Cross-reactivity: Yeast share conserved domains with other eukaryotes, necessitating sequence alignment checks.
Batch variability: Polyclonal antibodies may exhibit lot-to-lot inconsistency (source ).
Advancements in antibody engineering, such as recombinant antibodies (source ), could improve reproducibility for YCL065W studies. Additionally, integrating CRISPR-based KO validation (source ) would enhance specificity assessments.
STRING: 4932.YCL065W
YCL065W refers to a specific open reading frame (ORF) in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome, identified by its chromosomal location. The protein encoded by this gene has been the subject of various studies examining yeast molecular biology and genetics. Research involving YCL065W contributes to our broader understanding of fundamental cellular processes in eukaryotes, as S. cerevisiae serves as a model organism with conserved pathways relevant to human biology. Antibodies against YCL065W enable researchers to detect, quantify, and localize this protein within cellular contexts, facilitating studies on its expression, regulation, and function .
The primary type of YCL065W antibody commercially available is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits against recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508/S288c) YCL065W protein. These antibodies are typically supplied in liquid form, containing preservatives such as 0.03% Proclin 300 and constituents including 50% glycerol and 0.01M PBS at pH 7.4. They are generally purified using antigen affinity methods and are classified as IgG immunoglobulins . Researchers should verify the specific validation data for their intended applications before use, as recommended by antibody validation repositories .
YCL065W antibodies have been validated for specific research applications including Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Western Blotting (WB). These applications enable researchers to quantify and characterize the YCL065W protein in yeast samples. When selecting an antibody for a particular application, researchers should consult antibody data repositories that provide validation data specific to their experimental context . The validation process typically involves testing the antibody on known positive and negative samples to confirm specificity and sensitivity in the desired application.
For optimal preservation of antibody activity, YCL065W antibodies should be stored at either -20°C or -80°C upon receipt. It is critical to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, as these can degrade antibody quality and reduce binding efficacy. The antibodies are typically supplied in a storage buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative, which helps maintain stability during proper storage . For laboratories preparing their own antibody dilutions or cocktails, proper labeling with preparation date, expiration date, and storage temperature is essential for maintaining quality control standards .
ChIP (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation) assays using YCL065W antibody can be implemented following similar protocols to those established for other yeast proteins. When designing a ChIP experiment with YCL065W antibody, researchers should consider:
Crosslinking optimization: Typically using 1% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes
Sonication parameters: Adjusted to yield chromatin fragments between 200-600bp
Antibody specificity: Pre-clearing lysates and including appropriate negative controls
Quantification method: Real-time quantitative PCR is recommended for analyzing immunoprecipitated DNA
The experimental approach should be modeled after successful ChIP protocols such as those used for analyzing Htz1 association to promoters of genes like GAL1, SWR1, and ribosomal protein genes (RPL13A and RPS16B), where percentage of input DNA obtained by ChIP is calculated and compared between wild-type and mutant strains . This enables researchers to determine the chromosomal localization patterns of YCL065W protein and its potential interactions with specific genomic regions.
When planning co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) experiments with YCL065W antibody, researchers should address several critical factors:
Cell lysis conditions: Buffer composition should preserve protein-protein interactions while efficiently lysing yeast cells (typically requiring mechanical disruption)
Antibody binding capacity: Determine optimal antibody-to-protein ratio through titration experiments
Control experiments: Include both positive controls (known interacting proteins) and negative controls (IgG from the same species)
Washing stringency: Balance between removing non-specific interactions and preserving genuine interactions
Detection strategy: Western blotting with antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Implementing YCL065W antibody in multi-parameter flow cytometry for yeast research requires specific technical considerations:
Cell wall digestion: Yeast cells require enzymatic treatment (typically with zymolyase or lyticase) to create spheroplasts permeable to antibodies
Fixation protocol: Typically using 3.7% formaldehyde followed by permeabilization with a detergent such as 0.1% Triton X-100
Antibody cocktail design: When combining YCL065W antibody with other antibodies, spectral overlap must be minimized
Compensation controls: Single-stained controls for each fluorochrome are essential for accurate compensation
Gating strategy: Sequential gating beginning with scatter properties to identify intact spheroplasts
For antibody cocktail validation, researchers must confirm that combining YCL065W antibody with other antibodies doesn't compromise detection sensitivity. This validation should include comparing staining patterns between individual antibodies and the cocktail using samples containing relevant positive and negative populations . The stability of antibody cocktails containing YCL065W antibody should be determined empirically, with particular attention to potential breakdown of tandem fluorochromes if included in the panel.
A comprehensive Western blotting protocol using YCL065W antibody should follow these methodological steps:
Sample preparation:
Harvest yeast cells during logarithmic growth phase
Lyse cells using glass bead disruption in buffer containing protease inhibitors
Clear lysates by centrifugation (14,000 × g, 10 minutes, 4°C)
Quantify protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assay
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Resolve 20-50 μg total protein on 10-12% SDS-PAGE
Transfer to PVDF membrane (recommended over nitrocellulose for yeast proteins)
Confirm transfer efficiency with reversible protein stain
Antibody incubation:
Block membrane with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with YCL065W antibody at 1:1000 dilution in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C
Wash 3 × 10 minutes with TBST
Incubate with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody at 1:5000 for 1 hour
Wash 3 × 10 minutes with TBST
Detection and analysis:
Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence substrate
Analyze band intensity using image analysis software
Include loading control (e.g., Act1) for normalization
This protocol should be optimized for each specific research context, with particular attention to antibody dilution and incubation conditions .
A rigorous validation approach for YCL065W antibody specificity should include multiple complementary strategies:
Genetic validation:
Test antibody reactivity in wild-type versus YCL065W deletion strains
Confirm loss of signal in knockout/deletion samples
Epitope competition:
Pre-incubate antibody with excess immunizing peptide
Verify signal reduction/elimination in pre-blocked samples
Multiple detection methods:
Compare results between Western blot, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence
Consistency across methods strengthens specificity evidence
Mass spectrometry validation:
Immunoprecipitate with YCL065W antibody
Confirm protein identity by mass spectrometry analysis
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test antibody against closely related yeast proteins
Evaluate potential off-target binding
Proper validation ensures experimental reproducibility and reliable data interpretation. Researchers should document validation results thoroughly and consider submitting data to antibody validation repositories to benefit the scientific community .
Immunofluorescence microscopy with YCL065W antibody requires a comprehensive set of controls:
Primary antibody controls:
Positive control: Wild-type yeast strain known to express YCL065W
Negative control: YCL065W deletion strain
Isotype control: Non-specific rabbit IgG at equivalent concentration
Secondary antibody controls:
Autofluorescence control: Unstained cells
Secondary-only control: Cells incubated with secondary antibody but no primary
Fluorophore controls:
Single-fluorophore controls when performing multi-label experiments
Photobleaching controls for quantitative analysis
Sample preparation controls:
Fixation control: Different fixation methods may affect epitope accessibility
Permeabilization control: Optimize detergent concentration
Blocking efficacy controls:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers)
Additionally, co-localization studies should include appropriate markers for cellular compartments to determine the subcellular localization of the YCL065W protein. Z-stack imaging is recommended to ensure complete visualization of three-dimensional structures within yeast cells.
When encountering weak or absent signals with YCL065W antibody, systematic troubleshooting should include:
Antibody concentration optimization:
Perform titration experiments using 2-fold serial dilutions
Test range from 1:500 to 1:5000 for Western blotting
Consider longer incubation times at more dilute concentrations
Protein extraction method assessment:
Evaluate different lysis buffers for compatibility with YCL065W epitope
Test mechanical (glass beads) versus enzymatic (zymolyase) lysis methods
Include multiple protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Expression level considerations:
Confirm YCL065W expression under experimental conditions
Consider inducing expression if protein levels are naturally low
Use enrichment methods (e.g., subcellular fractionation) if necessary
Detection system sensitivity:
Switch to more sensitive detection methods (e.g., from colorimetric to chemiluminescent)
Use signal enhancement systems (e.g., biotin-streptavidin amplification)
Consider longer exposure times for Western blots
Antibody quality verification:
Test a new lot or alternative source of antibody
Verify storage conditions have been optimal
Creating a systematic troubleshooting table documenting each variable tested will facilitate identification of the problematic step in the protocol.
To distinguish specific from non-specific binding when using YCL065W antibody, researchers should implement these analytical approaches:
Signal pattern analysis:
Specific binding produces distinct bands/patterns at expected molecular weights
Non-specific binding typically shows multiple bands or diffuse signals
Comparative genetics approach:
Compare signal between wild-type and YCL065W deletion strains
Test in strains with YCL065W tagged with epitope tags (e.g., FLAG, HA)
Competitive inhibition evaluation:
Pre-incubate antibody with excess immunizing peptide
Specific signals should be reduced/eliminated while non-specific signals persist
Cross-validation with orthogonal methods:
Confirm findings using alternative detection methods
Compare with published localization/expression data for YCL065W
Statistical analysis of replicates:
Quantify signal-to-noise ratio across multiple experiments
Apply appropriate statistical tests to determine significance
The interpretation should consider the biological context and expected expression pattern of YCL065W under the specific experimental conditions being studied.
When unexpected molecular weight bands appear in Western blots with YCL065W antibody, systematic interpretation involves:
Post-translational modification assessment:
Higher molecular weight bands may indicate ubiquitination, SUMOylation, phosphorylation
Lower bands may represent proteolytic cleavage products
Verify with specific inhibitors of modifications or proteases
Isoform consideration:
Check databases for potential alternatively spliced variants
Compare with RNA-seq data for evidence of variant transcripts
Experimental artifact evaluation:
Incomplete denaturation can cause aggregate formation
Sample overheating may cause protein degradation
Insufficient reducing agent can maintain disulfide bonds
Cross-reactivity investigation:
Compare observed bands with predicted sizes of related proteins
Test antibody against purified related proteins
Validation approach:
Immunoprecipitate protein and analyze by mass spectrometry
Compare results with tagged versions of YCL065W
A methodical investigation table documenting each unexpected band, potential explanations, and confirmatory experiments should be maintained to track the investigation process.
Integrating YCL065W antibody-based protein data with gene expression studies requires a multi-layered analytical approach:
Correlation analysis protocol:
Quantify YCL065W protein levels via Western blot or ELISA
Measure YCL065W mRNA levels using RT-qPCR or RNA-seq
Calculate Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients between protein and mRNA levels
Plot expression values and perform regression analysis
Temporal dynamics assessment:
Design time-course experiments measuring both mRNA and protein
Calculate time delays between transcriptional and translational changes
Apply mathematical models to characterize protein production and degradation rates
Condition-specific integration:
Compare protein-mRNA relationships across different growth conditions
Identify conditions where post-transcriptional regulation may be prominent
Multi-omics data integration:
Combine with ribosome profiling data to assess translational efficiency
Incorporate proteomics data to position YCL065W within protein interaction networks
Visualization strategies:
Generate heat maps showing protein and mRNA levels across conditions
Create scatter plots with mRNA on one axis and protein on the other
This integrated approach can reveal insights into the post-transcriptional regulation of YCL065W and identify conditions where protein levels deviate from what would be predicted by mRNA abundance alone .
Robust statistical analysis of quantitative YCL065W antibody data should implement these methodological approaches:
Normalization strategies:
Western blot: Normalize to loading controls (e.g., Act1, tubulin)
ELISA: Use standard curves with purified recombinant protein
Flow cytometry: Apply fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls for threshold setting
Replicate analysis:
Minimum of three biological replicates recommended
Calculate means, standard deviations, and standard errors
Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution:
Parametric: t-test (two conditions) or ANOVA (multiple conditions)
Non-parametric: Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test
Multiple testing correction:
Apply Bonferroni or Benjamini-Hochberg procedures when performing multiple comparisons
Report adjusted p-values alongside raw p-values
Effect size calculation:
Report Cohen's d or fold changes rather than relying solely on p-values
Calculate confidence intervals for all measurements
Power analysis:
Determine appropriate sample sizes based on expected effect sizes
Consider retrospective power analysis when interpreting negative results