The SPCC663.15c Antibody is designed to recognize the protein product of the SPCC663.15c gene. This gene is part of a cluster (SPCC663.14c+/SPCC663.15c+) involved in meiotic gene regulation in S. pombe. The antibody is typically used in molecular biology studies to detect protein expression, localization, or interactions .
The SPCC663.14c+/SPCC663.15c+ locus regulates meiosis-specific gene expression during nitrogen starvation. These genes are transcriptionally repressed during mitosis and induced upon meiotic initiation, playing roles in chromatin remodeling and transcriptional control .
The antibody targets proteins associated with the Hip3 complex, which mediates transcriptional repression via histone modifications (e.g., H3K9 trimethylation) and chromatin silencing .
Gene Expression: SPCC663.15c+ mRNA levels increase during nitrogen starvation, correlating with meiotic induction .
Protein Interactions: The encoded protein interacts with the Hip3 complex to regulate heterochromatin formation .
Chromatin Dynamics: Antibody-based ChIP assays reveal enrichment of H3K9me3 at SPCC663.15c+ loci in hip3-1 mutants .
Limited functional studies on the antibody itself exist; its utility is inferred from related gene studies.
No clinical or therapeutic applications are reported for this antibody.
KEGG: spo:SPCC663.15c
STRING: 4896.SPCC663.15c.1
SPCC663.15c is a gene/protein in Schizosaccharomyces pombe associated with cell wall biosynthesis pathways. Similar to other cell wall proteins in fission yeast, it may be involved in maintaining structural integrity and cellular morphology. Antibodies targeting this protein enable researchers to investigate its localization, expression levels, and functional significance in various cellular contexts. Understanding SPCC663.15c contributes to our broader knowledge of cell wall biology in fission yeast, which serves as an important model organism for eukaryotic cell studies.
For SPCC663.15c detection, Western blotting typically offers reliable protein expression analysis when using optimized lysis buffers that effectively extract membrane-associated proteins. Immunofluorescence microscopy provides spatial information and is particularly useful for determining subcellular localization during different cell cycle stages. Flow cytometry can be employed for quantitative analysis across cell populations, while immunoprecipitation helps identify interaction partners. When designing experiments, researchers should consider that membrane-associated proteins like those involved in cell wall biosynthesis may require specialized extraction protocols to maintain epitope integrity.
Comprehensive validation should include multiple approaches: (1) Western blot comparison between wild-type and SPCC663.15c deletion strains, (2) peptide competition assays where pre-incubation with the immunizing peptide blocks specific binding, (3) immunofluorescence analysis comparing signal patterns in wild-type versus knockout cells, and (4) immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity. For monoclonal antibodies, epitope mapping provides additional validation. Researchers should be particularly attentive to potential cross-reactivity with related proteins in the S. pombe proteome, especially other cell wall-related proteins with similar structural domains.
For effective Western blot detection of SPCC663.15c, researchers should: (1) Lyse cells using buffer containing 50mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl, 1% NP-40 or Triton X-100, supplemented with protease inhibitors. (2) Include 1-2% SDS and gentle sonication to solubilize membrane-associated proteins. (3) Separate proteins on 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels. (4) Transfer to PVDF membranes (preferred over nitrocellulose for hydrophobic proteins). (5) Block with 5% non-fat milk or 3-5% BSA in TBST. (6) Incubate with primary antibody at optimal dilution (typically 1:500-1:2000) overnight at 4°C. (7) Use HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence detection. Load 30-50μg of total protein per lane and include appropriate loading controls like α-tubulin .
Immunofluorescence optimization for SPCC663.15c should address several key factors: (1) Fixation method: 4% paraformaldehyde for 15-30 minutes preserves most epitopes while maintaining cell morphology; methanol fixation at -20°C may provide better accessibility to certain epitopes. (2) Cell wall digestion: Treat with zymolyase (1mg/ml for 30 minutes) to facilitate antibody penetration. (3) Permeabilization: Use 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 for 5-10 minutes. (4) Blocking: Apply 3-5% BSA or normal serum in PBS for 30-60 minutes. (5) Antibody dilution: Test ranges from 1:100-1:500. (6) Include appropriate controls such as no primary antibody and SPCC663.15c deletion strains to validate signal specificity.
When designing co-localization experiments: (1) Select marker proteins relevant to expected SPCC663.15c localization (cell periphery, ER, Golgi). (2) Ensure antibody compatibility – choose primary antibodies from different host species to avoid cross-reactivity. (3) Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap (e.g., Alexa 488 and Alexa 594). (4) Implement appropriate controls including single-stained samples for detecting bleed-through. (5) Use quantitative co-localization analysis with software like ImageJ with the JACoP plugin to calculate Pearson's correlation coefficient or Manders' overlap coefficient. (6) Consider super-resolution microscopy for detailed subcellular localization if conventional microscopy provides insufficient resolution.
To study SPCC663.15c dynamics during cell wall stress: (1) Expose S. pombe cultures to cell wall stressors such as Calcofluor White (50-100μg/ml), Congo Red (100-200μg/ml), or enzymatic cell wall digestion. (2) Collect samples at multiple time points (0, 15, 30, 60, 120 minutes). (3) Analyze protein expression changes via Western blotting, normalizing to appropriate loading controls. (4) Examine localization changes using immunofluorescence microscopy. (5) Quantify intensity and distribution patterns using image analysis software. (6) Complement with transcriptional analysis of SPCC663.15c mRNA levels to distinguish between transcriptional and post-transcriptional responses. This approach provides insights into the protein's role in cell wall integrity pathways and stress adaptation mechanisms.
To investigate post-translational modifications (PTMs) of SPCC663.15c: (1) Perform immunoprecipitation using SPCC663.15c antibody followed by Western blotting with modification-specific antibodies (anti-phospho, anti-ubiquitin, anti-SUMO). (2) Use phosphatase treatment prior to SDS-PAGE to identify phosphorylation-dependent mobility shifts. (3) Employ 2D gel electrophoresis to separate protein isoforms followed by Western blotting. (4) Conduct mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated SPCC663.15c to identify specific modified residues. (5) Generate phospho-specific antibodies for key regulatory sites identified by mass spectrometry. The functional significance of identified PTMs can be assessed through site-directed mutagenesis of the corresponding residues.
For investigating protein-protein interactions: (1) Perform co-immunoprecipitation using SPCC663.15c antibody followed by mass spectrometry or Western blotting for suspected interaction partners. (2) Validate interactions using reciprocal co-IP experiments. (3) Implement proximity ligation assays (PLA) to detect protein interactions in situ with spatial resolution. (4) Use FRET-based approaches with fluorescently-tagged proteins to confirm direct interactions in living cells. (5) Apply crosslinking approaches followed by immunoprecipitation to capture transient interactions. (6) Consider BioID or APEX2 proximity labeling combined with SPCC663.15c antibody validation to identify the broader interactome including weak or transient interactions .
Inconsistent Western blot results may stem from: (1) Protein degradation during extraction—add protease inhibitors and maintain samples at 4°C. (2) Insufficient membrane protein solubilization—include stronger detergents like 1-2% SDS or 0.5% sodium deoxycholate. (3) Inefficient transfer of hydrophobic proteins—use PVDF membranes and extend transfer time or reduce methanol in transfer buffer. (4) Antibody lot variability—validate each new lot against previous standards. (5) Insufficient blocking—extend blocking time to 2 hours or overnight with 5% milk or BSA. (6) Over-stripping when re-probing membranes—limit stripping or use multiple identical blots instead. (7) Variation in SPCC663.15c expression under different growth conditions—standardize culture conditions rigorously between experiments.
To address weak signals: (1) Increase protein loading to 40-60μg per lane. (2) Optimize antibody concentration through titration experiments. (3) Extend primary antibody incubation to overnight at 4°C. (4) Employ signal enhancement systems like biotin-streptavidin amplification. (5) Use more sensitive detection methods such as enhanced chemiluminescence plus (ECL+) or fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies with digital imaging. (6) Modify antigen retrieval methods for fixed samples. (7) Verify SPCC663.15c expression levels in your specific strain and conditions using RT-qPCR. (8) Consider enriching the protein fraction through subcellular fractionation if SPCC663.15c is expressed at low levels .
To reduce background in immunofluorescence: (1) Increase blocking stringency (5% BSA or normal serum for 1-2 hours). (2) Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 in antibody dilution buffers. (3) Extend washing steps (5-6 washes, 10 minutes each) with gentle agitation. (4) Pre-absorb antibody with acetone powder prepared from SPCC663.15c deletion strains. (5) Use affinity-purified antibody preparations. (6) Reduce secondary antibody concentration and confirm it's been cross-adsorbed against relevant species. (7) Include 0.1-0.3M NaCl in wash buffers to reduce non-specific ionic interactions. (8) Minimize autofluorescence by using freshly prepared cells and including appropriate controls to distinguish between specific signal and autofluorescence.
For cell cycle analysis: (1) Synchronize S. pombe cultures using standard methods like lactose gradient centrifugation or nitrogen starvation-release. (2) Collect samples at defined intervals (every 20-30 minutes through a complete cell cycle). (3) Prepare parallel samples for Western blot analysis and cell cycle position verification (microscopy or flow cytometry). (4) Perform Western blots with α-tubulin as loading control. (5) Quantify band intensities using densitometry software (ImageJ). (6) Normalize SPCC663.15c signals to loading control. (7) Plot normalized expression against time and cell cycle position. (8) Perform at least three biological replicates for statistical analysis. This approach allows correlation of SPCC663.15c expression with specific cell cycle events such as septum formation.
For robust statistical analysis: (1) Collect images from multiple fields (>10) across at least three biological replicates. (2) Use consistent exposure settings between samples and controls. (3) Measure fluorescence intensity using software like ImageJ or CellProfiler with background subtraction. (4) For localization studies, employ line scan analysis across cells to generate intensity profiles. (5) Quantify the percentage of cells showing specific localization patterns. (6) Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution (t-test for normally distributed data or non-parametric alternatives like Mann-Whitney U test). (7) Present results as mean ± standard deviation or standard error with p-values to indicate significance. (8) Consider advanced analyses like coefficient of variation to assess expression heterogeneity within populations.
For integrated data analysis: (1) Compare SPCC663.15c protein levels (Western blot) with mRNA expression (RT-qPCR or RNA-seq) to identify post-transcriptional regulation. (2) Correlate SPCC663.15c expression patterns with phenotypic data from knockout or mutation studies. (3) Perform Gene Ontology enrichment analysis on proteins co-immunoprecipitated with SPCC663.15c to identify functional pathways. (4) Integrate with publicly available S. pombe datasets using tools like PomBase. (5) Compare expression and localization patterns under various stress conditions to identify condition-specific functions. (6) Use network analysis to place SPCC663.15c in the context of known cell wall biosynthesis pathways. (7) Consider evolutionary conservation by comparing with homologs in related species to identify conserved functional domains.
| Application | Recommended Dilution Range | Incubation Conditions | Buffer System | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | 1:500 - 1:2000 | 2 hrs at RT or overnight at 4°C | TBST with 5% non-fat milk | ECL or fluorescent |
| Immunofluorescence | 1:100 - 1:500 | 1-2 hrs at RT or overnight at 4°C | PBS with 1-3% BSA | Fluorescence microscopy |
| Flow Cytometry | 1:50 - 1:200 | 30-60 min at RT | PBS with 0.5% BSA | Flow cytometer |
| Immunoprecipitation | 2-5 μg per 500 μg lysate | 2-4 hrs or overnight at 4°C | IP lysis buffer | Various |
| ChIP | 2-5 μg per reaction | Overnight at 4°C | ChIP dilution buffer | qPCR/sequencing |
Note: Optimal dilutions should be determined empirically for each specific application and antibody lot.
| Fixation Method | Epitope Preservation | Morphology Preservation | Recommended Protocol | Best Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4% Paraformaldehyde | Good for most epitopes | Excellent | 15-30 min at RT | General localization studies |
| Methanol (-20°C) | Better for some intracellular epitopes | Moderate | 10 min at -20°C | Nuclear/cytoskeletal proteins |
| Acetone | Good for cytoplasmic proteins | Poor to moderate | 5 min at -20°C | Quick fixation needs |
| Glutaraldehyde (0.1-0.5%) | Excellent for structural proteins | Excellent but high autofluorescence | 10-15 min at RT | Detailed structural studies |
| Methanol:Acetone (1:1) | Good for membranous proteins | Moderate | 10 min at -20°C | Membrane protein detection |
Note: Always include controls to validate fixation efficacy for your specific SPCC663.15c antibody.