The YDR029W Antibody (Product Code: CSB-PA623579XA01SVG) is a monoclonal antibody developed against the YDR029W protein encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker’s yeast) genome. This antibody is primarily utilized in molecular biology and proteomics research to study the function, localization, and interactions of the YDR029W protein . The target protein is annotated under UniProt accession Q12111, though its specific biological role remains under investigation due to limited published studies.
The YDR029W Antibody likely targets a linear or conformational epitope within the YDR029W protein. Antibody-antigen interactions depend on complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) within the variable domains of the antibody . While structural data specific to this antibody is unavailable, general principles of antibody binding apply:
Epitope Specificity: Determined by CDR loops (CDR-H1, CDR-H2, CDR-H3, and light-chain CDRs) .
Affinity: Estimated to be in the nanomolar range, typical for monoclonal antibodies .
Cross-Reactivity: No reported cross-reactivity with non-yeast proteins, though rigorous validation is advised .
The antibody enables detection of YDR029W in yeast lysates, aiding in:
Protein Localization: Subcellular distribution analysis via immunofluorescence.
Expression Profiling: Quantification under stress conditions or genetic perturbations.
YDR029W’s interactions with other yeast proteins (e.g., kinases, transcription factors) can be mapped using co-immunoprecipitation assays.
The YDR029W Antibody is part of a broader catalog targeting Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins. Below is a comparison with select antibodies:
| Antibody Target | Product Code | UniProt ID | Size Options |
|---|---|---|---|
| YDR029W | CSB-PA623579XA01SVG | Q12111 | 0.1 mL, 1 mL |
| YCR064C | CSB-PA333092XA01SVG | P25640 | 2 mL, 0.1 mL |
| YBT1 | CSB-PA327130XA01SVG | P32386 | 2 mL, 0.1 mL |
| ARR1 | CSB-PA578389XA01SVG | Q06596 | 2 mL, 0.1 mL |
Data sourced from Cusabio’s catalog .
Specificity: Confirmed via knockout (KO) yeast strains (if available) .
Batch Consistency: Rigorous lot-to-lot testing for reproducibility .
Application Optimization: Protocols validated for Western blotting (1:1,000 dilution) and ELISA (1:5,000) .
No peer-reviewed studies explicitly validating this antibody’s performance.
Epitope mapping data unavailable, necessitating user verification.
Advancements in antibody engineering (e.g., recombinant formats) could improve YDR029W detection sensitivity . Collaborative efforts to characterize yeast ORFs like YDR029W will enhance functional annotation and expand research applications.
STRING: 4932.YDR029W
The YYDRxG motif is a recurring hexapeptide sequence pattern found in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR H3) of certain antibodies. This motif is primarily encoded by the IGHD3-22 gene and facilitates antibody targeting to functionally conserved epitopes on the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD). The motif represents a common convergent solution for the human humoral immune system to target sarbecoviruses, including various SARS-CoV-2 variants .
YYDRxG motif-containing antibodies feature a distinctive β-bulge formed near the tip of CDR H3 after a type 1 β-turn. Key residues within the motif (VH Y99, VH Y100, and VH R100b) form critical hydrophobic interactions with the RBD. This structural arrangement creates a conserved local conformation that enables interaction with highly conserved residues in the RBD .
In antibody research, a properly qualified in-house reference standard with known characteristics, specificity, and potency should be established and used for lot-to-lot comparisons. These standards must be stored under appropriate conditions and periodically tested to ensure their integrity. Reference standards should be updated as product development progresses but should be finalized by the start of phase 3 clinical trials. Appropriate standard operating procedures (SOPs) should be developed for qualification of new reference standards .
YYDRxG-containing antibodies target a functionally conserved epitope on the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain. The CDR H3 of these antibodies dominates the interaction with the RBD, contributing nearly 70% of the total buried surface area. Despite differences in IGHV gene usage between antibodies like ADI-62113 and COVA1-16, they exhibit near-identical interactions with the RBD through their YYDRxG motif, which forms a conserved local structure for interaction with highly conserved RBD residues .
Analysis of CDR H3 coding sequences of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 reveals a high incidence of T→A/G or A→C transversions that convert serine in the germline sequence to arginine. This somatic mutation from germline serine to arginine in the YYDRxG motif (VH R100b position) appears critical for high-affinity binding and neutralization capabilities. This specific mutation pattern represents a key evolutionary step in developing effective neutralizing antibodies .
The comparatively low frequency of YYDRxG motif antibodies in the human repertoire can be attributed to several specific requirements: (1) the need for a specific reading frame of the IGHD3-22 gene, (2) site-specific somatic hypermutation patterns, and (3) relatively long N additions at both ends of IGHD3-22 during V(D)J recombination. These N additions are crucial in determining both CDR H3 length and the reading frame of IGHD3-22 that are essential for proper positioning and interaction of YYDRxG with the RBD .
Recent research demonstrates that combining two antibodies can create more effective treatments against evolving viruses like SARS-CoV-2. A Stanford-led team discovered that pairing an antibody that attaches to the relatively conserved N-terminal domain (NTD) with another antibody that targets the receptor-binding domain (RBD) creates a synergistic effect. The NTD-binding antibody serves as an "anchor," remaining attached to the virus even as mutations occur, while allowing the second antibody to inhibit the virus's ability to infect cells. This dual approach has demonstrated effectiveness against all variants of SARS-CoV-2 through Omicron in laboratory testing .
To properly characterize antibody specificity, researchers should implement multiple complementary approaches:
Direct binding assays that include both positive and negative antibody and antigen controls. At least one isotype-matched, irrelevant (negative) control antibody should be tested.
Biochemical characterization of the target epitope. Whenever possible, the protein, glycoprotein, glycolipid, or other molecule bearing the reactive epitope should be biochemically defined, and the antigenic epitope itself determined.
Fine specificity studies using antigenic preparations of defined structure (e.g., oligosaccharides or peptides) conducted through inhibition or other techniques.
Quantitative measurement of inhibition of antibody binding by soluble antigen or other antibodies .
Potency assays should be designed to characterize the product, monitor lot-to-lot consistency, and assure stability. The ideal potency assay should:
Bear the closest possible relationship to the physiologic/pharmacologic activity of the antibody
Be sufficiently sensitive to detect differences of potential clinical importance
Measure all critical functions when antibody performance depends on multiple mechanisms
Antibody binding activity may be quantitated by ELISA, RIA, radioimmune precipitation, cytotoxicity, flow cytometry, or other standard methods. Activity should be expressed as specific antigen-binding units per mg or μg of antibody. Product should be compared to an in-house reference standard, and parallel line bioassay or similar valid statistical procedures should be used in calculating potency .
A combination of complementary physicochemical methods should be employed to demonstrate that a purified antibody is not fragmented, aggregated, or otherwise modified:
SDS-PAGE for molecular weight and purity assessment
Isoelectric focusing (IEF) to determine charge variants
HPLC for detection of aggregates, fragments, and other modifications
Mass spectrometry for precise molecular weight determination and identification of post-translational modifications
Side-by-side comparisons of production lots to in-house reference standards should be performed to ensure consistency and quality .
Data compiled from analysis of antibody sequences with YYDRxG pattern in CDR H3 .
| Characteristic to Measure | Recommended Assays |
|---|---|
| Structural Integrity | SDS-PAGE, IEF, HPLC, mass spectrometry |
| Binding Activity | ELISA, RIA, radioimmune precipitation, cytotoxicity, flow cytometry |
| Specificity | Direct binding assays with controls, fine specificity studies, inhibition assays |
| Potency | Binding assay, serologic assay, activity in animal model, functional assay |
Data compiled from FDA guidelines on monoclonal antibody characterization .