YDR340W Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of YDR340W Antibody

The YDR340W antibody (Product Code: CSB-PA172140XA01SVG) is designed to recognize the protein encoded by the YDR340W gene in S. cerevisiae. According to UniProt entry Q05503 , this protein remains uncharacterized in terms of molecular function, but it is annotated in the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) as part of the yeast reference genome (strain S288c) . The antibody is available in two sizes (2 ml/0.1 ml) and is validated for use in immunoassays such as Western blotting and immunoprecipitation .

Target Protein Features

  • Gene: YDR340W (systematic name in SGD) .

  • Protein: Molecular weight and isoelectric point are not explicitly stated in available sources, but SGD provides tools for sequence retrieval and physicochemical property analysis .

  • Post-Translational Modifications: No experimentally confirmed modifications are reported, though yeast proteins commonly undergo phosphorylation or glycosylation .

Research Applications

The YDR340W antibody is employed in:

  • Functional Genomics: Identifying interactions or localization of YDR340W in yeast .

  • Protein Characterization: Detecting expression levels under varying experimental conditions (e.g., stress responses).

  • Post-Translational Modification Studies: Potential use in probing phosphorylation or glycosylation states, though no direct evidence is cited .

Key Research Challenges

  • Uncharacterized Protein: The biological role of YDR340W remains unknown, limiting hypothesis-driven studies .

  • Antibody Validation: While the antibody is commercially available, peer-reviewed studies specifically using it are absent in the provided sources.

Future Directions

  • CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Models: Pairing the antibody with gene-edited yeast strains to elucidate YDR340W’s function.

  • Multi-Omics Integration: Combining proteomics data from this antibody with transcriptomic or metabolomic datasets .

  • Comparative Studies: Investigating homologs in pathogenic fungi for broader biomedical relevance.

Data Gaps and Opportunities

  • Structural Insights: Cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography could resolve the protein’s 3D structure, as seen in SARS-CoV-2 antibody studies .

  • Interaction Networks: High-throughput screens (e.g., yeast two-hybrid) may identify binding partners .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
YDR340W antibody; Putative uncharacterized protein YDR340W antibody
Target Names
YDR340W
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Subcellular Location
Membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the YDR340W gene product and what is its function in yeast cells?

The YDR340W gene encodes the Cth2 protein, which plays a crucial role in mediating early adaptation of yeast cells to oxidative stress. This protein functions by controlling the uptake of oxidant-promoting iron cations, resulting in immediate cellular adaptation to oxidative stress conditions . Cth2 regulates the expression of genes in the Fe regulon, with different patterns observed between wild-type and Δcth2 mutant strains, particularly at different time points following oxidative stress exposure .

What are the recommended protocols for validating YDR340W antibody specificity?

For optimal antibody validation, researchers should implement a multi-step approach:

  • Perform Western blot analysis comparing protein expression in wild-type cells versus Δcth2 deletion strains

  • Include a GFP-tagged Cth2 construct as a positive control and probe with anti-GFP antibodies (recommended dilution 1:500)

  • Use anti-hexokinase 1 (1:5000 dilution) as a loading control for Western blots

  • Conduct immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm target specificity

  • Test for cross-reactivity with related proteins using relevant knockout strains

How should samples be prepared for optimal YDR340W protein detection?

Sample preparation should follow these methodological guidelines:

  • Synchronize cells in G1 phase using α-factor (4 μg/ml) for 45 minutes, followed by an additional 45 minutes with the same concentration

  • Release cells from G1 arrest by filtration and washing with pre-warmed (30°C) medium

  • Lyse cells in buffer containing protease inhibitors to prevent protein degradation

  • Process samples quickly on ice to maintain protein integrity

  • For oxidative stress studies, treat cells with t-BOOH according to established protocols

How can I design experiments to study the role of YDR340W/Cth2 in transcriptional regulation during stress?

Effective experimental design should include:

  • Time-course experiments analyzing gene expression at multiple intervals (45 min and 90 min post-treatment are critical timepoints based on existing data)

  • Comparative analysis between wild-type and Δcth2 mutant strains under identical stress conditions

  • Northern blot analysis with gene-specific probes generated by PCR from genomic DNA

  • Use of SNR19 (U1 snRNA) as a loading control for RNA analysis

  • Selection of genes showing at least 1.5-fold difference in expression between strains for focused study

What approaches can be used to investigate YDR340W/Cth2 protein interactions with target mRNAs?

Advanced methodological approaches include:

  • RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) using validated YDR340W antibodies

  • Hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled probes for specific mRNA detection

  • Application of active learning techniques similar to those used in antibody-antigen binding studies to predict interactions

  • Structural analysis of protein-RNA complexes

  • Simulation-based evaluation using frameworks similar to Absolut! to test binding predictions

How can machine learning improve YDR340W antibody research?

Machine learning applications in YDR340W research include:

  • Implementing active learning techniques to enhance selection and sequencing of experiments

  • Creating predictive models that reduce the number of laboratory iterations needed for accurate binding predictions

  • Utilizing receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) metrics to evaluate model performance

  • Comparing different machine learning strategies through simulated datasets before application to experimental data

  • Integration of 3D simulation frameworks like Absolut! to generate training datasets that mimic real-world binding data

Why might I observe inconsistent results in YDR340W/Cth2 protein detection experiments?

Inconsistent results may stem from several methodological factors:

  • Cell cycle variations (use synchronization protocols with α-factor as described)

  • Time-dependent changes in protein expression following stress induction (45 min vs. 90 min)

  • Differences in stress response between individual cells (consider population heterogeneity)

  • Protein degradation during sample preparation

  • Variations in antibody specificity across different experimental conditions

How can I improve signal detection when working with YDR340W antibodies in challenging samples?

Signal optimization strategies include:

  • Adapting antibody-binding optimization techniques from immunological studies

  • Implementing signal amplification methods similar to those used in serological studies

  • Optimizing blocking conditions to reduce non-specific binding

  • Using monoclonal antibodies for increased specificity

  • Considering epitope exposure through different sample preparation methods

What controls are essential when studying YDR340W/Cth2-dependent gene regulation?

Essential experimental controls include:

  • Parallel analysis of wild-type and Δcth2 strains under identical conditions

  • Untreated control samples at each time point

  • RNA and protein loading controls (SNR19/U1 snRNA for RNA; hexokinase for protein)

  • Positive controls using genes known to be regulated by Cth2

  • Negative controls using genes not affected by Cth2 deletion

How should RNA-seq data be analyzed to identify YDR340W/Cth2-regulated genes?

Comprehensive data analysis should follow these steps:

  • Calculate median values for each feature at given conditions from at least two arrays

  • Subtract log2 ratios between Δcth2 mutant and control CTH2 strain

  • Select genes with >1.5-fold (log2 = 0.585) difference in expression

  • Analyze time points separately (e.g., 45 min and 90 min) to capture dynamic regulation

  • Group regulated genes by pattern: (i) genes not induced in wild-type but induced in Δcth2; (ii) genes induced in both strains but at different magnitudes; (iii) genes downregulated more in wild-type than in Δcth2

What statistical approaches are recommended for analyzing YDR340W antibody binding data?

Statistical analysis should include:

  • Implementation of binary classification approaches for binding/non-binding determination

  • Application of ROC AUC metrics on test datasets to evaluate model performance

  • Development of active learning curves (ALC) to track model improvement over iterations

  • Comparison against random selection baseline to assess active learning strategy effectiveness

  • Subdivision of test datasets to evaluate model performance under different conditions (e.g., TestSharedAG, TestSharedAB, and Test)

How might research on YDR340W antibodies inform therapeutic antibody development?

Potential translational applications include:

  • Adaptation of antibody engineering approaches used in therapeutic antibody development

  • Application of lessons from stress response studies to immunomodulatory contexts

  • Development of monoclonal antibodies with reduced side effects, similar to approaches used for transplant rejection prevention

  • Testing specificity and efficacy using validation protocols adapted from clinical antibody studies

  • Implementation of active learning to optimize antibody properties with fewer experimental iterations

What emerging technologies show promise for YDR340W/Cth2 research?

Promising emerging technologies include:

  • 3D simulation frameworks like Absolut! to predict protein-antibody interactions

  • Active learning approaches that strategically select experiments to maximize information gain

  • Advanced binding energy calculations for CDRH3 sequences against antigen variants

  • Discretized lattice representations of protein-antigen complexes for computational modeling

  • High-throughput screening approaches using simulated datasets to guide experimental design

Experimental ApproachApplicationKey MethodsReference
Western Blot AnalysisProtein detectionAnti-GFP (1:500), Anti-hexokinase 1 (1:5000)
RNA AnalysisTarget mRNA detectionNorthern blot with digoxigenin-labeled probes
Cell SynchronizationControlled experimental conditionsα-factor (4 μg/ml) for 90 min (two applications)
Gene Expression AnalysisRegulatory network identification>1.5-fold (log2 = 0.585) expression difference
Prediction ModelingAntibody-antigen bindingROC AUC metrics, active learning curves
Data SimulationExperimental design optimizationAbsolut! framework, binding hotspot clustering
Serological TestingAntibody response measurementIgGAM ratio, live virus neutralization assays

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.