SPAC1F3.03 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Components: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPAC1F3.03 antibody; Uncharacterized protein C1F3.03 antibody
Target Names
SPAC1F3.03
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

  • What is SPAC1F3.03 and why would researchers use antibodies against it?

    SPAC1F3.03 is an uncharacterized protein in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) with the UniProt accession number Q10408. It is classified as a multi-pass membrane protein. Researchers use antibodies against SPAC1F3.03 primarily for studying protein localization, expression levels, and protein-protein interactions in S. pombe. These antibodies are particularly valuable for membrane protein research and can help elucidate the function of this uncharacterized protein in cellular processes.

  • What are the standard applications for SPAC1F3.03 antibodies in research?

    SPAC1F3.03 antibodies are typically used in several standard laboratory techniques:

    • Western blotting: For detection and quantification of SPAC1F3.03 protein in cell lysates

    • Immunoprecipitation: To isolate SPAC1F3.03 and its binding partners

    • Immunofluorescence microscopy: To visualize subcellular localization

    When designing experiments, protocols should be optimized based on standardized antibody characterization processes similar to those used for other proteins like SMOC-1, where multiple applications are systematically evaluated .

  • How should SPAC1F3.03 antibody specificity be validated?

    Proper validation requires a multi-faceted approach:

    • Use of knockout (KO) cell lines as negative controls

    • Comparison with isogenic parental controls as positive controls

    • Detection of bands at the expected molecular weight (~predicted kDa for SPAC1F3.03)

    • Competitive binding assays with purified recombinant protein

    Following standardized consensus antibody characterization protocols, similar to those available on platforms like Protocol Exchange (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.pex-2607/v1) , would ensure robust validation.

Intermediate Research Questions

  • What membrane protein extraction protocols are optimal for SPAC1F3.03 detection by immunoblotting?

    For effective extraction of SPAC1F3.03 as a multi-pass membrane protein:

    1. Cell disruption should be performed using glass beads in a buffer containing 1% NP-40 or Triton X-100

    2. Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

    3. Use mild sonication to improve extraction efficiency

    4. Centrifuge at 14,000-16,000g to separate membrane fractions

    5. Solubilize membrane proteins with 0.5-1% SDS or specialized membrane protein solubilization buffers

    This approach is similar to extraction methods used for other membrane proteins in yeast studies. Preservatives like 0.03% Proclin 300 and storage in 50% glycerol with 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4) can maintain antibody stability.

  • How can researchers optimize immunoprecipitation of SPAC1F3.03?

    Efficient immunoprecipitation of membrane proteins like SPAC1F3.03 requires:

    1. Crosslinking optimization (if required): Test formaldehyde concentrations from 0.1-1%

    2. Cell lysis using specialized buffers with appropriate detergents (CHAPS or digitonin may preserve protein-protein interactions better than SDS)

    3. Pre-clearing lysates with protein G beads to reduce non-specific binding

    4. Antibody immobilization strategies: Direct coupling to beads vs. capture via protein G

    5. Careful washing steps with decreasing detergent concentrations

    Similar methodologies have proven successful with other membrane proteins in characterization studies .

  • What factors affect the reproducibility of SPAC1F3.03 antibody experiments?

    Several factors can impact reproducibility:

    FactorImpactMitigation
    Antibody lot variationDifferent performance characteristicsValidate each lot against reference standards
    Buffer compositionAltered binding efficiencyDocument and standardize buffers across experiments
    Fixation methodsChanged epitope accessibilityOptimize fixation for specific applications
    Protein extractionVariable yieldsStandardize extraction protocols
    Cell growth conditionsChanged expression levelsMaintain consistent growth parameters

    These considerations align with principles from standardized antibody characterization platforms endorsed by industry-academic representatives .

Advanced Research Questions

  • How can cross-reactivity issues with SPAC1F3.03 antibodies be systematically addressed?

    To systematically address potential cross-reactivity:

    1. Perform immunoblotting against a panel of related and unrelated yeast proteins

    2. Utilize epitope mapping to identify the specific binding region

    3. Conduct pre-absorption tests with recombinant proteins

    4. Employ bioinformatic analysis to identify proteins with similar epitopes

    5. Validate findings using knockout strains or CRISPR-modified lines

    This approach parallels methods used in high-performing antibody identification studies for other proteins like SMOC-1, where systematic characterization against knockout cell lines was critical for specificity confirmation .

  • What approaches enable accurate quantification of SPAC1F3.03 expression levels?

    For precise quantification:

    1. Develop a calibration curve using purified recombinant SPAC1F3.03 protein

    2. Implement internal loading controls (housekeeping proteins) appropriate for membrane fraction analysis

    3. Use advanced signal detection methods like fluorescent secondary antibodies for wider dynamic range

    4. Apply image analysis software with background correction

    5. Consider mass spectrometry-based verification

    Researchers may benefit from approaches similar to those used in antibody limit-of-detection studies, where controlled spike-in experiments with known concentrations establish sensitivity thresholds .

  • How can researchers determine if different SPAC1F3.03 antibody preparations recognize distinct epitopes?

    Epitope characterization can be approached through:

    1. Sequential immunoprecipitation assays (similar to those described for NCAM antibodies )

    2. Competition assays with gradual titration of competing antibodies

    3. Peptide array analysis using overlapping peptides spanning the entire SPAC1F3.03 sequence

    4. Fragment-based analysis with truncated proteins

    5. HDX-MS (hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry) for fine epitope mapping

    By employing these techniques, researchers can determine if antibodies recognize distinct epitopes, similar to how at least three distinct epitopes were identified in NCAM studies .

  • What strategies can improve detection of post-translational modifications (PTMs) on SPAC1F3.03?

    PTM detection can be enhanced through:

    1. Specialized extraction buffers containing phosphatase inhibitors for phosphorylation studies

    2. Development of modification-specific antibodies (e.g., phospho-specific)

    3. Enrichment strategies prior to antibody detection (e.g., phosphopeptide enrichment)

    4. Use of phos-tag gels to separate phosphorylated forms

    5. Combined approaches using immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

    These approaches draw on established PTM detection workflows used in antibody-based research and can be adapted for SPAC1F3.03 studies in S. pombe.

  • How can researchers leverage SPAC1F3.03 antibodies for proximity labeling studies?

    For proximity labeling applications:

    1. Conjugate SPAC1F3.03 antibodies to enzymes like HRP, APEX2 or TurboID

    2. Optimize conjugation chemistry to maintain antibody binding capacity

    3. Develop permeabilization protocols that allow antibody entry while preserving cellular architecture

    4. Establish appropriate controls (non-specific IgG conjugates)

    5. Validate labeling radius through known interaction partners

    This methodology extends traditional antibody applications into the spatial proteomics domain, providing insights into SPAC1F3.03's immediate interaction network in native cellular contexts.

  • What are the considerations for using SPAC1F3.03 antibodies in super-resolution microscopy?

    For super-resolution applications:

    1. Select antibodies with high specificity and signal-to-noise ratio

    2. Evaluate different fixation methods for epitope preservation and structural integrity

    3. Test various secondary antibody conjugates (Alexa Fluor dyes vs. quantum dots)

    4. Optimize antibody concentration to achieve appropriate label density

    5. Consider direct labeling strategies to reduce linkage error

    These considerations parallel those required for high-resolution imaging with other membrane proteins and can significantly improve localization precision for SPAC1F3.03 studies.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.