The YDL196W antibody (Product Code: CSB-PA623586XA01SVG) is a polyclonal antibody developed against the putative protein encoded by the YDL196W ORF. Key characteristics include:
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Target Organism | Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c) |
| Uniprot ID | Q12187 |
| Applications | Western blot, Immunoprecipitation, Immunofluorescence |
| Host Species | Not specified (typical hosts include rabbit or mouse) |
| Availability | 0.1 ml or 2 ml aliquots |
This antibody is cataloged by Cusabio and is part of a broader panel targeting yeast ORFs .
YDL196W is classified as a "dubious" ORF in the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD), indicating limited evidence for protein-coding functionality. Key findings include:
Variable Expression: YDL196W exhibits highly variable transcript levels under standard growth conditions, complicating its functional annotation .
Experimental Artifacts: In studies using FRB-GFP-tagged strains, apparent increases in YDL196W transcription were attributed to technical artifacts (e.g., inefficient cDNA synthesis near elongated gene regions) .
Lack of Phenotypic Impact: Deletion or overexpression of YDL196W does not alter yeast growth rates, supporting its classification as non-essential .
Western Blot: Requires validation using knockout (KO) yeast strains to confirm specificity, as recommended by antibody characterization initiatives like YCharOS .
Immunofluorescence: Limited data available; cross-reactivity with other yeast proteins remains a concern due to the ORF’s dubious nature.
In a 2016 study, YDL196W transcription was anomalously elevated in Hsf1 FRB-GFP-tagged strains. This was linked to methodological constraints rather than biological relevance, highlighting the importance of controlled experimental design when using this antibody .
Epitope Uncertainty: The target protein’s dubious status raises questions about the antibody’s functional relevance.
Validation Gaps: No peer-reviewed studies explicitly validating YDL196W antibody utility in high-impact applications (e.g., cryo-EM, structural biology) were identified.
STRING: 4932.YDL196W
YDL196W antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody specifically targeting the putative uncharacterized protein YDL196W from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker's yeast), strain 204508/S288c. This antibody recognizes a protein with a molecular weight of approximately 12,905 Da and is generated using recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae YDL196W protein as the immunogen . The antibody is typically in liquid form with preservatives including 0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, and 0.01M PBS at pH 7.4 .
Based on available research data, YDL196W antibody has been tested and validated for the following applications:
ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay)
Western Blot (WB)
These applications enable researchers to detect and quantify the presence of the YDL196W protein in yeast samples, which is crucial for studies involving gene expression, protein localization, and functional characterization .
For optimal preservation of antibody activity:
Store at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
If the antibody becomes entrapped in the seal during shipment or storage, briefly centrifuge the vial on a tabletop centrifuge to dislodge any liquid in the container's cap
Certain products may require shipping with dry ice and additional dry ice fees may apply
Proper storage and handling ensure the antibody maintains its specificity and binding efficiency throughout your research project .
Comprehensive validation requires a multi-pronged approach:
Western Blot Analysis:
Compare wild-type yeast extracts (positive control) with YDL196W deletion strain extracts (negative control)
Confirm single band detection at approximately 12,905 Da
Include recombinant YDL196W protein as additional positive control
Immunoprecipitation Followed by Mass Spectrometry:
Perform pull-down experiments using the antibody
Analyze precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Confirm enrichment of YDL196W peptides
Epitope Competition Assays:
Pre-incubate antibody with excess recombinant YDL196W protein
Apply to samples in parallel with non-competed antibody
Specific binding should be significantly reduced in the competed samples
These validation steps ensure your experimental results truly reflect YDL196W presence rather than non-specific interactions .
For optimal Western blot results with YDL196W antibody:
Sample Preparation:
Extract proteins from yeast cells using glass bead lysis or enzymatic methods
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Denature proteins in standard SDS-PAGE loading buffer
Gel Electrophoresis and Transfer:
Use 12-15% acrylamide gels due to the small size of YDL196W (12,905 Da)
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes at 100V for 1 hour or 30V overnight
Antibody Incubation:
Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST
Dilute primary antibody according to manufacturer's recommendations
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation
Use HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG as secondary antibody
Detection and Imaging:
Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection systems
Optimize exposure time based on signal strength
Document with digital imaging systems for quantitative analysis
This protocol may require optimization based on your specific experimental conditions and antibody batch characteristics .
Based on reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) methodologies, researchers can effectively incorporate YDL196W antibody into array-based studies:
Sample Preparation:
Prepare standardized yeast lysates under various experimental conditions
Create serial dilutions to ensure quantitative analysis
Include appropriate controls (wild-type, deletion mutants, etc.)
Array Printing and Processing:
Print samples in an ordered array on nitrocellulose-coated glass slides
Process slides with validated YDL196W antibody at optimized concentration
Include technical replicates for statistical confidence
Data Analysis:
Implement Python command-line tools for normalization and quality control
Perform statistical analysis to compare expression levels across conditions
Validate findings with orthogonal methods (Western blot, immunoprecipitation)
This approach allows high-throughput analysis of YDL196W expression across multiple experimental conditions simultaneously, providing robust quantitative data .
| Problem | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| High background | Insufficient blocking, antibody concentration too high, inadequate washing | Increase blocking time/concentration, optimize antibody dilution, add more stringent washing steps |
| Weak or no signal | Inadequate protein extraction, low expression levels, antibody degradation | Verify extraction efficiency, increase protein loading, check antibody storage conditions |
| Multiple bands | Protein degradation, post-translational modifications, cross-reactivity | Add protease inhibitors, verify with recombinant protein, pre-absorb antibody with yeast extract from knockout strain |
| Poor reproducibility | Batch-to-batch antibody variation, inconsistent sample preparation | Standardize protocols, maintain detailed records, use internal controls, consider monoclonal alternatives |
Systematic troubleshooting using this approach can help resolve most technical issues encountered with YDL196W antibody applications .
When faced with discrepancies between applications (e.g., positive Western blot but negative ELISA):
Technical Validation:
Verify antibody specificity in each application
Assess whether epitope accessibility differs between applications
Test different sample preparation methods that might affect epitope exposure
Cross-validation Approaches:
Confirm findings using orthogonal detection methods
If possible, use YDL196W-tagged constructs and detect with tag-specific antibodies
Implement genetic approaches (knockout/knockdown) to validate specificity
Biological Explanations to Consider:
Post-translational modifications might affect antibody recognition
Protein conformation changes under different experimental conditions
Protein complex formation may mask epitopes in certain applications
By systematically investigating discrepancies, you can determine whether contradictions arise from technical issues or reflect genuine biological complexity .
A comprehensive control strategy includes:
Positive Controls:
Wild-type yeast strains expressing YDL196W
Recombinant YDL196W protein at known concentrations
Previously validated positive samples
Negative Controls:
YDL196W deletion or knockout strains
Secondary antibody-only samples (omit primary antibody)
Isotype controls (non-specific rabbit IgG at same concentration)
Specificity Controls:
Pre-absorption controls (pre-incubate antibody with excess antigen)
Competing peptide controls
Antibody dilution series to demonstrate signal specificity
Technical Controls:
Loading controls for Western blots (e.g., housekeeping proteins)
Internal reference standards for quantitative applications
Technical replicates to assess reproducibility
These controls provide confidence that observed signals are specific to YDL196W and not artifacts of the experimental procedure .
Recent advances in antibody engineering demonstrated in the DyAb model show promising applications for research antibodies like YDL196W:
Sequence-Based Optimization:
Apply deep mutational scanning to identify affinity-enhancing mutations
Use pre-trained language models (like AntiBERTy or LBSTER mentioned in the research) to predict improved variants
Implement genetic algorithms to select and combine beneficial mutations
Predictive Performance Analysis:
Train regression models to predict binding affinity changes (ΔpKD)
Use embedding-based models to score potential antibody designs
Apply these techniques to generate higher-affinity YDL196W antibody variants
Data Analysis Enhancement:
Develop automated image analysis pipelines for microscopy-based experiments
Implement machine learning for pattern recognition in complex datasets
Use clustering algorithms to identify experimental conditions with similar outcomes
The DyAb research demonstrates that such approaches can yield significant improvements in antibody performance, with binding improvements of 3-50 fold compared to parent antibodies .
To implement proximity labeling with YDL196W antibody:
Antibody-Enzyme Fusion Strategy:
Conjugate YDL196W antibody to proximity labeling enzymes such as:
APEX2 (engineered ascorbate peroxidase)
BioID or TurboID (biotin ligase variants)
Validate construct specificity and labeling activity
Implementation Protocol:
Introduce the antibody-enzyme construct into yeast cells
Add appropriate labeling substrate
Allow proximity labeling to occur (minutes to hours)
Purify biotinylated proteins using streptavidin beads
Identify labeled proteins by mass spectrometry
Data Analysis Considerations:
Compare labeled proteome to appropriate controls
Filter out common contaminants
Validate interactions with orthogonal methods
Create interaction network maps
This approach would allow mapping of the local interactome of YDL196W in intact cells, providing insights into its functional associations and potential role in yeast cellular processes .
For robust quantitative analysis:
Western Blot Quantification:
Use specialized software (ImageJ, Image Lab) to quantify band intensity
Normalize to loading controls
Include technical and biological replicates (minimum n=3)
Apply appropriate statistical tests (t-test, ANOVA)
ELISA Data Analysis:
Generate standard curves using purified recombinant YDL196W
Ensure linearity in the working range
Apply 4 or 5-parameter logistic curve fitting
Report both raw and normalized values
Protein Array Data Processing:
Implement Python-based analysis pipelines for normalization and QC
Apply appropriate background subtraction methods
Use positive controls for inter-assay normalization
Account for batch effects
Statistical Considerations:
Control for multiple hypothesis testing when analyzing large datasets
Use appropriate visualization methods
Distinguish between statistical and biological significance
Report effect sizes alongside p-values
Proper data analysis ensures reliable interpretation of YDL196W expression or interaction studies and supports reproducible research .
Based on recent advancements in antibody engineering described in the DyAb research:
Complementarity-Determining Region (CDR) Optimization:
Perform deep mutational scanning of CDRs
Combine beneficial mutations using genetic algorithms
Select variants with improved affinity and specificity
Experimental Validation Approach:
Express engineered variants in mammalian cells as described in the DyAb research
Measure binding kinetics using surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Assess specificity using multiple experimental approaches
Incorporate successful designs into subsequent optimization rounds
Expected Improvements:
Higher binding affinity (potentially 3-50 fold improvements as seen in DyAb research)
Improved specificity for target protein
Better signal-to-noise ratio in experimental applications
The systematic approach described in the DyAb paper produced antibodies with significantly enhanced properties while maintaining high expression rates and target specificity, suggesting similar strategies could be applied to improve YDL196W antibody .
To better understand the currently "putative uncharacterized" YDL196W protein:
Sequence Analysis Tools:
Apply BLAST, Clustal Omega for homology identification
Use structure prediction tools (PSIPRED, SWISS-MODEL)
Identify functional domains and motifs (InterPro, Pfam)
Integration with Existing Datasets:
Map YDL196W to yeast transcriptomic and proteomic datasets
Utilize the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) for contextual information
Perform GO term enrichment analysis for functional insights
Network Analysis:
Map YDL196W into protein-protein interaction networks
Identify potential functional associations based on network position
Predict biological roles based on interaction partners
Custom Analysis Pipelines:
Develop Python-based tools for:
Cross-experiment data integration
Pathway analysis
Visualization of complex datasets
Statistical evaluation of experimental results
These bioinformatic approaches can provide valuable context for interpreting experimental findings and guide future research directions for YDL196W characterization .
Given that YDL196W is described as a "putative uncharacterized protein" located in the promoter region of SEC31, these experimental strategies could elucidate its function:
Genetic Approaches:
Create precise deletion and overexpression strains
Perform phenotypic screening under various conditions
Conduct synthetic genetic array analysis to identify genetic interactions
Implement CRISPR-based genetic screens
Biochemical Characterization:
Purify the protein and determine its structure
Assess potential enzymatic activities
Identify post-translational modifications
Determine subcellular localization using YDL196W antibody
Transcriptomic and Proteomic Impact:
Analyze gene expression changes upon YDL196W deletion/overexpression
Perform proteome-wide studies with and without YDL196W
Focus on SEC31 expression and regulation given the noted proximity
Chromatin Association Studies:
Use ChIP-seq with YDL196W antibody to identify potential DNA binding sites
Assess impact on chromatin structure and accessibility
Investigate potential role in transcriptional regulation of SEC31