TOG1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
TOG1 antibody; YER184C antibody; Transcription factor TOG1 antibody; Transcriptional regulator of oleate 1 antibody
Target Names
TOG1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
TOG1 Antibody targets a transcriptional activator essential for growth on non-fermentable carbon sources. This protein regulates genes involved in fatty acid utilization, acting as a direct activator that binds the promoters of genes encoding key enzymes in beta-oxidation and NADPH regeneration (POX1, FOX2, POT1, and IDP2), the glyoxylate shunt (MLS1 and ICL1), and gluconeogenesis (PCK1 and FBP1). Additionally, TOG1 regulates the abundance of peroxisomes, which are crucial for fatty acid oxidation.
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YER184C

STRING: 4932.YER184C

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is TOM1 protein and why is it significant in cellular research?

TOM1 (Target of Myb1 membrane trafficking protein) functions as an adapter protein that plays a crucial role in the intracellular membrane trafficking of ubiquitinated proteins. Its significance stems from its participation in multiple cellular pathways including autophagy, ubiquitination-dependent signaling, and receptor recycling pathways. TOM1 acts as a MYO6/Myosin VI adapter protein that targets MYO6 to endocytic structures and, in conjunction with MYO6, is required for autophagosomal delivery of endocytic cargo, the maturation of autophagosomes, and their fusion with lysosomes. Furthermore, MYO6 links TOM1 with autophagy receptors such as TAX1BP1, CALCOCO2/NDP52, and OPTN, establishing TOM1 as a critical node in cellular trafficking networks .

How do TOG1 antibodies differ from antibodies against TOGARAM1?

While both target proteins with "TOG" in their nomenclature, they recognize entirely different cellular components. TOM1 antibodies target the Target of Myb1 protein involved in membrane trafficking and ubiquitin-mediated pathways , whereas TOGARAM1 antibodies detect TOG array regulator of axonemal microtubules 1, a protein involved in ciliogenesis. TOGARAM1 is a much larger protein (189.4 kDa with 1720 amino acid residues) compared to TOM1, and is primarily localized in cell projections and cytoplasm. TOGARAM1 is associated with Joubert syndrome, making its antibodies particularly valuable in research related to ciliopathies .

What experimental applications are most suitable for TOG1 antibodies?

TOG1 antibodies are particularly well-suited for Western blotting applications in both human and mouse samples. For TOM1 specifically, rabbit recombinant monoclonal antibodies such as EPR11988(B) provide high specificity for research applications . In contrast, TOGARAM1 antibodies have broader application profiles including ELISA, Western Blot, Immunocytochemistry, Immunofluorescence, and Immunohistochemistry, making them versatile tools for localizing and quantifying this protein in various experimental contexts .

What are the recommended validation steps for TOG1 antibodies before experimental use?

A comprehensive validation protocol should include:

  • Specificity Assessment: Perform Western blot analysis on samples known to express the target protein alongside negative controls

  • Positive Control Selection: Include tissue/cell lines with established expression of the target protein

  • Knockout/Knockdown Verification: Use genetically modified samples (CRISPR knockout or siRNA knockdown) to confirm antibody specificity

  • Cross-Reactivity Testing: Test the antibody against related proteins, particularly other TOG family members

  • Cross-Species Reactivity: Validate the antibody across relevant species if conducting comparative studies

The validation process should be documented with positive and negative controls to establish a baseline for experimental interpretation .

How should researchers optimize Western blot protocols for TOM1 antibody detection?

Optimizing Western blot protocols for TOM1 antibody detection requires careful consideration of several parameters:

ParameterRecommended ConditionsOptimization Notes
Sample PreparationCell lysate or tissue homogenateInclude protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Protein Amount20-50 μg total proteinMay need adjustment based on expression level
Gel Percentage10-12% SDS-PAGEAppropriate for TOM1's molecular weight
Transfer MethodWet transfer (90 min at 100V)PVDF membrane preferred over nitrocellulose
Blocking Solution5% non-fat milk in TBSTBSA may be used if phospho-specific detection is needed
Primary Antibody Dilution1:1000 to 1:5000Optimize based on antibody specificity and background
Incubation Conditions4°C overnightCan be shortened to 1-2 hours at room temperature
Washing Steps3 × 10 min in TBSTCrucial for reducing background signal
Detection MethodHRP-conjugated secondary antibody with ECLConsider fluorescent detection for quantification

Researchers should perform pilot experiments to determine the optimal conditions for their specific experimental system .

What controls should be included when using TOG1 antibodies in immunoprecipitation studies?

For rigorous immunoprecipitation experiments with TOG1 antibodies, incorporate these controls:

  • Input Control: Sample prior to immunoprecipitation (typically 5-10% of starting material)

  • Isotype Control: Matched immunoglobulin isotype from the same species

  • No-Antibody Control: Beads alone to assess non-specific binding

  • Blocking Peptide Control: Pre-incubation with immunizing peptide to confirm specificity

  • Reciprocal Co-IP: If studying protein-protein interactions, confirm with reverse immunoprecipitation

  • Negative Sample Control: Cell/tissue type known not to express the target protein

These controls help distinguish between specific signals and background, particularly important when investigating TOM1's interactions with its binding partners such as TOLLIP or ubiquitinated proteins .

How can TOG1 antibodies be utilized to study autophagy pathways?

TOG1 antibodies offer powerful tools for investigating autophagy mechanisms due to TOM1's role in autophagosomal delivery of endocytic cargo and the maturation of autophagosomes. Researchers can employ these antibodies in several advanced applications:

  • Co-localization Studies: Use immunofluorescence microscopy with TOG1 antibodies alongside markers for autophagosomes (LC3), endosomes (EEA1), and lysosomes (LAMP1) to track the spatiotemporal dynamics of autophagy progression.

  • Cargo Trafficking Analysis: Employ TOG1 antibodies in combination with antibodies against MYO6 and autophagy receptors (TAX1BP1, CALCOCO2/NDP52, OPTN) to visualize and quantify how ubiquitinated cargo is directed to the autophagy pathway.

  • Proximity Ligation Assays: Detect protein-protein interactions between TOM1 and components of the autophagy machinery in situ, providing spatial resolution of these interactions within cells.

  • Autophagy Flux Assessment: Monitor changes in TOM1 localization and interaction partners in response to autophagy inducers or inhibitors to understand its role in regulating autophagy flux .

What approaches can be used to study TOM1's role in ubiquitin-mediated trafficking pathways?

To investigate TOM1's function in ubiquitin-mediated trafficking, researchers can implement these methodological approaches:

  • Domain-Specific Antibody Selection: Use antibodies targeting TOM1's GAT domain, which binds polyubiquitinated proteins, to study domain-specific functions.

  • Ubiquitin Pull-Down Assays: Employ TOM1 antibodies in combination with ubiquitin-binding resins to isolate and characterize ubiquitinated cargo proteins associated with TOM1.

  • Sequential Immunoprecipitation: Perform tandem immunoprecipitation using first anti-ubiquitin antibodies followed by TOM1 antibodies (or vice versa) to identify specific ubiquitinated proteins in the TOM1 complex.

  • Live-Cell Imaging: Combine TOM1 antibodies (for fixed samples) with fluorescently tagged ubiquitin in parallel experiments to track the dynamics of ubiquitinated cargo trafficking.

  • CRISPR-Mediated Tagging: Generate endogenously tagged TOM1 to avoid overexpression artifacts when studying its association with ubiquitinated proteins .

How do phosphoinositide interactions influence TOM1 function and how can this be studied?

TOM1 serves as a phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate (PtdIns(5)P) effector, suggesting a complex role in phosphoinositide-regulated membrane trafficking. To investigate this relationship:

  • Liposome Binding Assays: Use purified TOM1 (immunoprecipitated with TOG1 antibodies) to assess direct binding to liposomes containing different phosphoinositides.

  • Phosphoinositide Manipulation: Combine TOG1 antibody-based detection with pharmacological or genetic approaches to alter cellular phosphoinositide levels and observe effects on TOM1 localization and function.

  • Protein-Lipid Overlay Assays: Employ TOG1 antibodies to detect TOM1 binding to membrane strips spotted with various phosphoinositides.

  • Structured Illumination Microscopy: Use super-resolution microscopy with TOG1 antibodies and phosphoinositide biosensors to visualize their spatial relationship at high resolution.

  • Domain Mutation Studies: Compare wildtype TOM1 with phosphoinositide-binding mutants using TOG1 antibodies to track changes in localization and function .

What are the common technical challenges when using TOG1 antibodies and how can they be addressed?

Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with TOG1 antibodies:

ChallengePotential CausesSolutions
High BackgroundNon-specific binding, excessive antibody concentrationIncrease blocking time, optimize antibody dilution, use alternative blocking agents
Weak or No SignalLow protein expression, inefficient extraction, antibody degradationIncrease protein loading, optimize extraction protocol, use fresh antibody aliquots
Multiple BandsSplice variants, protein degradation, non-specific bindingVerify against positive controls, include protease inhibitors, increase stringency of washing
Inconsistent ResultsAntibody batch variation, sample preparation differencesUse the same antibody lot, standardize sample preparation, include internal controls
Cross-ReactivityAntibody binding to related proteinsValidate using knockout/knockdown controls, use monoclonal antibodies, perform peptide competition

For applications investigating TOM1's role in membrane trafficking, additional optimization may be needed to preserve membrane-associated fractions during sample preparation .

How should researchers interpret differences in TOG1 localization patterns across cell types?

When observing variations in TOG1 localization across different cell types or conditions, consider these interpretive guidelines:

How can researchers distinguish between closely related TOG family proteins when using antibodies?

Discriminating between TOM1 and related proteins like TOGARAM1 or other family members requires careful experimental design:

  • Epitope Mapping: Select antibodies targeting unique epitopes not conserved across family members. Consult sequence alignment data to identify distinctive regions.

  • Parallel Detection: Run side-by-side comparisons with antibodies specific to each family member to establish distinct molecular weight profiles.

  • Recombinant Protein Controls: Include purified recombinant proteins of each family member as positive controls to establish specificity.

  • Genetic Approaches: Validate antibody specificity using cells with genetic knockout or knockdown of specific family members.

  • Mass Spectrometry Validation: For critical experiments, confirm antibody targets by immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry identification .

How are TOG1 antibodies being employed in studies of Toll-like receptor signaling and inflammation?

TOG1 antibodies are increasingly valuable in investigating TOM1's inhibitory role in Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling and immune receptor recycling pathways. Current methodological approaches include:

  • Signaling Pathway Analysis: Using TOG1 antibodies to track changes in TOM1 expression and localization during TLR activation and resolution.

  • Inflammation Models: Employing TOG1 antibodies in tissue samples from inflammatory disease models to correlate TOM1 expression with disease progression.

  • Receptor Trafficking Studies: Combining TOG1 antibodies with antibodies against TLR family members to characterize their co-localization and trafficking patterns during inflammatory responses.

  • Ubiquitination Analysis: Investigating how TOM1 participates in the ubiquitin-dependent regulation of inflammatory signaling components using TOG1 antibodies in conjunction with ubiquitin detection.

  • Therapeutic Target Validation: Utilizing TOG1 antibodies to validate TOM1 as a potential therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases by correlating its expression with disease biomarkers .

What methodological considerations are important when studying TOM1-TOLLIP interactions?

The TOM1-TOLLIP complex represents a significant area of research given its role in recruiting ubiquitin-conjugated proteins to early endosomes. When investigating this interaction:

  • Co-Immunoprecipitation Optimization: Use native conditions that preserve the TOM1-TOLLIP interaction, avoiding harsh detergents that might disrupt membrane-associated complexes.

  • Domain Mapping: Employ antibodies targeting specific domains to determine which regions of TOM1 are essential for TOLLIP binding.

  • Competitive Binding Assays: Design experiments to study how TOM1 modulates TOLLIP's binding to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PtdIns(3)P) through binding competition.

  • Microscopy Approaches: Implement advanced microscopy techniques like FRET or FLIM to visualize the TOM1-TOLLIP interaction in living cells.

  • Functional Reconstitution: Develop in vitro systems using purified components to study how the TOM1-TOLLIP complex mediates cargo selection and trafficking .

How might antibody engineering approaches similar to those used for TAVO101 be applied to develop enhanced TOG1 antibodies?

Drawing from the engineering strategies employed for the TAVO101 antibody, researchers could develop next-generation TOG1 antibodies with enhanced properties:

  • Half-Life Extension: Incorporate M428L/N434S mutations in the Fc region to increase FcRn binding affinity, enabling prolonged experimental detection windows for in vivo studies.

  • Reduced Effector Function: Implement L234A and L235A mutations to minimize Fcγ receptor binding, reducing background in applications where effector functions might interfere with experimental outcomes.

  • Domain-Specific Recognition: Engineer antibodies with enhanced specificity for particular functional domains of TOM1, such as the GAT domain involved in ubiquitin binding.

  • Conformation-Specific Antibodies: Develop antibodies that specifically recognize active or inactive conformations of TOM1 to study its regulation.

  • Intrabody Development: Convert effective TOG1 antibodies into intrabodies that can be expressed within cells to track or manipulate TOM1 function in real-time .

This approach to antibody engineering could significantly enhance the experimental utility of TOG1 antibodies in both basic research and potential therapeutic applications.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.