YER188C-A Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Context

YER188C-A is a dubious open reading frame (ORF) in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome, annotated as unlikely to encode a functional protein due to lack of conservation across yeast strains and absence of experimental validation . Antibodies targeting this ORF are primarily used in research settings to investigate gene expression or localization in yeast models, though their utility is limited by the ORF’s questionable biological significance.

Key Features of YER188C-A:

FeatureDetail
Genomic CoordinatesChromosome IV: 1,449,903-1,450,100 (S288C reference strain)
Sequence TypeDubious ORF, non-coding RNA candidate
Protein ProductNone experimentally confirmed
HomologyNo conserved orthologs in other yeast species

Functional Studies

No peer-reviewed studies directly link YER188C-A to a biological function. Interaction databases list 41 genetic interactions for YER188C-A, primarily with genes involved in tRNA modification and ribosomal biogenesis , though these are inferred computationally and lack experimental validation.

Antibody Performance

  • Validation: Most commercial antibodies against YER188C-A (e.g., polyclonal sera) show cross-reactivity with unrelated yeast proteins, raising concerns about specificity .

  • Phenotypic Data: No observable phenotypes in yeast knockout strains, further questioning the ORF’s relevance .

Technical Challenges

  • Epitope Uncertainty: The absence of a confirmed protein product complicates antibody design.

  • Lack of Reproducibility: Studies using YER188C-A antibodies often report inconsistent results, attributed to nonspecific binding .

Recommendations for Future Research

  1. Reassess Genomic Annotation: High-throughput RNA-seq or ribosome profiling could clarify whether YER188C-A is transcribed or translated.

  2. Antibody Validation: Implement orthogonal methods (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts) to confirm target specificity.

  3. Explore Non-Coding Roles: Investigate potential regulatory functions as a non-coding RNA.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
YER188C-AUPF0320 protein YER188C-A antibody
Target Names
YER188C-A
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is YB-1 protein and why is it significant for cancer research?

YB-1 (Y-box binding protein-1) belongs to the cold shock protein family and plays crucial roles in both intracellular and extracellular environments. This multifunctional protein is involved in cell transformation, proliferation, and cancer progression. YB-1 is actively secreted by both transformed and non-transformed cells in response to cytokines like PDGF-BB and TGF-β, as well as under oxidative stress conditions . The significance lies in its universal role across various solid tumors, making it a promising biomarker for cancer detection and monitoring. Research has demonstrated that immunohistochemical detection of cold shock proteins correlates with poor prognosis in numerous malignant diseases .

How do YB-1 antibodies detect specific protein fragments in clinical samples?

YB-1 antibodies can detect both full-length protein (~50 kDa) and specific fragments in clinical samples. The detection methodology typically involves:

  • Sample preparation: Diluted plasma samples (typically 0.1 μl) are separated by SDS-PAGE

  • Protein transfer: Separated proteins are transferred to nitrocellulose membranes

  • Blocking: Membranes are blocked with 2.5% milk in TBST

  • Primary antibody incubation: Using monoclonal anti-YB-1 antibodies (such as biotinylated Portugal; II 2C-5, 1:1000)

  • Detection: Using peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and ECL system

  • Quantification: Densitometric analysis against a known positive control

Under non-reducing conditions, these antibodies can detect full-length YB-1 (~50 kDa), a ~30 kDa fragment, and high molecular weight complexes (>150 kDa) . Most significantly, the antibodies can detect the YB-1/p18 fragment (~18 kDa) that appears to be associated with malignancies.

What are the primary differences between antibodies targeting different domains of YB-1?

Antibodies targeting different domains of YB-1 demonstrate distinct detection profiles:

  • N-terminal and C-terminal specific antibodies: Both detect full-length YB-1 protein (~50 kDa) and bands corresponding to 66 kDa and 30 kDa in plasma samples

  • Cold shock domain-specific antibodies: Detect the YB-1/p18 fragment that includes the cold shock domain but lacks the N- and C-terminal domains

  • DbpA-specific antibodies: Do not detect protein in plasma samples, though they show reactivity with nuclear protein extracts

This domain-specific detection pattern is critical for research applications as it allows for the identification of different YB-1 fragments with potentially distinct biological functions.

How does the detection of YB-1/p18 fragment differ between cancer patients and healthy controls?

The detection of YB-1/p18 fragment shows significant differences between cancer patients and healthy individuals:

  • Cancer patients: YB-1/p18 fragment was detected in 11/25 hepatocellular carcinoma patients and 16/20 patients with advanced solid tumors

  • Healthy controls: None of the 33 healthy blood donors tested strongly positive for YB-1/p18

  • Non-cancerous disease patients: Only 10/60 patients with non-cancerous diseases (primarily inflammatory conditions) showed positive results

This differential detection pattern suggests that YB-1/p18 fragment appears to be predominantly associated with malignant conditions rather than inflammatory diseases or normal physiological states. In patients with chronic liver disease, YB-1/p18 proved most powerful in detecting malignancies other than HCC (60% positive) with fewer false-positive results compared to other established tumor markers .

What methodological approaches can be used to map immunogenic epitopes in YB-1 autoantibodies?

Researchers investigating YB-1 autoantibodies can employ several techniques to map immunogenic epitopes:

  • Recombinant protein preparations: Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems can be used to produce different YB-1 protein variants

  • Autoantibody detection assay:

    • Separate recombinant YB-1 proteins by SDS-PAGE

    • Use human serum samples as "primary" antibodies

    • Detect binding with mouse anti-human Fc-IgG antibodies followed by peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies

  • Peptide array analysis: Design arrays with overlapping residues to map linear epitopes recognized by autoantibodies

  • Domain-specific testing: Compare reactivity against different protein domains (cold shock vs. C-terminal domains)

These approaches have revealed that cancer patients show stronger bands corresponding to full-length His-YB-1 protein (8/15 cancer patients vs. 3/14 controls) and a more complex pattern of protein fragments, particularly those around 18 kDa and high molecular weight bands >100 kDa .

How do autoantibodies against YB-1 differ between cancer and autoimmune conditions?

Autoantibodies targeting YB-1 have been identified in both cancer and autoimmune conditions, with notable differences:

Disease ConditionPrevalence of YB-1 AutoantibodiesCharacteristics
CancerHigher in cancer patients than healthy controlsMore complex pattern with stronger bands for full-length protein and specific fragments (p18)
Systemic sclerosis44%Highest prevalence among rheumatic diseases
Systemic lupus erythematosus14%Moderate prevalence
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC)30-35%Similar prevalence in PBC-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome
Autism spectrum disorders31% (mothers of affected children)Higher than control group (23%)
Healthy controls7-23% depending on studyGenerally low prevalence

The differences in epitope recognition patterns and fragment specificity can help distinguish between cancer-associated and autoimmune-associated YB-1 autoantibodies, which has important implications for diagnostic applications.

What factors affect the degradation patterns of YB-1 protein in experimental settings?

Several factors influence the degradation patterns of YB-1 protein:

  • Sample source: Prokaryotic vs. eukaryotic expression systems result in different degradation patterns

  • Presence of autoantibodies: Cancer sera containing autoantibodies targeting YB-1 extend the half-life of the YB-1 protein

  • Post-translational modifications: These can affect conformational changes despite SDS-PAGE and heating

  • Multimerization: YB-1 has a known propensity to form multimers, resulting in high molecular weight bands (>100 kDa)

  • Proteolytic processing: The YB-1/p18 fragment appears to be generated as an (auto-)proteolytic fragment

Understanding these factors is crucial when designing experiments to detect and characterize YB-1 protein and its fragments in different sample types.

How should researchers optimize immunoblotting protocols for detecting YB-1/p18 in clinical samples?

Optimizing immunoblotting protocols for YB-1/p18 detection should consider:

  • Sample dilution: Use 0.1 μl human plasma for optimal results

  • Gel conditions: 12.5% SDS-PA gels provide appropriate separation of YB-1 fragments

  • Blocking parameters: 2.5% milk in TBST is recommended

  • Antibody selection: Monoclonal anti-YB-1 antibodies (e.g., biotinylated Portugal; II 2C-5, 1:1000) show high specificity

  • Detection system: Peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin with ECL system provides reliable visualization

  • Positive controls: Include a known positive sample (e.g., from a patient with metastasized small cell lung cancer) as an internal standard

  • Quantification: Use densitometry to calculate relative optical density compared to the positive control

Each sample should be tested on at least two independent blots to ensure reproducibility of results.

How can YB-1/p18 be integrated with other biomarkers for improved cancer detection?

Research indicates that combining YB-1/p18 with established tumor markers improves diagnostic accuracy:

This multi-marker approach can enhance the screening of high-risk populations, such as patients being evaluated for organ transplantation.

What experimental designs can best evaluate the role of YB-1 autoantibodies in cancer progression?

To effectively study the role of YB-1 autoantibodies in cancer progression, researchers should consider:

  • Prospective cohort studies: Follow patients longitudinally to correlate YB-1 autoantibody levels with disease progression

  • Degradation analyses: Time-course experiments to elucidate degradation patterns of spiked recombinant YB-1 protein in the presence and absence of autoantibodies within serum samples

  • Functional studies: Since extracellular YB-1 serves as a ligand for receptors like Notch3 and TNFR1, investigate how autoantibodies affect these signaling pathways

  • Comparative analyses: Study epitope recognition patterns between cancer patients and healthy controls using peptide arrays with overlapping residues

  • Domain-specific effects: Compare the functional consequences of autoantibodies targeting different domains (cold shock vs. C-terminal domains)

These approaches can help elucidate whether YB-1 autoantibodies contribute to aberrant signaling that promotes tumor development.

What are the prospects for developing YB-1/p18 as a screening biomarker for malignancies?

YB-1/p18 shows promise as a screening biomarker for malignancies, particularly in:

  • High-risk populations: Patients being evaluated for organ transplantation could benefit from YB-1/p18 screening

  • Multi-marker panels: Combining YB-1/p18 with established markers like AFP and CA19-9 improves detection accuracy

  • Differential diagnosis: YB-1/p18 helps identify malignancies other than HCC in patients with chronic liver disease

Future development requires larger prospective studies to validate these findings across diverse patient populations. The independence of YB-1/p18 from confounding factors like inflammation, renal impairment, or liver dysfunction makes it particularly valuable for complex clinical scenarios .

How might epitope mapping of YB-1 autoantibodies advance personalized cancer diagnostics?

Epitope mapping of YB-1 autoantibodies could advance personalized cancer diagnostics through:

  • Cancer subtype characterization: Different epitope recognition patterns may correlate with specific cancer subtypes

  • Treatment response prediction: Autoantibody profiles might predict response to certain therapies

  • Detection assays: Development of specific assays targeting the immunodominant epitopes identified in cancer patients

  • Monitoring disease progression: Changes in epitope recognition patterns could indicate disease progression or remission

  • Distinction from autoimmune conditions: Differential epitope mapping can help distinguish cancer-related from autoimmune-related YB-1 autoantibodies

The research indicates that cancer sera show distinct patterns of reactivity against YB-1 epitopes, providing a foundation for more personalized diagnostic approaches.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.