yehR Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Components: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
yehR antibody; b2123 antibody; JW5351 antibody; Uncharacterized lipoprotein YehR antibody
Target Names
yehR
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Lipid-anchor.

Q&A

What is yehR protein and why is it studied in molecular microbiology?

yehR (UniProt: P33354) is an uncharacterized lipoprotein found in Escherichia coli (strain K12) that localizes to the cell membrane via a lipid anchor. Also known as b2123 or JW5351, this protein represents one of many bacterial membrane proteins that remain functionally uncharacterized despite their potential importance in bacterial physiology and pathogenesis. Studying yehR contributes to our understanding of bacterial membrane organization and potentially identifies new targets for antimicrobial development.

What are the key specifications of commercially available yehR Antibodies?

Most commercially available yehR Antibodies are rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against recombinant Escherichia coli (strain K12) yehR protein . These antibodies typically have the following specifications:

SpecificationDetails
HostRabbit
ClonalityPolyclonal
IsotypeIgG
FormatLiquid (Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300, Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4)
ApplicationsELISA, Western Blot
ImmunogenRecombinant Escherichia coli (strain K12) yehR protein
PurityAntigen Affinity purified
Target SpeciesEscherichia coli (strain K12)

How does antibody specificity impact yehR research, and what methods can validate specificity?

Antibody specificity is crucial for yehR research accuracy, as recent studies indicate up to one-third of antibody-based reagents exhibit nonspecific binding to unintended targets . For yehR Antibody validation, researchers should:

  • Perform knockout/knockdown controls: Compare antibody signals between wild-type and yehR-knockout E. coli strains.

  • Conduct epitope mapping: Identify the specific regions of yehR recognized by the antibody.

  • Apply orthogonal detection methods: Verify findings using mass spectrometry or other antibody-independent techniques.

  • Test for cross-reactivity: Examine reactivity against related bacterial lipoproteins.

  • Use recombinant protein competition: Pre-incubate antibody with purified yehR protein to block specific binding.

Poor antibody specificity has been identified as a major contributor to the reproducibility crisis in biomedical research , making these validation steps essential for reliable yehR studies.

What are the optimal protocols for using yehR Antibody in Western blot applications?

For optimal Western blot results with yehR Antibody:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Harvest E. coli cells (OD600 ≈ 0.8-1.0)

    • Isolate membrane fractions using differential centrifugation

    • Solubilize membrane proteins with appropriate detergents (1% Triton X-100 or 0.5% SDS)

  • Electrophoresis conditions:

    • Use 12-15% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal resolution

    • Load purified membrane fractions (20-30 μg/lane)

    • Include recombinant yehR protein as positive control

  • Transfer and blocking:

    • Transfer to PVDF membrane (more suitable than nitrocellulose for membrane proteins)

    • Block with 5% non-fat milk in TBST (PBS-based buffers may reduce background)

  • Antibody incubation:

    • Primary antibody: Dilute yehR Antibody 1:500-1:2000 in blocking buffer

    • Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking

    • Secondary antibody: Anti-rabbit IgG-HRP at 1:5000-1:10000 for 1 hour at room temperature

  • Detection and visualization:

    • Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate for detection

    • Expected band size: Approximately 21-23 kDa, though post-translational modifications may alter migration

For membrane proteins like yehR, optimization of detergent conditions and transfer parameters is critical for successful detection.

How should researchers optimize ELISA protocols for yehR detection?

For ELISA applications with yehR Antibody:

  • Plate coating:

    • For direct ELISA: Coat plates with purified yehR protein (1-5 μg/ml in carbonate buffer, pH 9.6)

    • For sandwich ELISA: Coat with capture antibody (1-5 μg/ml) specific to a different epitope than the detection antibody

  • Sample preparation:

    • For bacterial lysates: Sonicate E. coli cultures, clarify by centrifugation

    • For membrane protein enrichment: Perform ultracentrifugation fractionation

  • Antibody dilutions and incubations:

    • Primary antibody: Test serial dilutions from 1:500-1:5000

    • Detection systems: HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000-1:10000)

    • Incubation times: 1-2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C

  • Signal development:

    • Substrate: TMB provides high sensitivity for membrane protein detection

    • Stop solution: 2M H₂SO₄

    • Measure absorbance at 450 nm with 570 nm reference

  • Controls and validation:

    • Include recombinant yehR standard curve (0.1-1000 ng/ml)

    • Test lysates from yehR-knockout strains as negative controls

    • Validate with spike-recovery experiments using recombinant protein

Optimization of detergent concentration in buffers is particularly important for membrane-associated antigens like yehR to ensure proper exposure of epitopes.

What strategies can overcome the challenges of detecting native yehR in bacterial samples?

Detecting native yehR in bacterial samples presents several challenges due to its membrane localization and potentially low expression levels. Effective strategies include:

  • Enrichment techniques:

    • Membrane fractionation by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g for 1 hour)

    • Use of detergent extractions optimized for lipoproteins (n-Dodecyl β-D-maltoside at 1-2%)

    • Immunoprecipitation with yehR Antibody conjugated to magnetic beads

  • Signal amplification methods:

    • Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for immunofluorescence applications

    • Polymer-based detection systems for enhanced Western blot sensitivity

    • Proximity ligation assay (PLA) for protein-protein interaction studies

  • Expression modulation:

    • Growth conditions that upregulate yehR expression (investigate transcriptional controls)

    • Use of inducible promoter systems for controlled overexpression

  • Alternative detection methods:

    • Mass spectrometry-based detection after immunoprecipitation

    • RNA analysis (RT-qPCR) as a complementary approach to verify expression

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Fresh sample processing to prevent protein degradation

    • Protease inhibitor cocktails specifically designed for bacterial applications

    • Lipid bilayer solubilization techniques that preserve native protein conformation

These approaches can significantly improve detection sensitivity while maintaining specificity for native yehR in complex bacterial samples.

How can researchers address the batch-to-batch variability often observed with polyclonal antibodies like yehR Antibody?

Batch-to-batch variability is a significant challenge with polyclonal antibodies and can dramatically affect experimental outcomes . To address this issue:

  • Standardized validation protocol:

    • Develop a consistent validation workflow for each new antibody batch

    • Compare new batches directly against previous ones using identical samples

    • Document lot-specific optimal dilutions and application conditions

  • Reference standard preparation:

    • Create and freeze large batches of positive control samples

    • Prepare standard curves with recombinant yehR protein

    • Maintain consistent reference samples across multiple experiments

  • Quantitative benchmarking:

    • Use quantitative Western blot or ELISA to establish signal intensity thresholds

    • Determine lot-specific detection limits and linear dynamic range

    • Apply statistical methods to normalize between batches

  • Epitope mapping:

    • Characterize each batch for epitope recognition patterns

    • Identify variations in dominant epitope recognition between lots

    • Consider using epitope-specific monoclonal antibodies as complementary tools

  • Long-term antibody storage optimization:

    • Aliquot antibodies to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

    • Add stabilizers like BSA (0.1-1%) for long-term storage

    • Maintain consistent storage conditions (-20°C or -80°C)

Implementing these systematic approaches can significantly reduce experimental variability and improve reproducibility across antibody batches.

What are the potential causes and solutions for high background signal when using yehR Antibody?

High background signal is a common challenge when working with antibodies targeting bacterial membrane proteins. Potential causes and solutions include:

  • Cross-reactivity with related lipoproteins:

    • Cause: Similarity in epitopes between yehR and other bacterial membrane proteins

    • Solution: Pre-absorb antibody with lysates from yehR-knockout strains; increase washing stringency; use higher antibody dilutions

  • Non-specific binding to hydrophobic regions:

    • Cause: Membrane proteins contain hydrophobic domains that promote non-specific interactions

    • Solution: Add 0.1-0.5% non-ionic detergents (Tween-20, Triton X-100) to blocking and antibody diluent buffers

  • Inadequate blocking:

    • Cause: Insufficient blocking of non-specific binding sites

    • Solution: Optimize blocking agent (BSA vs. milk vs. casein); extend blocking time to 2 hours or overnight; use commercial protein-free blockers

  • Secondary antibody issues:

    • Cause: Non-specific binding of secondary antibody

    • Solution: Use highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies; include 1-5% serum from the secondary antibody host species in diluent

  • Sample preparation problems:

    • Cause: Incomplete solubilization or protein aggregation

    • Solution: Optimize lysis conditions; centrifuge samples at 20,000 × g before loading to remove aggregates; heat samples at 37°C instead of boiling

  • Detection system sensitivity:

    • Cause: Overly sensitive detection system amplifying background

    • Solution: Reduce substrate incubation time; dilute substrate; switch to less sensitive detection method

Systematic optimization of these parameters can significantly improve signal-to-noise ratio in yehR detection experiments.

How can researchers differentiate between true negative results and false negative results when using yehR Antibody?

Distinguishing between true and false negative results is critical for accurate data interpretation. When working with yehR Antibody:

  • Implement positive controls:

    • Include recombinant yehR protein in every experiment

    • Use known yehR-expressing E. coli strains under conditions that upregulate expression

    • Create fusion-tagged yehR constructs that can be detected by alternative methods

  • Evaluate antibody functionality:

    • Test antibody recognition of denatured versus native protein

    • Assess impact of different sample preparation methods on epitope accessibility

    • Determine if epitope masking occurs due to protein-protein interactions

  • Consider biological variables:

    • Test various growth conditions that might affect yehR expression

    • Examine expression timing throughout bacterial growth phases

    • Assess potential post-translational modifications that might affect epitope recognition

  • Apply complementary detection methods:

    • Confirm negative results using mRNA expression analysis

    • Employ mass spectrometry-based proteomics for validation

    • Use alternate antibodies targeting different epitopes of yehR

  • Assess technical limitations:

    • Determine detection limit of the assay with dilution series

    • Evaluate potential interfering substances in specific sample types

    • Consider antibody window period effects similar to those observed in diagnostic testing

Implementing these systematic approaches helps distinguish true biological absence from technical detection failures.

How can researchers apply protein engineering approaches to enhance yehR Antibody specificity and affinity?

Advanced protein engineering can significantly improve yehR Antibody performance. Based on current approaches in antibody engineering:

  • Directed evolution techniques:

    • Phage display for selecting high-affinity antibody fragments against specific yehR epitopes

    • Yeast surface display for improved affinity maturation through mutagenesis libraries

    • Ribosome display for generating antibody fragments with enhanced specificity

  • Rational design approaches:

    • Computational modeling of antibody-antigen interfaces to predict beneficial mutations

    • Structure-guided complementarity-determining region (CDR) modifications

    • Grafting of high-affinity binding residues from other antibodies into yehR Antibody framework

  • Machine learning-guided optimization:

    • Language model-based prediction of evolutionarily favorable substitutions, similar to approaches used for human antibody evolution

    • Deep learning models for predicting antibody-antigen interactions

    • Computational screening of antibody variants for specificity against related bacterial proteins

  • Antibody fragment engineering:

    • Generation of single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) against yehR for improved tissue penetration

    • Creation of bispecific antibodies targeting yehR and a second bacterial protein

    • Development of recombinant antibody fragments with enhanced stability

  • Post-translational modification control:

    • Glycoengineering to enhance antibody properties

    • Site-specific conjugation for added functionality

    • Charge distribution optimization for improved solubility

These approaches have been successfully applied to therapeutic antibodies and can be adapted for research antibodies like yehR Antibody to dramatically improve performance.

What methodologies can be employed for long-term studies of yehR expression and localization in bacterial populations?

For longitudinal studies of yehR expression and localization in bacterial populations:

  • Reporter system development:

    • Create yehR-fluorescent protein fusions (GFP, mCherry) for live-cell imaging

    • Develop luciferase-based reporters under yehR promoter control for continuous monitoring

    • Establish destabilized reporter systems to capture dynamic expression changes

  • Immunofluorescence microscopy techniques:

    • Optimize fixation protocols that preserve membrane structures (2% paraformaldehyde with controlled permeabilization)

    • Apply super-resolution microscopy (STORM, PALM) for precise localization

    • Use 3D confocal microscopy to map spatial distribution within bacterial populations

  • Flow cytometry and cell sorting:

    • Develop protocols for bacterial membrane protein analysis by flow cytometry

    • Implement fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to isolate subpopulations based on yehR expression levels

    • Apply spectral flow cytometry for multiparameter analysis of yehR with other markers

  • Time-lapse microscopy systems:

    • Establish microfluidic platforms for continuous monitoring of single bacterial cells

    • Develop temperature-controlled growth chambers for long-term imaging

    • Apply automated image acquisition and analysis for large-scale data collection

  • Quantitative mass spectrometry approaches:

    • Implement stable isotope labeling (SILAC) for quantitative temporal profiling

    • Apply targeted proteomics (MRM/PRM) for sensitive quantification across time points

    • Develop intact protein mass spectrometry methods for post-translational modification tracking

These methodologies enable robust temporal analysis of yehR dynamics in bacterial populations while maintaining sufficient sensitivity to detect low-abundance membrane proteins.

What are the considerations for developing custom yehR Antibodies against specific epitopes for specialized research applications?

When developing custom yehR Antibodies for specialized applications, researchers should consider:

  • Epitope selection strategy:

    • Analyze yehR sequence for immunogenic regions using prediction algorithms

    • Target extracellular domains for native conformation detection

    • Avoid regions with sequence homology to other bacterial proteins

    • Consider designing antibodies against specific post-translational modifications

  • Immunization approaches:

    • Compare multiple host species (rabbit, chicken, goat) for optimal immune response

    • Evaluate various immunogen formats: peptide-carrier conjugates, recombinant protein fragments, DNA immunization

    • Implement prime-boost strategies with different immunogen preparations

  • Screening and validation methodology:

    • Design screening assays that mimic the intended application

    • Implement negative controls using samples from yehR-knockout strains

    • Validate across multiple detection platforms (ELISA, Western blot, immunofluorescence)

  • Rational design alternatives:

    • Consider complementary peptide design approaches for targeting specific disordered epitopes

    • Explore single-domain antibody scaffolds for improved stability

    • Apply in vitro antibody design using methods like IgDesign for binders to specific epitopes

  • Documentation and registration:

    • Register custom antibodies in the Antibody Registry for proper citation and tracking

    • Document complete validation data including all positive and negative controls

    • Specify clone identifiers and epitope information for reproducibility

By implementing these considerations, researchers can develop highly specific yehR Antibodies tailored to their particular experimental requirements while ensuring proper validation and documentation for research reproducibility.

What comprehensive validation standards should be applied to ensure yehR Antibody reliability in critical research applications?

For rigorous validation of yehR Antibody for critical research:

  • Genetic strategy validation:

    • Test antibody on samples from wild-type and yehR gene knockout strains

    • Evaluate reactivity in yehR overexpression systems

    • Perform RNA interference validation if working in eukaryotic expression systems

  • Independent target verification:

    • Confirm target recognition using orthogonal methods like mass spectrometry

    • Perform immunoprecipitation followed by proteomic identification

    • Correlate antibody signal with mRNA expression data

  • Epitope mapping:

    • Determine specific recognition sites using peptide arrays or HDX-MS

    • Test antibody against truncated proteins to localize binding regions

    • Evaluate effects of site-directed mutagenesis on antibody recognition

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Test against closely related bacterial species and strains

    • Evaluate recognition of homologous proteins from different organisms

    • Perform competitive binding assays with purified potential cross-reactants

  • Reproducibility testing:

    • Validate across multiple laboratories using standardized protocols

    • Test different sample preparation methods and their impact on detection

    • Evaluate batch-to-batch consistency using reference standards

  • Application-specific validation:

    • For each application (WB, ELISA, IHC), develop specific validation criteria

    • Document optimal conditions, dilutions, and expected results

    • Establish quantitative performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, precision)

These comprehensive validation standards align with recent initiatives to address antibody reproducibility issues in scientific research and provide a framework for ensuring reliable results in critical applications.

How does antibody persistence impact longitudinal studies using yehR Antibody, and what controls should be implemented?

In longitudinal studies using yehR Antibody, antibody persistence and stability must be carefully controlled:

  • Stability monitoring strategy:

    • Implement regular testing of antibody activity using reference samples

    • Monitor changes in antibody titer and specificity over time

    • Document performance metrics throughout the study duration

  • Storage optimization:

    • Prepare single-use aliquots to avoid freeze-thaw cycles

    • Evaluate stabilizing additives for long-term storage

    • Compare performance of antibodies stored under different conditions

  • Reference standard preparation:

    • Create large batches of positive control samples for consistent comparison

    • Prepare standardized bacterial lysates with known yehR expression levels

    • Develop quantifiable reference materials for normalization between timepoints

  • Calibration protocols:

    • Implement regular calibration using purified recombinant yehR protein

    • Establish standard curves at defined intervals throughout the study

    • Apply statistical methods to normalize between analysis timepoints

  • Environmental factor control:

    • Monitor and document temperature fluctuations in storage conditions

    • Evaluate effects of buffer composition on long-term stability

    • Consider the impact of antibody carrier proteins on performance over time

These considerations are informed by studies on antibody persistence in various contexts , which demonstrate that careful monitoring and standardization are essential for reliable longitudinal data collection.

How can researchers evaluate and mitigate potential off-target effects when using yehR Antibody in complex bacterial systems?

To evaluate and mitigate off-target effects of yehR Antibody in complex bacterial systems:

  • Comprehensive cross-reactivity screening:

    • Test against a panel of related bacterial species and strains

    • Evaluate binding to bacterial lysates from yehR-knockout strains

    • Perform competitive binding assays with purified potential cross-reactants

  • Advanced specificity testing:

    • Apply membrane proteome array technology similar to approaches used for therapeutic antibodies

    • Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify all captured proteins

    • Use protein microarrays containing bacterial membrane proteins to assess binding specificity

  • Bioinformatic prediction of potential cross-reactants:

    • Conduct sequence similarity searches for epitope regions across bacterial proteomes

    • Apply structural modeling to identify proteins with similar epitope conformations

    • Predict potential cross-reactivity based on physicochemical properties of the epitope

  • Experimental controls to identify false positives:

    • Include pre-immune serum controls from the same animal used to generate the antibody

    • Implement epitope blocking experiments using synthetic peptides

    • Test signal persistence after pre-absorption with recombinant yehR protein

  • Signal validation strategies:

    • Confirm key findings using alternative detection methods

    • Implement multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of yehR

    • Correlate protein detection with gene expression data

These approaches help researchers distinguish between specific and non-specific signals, addressing the concerning finding that up to one-third of antibody drugs exhibit nonspecific binding to unintended targets , which likely applies to research antibodies as well.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.