Sup11p is essential for β-1,6-glucan synthesis, as demonstrated by:
| Parameter | Wild Type | nmt81-sup11 Mutant |
|---|---|---|
| β-1,6-glucan | Present (23% of wall mass) | Undetectable |
| β-1,3-glucan | 55% of wall mass | Increased to 68% |
| Chitin | 9% | Elevated to 15% |
Knockdown experiments using thiamine-repressible nmt81 promoter revealed:
87% reduction in β-1,6-glucan levels within 18 hours
Compensatory upregulation of Gas2p (β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase) by 4.2-fold
Immunogold electron microscopy with SPAC27E2.14 Antibody demonstrated:
Sup11p localizes to growing cell poles (80% of cells) and septum (92% during cytokinesis)
Mutant phenotypes:
Host: Rabbit
Immunogen: Recombinant Sup11p fragments (aa 112-230)
Purification: Protein A affinity chromatography
Applications:
Validation confirmed no cross-reactivity with Kre9p (S. cerevisiae homolog) through comparative proteomics .
Genetic interactions:
Synthetic lethality with oma2Δ (O-mannosyltransferase mutant)
Suppresses temperature sensitivity in bgs1-12 (β-glucan synthase mutant)
Transcriptional regulation:
Microarray analysis of nmt81-sup11 mutants showed:
The SPAC27E2.14 Antibody has enabled critical discoveries about:
GPI-anchor processing mechanisms conserved in pathogenic fungi
Compensatory cell wall remodeling pathways
Evolutionary conservation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kre9 (32% identity)
Ongoing research utilizes this antibody to study antifungal drug targets, particularly in β-glucan biosynthesis pathways .
What is SPAC27E2.14 and why would researchers need an antibody against it?
SPAC27E2.14 is classified as a sequence orphan or hypothetical protein in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) . As an uncharacterized protein with no known homologs, antibodies against it are crucial for validating its expression, determining subcellular localization, and characterizing its interactions with other cellular components. The computed structure model (AF_AFC6Y4B0F1) indicates a moderate confidence level (pLDDT global score of 64.45), suggesting a partially structured protein .
What types of SPAC27E2.14 antibodies are currently available for research?
Currently, polyclonal antibodies raised against recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe SPAC27E2.14 protein are available for research purposes. These antibodies are typically:
Raised in rabbits
Antigen-affinity purified
Supplied in liquid form (typically in 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4 with 0.03% Proclin 300 as preservative)
Validated for applications such as ELISA and Western blotting
These antibodies are designed specifically for research use and not for diagnostic or therapeutic applications.
What experimental applications are SPAC27E2.14 antibodies validated for?
According to product documentation, current SPAC27E2.14 antibodies have been tested and validated for:
Researchers should validate these antibodies for other applications such as immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence microscopy, or ChIP (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation) before proceeding with experiments.
How should SPAC27E2.14 antibodies be stored and handled in laboratory settings?
For optimal performance and longevity:
What controls should be included when using SPAC27E2.14 antibodies?
When designing experiments with SPAC27E2.14 antibodies, include:
Positive control: Lysate from wild-type S. pombe expressing the protein
Negative control: Lysate from a SPAC27E2.14 deletion strain (if available)
Isotype control: Non-specific IgG from the same species the antibody was raised in (rabbit)
Loading control: Antibody against a constitutively expressed S. pombe protein
Pre-adsorption control: SPAC27E2.14 antibody pre-incubated with excess recombinant protein
How can researchers validate the specificity of SPAC27E2.14 antibodies given the limited information about this uncharacterized protein?
For rigorous validation of antibody specificity:
Generate a SPAC27E2.14 knockout strain using CRISPR-Cas9 or traditional homologous recombination methods
Create an epitope-tagged version (e.g., GFP, FLAG, or HA tag) of SPAC27E2.14 expressed under its native promoter
Perform parallel Western blots with both the SPAC27E2.14 antibody and an anti-tag antibody
Conduct immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm the identity of the pulled-down protein
Perform immunodepletion experiments with recombinant SPAC27E2.14 protein
These approaches collectively provide strong evidence for antibody specificity to the target protein.
What methodological considerations should be taken into account when using SPAC27E2.14 antibodies for immunofluorescence in S. pombe?
For successful immunofluorescence in fission yeast:
Cell wall digestion: Optimize spheroplasting using zymolyase or lysing enzymes to ensure adequate antibody penetration while maintaining cellular morphology
Fixation method: Compare methanol fixation and paraformaldehyde fixation, as described in search result for S. pombe immunofluorescence
Blocking: Use 5% BSA or normal serum from the secondary antibody species to reduce background
Antibody dilution: Perform titration experiments (starting from manufacturer's recommendation of ≤5 μg/mL)
Microscopy controls: Include secondary-only controls and cells without the target protein
Counterstaining: Use DAPI for nuclear staining to aid in cellular localization analysis
How can SPAC27E2.14 antibodies be used to investigate protein-protein interactions and complex formation?
To investigate protein-protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Optimize lysis conditions to preserve native protein complexes
Use crosslinking agents like formaldehyde or DSP to stabilize transient interactions
Elute with gentle conditions to maintain complex integrity
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):
Combine SPAC27E2.14 antibody with antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Use species-specific PLA probes and optimize signal amplification
Immunoprecipitation coupled to mass spectrometry (IP-MS):
Perform stringent washing steps to remove non-specific binders
Include appropriate negative controls (IgG, knockout cells)
Use both label-free and SILAC approaches for quantitative comparisons
Size Exclusion Chromatography followed by Western blot:
Analyze whether SPAC27E2.14 co-elutes with suspected complex components
What approaches should be used to characterize post-translational modifications of SPAC27E2.14 using available antibodies?
For PTM characterization:
Phosphorylation analysis:
Treat samples with phosphatase inhibitors during preparation
Perform Phos-tag SDS-PAGE to separate phosphorylated forms
Compare migration patterns before and after phosphatase treatment
Glycosylation analysis:
Ubiquitination analysis:
Use denaturing conditions during immunoprecipitation
Probe with anti-ubiquitin antibodies after SPAC27E2.14 immunoprecipitation
Mass spectrometry:
Immunoprecipitate SPAC27E2.14 and analyze by LC-MS/MS
Use enrichment strategies specific for phosphopeptides, glycopeptides, etc.
How can SPAC27E2.14 antibodies be used in combination with genomic and transcriptomic data to understand protein function?
For integrative analysis:
Correlation with transcriptome data:
ChIP-seq analysis (if nuclear protein):
Optimize cross-linking conditions for S. pombe
Use stringent controls for antibody specificity
Compare binding sites with transcriptional changes
Proteomics correlation:
Combine antibody-based quantification with global proteomics data
Identify co-regulated proteins across conditions
Genetic interaction mapping:
Use antibody to validate protein levels in genetic interaction screens
Confirm protein expression changes in synthetic lethal or suppressor strains
What methodological approaches should be considered when using SPAC27E2.14 antibodies for analyzing protein localization during cell cycle progression in S. pombe?
For cell cycle localization studies:
Synchronization methods:
Time-course sampling:
Collect samples at defined intervals covering the entire cell cycle
Process samples simultaneously for immunofluorescence
Co-localization with markers:
Use antibodies against known cell cycle-regulated proteins
Include markers for cellular structures (SPB, septum, etc.)
Quantitative analysis:
Measure signal intensity relative to cell cycle progression
Correlate with septum formation and nuclear division
Live-cell imaging comparison:
Compare immunofluorescence results with live-cell imaging of tagged protein
How can researchers troubleshoot non-specific binding when using SPAC27E2.14 antibodies in S. pombe lysates?
To address non-specific binding:
Optimization of blocking conditions:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, milk, normal serum)
Increase blocking time and concentration
Antibody purification strategies:
Consider pre-adsorption against fixed S. pombe SPAC27E2.14 deletion strain
Use antigen-specific affinity purification to enrich specific antibodies
Sample preparation optimization:
Test different lysis methods (mechanical disruption, enzymatic)
Optimize detergent concentrations to reduce non-specific interactions
Western blot conditions:
Increase washing stringency (higher salt, mild detergents)
Optimize antibody dilution and incubation conditions
Consider using more sensitive detection methods with shorter exposure times
| Validation Method | Experimental Approach | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | Detect protein in wild-type vs. knockout strain | Single band of predicted size in wild-type only |
| Immunoprecipitation | Pull-down followed by mass spectrometry | SPAC27E2.14 identified as top hit |
| Epitope-tagged validation | Compare antibody signal with anti-tag antibody | Co-localization of signals |
| Pre-adsorption control | Pre-incubate antibody with recombinant protein | Loss of specific signal |
| Cross-reactivity testing | Test against related species lysates | Specificity for S. pombe protein |