KEGG: spo:SPAC17A2.10c
STRING: 4896.SPAC17A2.10c.1
SPAC17A2.10c is an uncharacterized membrane protein found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast), which is a model organism widely used in molecular and cellular biology research . The protein is localized in both the cytoplasm and nucleus membrane as a multi-pass membrane protein. While its specific function remains largely uncharacterized, antibodies against this protein are valuable tools for studying membrane protein dynamics, yeast cellular processes, and protein-protein interactions in S. pombe. The significance lies in its potential role in membrane biology and cellular compartmentalization in this important model organism.
The SPAC17A2.10c antibody serves multiple research purposes in S. pombe studies:
Protein localization studies: Using immunofluorescence to determine subcellular distribution of the target protein
Protein expression analysis: Western blotting to quantify protein levels across different experimental conditions
Protein-protein interaction studies: Immunoprecipitation to identify binding partners
Cell cycle regulation research: Examining protein expression changes during different phases
Membrane protein dynamics: Studying trafficking and turnover of membrane proteins
Based on available data, SPAC17A2.10c antibodies are primarily designed for specificity to Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) . Cross-reactivity studies with other yeast species or higher eukaryotes have not been extensively documented. When using this antibody, researchers should expect:
High specificity for S. pombe SPAC17A2.10c protein
Potential cross-reactivity with highly conserved membrane proteins in closely related yeast species
Limited to no cross-reactivity with mammalian cells or other distant organisms
For critical experiments, validation of specificity through knockout controls is recommended, particularly when applying these antibodies to species other than S. pombe .
For optimal Western blotting results with SPAC17A2.10c antibody, follow these methodological guidelines:
Sample preparation:
Extract total protein from S. pombe using either glass bead lysis or enzymatic digestion
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of membrane proteins
Use a membrane protein-compatible lysis buffer (containing 1-2% detergent such as Triton X-100)
Electrophoresis and transfer conditions:
Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal resolution
Transfer to PVDF membranes (preferred over nitrocellulose for membrane proteins)
Use semi-dry transfer at 15V for 1 hour or wet transfer at 30V overnight at 4°C
Antibody incubation:
Blocking: 5% non-fat milk in TBST, 1 hour at room temperature
Primary antibody: 1:1000 dilution in 2% BSA/TBST, overnight at 4°C
Secondary antibody: 1:5000 dilution in 2% BSA/TBST, 1 hour at room temperature
Detection:
Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate for standard detection
Expected molecular weight: Based on the protein sequence, expect bands at the appropriate kDa range for SPAC17A2.10c
Note that membrane proteins can sometimes migrate at apparent molecular weights different from their calculated size due to hydrophobicity and post-translational modifications .
For successful immunofluorescence experiments with SPAC17A2.10c antibody in S. pombe, follow this protocol:
Cell fixation and permeabilization:
Fix log-phase S. pombe cells with 3.7% formaldehyde for 30 minutes
Digest cell wall with zymolyase (1mg/ml) for 30-60 minutes at 37°C
Permeabilize with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 minutes
Antibody staining:
Block with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 hour
Incubate with SPAC17A2.10c antibody at 1:100-1:500 dilution overnight at 4°C
Wash 3 times with PBS
Incubate with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody (1:500) for 1 hour at room temperature
Counterstain with DAPI (1μg/ml) to visualize nuclei
Imaging considerations:
Use confocal microscopy for optimal resolution of membrane structures
Employ Z-stack imaging to capture the full distribution of the protein
Include proper controls: secondary-only control and ideally a SPAC17A2.10c knockout strain
For membrane proteins like SPAC17A2.10c, careful optimization of permeabilization conditions is crucial to maintain membrane structure while allowing antibody access .
Validation of antibody specificity is essential for reliable research results. For SPAC17A2.10c antibody, employ these validation approaches:
Genetic validation:
Test the antibody on a SPAC17A2.10c gene deletion strain (negative control)
Test on cells overexpressing SPAC17A2.10c (positive control)
Biochemical validation:
Perform peptide competition assay
Use recombinant SPAC17A2.10c protein as a positive control
Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to confirm target identity
Cross-validation:
Compare results using different antibody clones (if available)
Compare with localization of epitope-tagged versions of SPAC17A2.10c (e.g., GFP fusion)
The yeast two-hybrid approach can also be used for characterizing the antibody target, as described in related antibody research . This method can help confirm the specificity of the antibody binding domain and reveal potential cross-reactivity.
Working with antibodies against membrane proteins like SPAC17A2.10c presents several challenges:
| Challenge | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Weak or no signal in Western blot | Inefficient protein extraction | Use stronger lysis buffers with appropriate detergents (1-2% Triton X-100, SDS, or NP-40) |
| Protein degradation | Add protease inhibitor cocktail and keep samples cold | |
| Insufficient antibody concentration | Increase antibody concentration or incubation time | |
| High background | Non-specific binding | Increase blocking time/concentration; use alternative blocking agents (BSA, casein) |
| Secondary antibody cross-reactivity | Test different secondary antibodies; include secondary-only control | |
| Multiple unexpected bands | Cross-reactivity | Validate with knockout controls; use more stringent washing |
| Post-translational modifications | Confirm with different techniques (e.g., mass spectrometry) | |
| Poor immunofluorescence signal | Inadequate fixation/permeabilization | Optimize fixation protocol for membrane proteins |
| Epitope masking | Try different fixation methods (PFA vs. methanol) | |
| Inconsistent results | Antibody batch variation | Use the same lot for critical experiments; revalidate new lots |
For membrane proteins like SPAC17A2.10c, additionally consider using specialized detergents (e.g., CHAPS, DDM) that better preserve membrane protein structure while ensuring extraction efficiency .
To enhance detection sensitivity of low-abundance SPAC17A2.10c protein:
For Western blotting:
Signal amplification: Use high-sensitivity chemiluminescent substrates (e.g., femto-level ECL)
Sample concentration: Enrich membrane fractions through ultracentrifugation
Loading optimization: Increase total protein loaded (up to 50-80µg per lane)
Detection systems: Use digital imaging systems with high dynamic range instead of film
Enhanced antibody binding: Use signal enhancer solutions before primary antibody incubation
For immunofluorescence:
Tyramide signal amplification (TSA): Enzymatically deposits multiple fluorophores per antibody binding event
Alternative fixation: Try methanol fixation which can sometimes better preserve certain epitopes
Antigen retrieval: Apply mild heat treatment in citrate buffer prior to antibody incubation
Microscopy optimization: Use high-sensitivity cameras and appropriate filter sets
Sample preparation: Synchronize yeast cultures to capture peak expression phases
For quantitative applications, consider developing a sandwich ELISA using the SPAC17A2.10c antibody paired with another antibody recognizing a different epitope of the same protein, which can significantly improve sensitivity compared to single antibody detection methods .
Proper storage and handling significantly impact antibody performance over time:
Storage conditions:
Store concentrated antibody stocks (>0.5 mg/ml) at -20°C or -80°C in small aliquots to avoid freeze-thaw cycles
Working dilutions can be stored at 4°C with preservative (0.03% Proclin 300) for up to 2 weeks
For long-term storage, adding glycerol to 50% can prevent damage from freeze-thaw cycles
Handling recommendations:
Avoid protein denaturation by never vortexing antibody solutions (gentle mixing only)
Centrifuge briefly before opening vials to collect solution at the bottom
Use low protein-binding tubes and pipette tips for dilution
Monitor for bacterial contamination (cloudiness or unusual odor)
Document lot numbers and prepare standardized dilutions for experimental consistency
Stabilization additives:
50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4 has been shown to maintain antibody activity
For working solutions, adding 1% BSA or 5% glycerol can provide additional stability
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles; limit to maximum 5 cycles
Following these guidelines will help ensure consistent performance across experiments and maximize the usable lifetime of the antibody.
Integrating antibody-based approaches with yeast genetics provides powerful insights into SPAC17A2.10c function:
Combining with gene deletion/mutation approaches:
Create SPAC17A2.10c point mutations or domain deletions in S. pombe
Use the antibody to assess changes in protein localization, abundance, or interaction partners
Determine structure-function relationships by correlating mutant phenotypes with antibody-detected changes
Integration with yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) systems:
The antibody can validate Y2H interactions by:
Confirming interaction partners through co-immunoprecipitation
Verifying subcellular co-localization of interaction partners
Analyzing competition between antibody binding and protein-protein interactions
Combined with yeast surface display:
Generate yeast display libraries of SPAC17A2.10c variants
Use the antibody for flow cytometry screening of binding properties
Isolate high-affinity binding variants for structure-function studies
This integrated approach has been effectively used in similar research contexts to characterize antibody targets through yeast two-hybrid methods and could be applied to SPAC17A2.10c studies . The yeast display methodology in particular allows rapid screening of protein variants and epitope mapping as demonstrated in related research .
Epitope mapping is critical for understanding antibody specificity and function. For SPAC17A2.10c antibody, these methods can be employed:
Fragment-based epitope mapping:
Generate overlapping fragments of SPAC17A2.10c protein
Express fragments in bacteria or yeast display systems
Test antibody binding to each fragment by ELISA or flow cytometry
Narrow down to minimal binding region through nested deletions
Peptide array analysis:
Synthesize overlapping peptides (15-20 amino acids) spanning SPAC17A2.10c sequence
Spot peptides on membrane or glass slide
Probe with the antibody followed by secondary detection
Identify reactive peptides that represent linear epitopes
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Based on initial mapping, create point mutations in potential epitope regions
Test antibody binding to mutants by ELISA or Western blot
Identify critical residues for antibody recognition
Structural approaches:
X-ray crystallography of antibody-peptide complexes
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify protected regions
This methodology has been successfully applied in studies such as those identifying epitopes for Sp17 and SpA5 antibodies, as referenced in the search results , and could be adapted for SPAC17A2.10c antibody characterization.
The SPAC17A2.10c antibody can be integrated into advanced screening and proteomics approaches:
Antibody microarray applications:
Immobilize SPAC17A2.10c antibody on microarray slides
Probe with differentially labeled protein samples from various conditions
Detect changes in SPAC17A2.10c levels or modifications across conditions
High-content screening:
Use the antibody in automated immunofluorescence workflows
Screen genetic or chemical libraries for effects on SPAC17A2.10c localization
Identify factors that regulate membrane protein trafficking
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics:
Immunoprecipitate SPAC17A2.10c and associated proteins
Analyze by LC-MS/MS to identify interaction partners
Quantify changes in the SPAC17A2.10c "interactome" under different conditions
In vivo biotinylation for biomarker discovery:
Similar to the approach described in search result , the antibody could be:
In vivo biotinylated to create "biobodies"
Used to immunoprecipitate target and associated proteins
Applied in protein complex identification through mass spectrometry
This approach is particularly valuable for membrane proteins like SPAC17A2.10c where traditional interaction methods may be more challenging due to hydrophobicity and complex membrane environments.
For researchers seeking to develop enhanced SPAC17A2.10c antibodies, several advanced engineering approaches can be employed:
Affinity maturation through display technologies:
Create antibody fragment libraries with mutations in complementarity-determining regions (CDRs)
Display libraries on yeast or phage surface
Select high-affinity variants through increasing stringency of binding conditions
Convert selected variants to full antibodies
Antibody humanization/optimization:
Analyze framework regions for potential immunogenicity
Modify framework while preserving CDRs
Test engineered variants for improved stability and reduced aggregation
Format optimization:
Convert to different antibody formats (Fab, scFv, nanobody) for specific applications
Develop bispecific antibodies targeting SPAC17A2.10c and another protein of interest
Create antibody-drug conjugates for targeted protein degradation studies
High-throughput functional screening:
As demonstrated in search result , autonomous hypermutation in yeast can rapidly generate potent antibody variants:
Encode antibody sequence in specially designed yeast vectors
Allow continuous diversification through error-prone DNA polymerases
Select improved variants based on binding or functional assays
This approach resulted in ~20-fold functional affinity enhancement in similar antibody engineering efforts and could be applied to develop improved SPAC17A2.10c antibodies for specific research applications.
When evaluating SPAC17A2.10c antibody performance against other yeast membrane protein antibodies, researchers should consider these comparative aspects:
| Characteristic | SPAC17A2.10c Antibody | Typical Yeast Membrane Protein Antibodies |
|---|---|---|
| Specificity | Target-specific with limited cross-reactivity | Variable; often cross-reactive with homologous proteins |
| Background in S. pombe | Generally low when properly validated | Often high due to abundant membrane proteins |
| Extraction efficiency | Requires specialized buffers with detergents | Similar requirements; efficiency depends on protein abundance |
| Fixation sensitivity | May require optimization for membrane preservation | Typically sensitive to fixation methods |
| Application versatility | Functional in multiple applications (WB, IF, IP) | Application-dependent success common |
For comprehensive studies, researchers often employ antibodies against established membrane protein markers (e.g., ER, Golgi, plasma membrane) alongside SPAC17A2.10c antibody for co-localization studies. This comparative approach helps establish the relative subcellular distribution pattern of the target protein .
When extending SPAC17A2.10c antibody use beyond S. pombe:
Sequence homology analysis:
Perform sequence alignment of SPAC17A2.10c with homologs in target species
Focus on conservation in the epitope region (if known)
Predict cross-reactivity based on percent identity in key regions
Validation requirements:
Western blots with positive controls (S. pombe extract)
Include negative controls (non-expressing cells/species)
Consider epitope-tagged versions of homologous proteins as validation
Optimization strategies:
Increase antibody concentration (typically 2-5× higher than for S. pombe)
Extend incubation times (overnight at 4°C recommended)
Modify extraction buffers to account for different cell wall composition
Adjust permeabilization protocols for species-specific differences
Species-specific challenges:
Cell wall thickness varies across species, affecting antibody penetration
Post-translational modifications may differ, altering epitope accessibility
Expression levels of homologs may be substantially different
While homologs exist across fungi, the uncharacterized nature of SPAC17A2.10c means that cross-species applications should be approached with caution and thorough validation.
For investigating membrane protein interactions involving SPAC17A2.10c:
Co-immunoprecipitation optimization for membrane proteins:
Use mild detergents (0.5-1% NP-40, Digitonin, or CHAPS) to preserve interactions
Include chemical crosslinking step (e.g., DSP, formaldehyde) to stabilize transient interactions
Consider native extraction conditions to maintain protein complexes
Perform parallel experiments with and without crosslinking
Proximity-based interaction methods:
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Detect SPAC17A2.10c interactions with candidate proteins in situ
Requires antibodies against both interaction partners from different species
Generates fluorescent signal only when proteins are within 40nm
BioID or TurboID proximity labeling:
Fuse biotin ligase to SPAC17A2.10c
Identify proximal proteins through streptavidin pulldown and mass spectrometry
Particularly useful for transient or weak interactions in membrane environments
Validation approaches:
Reverse co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against interaction partners
Genetic perturbation (deletion/overexpression) of one partner
Functional assays to demonstrate biological relevance of interactions