The SPAC3H5.09c Antibody is a custom monoclonal antibody targeting the protein encoded by the SPAC3H5.09c gene in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast). It is produced by Cusabio Biotech Co., Ltd., as part of their catalog of rare antibodies for yeast research . The antibody is designed for immunological studies of fission yeast proteins, particularly those involved in cellular processes such as DNA repair, chromosome segregation, or stress response.
Fission yeast (S. pombe) is a model organism for studying eukaryotic cell biology. The SPAC3H5.09c Antibody could be used to investigate the role of its target protein in:
DNA damage response: Many fission yeast proteins are homologs of human tumor suppressors (e.g., Rad proteins)[citation needed].
Cell cycle regulation: Antibodies targeting SPAC3H5.09c may help map protein interactions critical for mitotic checkpoints .
The antibody’s specificity for S. pombe proteins makes it a tool for cross-species studies. For example, comparing the function of SPAC3H5.09c with its budding yeast (S. cerevisiae) or human homologs could reveal conserved pathways .
Lack of Published Data: No peer-reviewed studies explicitly cite the SPAC3H5.09c Antibody, limiting its validated applications.
Species Specificity: Cross-reactivity with other yeasts or organisms has not been reported .
Researchers could leverage this antibody to:
Characterize SPAC3H5.09c function through loss-of-function studies.
Develop diagnostic tools for studying yeast infections or biotechnological applications.
KEGG: spo:SPAC3H5.09c
STRING: 4896.SPAC3H5.09c.1
SPAC3H5.09c is a conserved eukaryotic mitochondrial protein found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) . It belongs to the UPF0648 protein family and is studied for several reasons:
It plays a role in mitochondrial function in S. pombe
The protein has been identified in telomere-related processes based on interaction mapping studies
It appears in glucose starvation response experiments, with potential implications for cytoplasmic organization during nutrient limitation
The protein sequence consists of 1305 amino acids and contains several conserved domains that suggest important cellular functions, though specific molecular mechanisms remain under investigation .
Antibody validation is critical for ensuring experimental reliability. For SPAC3H5.09c antibodies, employ these validation methods:
Orthogonal validation: Use independent methods like mass spectrometry to confirm protein detection
Genetic validation: Compare antibody staining in wild-type vs. knockout strains (when available)
Independent antibody validation: Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of SPAC3H5.09c to verify consistency in staining patterns
Recombinant expression: Test antibodies against recombinant SPAC3H5.09c protein
A validation scoring matrix based on these criteria can be applied:
| Validation Method | Pass Criteria | Validation Score |
|---|---|---|
| Western blot band at expected MW | Single band at predicted 147 kDa | 1 point |
| Immunofluorescence pattern | Consistent mitochondrial localization | 1 point |
| Comparison with knockout control | Absence of signal in knockout | 2 points |
| Agreement between independent antibodies | Consistent pattern with ≥2 antibodies | 1 point |
| Mass spectrometry correlation | Detection of specific peptides | 1 point |
A score ≥3 indicates a reliably validated antibody for research applications .
Based on the available technical information, SPAC3H5.09c antibodies can be used for:
Western blotting: Detection of endogenous protein expression levels
Immunofluorescence microscopy: Subcellular localization studies
Immunoprecipitation: Isolation of SPAC3H5.09c protein complexes
ChIP assays: For investigating potential chromatin associations
When designing experiments, researchers should note that antibody performance may vary between applications, and validation should be performed for each specific technique.
SPAC3H5.09c has been identified in studies examining cytoplasmic organization during glucose starvation in S. pombe . Researchers investigating stress responses can use these antibodies to:
Track protein localization changes: Monitor SPAC3H5.09c redistribution during cytoplasmic freezing events
Quantify expression dynamics: Measure protein levels at different stages of starvation
Identify interaction partners: Use co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify stress-specific protein associations
Research data indicates SPAC3H5.09c may be involved in the transition from fluid-like to solid-like cytoplasmic states that occur during nutrient limitation, with expression patterns changing significantly as cells enter stationary phase .
Achieving high specificity with SPAC3H5.09c antibodies requires:
Position-specific structure-scoring matrices (P3SM): Similar to approaches used for influenza virus antibodies, structural prediction tools can identify epitopes with optimal specificity characteristics
Sequential epitope mapping: Test antibody binding to synthetic peptides representing different regions of SPAC3H5.09c
Competitive binding assays: Use synthetic peptides to validate epitope specificity through competitive inhibition experiments
Structural binding validation: For maximum specificity, perform validation similar to that used for SpA5 antibodies:
These approaches significantly reduce cross-reactivity with other UPF0648 family proteins.
Recent research has implicated SPAC3H5.09c in telomere dynamics, particularly related to telomere entanglements . Researchers can integrate antibody-based approaches with telomere studies by:
Co-localization studies: Examine spatial relationships between SPAC3H5.09c and telomere proteins (e.g., Taz1, Rap1) during different cell cycle stages
Temporal association analysis: Track SPAC3H5.09c localization during telomere entanglement resolution, particularly at the nuclear envelope
Genetic interaction mapping: Use SPAC3H5.09c antibodies in strains with telomere-related gene deletions (taz1Δ, rif1Δ) to identify functional relationships
The telomere entanglement resolution appears to be related to cytoplasmic exposure during nuclear envelope breakdown, where SPAC3H5.09c may play a role in this process .
For rigorous experimental design, researchers should include:
Positive controls:
Wild-type S. pombe extracts with confirmed SPAC3H5.09c expression
Recombinant SPAC3H5.09c protein (when available)
Negative controls:
Isotype controls matching the SPAC3H5.09c antibody class
Extracts from SPAC3H5.09c deletion strains (if viable)
Blocking peptide controls to demonstrate epitope specificity
Technical controls:
Secondary antibody-only controls
Non-specific IgG immunoprecipitation controls
Loading controls for western blot normalization
These controls help distinguish specific signals from background and validate experimental outcomes.
When encountering variable results with SPAC3H5.09c antibodies, systematically address these factors:
Epitope accessibility issues:
Test different sample preparation methods (native vs. denaturing conditions)
Evaluate fixation protocols that may mask epitopes
Consider epitope retrieval methods for fixed samples
Technical optimization:
Sample preparation factors:
Ensure complete lysis of S. pombe cell wall
Prevent protein degradation with appropriate protease inhibitors
Address potential post-translational modifications that may affect epitope recognition
Implementing a structured troubleshooting approach enhances reproducibility across experiments.
For high-throughput applications:
Antibody stability: Ensure lot-to-lot consistency through validation of each batch
Automation compatibility: Test antibody performance under automated handling conditions
Signal quantification: Establish reliable signal-to-noise ratios for automated image analysis
Scale-up considerations: Validate antibody performance at different scales (96-well to 384-well formats)
Researchers have successfully applied systematic screening approaches to mutant S. pombe strains using fluorescent markers and may adapt similar strategies with SPAC3H5.09c antibodies .
Single-cell approaches with SPAC3H5.09c antibodies include:
Flow cytometry optimization:
Single-cell imaging:
Apply high-content imaging to track SPAC3H5.09c dynamics in individual cells
Combine with live-cell markers to correlate with cell cycle positions or stress responses
Implement quantitative image analysis for subcellular distribution patterns
Single-cell approaches are particularly valuable for heterogeneous responses during stress conditions like glucose starvation that affect SPAC3H5.09c behavior .
For precise quantitative measurements:
Absolute quantification methods:
Use recombinant protein standards with known concentrations
Implement SILAC or TMT labeling for mass spectrometry-based quantification
Apply digital ELISA techniques for detection of low abundance protein
Relative quantification strategies:
Normalize to appropriate housekeeping proteins
Implement fluorescence intensity calibration
Use ratiometric measurements with internal standards
Expression dynamics:
Track temporal changes during stress responses
Correlate with cell cycle phases
Compare wild-type vs. genetic backgrounds affecting mitochondrial function
Proper quantification enables detection of subtle changes in SPAC3H5.09c expression during cellular perturbations.
The UPF0648 classification of SPAC3H5.09c provides important context for antibody design and selection:
Cross-reactivity considerations:
Evaluate potential cross-reactivity with other UPF0648 family members
Select antibodies targeting unique regions of SPAC3H5.09c
Validate specificity against related proteins
Structural insights:
Use structural prediction tools like AlphaFold2 to identify accessible epitopes
Consider conformational vs. linear epitopes based on protein structure
Evaluate epitope conservation across related species
Functional domains:
Target antibodies to functional domains of interest
Consider epitopes outside catalytic regions that may interfere less with function
Map epitopes relative to protein interaction domains
Understanding the molecular classification helps researchers select antibodies most suitable for their specific experimental questions.
The concept of "missing proteins" relates to proteins predicted by genomic data but lacking experimental evidence. Approaches used for other missing proteins can be applied to SPAC3H5.09c:
Enhanced validation strategies:
Integration with mass spectrometry:
Enrich samples using SPAC3H5.09c antibodies before mass spectrometry
Target SPAC3H5.09c-specific peptides for selected reaction monitoring
Validate antibody specificity using immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Tissue-specific expression mapping:
Apply methods similar to those used in human tissue mapping to S. pombe under different conditions
Correlate expression with specific cellular states or stress responses
These approaches may help characterize SPAC3H5.09c function and expression patterns across different experimental conditions .
When investigating the functional role of SPAC3H5.09c:
Correlation with phenotypic data:
Structure-function relationships:
Evolutionary conservation:
Combining antibody-based detection with genetic and phenotypic data provides deeper insights into SPAC3H5.09c function.