Uncharacterized protein in ferredoxin 2Fe-2S gene 3'region Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
antibody; Uncharacterized protein in ferredoxin 2Fe-2S gene 3'region antibody; Fragment antibody
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What are ferredoxins and what structural features characterize the 2Fe-2S cluster proteins?

Ferredoxins are soluble, low molecular weight proteins that mediate one-electron transfer from donors to acceptors. The conventional ferredoxins contain [2Fe-2S] clusters as their redox active centers, which are typically coordinated by four conserved cysteine residues. These proteins participate in a wide variety of oxidation-reduction reactions in plants and bacteria .

Methodologically, UV-visible spectroscopy is a primary technique for identifying [2Fe-2S] cluster-containing proteins, with characteristic absorption bands at approximately 342, 416, and 457 nm. For definitive structural characterization, techniques such as X-ray crystallography, EPR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry should be employed to confirm the presence and coordination of iron-sulfur clusters .

How can I distinguish between different ferredoxin isoforms when using antibodies?

When working with antibodies targeting different ferredoxin isoforms, cross-reactivity presents a significant challenge. A methodological approach involves:

  • Immunoblotting validation using recombinant proteins for each isoform

  • Performing anion exchange chromatography to separate isoforms before immunodetection

  • Comparing migration patterns on both native PAGE and SDS-PAGE

  • Removing cross-reactive IgGs through affinity purification against conserved sequences

Researchers have successfully distinguished between multiple Arabidopsis ferredoxin isoforms (AtFd1, AtFd2, AtFd3, AtFd4) using this approach, with densitometric comparison showing that AtFd2 comprises approximately 90% of all leaf Fd, AtFd1 and AtFd3 contribute around 7% and 3% respectively, while AtFd4 makes up only about 0.05% of total leaf Fd .

What is the optimal experimental approach for characterizing an uncharacterized protein in the ferredoxin 2Fe-2S gene region?

For comprehensive characterization of an uncharacterized protein in the ferredoxin 2Fe-2S gene region, a multi-step approach is recommended:

  • Recombinant expression and purification of the target protein in an E. coli heterologous system

  • UV-visible spectroscopic analysis to detect characteristic [2Fe-2S] cluster absorption bands

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of putative cluster-coordinating residues

  • Protein-protein interaction studies using techniques such as Bacterial Adenylate Cyclase Two-Hybrid (BACTH) system

  • Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) to identify potential protein complexes

  • Functional assays to determine redox potential and electron transfer capabilities

This comprehensive approach has been successfully applied to characterize ferredoxin proteins from various organisms, including Arabidopsis and Azotobacter vinelandii .

How can I validate the specificity of antibodies against uncharacterized proteins in the ferredoxin 2Fe-2S gene region?

Antibody validation is critical for ensuring specificity when studying uncharacterized proteins. A robust validation protocol includes:

  • Western blot analysis using recombinant protein at varying concentrations

  • Competition assays with purified recombinant protein

  • Testing in multiple tissue types to confirm expression patterns

  • Cross-validation with mass spectrometry identification

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by proteomic analysis

  • Negative controls using knockout or knockdown tissues/cells when available

Research with AtFd proteins demonstrates the importance of robust validation, as shown when researchers purified antibodies by removing IgGs that reacted to conserved Fd sequences, resulting in highly specific detection of individual isoforms even when they shared high sequence similarity .

What structural determinants differentiate functional from non-functional 2Fe-2S cluster binding sites in ferredoxin proteins?

The structural determinants of functional 2Fe-2S cluster binding involve specific amino acid residues and their spatial arrangement:

  • The four cysteine residues that coordinate the iron atoms in the [2Fe-2S] cluster are essential

  • Substitution of a single coordinating cysteine with another amino acid (such as histidine) can completely abolish [2Fe-2S] cluster binding capability

  • The spacing between coordinating cysteines must be preserved in specific motifs (CX₂CX₂CX₃C)

How can protein-protein interaction networks be established for uncharacterized ferredoxin-like proteins?

Establishing protein-protein interaction networks for uncharacterized ferredoxin-like proteins requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Bacterial Adenylate Cyclase Two-Hybrid (BACTH) system for in vivo detection of protein-protein interactions

  • Co-immunoprecipitation using antibodies against the uncharacterized protein

  • Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) to identify stable protein complexes

  • Cross-linking mass spectrometry to capture transient interactions

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) to determine binding kinetics

  • Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) for in vivo interaction mapping

Studies with H. pylori Fe-S cluster assembly systems have successfully employed BACTH systems to identify interactions between NifS, NifU, Nfu, and various putative Fe-S proteins including HP0207 and HP0277 (FdxA) .

ProteinInteraction PartnersDetection MethodReference
NifSNifU, Nfu, HP0207, HP0277BACTH
NifUNifS, NfuBACTH, SEC
NfuNifS, NifUBACTH
NFU1ISCU2, ISCA1Not specified

What are the methodological approaches for distinguishing between [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] cluster-containing proteins?

Distinguishing between [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] cluster-containing proteins requires a combination of spectroscopic and biochemical techniques:

  • UV-visible spectroscopy: [2Fe-2S] proteins typically show characteristic absorption bands at approximately 342, 416, and 457 nm, while [4Fe-4S] proteins exhibit different spectral features

  • EPR spectroscopy: [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] clusters show distinctive EPR signatures

  • Mössbauer spectroscopy to analyze the chemical environment of iron atoms

  • Iron and sulfur content determination via colorimetric assays or ICP-MS

  • Sequence analysis for characteristic motifs (e.g., CX₂CX₂CX₃C for [2Fe-2S] vs. CX₂CX₉CX₃CP for [4Fe-4S])

Research has identified that some proteins, like HP0277 (FdxA) from H. pylori, contain both a canonical [2Fe-2S] binding domain and an additional CX₂CX₉CX₃CP domain characteristic of [4Fe-4S] dicluster ferredoxins of the YfhL family, highlighting the importance of comprehensive sequence and structural analysis .

What factors might affect antibody recognition of uncharacterized proteins in the ferredoxin 2Fe-2S gene region?

Several factors can influence antibody recognition of uncharacterized ferredoxin proteins:

  • Protein abundance: Low-abundance isoforms may require loading higher amounts of protein (e.g., 7.5-times more leaf protein was needed to detect AtFd4 compared to other isoforms)

  • Cross-reactivity with similar isoforms: Ferredoxin proteins often share high sequence homology

  • Post-translational modifications affecting epitope accessibility

  • Protein conformational changes due to [2Fe-2S] cluster presence or absence

  • Sample preparation conditions that may denature the protein or alter epitope exposure

  • Tissue-specific expression patterns (e.g., root vs. leaf expression)

Research with Arabidopsis ferredoxins demonstrated that AtFd4 protein was so scarce in leaf tissues that 7.5 times more leaf protein was needed for detection despite using a high-specificity antibody, highlighting the importance of considering protein abundance in experimental design .

How should researchers interpret discrepancies between predicted and observed molecular weights of ferredoxin proteins in immunoblotting experiments?

When encountering discrepancies between predicted and observed molecular weights:

  • Evaluate post-translational modifications (phosphorylation, oxidation, etc.)

  • Consider the presence/absence of [2Fe-2S] clusters which can affect protein migration

  • Assess protein sample preparation conditions that may cause protein degradation

  • Verify proper protein denaturation for SDS-PAGE

  • Compare migration patterns on both native PAGE and SDS-PAGE

  • Confirm protein identity using mass spectrometry

Methodologically, researchers should run parallel experiments with recombinant proteins of known sequence and molecular weight alongside the experimental samples for direct comparison. Additionally, chromatographic separation (e.g., anion exchange chromatography) followed by immunoblotting can help resolve ambiguities in protein identification, as demonstrated with Arabidopsis ferredoxins .

How can researchers determine if an uncharacterized protein in the ferredoxin 2Fe-2S gene region represents a novel functional class?

To establish whether an uncharacterized protein represents a novel functional class:

  • Perform comprehensive phylogenetic analysis across diverse organisms

  • Conduct detailed sequence motif analysis, especially focusing on Fe-S cluster binding sites

  • Compare redox potentials with established ferredoxin classes

  • Analyze protein structural features through homology modeling or experimental structure determination

  • Perform functional complementation studies in relevant model organisms

  • Characterize protein-protein interaction networks to identify unique interaction partners

Research has identified distinct functional classes of ferredoxins, including classic leaf type, root type, and high redox potential type in Arabidopsis, each with distinct biophysical properties and interaction partners . Similarly, the identification of YfhL family ferredoxins with both [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] cluster binding domains represents another functional class with potentially unique roles .

What approaches can be used to study the evolution of 2Fe-2S cluster binding motifs in ferredoxins across different species?

Studying the evolution of 2Fe-2S cluster binding motifs requires:

  • Comprehensive sequence alignment of ferredoxins across diverse taxonomic groups

  • Analysis of conservation patterns of cluster-binding cysteine residues

  • Structural superimposition of available 3D structures

  • Functional analysis of naturally occurring variants

  • Site-directed mutagenesis to test the impact of evolutionary variations

  • Ancestral sequence reconstruction to trace evolutionary trajectories

Research comparing ferredoxins from diverse organisms has revealed important insights into their evolution. For example, the [2Fe-2S] protein from Azotobacter vinelandii (2FeAvFdI) shows high similarity to the [2Fe-2S] ferredoxin from Clostridium pasteurianum (2FeCpFd), with conserved cysteine ligands in the same positions, though they differ in the absence of the N-terminal methionine, the presence of a five-residue C-terminal extension, and a lesser number of acidic and polar residues in the A. vinelandii protein .

What technological advances would enhance the study of uncharacterized proteins in ferredoxin 2Fe-2S gene regions?

Future technological advances that would significantly enhance research include:

  • Cryo-EM approaches for structural determination of ferredoxin proteins in complex with interaction partners

  • Single-molecule techniques to observe electron transfer dynamics in real-time

  • CRISPR-based genome editing for creating precise mutations in endogenous ferredoxin genes

  • Advanced mass spectrometry approaches for quantitative proteomic analysis of low-abundance ferredoxin isoforms

  • Computational methods for predicting Fe-S cluster binding and protein-protein interactions

  • In-cell NMR techniques to observe ferredoxin behavior in physiological conditions

These advanced approaches would provide deeper insights into the structure, function, and interactions of uncharacterized ferredoxin proteins that current methodologies cannot fully resolve.

What is the potential role of uncharacterized ferredoxin-like proteins in iron-sulfur cluster assembly pathways?

Uncharacterized ferredoxin-like proteins may play critical roles in iron-sulfur cluster assembly:

  • They may function as intermediate carriers of [2Fe-2S] clusters between scaffold proteins and target proteins

  • Some may serve as alternative scaffold proteins in specific cellular compartments

  • Others might function in cluster type conversion (e.g., [2Fe-2S] to [4Fe-4S])

  • They may participate in specific protein-protein interactions that regulate cluster assembly

  • Some might have specialized roles in stress responses or under specific metabolic conditions

Research has shown that proteins like NFU1 directly interact with Fe-S cluster scaffold proteins known to ligate [2Fe-2S] clusters, such as ISCU2 and ISCA1, suggesting complex interaction networks in Fe-S cluster assembly pathways . Additionally, proteins like HP0207 (a member of the Nbp35/ApbC ATPase family) and HP0277 (FdxA) have been shown to interact with cysteine desulfurase NifS, suggesting potential roles as stand-alone scaffold proteins .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.