SPAC23A1.05 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Structure and Function

Antibodies (immunoglobulins) are Y-shaped proteins produced by B-lymphocytes to neutralize pathogens by binding to specific antigens . Their structure includes:

  • Fab region: Contains the antigen-binding site (paratope) for specificity.

  • Fc region: Interacts with immune effector cells and complement proteins to mediate responses like phagocytosis or lysis .

Antibody Nomenclature

The name SPAC23A1.05 suggests a standardized format:

  • SPAC: Likely a prefix for a specific antibody class or target (e.g., cancer-related, viral).

  • 23A1.05: Indicates a clonal variant (clone 23A1.05) with unique specificity for an antigen.

Relevant Antibodies in Search Results

While SPAC23A1.05 is not mentioned, the following antibodies in the search results share structural or functional parallels:

AntibodyTarget/ClassApplicationsKey Features
Rat Anti-Mouse IgM-HRPMouse IgMELISA, Western Blot, IHC Conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for detection in assays
Anti-HSP70 [C92F3A-5]Heat Shock Protein 70Cancer, Heat Shock Research Detects ~70kDa HSP70 without cross-reactivity to HSC70
MotavizumabRespiratory Syncytial VirusNeonatal RSV prevention Reduces hospitalizations and ICU admissions by 48% per 1,000 participants
Goat Anti-Mouse IgGMouse IgGELISA, IHC, Western Blot Minimizes human protein cross-reactivity

Hypothetical SPAC23AAntibody

If SPAC23A1.05 were a monoclonal antibody, it might:

  • Target a tumor-associated antigen (e.g., SPAC23A1.05 could imply specificity for a cancer biomarker).

  • Utilize Fc-mediated effector functions (e.g., ADCC or complement activation) for therapeutic effects .

  • Require validation in assays like ELISA or Western Blot, as demonstrated for Anti-HSP70 and Rat Anti-Mouse IgM .

Gaps in Information

The absence of SPAC23A1.05 in the search results suggests it is either:

  • A proprietary or experimental antibody not yet published.

  • A misidentified or niche compound outside mainstream research.

Recommendations for Further Research

To locate SPAC23A1.05, consider:

  1. Patent databases: Check for filings related to novel antibody targets.

  2. Clinical trial registries: Search for trials involving SPAC23A1.05.

  3. Vendor catalogs: Contact antibody manufacturers (e.g., Southern Biotech, StressMarq) for custom synthesis details.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPAC23A1.05; Uncharacterized membrane protein C23A1.05
Target Names
SPAC23A1.05
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the SPAC23A1.05 protein and why is it significant in research contexts?

SPAC23A1.05 is a Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene encoding a protein involved in cellular processes related to gene expression regulation. The protein's significance lies in its role in fundamental cellular pathways, making it an important target for studies investigating eukaryotic cell biology. Antibodies against this target enable researchers to track protein expression, localization, and interactions in experimental systems. Understanding the protein's functional domains is essential when selecting antibody epitopes for specific research applications.

What validation methods should be employed before using SPAC23A1.05 antibody in research?

Proper antibody validation requires a multi-step approach:

  • Western blot analysis with positive controls (cell lysates known to express SPAC23A1.05) to confirm specificity and apparent molecular weight

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to verify target pull-down

  • Immunofluorescence patterns comparison with known localization data

  • Testing in knockout/knockdown models to confirm specificity

  • Cross-reactivity assessment with related proteins

For SPAC23A1.05 antibody specifically, validation should include testing against S. pombe extracts with and without the target protein expression, similar to approaches used for other proteins like GFAP where specific band detection at the expected molecular weight is critical .

How should researchers optimize fixation protocols for immunohistochemistry with SPAC23A1.05 antibody?

Optimization of fixation protocols should follow a systematic approach:

  • Test multiple fixatives: 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) is often the starting point, but also evaluate performance with methanol, acetone, or combination protocols

  • Optimize fixation duration (10-30 minutes at room temperature)

  • Evaluate epitope retrieval methods if using paraffin-embedded sections:

    • Heat-mediated antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0)

    • EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) for certain epitopes

    • Enzymatic retrieval with proteinase K for membrane epitopes

Similar to other antibodies like the GFAP antibody in the reference data, PFA fixation is recommended as it provides better tissue penetration ability and should be prepared fresh before use to prevent conversion to formalin .

What strategies can improve SPAC23A1.05 antibody specificity in multi-protein detection assays?

When using SPAC23A1.05 antibody in multiplex assays, researchers should implement these strategies:

  • Cross-adsorption against potential cross-reactive proteins

  • Affinity purification against the specific epitope

  • Optimization of blocking conditions (5% BSA or 5% normal serum from a species different from the secondary antibody source)

  • Titration experiments to determine optimal antibody concentration

  • Sequential application of antibodies when using multiple primaries

For multiplex immunofluorescence, ensure proper fluorophore selection to minimize spectral overlap, similar to methodologies used in other studies where antibodies like anti-GFAP and anti-MBP were successfully employed together .

How can researchers troubleshoot non-specific binding when using SPAC23A1.05 antibody in immunofluorescence?

ProblemPotential CauseSolution Strategy
High backgroundInsufficient blockingIncrease blocking time (2h) or concentration (5-10%)
Non-specific bands in WBCross-reactivityPre-adsorb antibody against related proteins
Cytoplasmic backgroundFixation artifactsTry alternative fixation methods or reduce fixation time
Non-specific nuclear stainingCharge interactionsIncrease salt concentration in wash buffers (150-300mM NaCl)
Membrane artifactual bindingHydrophobic interactionsAdd 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 or Tween-20 to antibody diluent

When troubleshooting, systematically modify one parameter at a time to identify the source of non-specific binding. For particularly challenging samples, consider using specialized blocking reagents containing both proteins and detergents to minimize hydrophobic and ionic interactions .

What are the critical parameters for successful conjugation of SPAC23A1.05 antibody for specialized applications?

When conjugating SPAC23A1.05 antibody with biotin, fluorophores, or enzymes:

  • Buffer composition considerations:

    • Remove carrier proteins (BSA) and preservatives (sodium azide) through buffer exchange

    • Include cryoprotectants like trehalose or glycerol for stored conjugates

    • Maintain pH between 7.2-8.5 during conjugation reactions

  • Storage recommendations:

    • Avoid storing in PBS-only formulations at -20°C

    • Add glycerol (25-50%) as a cryoprotectant

    • Store in small aliquots (10-50μL) to avoid freeze-thaw cycles

  • Conjugation chemistry optimization:

    • For biotin conjugation, use NHS-biotin at 10-20 molar excess

    • For fluorophore conjugation, use NHS-ester or maleimide chemistry depending on available reactive groups

    • Monitor degree of labeling to avoid over-conjugation which can reduce antibody affinity

As noted in similar conjugation questions for other antibodies, specialized formulations with trehalose and/or glycerol provide good protection for the antibody from degradation without interfering with conjugation chemistry .

How should researchers design controls for SPAC23A1.05 antibody validation experiments?

A comprehensive control strategy includes:

  • Positive controls:

    • Cells/tissues known to express SPAC23A1.05

    • Recombinant SPAC23A1.05 protein

    • Transfected cells overexpressing the target

  • Negative controls:

    • Cells with CRISPR knockout or RNAi knockdown of SPAC23A1.05

    • Non-expressing tissues or species

    • Isotype control antibodies at matching concentrations

  • Technical controls:

    • Secondary-only control to assess background

    • Blocking peptide competition assay to confirm specificity

    • Pre-immune serum controls for polyclonal antibodies

Implement a validation matrix documenting all controls and their results across different applications (WB, IHC, IF, IP) to establish a complete validation profile for the antibody .

What considerations are important when analyzing quantitative data from SPAC23A1.05 immunoassays?

When analyzing quantitative data:

  • Establish a standard curve using recombinant protein at known concentrations

  • Account for technical variables:

    • Antibody lot-to-lot variations

    • Sample preparation consistency

    • Image acquisition parameters for microscopy/blotting

    • Signal detection linearity range

  • Data normalization approaches:

    • Normalize to housekeeping proteins (β-actin, GAPDH)

    • Use total protein normalization for Western blots

    • Include internal reference standards

  • Statistical analysis:

    • Determine appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution

    • Account for multiple testing when analyzing multiple samples

    • Report effect sizes along with p-values for meaningful interpretation

For Western blot quantification specifically, ensure exposure times produce signals within the linear range of detection, similar to the protocols used for analyzing GFAP antibody signals in referenced validation experiments .

How can researchers employ machine learning approaches to enhance SPAC23A1.05 antibody-based detection systems?

Recent advances in machine learning offer powerful approaches for antibody-based research:

  • Image analysis enhancement:

    • Automated segmentation of cellular compartments in IF images

    • Quantification of co-localization with other proteins

    • Detection of subtle expression changes across experimental conditions

  • Prediction of antibody-antigen interactions:

    • Library-on-library approaches can identify specific interacting pairs

    • Out-of-distribution prediction methods can help identify novel binding patterns

    • Active learning strategies can reduce the experimental burden by prioritizing the most informative experiments

As highlighted in recent research, active learning algorithms can significantly reduce the number of required experimental tests (by up to 35%) when characterizing antibody-antigen interactions, potentially accelerating research timelines while maintaining accuracy .

What approaches should researchers use when applying SPAC23A1.05 antibody in multiplexed single-cell analysis techniques?

For advanced single-cell applications:

  • Optimization strategies for CyTOF/mass cytometry:

    • Metal-conjugated SPAC23A1.05 antibody requires titration at 1:50, 1:100, 1:200, and 1:500 dilutions

    • Validate metal-conjugated antibodies against fluorophore-conjugated versions

    • Use barcoding approaches to minimize batch effects

  • Single-cell Western blot considerations:

    • Adjust lysis conditions for microfluidic platforms

    • Optimize antibody concentration (typically 2-5× higher than standard WB)

    • Implement rigorous background correction algorithms

  • Imaging mass cytometry protocols:

    • Tissue preparation requires metal-free fixatives

    • Sequential staining may be necessary for densely packed epitopes

    • Custom panel design to avoid signal overlap

These advanced techniques require extensive validation and optimization but provide unprecedented insights into cell-to-cell heterogeneity in SPAC23A1.05 expression and localization patterns.

How can researchers interpret contradictory results between different detection methods using SPAC23A1.05 antibody?

When facing contradictory results:

  • Evaluate potential methodological differences:

    • Fixation methods may affect epitope accessibility differently

    • Denaturing vs. native conditions in different assays

    • Sensitivity differences between detection methods

  • Systematic troubleshooting approach:

    • Compare antibody performance across multiple lots

    • Test different clones targeting distinct epitopes

    • Validate with orthogonal methods (mRNA expression, mass spectrometry)

  • Biological explanations to consider:

    • Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition

    • Splice variants or protein isoforms

    • Protein-protein interactions masking epitopes in specific contexts

When results differ between techniques, document all experimental conditions meticulously and consider that each method may reveal different aspects of protein biology, rather than necessarily indicating experimental failure.

What considerations are important when adapting SPAC23A1.05 antibody protocols for tissue-specific applications?

Tissue-specific optimization requires:

  • Tissue penetration enhancement strategies:

    • Extended primary antibody incubation (overnight at 4°C)

    • Permeabilization optimization (detergent type and concentration)

    • Section thickness adjustment (typically 5-10μm for standard IHC)

  • Autofluorescence mitigation:

    • Sudan Black B (0.1-0.3%) treatment for lipofuscin

    • Sodium borohydride pre-treatment for aldehyde-induced fluorescence

    • Spectral unmixing for multi-fluorophore experiments

  • Tissue-specific blocking strategies:

    • For neural tissue: add 2% normal donkey serum + 0.1% Triton X-100

    • For highly vascularized tissue: add 1% BSA + 10% normal serum

    • For tissues with high biotin content: use avidin-biotin blocking kit

Similar to protocols established for GFAP antibody applications in neural tissues, SPAC23A1.05 antibody protocols may require adaptation when transitioning between different tissue types, with particular attention to fixation methods and antigen retrieval steps .

How can SPAC23A1.05 antibody be effectively employed in 3D cell culture and organoid systems?

For 3D systems optimization:

  • Penetration enhancement techniques:

    • Extended incubation times (48-72 hours at 4°C)

    • Higher detergent concentrations (0.3-0.5% Triton X-100)

    • Reversible clearing methods (CUBIC, CLARITY, or Scale)

  • Recommended clearing protocols:

    • Small organoids (<500μm): 2% Triton X-100 + 0.5% SDS for 24 hours

    • Medium organoids (0.5-1mm): CUBIC-1 reagent for 3-5 days

    • Large organoids (>1mm): CLARITY hydrogel embedding followed by electrophoretic clearing

  • Imaging considerations:

    • Light-sheet microscopy for minimal photobleaching

    • Confocal z-stack acquisition with correction for depth-dependent signal attenuation

    • Deconvolution algorithms to enhance signal quality

Adapting protocols from established neurospheroid immunostaining methods will provide a starting point for SPAC23A1.05 detection in complex 3D systems.

What are the key considerations for SPAC23A1.05 antibody use in proximity ligation assays for protein interaction studies?

Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) optimization requires:

  • Antibody compatibility assessment:

    • Verify that both antibodies (SPAC23A1.05 and interaction partner) work in standard IF

    • Test antibodies from different host species or use directly conjugated primary antibodies

    • Validate with known interaction partners before investigating novel interactions

  • Protocol optimization:

    • Cell/tissue fixation: 4% PFA for 10 minutes often preserves interactions

    • Permeabilization: Mild detergents (0.1% Triton X-100) to maintain protein complexes

    • Blocking: 5% BSA + 5% normal serum matching secondary antibody species

  • Controls design:

    • Positive control: Known protein interactor with SPAC23A1.05

    • Negative control: Protein known not to interact with SPAC23A1.05

    • Technical control: Single primary antibody to assess background

PLA provides exceptional sensitivity for detecting protein interactions in situ, offering insights into SPAC23A1.05 protein interaction networks that traditional co-immunoprecipitation might miss.

How can researchers apply SPAC23A1.05 antibody in super-resolution microscopy to investigate protein localization at the nanoscale?

For super-resolution applications:

  • Sample preparation considerations:

    • Use high precision coverslips (#1.5H, 170 ± 5 μm thickness)

    • Post-fixation with 3% PFA + 0.1% glutaraldehyde preserves ultrastructure

    • Mount samples in specialized imaging buffers containing oxygen scavenging systems

  • Antibody modification for different techniques:

    • STORM/PALM: Use directly labeled primary antibodies with photoswitchable fluorophores

    • STED: Select fluorophores with appropriate depletion wavelength compatibility

    • SIM: Standard fluorophores can be used but brighter dyes improve resolution

  • Quantitative analysis approaches:

    • Cluster analysis of protein distribution patterns

    • Co-localization at nanoscale resolution using coordinate-based analysis

    • Specialized software packages (ThunderSTORM, LAMA, SMLM) for quantification

Super-resolution imaging has revealed unexpected nanoscale organization of many proteins, offering potential new insights into SPAC23A1.05 function within cellular structures at resolutions below the diffraction limit.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.