SPAC1039.07c Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPAC1039.07c antibody; Uncharacterized aminotransferase C1039.07c antibody; EC 2.6.-.- antibody
Target Names
SPAC1039.07c
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
Class-III pyridoxal-phosphate-dependent aminotransferase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Mitochondrion.

Q&A

What is SPAC1039.07c and why is it significant for research?

SPAC1039.07c is a gene in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe that encodes an aminotransferase class-III protein with possible transaminase activity and unknown specificity. It is implicated in amino acid or cofactor metabolism . The protein is of interest because it represents one of the uncharacterized genes in S. pombe that could play important roles in cellular metabolism. Antibodies against this protein are valuable tools for studying its expression, localization, and functional characterization in various cellular contexts.

What experimental approaches can be used to validate SPAC1039.07c antibody specificity?

Validation of SPAC1039.07c antibody specificity requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Western blot with wildtype and knockout strains: Compare protein detection between wildtype S. pombe and SPAC1039.07c deletion mutants (if viable) to confirm antibody specificity .

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: Perform IP with the antibody and analyze precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry to confirm target identity .

  • Epitope mapping: Use alanine scanning to identify critical amino acid residues recognized by the antibody .

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test the antibody against related proteins or in other yeast species to determine specificity boundaries .

  • Orthogonal detection methods: Compare results with alternative methods such as epitope tagging (HA, TAP, GFP) to validate expression patterns .

How should researchers design experiments to study SPAC1039.07c expression under different conditions?

To effectively study SPAC1039.07c expression under different conditions:

  • Reference gene selection: Choose appropriate reference genes (e.g., actin) that show stable expression under your experimental conditions for normalization .

  • Environmental variables: Consider testing nitrogen depletion, as this significantly affects S. pombe transcriptome (approximately 20% of genes show ≥4-fold change) .

  • Time-course analysis: Design time-course experiments (20, 40, and 60 minutes) to capture dynamic changes in expression .

  • Sample preparation controls: Include protease inhibitors during protein extraction to prevent degradation, especially when comparing different growth conditions .

  • Quantification method: Use quantitative methods such as qPCR for transcript levels and quantitative Western blot for protein levels, ensuring technical replicates .

Growth ConditionRecommended ControlExpected ChallengeSuggested Approach
Nitrogen starvationCells in complete mediumSignificant transcriptome changesTime course (0, 20, 40, 60 min)
Cell cycle stagesAsynchronous cultureVariable expressionCell synchronization techniques
Oxidative stressUntreated cellsPost-translational modificationsInclude phosphatase inhibitors
Temperature shiftCells at standard temperatureProtein conformation changesUse multiple epitope antibodies

How can researchers develop a standardized protocol for SPAC1039.07c antibody characterization similar to YCharOS approaches?

Developing a standardized protocol for SPAC1039.07c antibody characterization would follow similar principles to those used by YCharOS :

  • Cell line selection: Identify S. pombe strains with adequate SPAC1039.07c expression and develop equivalent knockout (KO) strains.

  • Antibody panel assessment: Test multiple commercially available antibodies against SPAC1039.07c using standardized procedures.

  • Protocol standardization: Develop consensus protocols for Western blot, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence that are openly available.

  • Comprehensive documentation: Record experimental conditions including buffer compositions, incubation times, and detection systems.

  • Data repository creation: Establish an open-access repository (e.g., on Zenodo) for sharing raw characterization data.

  • Independent validation: Have results verified by multiple laboratories to ensure reproducibility.

The protocols should be systematic and include careful controls (both positive and negative) to enable reliable interpretation of results across different laboratories .

What approaches can be used to study protein-protein interactions involving SPAC1039.07c?

To study protein-protein interactions involving SPAC1039.07c:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Use SPAC1039.07c antibody to pull down the protein and its interacting partners, followed by mass spectrometry analysis .

  • Proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID): Fuse SPAC1039.07c to a biotin ligase to identify proximal proteins in living cells.

  • Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H): Screen for proteins that interact with SPAC1039.07c using S. cerevisiae-based Y2H systems (adaptation required for S. pombe proteins).

  • Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET): Tag SPAC1039.07c and potential interacting partners with fluorescent proteins to detect interactions in vivo.

  • Cross-linking mass spectrometry: Use chemical cross-linkers to stabilize transient interactions before immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analysis.

For Co-IP experiments, it's critical to optimize buffer conditions to maintain protein interactions while minimizing non-specific binding. Including controls such as IgG pulldowns and reverse Co-IPs with antibodies against predicted interacting partners will strengthen the validity of results .

How can SPAC1039.07c function be studied using computational antibody design approaches?

Studying SPAC1039.07c function through computational antibody design involves:

  • Structure prediction: Use AlphaFold2 or RosettaAntibody to predict the 3D structure of SPAC1039.07c protein .

  • Epitope identification: Apply computational tools to identify surface-exposed regions likely to be immunogenic and functionally relevant.

  • Antibody design pipeline: Implement the IsAb or RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD) computational protocol:

    • Generate 3D structure of query antibodies if no structural information is available

    • Perform two-step docking (global docking with ClusPro followed by local docking with SnugDock)

    • Conduct alanine scanning to predict hotspots

    • Apply computational affinity maturation to improve properties

  • Epitope grafting: Design epitope scaffolds by transplanting antibody-bound epitopes onto unrelated protein scaffolds for improved specificity .

  • In silico validation: Test the designed antibodies computationally before wet-lab validation to predict binding affinity and specificity .

It's important to note that while computational approaches can accelerate antibody design, experimental validation remains essential. Recent analyses have raised concerns about claims of purely in silico antibody design without proper sequence disclosure, highlighting the importance of transparency and reproducibility in this field .

What are the most common challenges when using antibodies in S. pombe and how can they be addressed?

Common challenges with antibodies in S. pombe and their solutions include:

  • Cell wall interference: S. pombe has a thick cell wall that can impede antibody penetration.

    • Solution: Optimize spheroplasting conditions using appropriate enzymes and osmotic stabilizers .

  • Non-specific binding: High background can obscure specific signals.

    • Solution: Include blocking agents specific for yeast proteins, pre-adsorb antibodies with cell extracts from knockout strains .

  • Low abundance proteins: SPAC1039.07c may be expressed at low levels under standard conditions.

    • Solution: Consider using TAP-tagging approaches combined with sensitive detection methods .

  • Post-translational modifications: Modifications may mask epitopes or alter protein mobility.

    • Solution: Use multiple antibodies targeting different regions or employ phosphatase treatment when appropriate .

  • Cross-reactivity with endogenous immunoglobulins: Some secondary antibodies may recognize yeast proteins.

    • Solution: Use non-cross-reactive secondary antibodies specifically validated for yeast applications .

  • Ambiguous detection: When using labeled antibodies, autofluorescence from yeast can interfere with detection.

    • Solution: Include appropriate controls and consider alternative detection methods .

How should researchers interpret conflicting results between antibody-based detection and transcript-level analysis of SPAC1039.07c?

When faced with discrepancies between antibody-based protein detection and transcript-level analysis of SPAC1039.07c:

  • Consider post-transcriptional regulation: Check if SPAC1039.07c is identified in Upf1 targets studies, which could indicate regulation through nonsense-mediated decay pathways .

  • Evaluate protein stability: Perform cycloheximide chase experiments to determine protein half-life, which may explain discrepancies if the protein is rapidly degraded.

  • Assess translation efficiency: Conduct polysome profiling to determine if mRNA is efficiently translated despite high transcript levels.

  • Examine post-translational modifications: Use phosphatase treatments or specific modification-detecting antibodies to determine if modifications affect antibody recognition.

  • Validate antibody specificity under specific conditions: Test if the antibody performs differently under the experimental conditions being compared.

  • Consider compartmentalization: Determine if the protein is sequestered in specific cellular compartments using fractionation approaches.

Remember that transcript levels often do not directly correlate with protein levels due to complex regulatory mechanisms. In S. pombe, nitrogen depletion can cause extensive alterations in the transcriptome that may not immediately translate to protein-level changes .

What quality control measures should be implemented when working with SPAC1039.07c antibody across different experimental batches?

To ensure consistency when working with SPAC1039.07c antibody across different experimental batches:

  • Standardized positive controls: Include a reference sample with known SPAC1039.07c expression in each experiment.

  • Batch testing: Perform side-by-side Western blots with old and new antibody batches to ensure comparable sensitivity and specificity.

  • Epitope mapping validation: Periodically confirm that the antibody recognizes the same epitope through competition assays with peptides or using alanine-scanning mutants .

  • Secondary antibody consistency: Maintain the same secondary antibody systems throughout a research project to avoid introduction of variables.

  • Documentation system: Implement detailed record-keeping that includes antibody lot numbers, incubation conditions, and detection parameters.

  • Quantitative standards: Include recombinant SPAC1039.07c protein standards at known concentrations for quantitative applications.

  • Automated image analysis: Use consistent image acquisition and analysis parameters when quantifying Western blots or immunofluorescence.

A systematic approach to validation and record-keeping is essential for ensuring reproducibility across extended research timelines and between different laboratory members .

How can high-throughput single-cell sequencing approaches be integrated with SPAC1039.07c antibody-based research?

Integrating high-throughput single-cell sequencing with SPAC1039.07c antibody research:

  • Single-cell proteogenomics: Combine SPAC1039.07c antibody staining with single-cell RNA sequencing to correlate protein presence with transcript levels at single-cell resolution.

  • CITE-seq adaptation for yeast: Develop CITE-seq (Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing) protocols for S. pombe using SPAC1039.07c antibodies conjugated to oligonucleotide barcodes.

  • Spatial transcriptomics correlation: Compare spatial distribution of SPAC1039.07c protein (via immunofluorescence) with spatial transcriptomics data to identify localized translation or protein trafficking patterns.

  • Trajectory analysis: Use antibody-based cell sorting to isolate SPAC1039.07c-expressing populations for single-cell RNA-seq trajectory analysis during cellular differentiation or stress response .

  • Epitope-specific B-cell sequencing: For researchers developing new antibodies against SPAC1039.07c, implement high-throughput B-cell receptor sequencing to identify optimal antibody candidates, similar to approaches used in therapeutic antibody discovery .

This integration would require careful optimization of fixation and permeabilization protocols to preserve both epitope accessibility and RNA integrity, especially challenging in yeast cells with their robust cell walls .

What experimental approaches could determine if SPAC1039.07c has orthologs in other species that could be studied with cross-reactive antibodies?

To determine if SPAC1039.07c has orthologs that could be studied with cross-reactive antibodies:

  • Orthology prediction tools: Use HCOP (HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee Orthology Prediction) tool to identify potential orthologs across species . The search results indicate that AGXT2 (alanine--glyoxylate aminotransferase 2) may be the human ortholog.

  • Sequence alignment analysis: Perform multiple sequence alignment of SPAC1039.07c with predicted orthologs to identify conserved epitopes that could be targeted by cross-reactive antibodies.

  • Epitope conservation mapping: Generate a conservation heat map of the protein sequence across species, focusing on regions used for antibody generation.

  • Cross-species Western blot: Test existing SPAC1039.07c antibodies against protein extracts from related species (other yeasts) and more distant ones (if orthologs are predicted).

  • Heterologous expression: Express the orthologous proteins in S. pombe and test reactivity with SPAC1039.07c antibodies.

  • Structural epitope analysis: If structures are available, compare the 3D conformation of epitope regions across species to predict antibody cross-reactivity .

SpeciesPredicted OrthologSequence IdentityExpected Cross-Reactivity
S. cerevisiaeYFL030WModeratePossible
C. albicansorf19.5622LowUnlikely
H. sapiensAGXT2Very lowHighly unlikely
M. musculusAgxt2Very lowHighly unlikely

This approach would be particularly valuable for comparative studies across different yeast species or for leveraging research tools developed for other model organisms .

How could chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) techniques be applied to study potential interactions between SPAC1039.07c and DNA?

If SPAC1039.07c is suspected to interact with DNA (directly or as part of a complex), ChIP techniques could be applied as follows:

  • ChIP protocol optimization: Adapt standard ChIP protocols specifically for S. pombe:

    • Optimize crosslinking conditions considering the yeast cell wall

    • Develop efficient sonication protocols for S. pombe chromatin

    • Validate SPAC1039.07c antibody specificity for ChIP applications

  • ChIP-seq analysis pipeline: Implement bioinformatics workflows specific to S. pombe genome annotation:

    • Account for the unique features of S. pombe genome organization

    • Compare binding patterns under different conditions such as nitrogen starvation

    • Correlate binding sites with nucleosome positioning data

  • ChIP-qPCR validation: Design primers for suspected binding regions and controls based on initial ChIP-seq results.

  • Sequential ChIP (Re-ChIP): If SPAC1039.07c functions in a complex, perform sequential ChIP with antibodies against predicted complex partners.

  • Integration with transcriptome data: Correlate binding sites with genes differentially expressed under conditions where SPAC1039.07c is active .

  • Comparison with nucleosome mapping: Analyze the relationship between SPAC1039.07c binding and nucleosome positioning, especially under conditions like nitrogen starvation where significant nucleosome loss occurs .

These approaches would need to be coupled with functional validation experiments to determine the biological significance of any identified DNA interactions .

How might CRISPR-Cas9 technology be used to enhance studies of SPAC1039.07c function and antibody validation?

CRISPR-Cas9 technology can significantly enhance SPAC1039.07c studies and antibody validation:

  • Endogenous tagging: Add epitope tags (HA, FLAG, GFP) to the endogenous SPAC1039.07c gene for parallel validation of antibody specificity.

  • Domain-specific mutations: Generate precise mutations in functional domains to study their impact on protein function and antibody recognition.

  • Conditional expression systems: Engineer inducible/repressible promoters to control SPAC1039.07c expression levels for dosage-dependent studies.

  • Knockout validation: Create clean deletion mutants of SPAC1039.07c as negative controls for antibody validation .

  • CRISPRi approaches: Use CRISPR interference to modulate expression without genetic modification for temporal studies.

  • Orthogonal validation: Generate multiple mutant strains with different modifications to SPAC1039.07c for comprehensive antibody epitope mapping.

  • Humanized yeast models: Replace SPAC1039.07c with human orthologs to study evolutionary conservation of function and create tools for cross-species antibody validation.

This approach would provide powerful genetic tools to complement antibody-based studies and enhance confidence in experimental findings .

What novel applications could emerge from studying SPAC1039.07c in the context of nitrogen starvation response in S. pombe?

Novel applications from studying SPAC1039.07c in nitrogen starvation response:

  • Metabolic adaptation mechanisms: If SPAC1039.07c is involved in amino acid metabolism, its study could reveal novel mechanisms of metabolic adaptation during nutrient limitation .

  • G0 state regulation: Nitrogen starvation induces a G0-like state in S. pombe; understanding SPAC1039.07c's role could provide insights into quiescence entry and maintenance mechanisms .

  • Stress response pathways: SPAC1039.07c may participate in cellular stress responses, potentially revealing conserved pathways relevant to other organisms .

  • Transcriptional regulation networks: Investigating how SPAC1039.07c expression is regulated during nitrogen starvation could uncover novel transcription factors or regulatory elements .

  • Cell wall remodeling processes: If SPAC1039.07c affects cell wall composition during stress, it could reveal targets for antifungal development .

  • Comparative genomics applications: Analysis of how SPAC1039.07c function compares to orthologs in pathogenic fungi could identify potential drug targets .

  • Bioengineering applications: Understanding SPAC1039.07c's role in nitrogen metabolism could inform metabolic engineering efforts for biotechnology applications.

These applications would leverage S. pombe's unique characteristics as a model organism while potentially yielding insights applicable to higher eukaryotes .

How might artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches enhance SPAC1039.07c antibody development and application?

AI and machine learning approaches could enhance SPAC1039.07c antibody research:

  • Epitope prediction optimization: Use ML algorithms to predict optimal epitopes for antibody generation based on protein structure, solvent accessibility, and evolutionary conservation .

  • Antibody design refinement: Apply deep learning models such as those used in RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD) to optimize antibody sequences for enhanced specificity and affinity .

  • Cross-reactivity prediction: Develop neural networks to predict potential cross-reactivity with other proteins, minimizing off-target binding .

  • Image analysis automation: Implement computer vision algorithms to quantify immunofluorescence patterns and detect subtle localization changes under different conditions.

  • Protocol optimization: Use Bayesian optimization approaches to efficiently explore experimental parameter space for optimal antibody performance.

  • Binding kinetics prediction: Apply physics-informed neural networks to predict antibody-antigen binding kinetics without extensive experimental screening .

  • Literature mining: Implement natural language processing to extract relevant information about aminotransferases from the scientific literature to inform experimental design.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.