SPBC4C3.09 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPBC4C3.09; Uncharacterized protein C4C3.09
Target Names
SPBC4C3.09
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Nucleus. Membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

  • What applications are SPBC4C3.09 antibodies typically used for in research?

    SPBC4C3.09 antibodies can be employed for multiple research applications:

    • Western blotting for protein detection in cell lysates

    • Immunofluorescence microscopy to determine subcellular localization

    • Immunoprecipitation to identify protein interaction partners

    • ELISA for quantitative detection of the protein

    • Flow cytometry if working with cell suspensions

    When designing experiments, researchers should evaluate the antibody's validation data for each specific application to ensure reliability .

  • What is the known structure and predicted topology of SPBC4C3.09?

    The amino acid sequence analysis of SPBC4C3.09 shows characteristics consistent with a membrane-associated glycosyltransferase . The protein appears to contain:

    • A signal peptide and transmembrane domain at the N-terminus

    • A hydrophilic catalytic domain likely facing the lumen/extracellular space

    • Potential glycosylation sites that may affect antibody recognition

    The transmembrane topology must be considered when selecting antibodies, as certain epitopes may be inaccessible depending on the experimental conditions.

Advanced Research Questions

  • How can I validate the specificity of an SPBC4C3.09 antibody in my experimental system?

    A multi-faceted validation approach is recommended:

    1. Compare signal between wild-type S. pombe and a SPBC4C3.09 deletion strain

    2. Perform Western blot to confirm detection at the expected molecular weight (~42 kDa)

    3. Use competitive blocking with recombinant SPBC4C3.09 protein

    4. Test cross-reactivity with related S. pombe glycosyltransferases

    5. Perform epitope mapping to confirm binding to the expected region

    6. Use RNA interference to reduce protein expression and confirm corresponding reduction in antibody signal

    For ultimate confirmation, mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated samples can verify the identity of the recognized protein .

  • What are the best methods for using SPBC4C3.09 antibodies in fission yeast cell wall studies?

    When investigating cell wall components in S. pombe:

    1. Cell preparation: Use careful spheroplasting with enzymes like zymolyase while preserving protein structure

    2. Fixation optimization: Test multiple fixation methods (paraformaldehyde, methanol) to preserve both antigenicity and cell wall architecture

    3. Permeabilization: Gentle detergent treatment after partial cell wall digestion may be necessary for antibody access

    4. Co-staining: Combine with calcofluor white or other cell wall stains to correlate localization with specific cell wall structures

    5. Controls: Include known cell wall proteins like Bgs1p (involved in β-1,3-glucan synthesis) or Agn1p (α-1,3-glucanase) as reference markers

    Time-course experiments during cell division are particularly valuable for understanding potential roles in septum formation .

  • How do post-translational modifications affect SPBC4C3.09 antibody recognition?

    As a predicted glycosyltransferase, SPBC4C3.09 likely undergoes post-translational modifications that can impact antibody binding:

    1. N-glycosylation: S. pombe proteins often contain N-linked glycans; test antibody recognition before and after PNGase F treatment

    2. O-mannosylation: Common in S. pombe cell wall proteins; compare antibody binding in wild-type and O-mannosylation defective strains (e.g., oma4)

    3. Phosphorylation: May occur on Ser/Thr residues; phosphatase treatment can determine if phosphorylation affects epitope recognition

    For comprehensive analysis, compare antibody binding under native versus denaturing conditions to assess if structural features affect recognition .

  • How can I optimize immunoprecipitation protocols using SPBC4C3.09 antibodies?

    For successful immunoprecipitation from S. pombe:

    1. Cell lysis optimization:

      • Test different lysis buffers containing mild detergents (0.5-1% NP-40 or Triton X-100)

      • For membrane proteins, consider stronger detergents like digitonin or DDM

      • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

    2. Binding conditions:

      • Optimize antibody concentration (typically 2-5 μg per sample)

      • Test different incubation times (2 hours vs. overnight) and temperatures (4°C vs. room temperature)

      • Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding

    3. Controls and verification:

      • Include isotype control antibody IP

      • Verify IP efficiency by Western blot of input, unbound, and eluted fractions

      • Consider cross-linking antibody to beads to prevent co-elution of antibody heavy chains

    4. Mass spectrometry analysis:

      • For identification of interaction partners, analyze IP samples by LC-MS/MS

      • Use appropriate controls and statistical analysis to filter out common contaminants

  • What are effective strategies for studying SPBC4C3.09 localization relative to cell wall components?

    To investigate the spatial relationship between SPBC4C3.09 and cell wall structures:

    1. Co-localization approach:

      • Perform double immunofluorescence with SPBC4C3.09 antibody and antibodies against known cell wall proteins

      • Combine antibody staining with fluorescent cell wall probes (calcofluor white for β-1,3-glucan, WGA for chitin)

      • Use super-resolution microscopy for precise co-localization analysis

    2. Temporal dynamics:

      • Track localization changes during cell cycle progression, particularly during septum formation

      • Compare localization patterns in wild-type cells versus mutants affecting cell wall synthesis (e.g., bgs1, agn1)

    3. Quantitative analysis:

      • Measure fluorescence intensity profiles across cell sections

      • Perform Manders' or Pearson's coefficient analysis for co-localization quantification

    4. Biochemical fractionation:

      • Isolate cell wall fractions using differential extraction methods

      • Analyze protein content by Western blotting with SPBC4C3.09 antibody

  • How can SPBC4C3.09 antibodies be used to investigate protein involvement in septum formation?

    Based on the importance of glycosyltransferases in septum formation :

    1. Septation time-course:

      • Synchronize cells and collect samples at defined time points during cell division

      • Use SPBC4C3.09 antibody to track protein localization relative to the developing septum

      • Co-stain with septum-specific markers (e.g., calcofluor white)

    2. Genetic interaction studies:

      • Compare SPBC4C3.09 localization in wild-type versus septation mutants (e.g., cps1-191)

      • Analyze septum formation in cells with altered SPBC4C3.09 expression

    3. Biochemical approaches:

      • Use antibodies to quantify protein levels during septation

      • Perform IP-MS to identify binding partners specific to septation

    4. Electron microscopy:

      • Use immunogold labeling with SPBC4C3.09 antibodies for TEM analysis of septum ultrastructure

      • Compare septum morphology in cells with normal versus altered SPBC4C3.09 function

  • What are the technical considerations for using SPBC4C3.09 antibodies in combination with active learning approaches for antibody research?

    When integrating SPBC4C3.09 antibody research with modern computational approaches:

    1. Machine learning integration:

      • Use datasets from antibody-based experiments to train predictive models for protein function

      • Apply active learning algorithms to optimize experimental design for antibody characterization

    2. Structural considerations:

      • Use antibody-antigen binding data to refine structural predictions of SPBC4C3.09

      • Apply computational approaches like AlphaFold2 to model antibody-antigen complexes

    3. Epitope mapping optimization:

      • Design experimental strategies to validate computationally predicted epitopes

      • Use targeted mutagenesis to confirm binding sites identified through computational analysis

    4. Data integration framework:

      • Establish pipelines to integrate antibody binding data with other -omics datasets

      • Implement reproducible workflows for consistent analysis of antibody-based experiments

    These approaches can significantly reduce the number of experiments needed while improving the reliability of results .

Table 1: Common Applications and Methodological Considerations for SPBC4C3.09 Antibodies

ApplicationRecommended DilutionBuffer ComponentsKey ControlsSpecial Considerations
Western Blot1:500-1:2000TBS-T with 5% BSASPBC4C3.09 deletion strain; Recombinant proteinMay require spheroplasting for efficient extraction
Immunofluorescence1:100-1:500PBS with 1% BSASecondary antibody only; Preimmune serumCell wall permeabilization critical for access
Immunoprecipitation2-5 μg per sample50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40IgG isotype control; Input sampleCross-link antibody to beads to avoid heavy chain contamination
ELISA1:1000-1:5000PBS with 1% BSAStandard curve; Blocking peptidePre-adsorb against yeast lysate to reduce background
Flow Cytometry1:100-1:500PBS with 0.5% BSAIsotype control; Unstained cellsRequires spheroplasting and careful fixation

Table 2: Troubleshooting Guide for SPBC4C3.09 Antibody Experiments

ProblemPossible CauseSolution Approach
No signal in Western blotInefficient extractionOptimize cell wall digestion; Use stronger lysis buffers with appropriate detergents
High background in immunofluorescenceNon-specific binding to cell wallPre-absorb antibody; Optimize blocking conditions; Increase wash stringency
Multiple bands in Western blotPost-translational modificationsTest deglycosylation enzymes; Compare with predicted size of unmodified protein
Failed immunoprecipitationPoor antibody-antigen bindingAdjust buffer conditions; Test different detergents; Increase incubation time
Inconsistent results between experimentsAntibody batch variationStandardize protocols; Use the same antibody lot when possible; Include positive controls

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.