The identifier "YHR213W-A" follows Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) gene naming conventions, where:
YHR: Chromosomal arm (H right)
213: Open reading frame (ORF) number
W: Indicates Watson strand orientation
A: Distinguishes between overlapping ORFs
This locus is annotated as a dubious ORF in SGD (Saccharomyces Genome Database)
No characterized protein product or antibody targeting this sequence has been documented .
Hypothetical construct: May refer to an unpublished antibody against a yeast protein
Terminology error: Possible confusion with:
Humanized antibodies (e.g., "YH" prefix in some therapeutic candidates)
Patent applications using provisional designators
Yeast display libraries (unrelated to commercial antibodies)
To resolve ambiguity:
Sequence Validation:
Cross-reference UniProt (Accession: P0CX81)
Confirm ORF status via SGD (YHR213W-A)
Alternative Sources:
Contact yeast research consortia (e.g., EUROSCARF)
Screen antibody repositories (CiteAb, Antibodypedia)
Experimental Confirmation:
Western blot using anti-peptide sera
Epitope mapping via phage display
While YHR213W-A lacks documentation, yeast-derived antibodies have established roles in:
KEGG: sce:YHR213W-A
STRING: 4932.YHR213W-A
YHR213W-A is an uncharacterized protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast, strain 204508/S288c) that has been identified through genomic analysis . The protein belongs to a class of overlooked genes in yeast that were not initially annotated in the yeast genome but have since been identified through integrated experimental and computational approaches .
Studies using HA-tagged versions of similar overlooked proteins (such as YHR137C-A and YMR272W-A) have revealed that these proteins typically localize to specific cellular compartments, with some showing cytoplasmic distribution with concentration around the nuclear rim and endoplasmic reticulum . Understanding YHR213W-A's function and localization contributes to our comprehensive knowledge of the yeast proteome and potentially uncovers new cellular pathways.
Currently available YHR213W-A antibodies include:
Polyclonal antibodies: Typically rabbit-derived anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae YHR213W-A polyclonal antibodies that have undergone antigen-affinity purification
Isotype: Most commonly IgG
These antibodies are designed to recognize the native or recombinant forms of the uncharacterized YHR213W-A protein. For researchers requiring custom antibodies against this target, several service providers offer custom antibody development options, though this is typically only necessary for specialized applications .
Like all antibodies, YHR213W-A antibodies consist of a Y-shaped molecule with three equal-sized regions. The structure includes:
A flexible hinge joining the antibody stalk (Fc) region to the arms
Two arms containing F(ab) regions that function to bind the YHR213W-A antigen
Heavy and light chains in each arm, with variable domains at the antigen-binding site
For polyclonal YHR213W-A antibodies, there is natural variation in the exact binding epitopes across the antibody population, providing recognition of multiple epitopes on the target protein. This is advantageous for detection of uncharacterized proteins like YHR213W-A where the optimal epitopes may not be well-defined .
YHR213W-A antibodies have been validated for the following applications:
ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): For quantitative detection of YHR213W-A in yeast lysates
Western Blot: For identification of YHR213W-A protein size and expression levels
Immunofluorescence: Similar overlooked yeast proteins have been successfully studied using immunofluorescence with HA-tagged versions, suggesting a similar approach would work for YHR213W-A
When designing experiments, researchers should note that for uncharacterized proteins like YHR213W-A, additional validation steps may be necessary to confirm specificity and sensitivity in your particular experimental context .
A comprehensive validation protocol for YHR213W-A antibodies should include:
Positive control testing: Using recombinant YHR213W-A protein (available with ≥85% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE)
Negative control testing: Using wild-type yeast strains and YHR213W-A knockout strains
Cross-reactivity assessment: Testing against closely related yeast proteins
Specificity validation: Confirming single band detection at the predicted molecular weight in Western blot
Titration experiments: Determining optimal antibody concentration for each application
For uncharacterized proteins like YHR213W-A, comparison with epitope-tagged versions (e.g., HA-tagged YHR213W-A) can provide additional validation by confirming co-localization or similar expression patterns .
To ensure experimental rigor when working with YHR213W-A antibodies, include the following controls:
| Control Type | Description | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Control | Recombinant YHR213W-A protein or yeast strain overexpressing YHR213W-A | Confirms antibody functionality |
| Negative Control | YHR213W-A deletion strain or non-yeast sample | Validates specificity |
| Secondary-only Control | Omit primary YHR213W-A antibody | Identifies non-specific binding of secondary antibody |
| Isotype Control | Non-specific IgG from same species as YHR213W-A antibody | Detects non-specific Fc-mediated binding |
| Loading Control | Antibody against constitutively expressed yeast protein | Ensures equal sample loading |
For immunofluorescence studies, include DAPI staining to visualize nuclei, as has been done with similar proteins to determine subcellular localization patterns .
For subcellular localization of YHR213W-A:
Immunofluorescence approach:
Fix yeast cells with formaldehyde (typically 3.7%)
Digest cell wall with zymolyase
Permeabilize with detergent (0.1% Triton X-100)
Block with BSA or normal serum
Incubate with YHR213W-A primary antibody
Detect with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody
Co-stain with DAPI for nuclear visualization
Comparison with known patterns:
Previous studies of similar overlooked yeast proteins have shown distinct localization patterns:
Validation strategy:
Compare results from antibody staining with localization of epitope-tagged YHR213W-A (e.g., HA-tagged or GFP-fusion) to confirm findings .
When encountering problems with YHR213W-A antibody signals:
For weak signals:
Increase antibody concentration (perform titration from 1:100 to 1:5000)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Optimize antigen retrieval methods for fixed samples
Use signal amplification systems (e.g., biotin-streptavidin)
Increase protein loading for Western blots
For non-specific signals:
Increase blocking stringency (5% BSA or 5% milk, 0.1% Tween-20)
Perform additional washes with higher detergent concentration
Pre-adsorb antibody with yeast lysate lacking YHR213W-A
Use antigen-affinity purified antibody fractions
Decrease antibody concentration after determining optimal dilution
For validation:
Compare results with those obtained using alternative detection methods, such as epitope-tagging approaches that have been successful with similar yeast proteins .
When extending YHR213W-A antibody use to multiple yeast strains:
Sequence variation assessment:
Check for YHR213W-A sequence conservation across target strains
Perform bioinformatic analysis to identify potential epitope differences
Consider strain-specific validation for highly divergent strains
Expression level differences:
Cross-reactivity testing:
Test antibody against lysates from multiple strains
Include knockout controls when available
Compare with results from tagged protein variants
Genetic background effects:
For accurate quantification of YHR213W-A expression:
Western blot quantification:
Use digital imaging and densitometry software
Include a standard curve with recombinant YHR213W-A protein
Normalize to loading controls (e.g., actin, GAPDH, or total protein stain)
Apply lane-specific background subtraction
Report data as fold-change relative to control conditions
Immunofluorescence quantification:
Measure mean fluorescence intensity across multiple cells (n>50)
Subtract background from cell-free areas
Define regions of interest based on cellular compartments
Apply consistent threshold settings across all experimental conditions
Report intensity data with statistical analysis
ELISA quantification:
Important limitations to consider include:
Epitope accessibility issues:
Post-translational modifications may mask epitopes
Protein-protein interactions might block antibody binding sites
Conformational epitopes may be lost in denatured samples
Validation challenges:
Lack of well-characterized positive controls
Difficulty confirming specificity without knockout controls
Limited information about potential cross-reactivity
Expression level concerns:
Uncharacterized proteins often have low expression levels
Temporal or condition-specific expression patterns may require optimization
Antibody sensitivity may be insufficient for detection at endogenous levels
Functional interpretation constraints:
Difficulty correlating detected expression with unknown function
Limited ability to interpret phenotypic effects of antibody binding
Challenges in distinguishing between paralogs or gene family members
Alternative approaches, such as epitope tagging combined with detection by tag-specific antibodies, can overcome some of these limitations and provide complementary data .
To ensure specificity when studying proteins with potential homology:
Bioinformatic analysis:
Perform sequence alignment of YHR213W-A with potential homologs
Identify unique regions suitable for specific antibody targeting
Assess cross-reactivity potential through epitope prediction tools
Experimental validation:
Use recombinant proteins of each homolog in Western blot comparisons
Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Create knockout strains for each homolog and test antibody specificity
Competition assays:
Pre-incubate antibody with purified recombinant YHR213W-A protein
Compare binding patterns before and after competition
Observe elimination of specific signals while non-specific signals remain
Comparative localization:
YHR213W-A and related proteins provide a model system for studying gene duplication events:
Genomic analysis approaches:
YHR213W-A may share similarities with YHR213W-B and other duplication products
Compare antibody detection patterns across duplicated genes
Combine with whole genome sequencing to identify strain-specific duplications
Quantify expression differences between duplicated genes using validated antibodies
Evolutionary implications:
Antibody-based detection of differential expression can reveal functional diversification
Study the regulation of duplicated genes under different conditions
Compare conservation patterns across yeast species using cross-reactive antibodies
Functional divergence analysis:
For challenging yeast proteins that may have poor immunogenicity:
Immunization optimization:
Carrier protein conjugation:
Fuse YHR213W-A to highly immunogenic carrier proteins (KLH, BSA)
Use immunogenic peptide tags (FLAG, HA) in recombinant constructs
Design chimeric proteins exposing multiple potential epitopes
Hybridoma screening optimization:
Implement high-throughput ELISA screening
Use both native and denatured protein in screening assays
Apply phage display technology to select high-affinity binders
Screen against multiple conformational states of the protein
Advanced antibody engineering:
The production of monoclonal antibodies would complement existing polyclonal reagents and potentially offer improved specificity for detecting YHR213W-A in complex samples.
YHR213W-A antibody research contributes to the larger field of cryptic gene discovery:
Methodological parallels:
Techniques developed for YHR213W-A detection mirror approaches used for other overlooked genes
Antibody-based validation complements transcriptomic and genomic approaches
Similar overlooked genes (YHR137C-A, YMR272W-A, YER023C-A, YGR174W-A, YPL135C-A) have been successfully studied using antibody-based approaches
Research integration:
YHR213W-A antibody studies build upon foundational work identifying overlooked genes through:
This combined approach validates protein expression of computationally predicted genes
Evolutionary considerations:
Antibodies help determine whether overlooked proteins are functional or pseudogenes
Cross-species reactivity testing can establish evolutionary conservation
Comparative proteomics enables reconstruction of evolutionary histories of gene families
Studying antibody-epitope interactions with uncharacterized proteins offers unique insights:
Novel binding motif discovery:
Structure-function relationships:
Antibody binding sites can reveal functional domains in uncharacterized proteins
Neutralizing vs. non-neutralizing epitopes provide clues about critical regions
Competition assays between different antibodies help construct epitope maps
Methodological approaches:
X-ray crystallography of antibody-antigen complexes reveals precise binding interfaces
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry identifies protected regions upon binding
Alanine scanning mutagenesis determines critical residues for antibody recognition
Translational applications:
This research parallels approaches used in therapeutic antibody development, where understanding precise epitope characteristics has been crucial for developing broadly neutralizing antibodies against pathogens .
YHR213W-A antibodies can enhance systems biology research through:
Interactome mapping:
Immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry to identify protein-protein interactions
Proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX) using YHR213W-A as bait
Integration of interaction data into existing yeast protein networks
Comparison of interaction patterns across growth conditions and stress responses
Regulatory network analysis:
ChIP-seq to identify transcription factors regulating YHR213W-A expression
Correlation of protein abundance (antibody-based) with transcript levels
Identification of post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms
Multi-omic data integration to position YHR213W-A in regulatory hierarchies
Functional genomics screening:
Antibody-based phenotypic screens following genetic perturbations
Systematic localization studies across gene deletion libraries
Quantitative analysis of expression changes in response to environmental challenges
Integration with existing datasets for overlooked genes to identify functional patterns
Next-generation binding reagents offer exciting possibilities:
Intracellular applications:
Nanobodies or DARPins expressed within yeast cells can track YHR213W-A in living cells
Proximity-dependent labeling using nanobody-enzyme fusions
Targeted protein degradation using nanobody-based degrons
Modulation of YHR213W-A function through intrabody binding
Super-resolution microscopy:
Small binding proteins labeled with bright fluorophores enable higher resolution imaging
Multi-color nanobody labeling for co-localization studies
Single-molecule tracking of YHR213W-A dynamics
Correlative light and electron microscopy using nanobody-gold conjugates
Biosensor development:
Creation of FRET-based sensors using nanobody pairs
Split-protein complementation assays to detect YHR213W-A conformational changes
Yeast two-hybrid derivative systems using nanobody fusions
Real-time monitoring of protein expression and localization changes
Structural biology applications:
Nanobodies as crystallization chaperones for YHR213W-A structural studies
Cryo-EM analysis using nanobody-decorated proteins
NMR studies with stabilizing nanobodies to determine solution structures
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry with protective nanobodies