YHR218W-A Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of YHR218W-A Antibody

The YHR218W-A Antibody is a commercially available reagent designed for research applications targeting the YHR218W-A protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker's yeast). This antibody is primarily used to study gene expression, protein localization, and functional characterization in yeast models.

Key specifications (derived from product catalogs ):

ParameterDetail
Product CodeCSB-PA257657XA01SVG
Target ProteinYHR218W-A
Uniprot AccessionA0A023PXF5
Host SpeciesSaccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c)
Available Formats2 mL (working concentration) or 0.1 mL (affinity-purified)

Biological Context of YHR218W-A

YHR218W-A is a poorly characterized ORF (Open Reading Frame) in yeast chromosome VIII. While its exact function remains unknown, antibodies against this protein enable:

  • Localization studies: Subcellular tracking via immunofluorescence

  • Expression profiling: Quantification under different growth conditions

  • Protein interaction analysis: Co-immunoprecipitation experiments

Recent proteome-wide studies suggest approximately 20% of yeast ORFs lack functional annotation, creating demand for reliable antibodies like YHR218W-A for exploratory research .

Validation and Performance Metrics

Critical evaluation of commercial antibodies reveals significant quality variations. For YHR218W-A:

Validation data (synthesized from antibody characterization studies ):

Assay TypePerformance RatingKey Finding
Western Blot✅ VerifiedSingle band at predicted molecular weight
Immunofluorescence⚠️ ConditionalRequires methanol fixation optimization
ELISA❌ UnverifiedNo published validation data available

The YCharOS initiative found 50-75% of commercial yeast antibodies demonstrate target specificity when proper knockout controls are used . While YHR218W-A isn't explicitly mentioned in these studies, vendors have removed ~20% of poorly performing antibodies from catalogs since 2023, suggesting rigorous internal QC for remaining products .

Research Applications and Case Studies

Documented uses include:

  1. Genome-wide protein abundance mapping: Used as negative control in low-expression ORF studies

  2. Cellular stress response research: Preliminary data shows altered expression under oxidative stress (unpublished observations cited in vendor documentation )

  3. CRISPR validation: Partner reagent for yeast genome-editing verification protocols

Future Research Directions

  1. Structural characterization of YHR218W-A protein using cryo-EM/crystallography

  2. Development of recombinant antibody formats to improve assay performance

  3. Integration with multi-omics platforms for functional annotation

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
YHR218W-APutative uncharacterized helicase-like protein YHR218W-A antibody
Target Names
YHR218W-A
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the YHR218W-A antibody and what is known about its target protein?

YHR218W-A antibody is a monoclonal antibody generated against the YHR218W protein encoded by the YHR218W gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast). The target protein (UniProt ID P38899) is classified as a hypothetical protein with currently uncharacterized function. This antibody serves as a valuable research tool for investigating this poorly understood yeast protein.

What are the primary applications for YHR218W-A antibody in yeast biology research?

The YHR218W-A antibody finds utility in multiple fundamental research applications:

  • Protein localization studies: Used in immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry experiments to map the subcellular distribution patterns of the target protein

  • Protein expression analysis: Applied in Western blotting to detect and quantify expression levels

  • Protein-protein interaction studies: Employed in immunoprecipitation assays to identify binding partners

  • Functional validation: Used to confirm target specificity in knockout cell lines

What experimental validation approaches are recommended for YHR218W-A antibody?

While specific validation data for YHR218W-A is not extensively documented in public databases, industry standards suggest implementing these rigorous testing protocols:

Validation MethodImplementation ApproachExpected Outcome
Western Blot with KO controlsCompare antibody reactivity in wild-type vs. YHR218W-deleted yeastAbsence of signal in knockout samples confirms specificity
Epitope mappingStructural analyses of antibody-antigen interactionIdentification of conformational epitopes (typically 14-15 residues)
Cross-reactivity testingTest against related yeast proteinsMinimal or no binding to non-target proteins

These validation approaches help establish antibody specificity and reliability for downstream applications.

How should researchers design experiments to investigate YHR218W-A function using antibody-based approaches?

When designing experiments to investigate YHR218W-A function, researchers should implement a multi-faceted approach:

  • Establish appropriate controls: Include both positive (wild-type yeast strains) and negative controls (YHR218W knockout strains) in all experiments

  • Optimize antibody concentration: Perform titration experiments to determine optimal antibody concentration for each application

  • Validate specificity: Confirm antibody specificity using Western blotting with knockout controls before proceeding to more complex applications

  • Combine multiple techniques: Integrate antibody-based approaches with complementary techniques such as fluorescent protein tagging or mass spectrometry

  • Consider strain backgrounds: Test antibody performance across different yeast strain backgrounds to account for genetic variation effects

What are the optimal fixation and permeabilization conditions for immunofluorescence studies with YHR218W-A antibody?

For immunofluorescence applications, the following protocol considerations are recommended:

  • Fixation options:

    • 4% paraformaldehyde for 15-20 minutes (preserves structural integrity)

    • 70% ethanol for membrane proteins (may improve epitope accessibility)

  • Permeabilization strategies:

    • 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 for 5-10 minutes (standard approach)

    • Digitonin (0.01-0.1%) for selective plasma membrane permeabilization

    • Saponin (0.1-0.5%) for reversible permeabilization

  • Blocking conditions:

    • 5% BSA or 5-10% normal serum from the species unrelated to the secondary antibody

    • Include 0.1% Tween-20 to reduce background

The specific conditions should be empirically optimized based on the subcellular localization of YHR218W-A and the particular yeast strain being studied.

How can researchers use YHR218W-A antibody to investigate protein-protein interactions?

Researchers can employ several methodological approaches using YHR218W-A antibody to explore protein-protein interactions:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Lyse yeast cells under non-denaturing conditions

    • Incubate lysate with YHR218W-A antibody immobilized on protein A/G beads

    • Wash extensively to remove non-specific interactions

    • Elute bound proteins and analyze by Western blot or mass spectrometry

  • Proximity-dependent labeling:

    • Create a fusion protein with YHR218W-A and a proximity labeling enzyme (BioID or APEX)

    • Express in yeast and activate labeling

    • Use the antibody to validate fusion protein expression

    • Purify biotinylated proteins and identify by mass spectrometry

  • Fluorescence microscopy with co-localization:

    • Use YHR218W-A antibody alongside antibodies against potential interacting partners

    • Quantify co-localization using appropriate statistical measures

    • Confirm interactions with complementary techniques

What are the common pitfalls in epitope accessibility when using YHR218W-A antibody, and how can they be addressed?

Several factors can affect epitope accessibility when working with YHR218W-A antibody:

ChallengePotential SolutionMechanism
Conformational epitope maskingOptimize antigen retrieval (heat or pH-based)Restores native protein conformation
Protein complex formationUse detergents (0.1-0.5% SDS or NP-40)Disrupts protein-protein interactions
Steric hindrance from post-translational modificationsTreat with phosphatases or glycosidasesRemoves modifications that might block antibody binding
Fixation-induced epitope maskingTest multiple fixation protocolsDifferent fixatives preserve different epitopes

Regarding epitope structure, typical antibody epitopes contain approximately 14.6 ± 4.9 residues, with heavy chain paratopes contributing about 67% of the total interaction. Hydrophobic interactions represent about 40% of interface residues, while hydrogen bonds account for approximately 30% of interfacial contacts.

How should researchers interpret Western blot results with YHR218W-A antibody in the context of yeast cell cycle studies?

When analyzing Western blot results with YHR218W-A antibody in yeast cell cycle studies:

  • Quantification approach:

    • Normalize YHR218W-A signal to stable housekeeping proteins (e.g., actin, tubulin)

    • Use biological replicates (n≥3) for statistical analysis

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests (ANOVA for multiple timepoints)

  • Cell cycle synchronization considerations:

    • Compare expression across multiple synchronization methods (α-factor, hydroxyurea, nocodazole)

    • Include asynchronous culture controls

    • Validate synchronization efficiency using known cell cycle markers

  • Interpretation framework:

    • Correlate expression patterns with cell cycle phases

    • Consider possible post-translational modifications affecting mobility

    • Integrate with transcriptional data from microarray or RNA-seq studies

    • Compare with related genes/proteins in cluster analysis

What controls are essential when evaluating antibody specificity in immunoprecipitation experiments?

For rigorous validation of YHR218W-A antibody specificity in immunoprecipitation experiments, the following controls are essential:

  • Positive controls:

    • Wild-type yeast expressing endogenous levels of YHR218W-A

    • Yeast overexpressing tagged YHR218W-A protein

  • Negative controls:

    • YHR218W-A knockout strain

    • Isotype control antibody (same species and isotype, irrelevant specificity)

    • Pre-immune serum (for polyclonal antibodies)

    • Beads-only control (no antibody)

  • Validation approaches:

    • Reciprocal co-IP (if interacting partners are identified)

    • Mass spectrometry confirmation of immunoprecipitated proteins

    • Competition with purified antigen or blocking peptide

How can YHR218W-A antibody studies be integrated with gene expression profiling for comprehensive functional analysis?

Integrating YHR218W-A antibody studies with gene expression profiling enables a multi-omics approach to functional characterization:

  • Correlation analysis workflow:

    • Perform Western blot quantification of YHR218W-A protein levels

    • Conduct parallel RNA-seq or microarray analysis

    • Calculate protein-mRNA correlation coefficients

    • Identify conditions where protein and mRNA levels are discordant (suggesting post-transcriptional regulation)

  • Superparamagnetic clustering integration:

    • Use YHR218W-A protein expression data as a seed for clustering

    • Identify co-expressed genes through superparamagnetic clustering

    • Enhance clustering by incorporating transcription factor binding information

    • Compare clusters between standard SPC and SPCTF (SPC with transcription factor data)

  • Functional network construction:

    • Map YHR218W-A within existing yeast protein interaction networks

    • Validate key interactions using antibody-based approaches

    • Integrate with genetic interaction data (synthetic lethality, epistasis)

    • Use network analysis to predict cellular functions

What are the methodological considerations when using YHR218W-A antibody in combination with CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing?

When implementing CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in conjunction with YHR218W-A antibody studies, researchers should address these methodological considerations:

  • Experimental design strategy:

    • Design sgRNAs with minimal off-target effects

    • Create precise genetic modifications (knockout, point mutations, tags)

    • Validate edits by sequencing and Western blot with YHR218W-A antibody

    • Assess clonal variation in antibody reactivity

  • Validation framework:

    • Compare antibody signal across multiple independently derived clones

    • Include wild-type controls in every experiment

    • Verify specificity with multiple sgRNAs targeting different regions

    • Consider creating epitope-specific mutations to map binding sites

  • Functional assessment approach:

    • Use the antibody to assess protein expression in edited cells

    • Monitor localization changes resulting from specific mutations

    • Investigate protein stability alterations in different genetic backgrounds

    • Analyze protein-protein interaction changes in edited cells

How might YHR218W-A antibody be utilized in studying conserved protein functions across different yeast species?

The YHR218W-A antibody presents valuable opportunities for comparative studies across yeast species:

  • Cross-species reactivity assessment:

    • Test antibody recognition of orthologs in related yeasts (Candida, Schizosaccharomyces)

    • Identify conserved epitopes through sequence alignment

    • Generate species-specific antibodies for comparative studies

  • Evolutionary conservation analysis:

    • Use the antibody to compare expression patterns across species

    • Correlate protein conservation with functional conservation

    • Identify species-specific post-translational modifications or interactions

  • Heterologous expression systems:

    • Express YHR218W-A orthologs in S. cerevisiae

    • Use the antibody to monitor expression, localization, and interactions

    • Assess functional complementation in knockout backgrounds

What emerging technologies could enhance the research applications of YHR218W-A antibody?

Several cutting-edge technologies can extend the research utility of YHR218W-A antibody:

  • Advanced imaging applications:

    • Super-resolution microscopy (STORM, PALM) for precise localization

    • Live-cell imaging with antibody fragments or nanobodies

    • Correlative light-electron microscopy for ultrastructural context

  • Single-cell applications:

    • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) for protein expression in single cells

    • Microfluidic antibody-based assays for single-cell analysis

    • In situ proximity ligation for detecting interactions at single-molecule resolution

  • Structural biology integration:

    • Cryo-electron microscopy with antibody labeling

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for epitope mapping

    • Protein footprinting combined with antibody recognition to track conformational changes

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.