SPBPB10D8.07c Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Structure and Function

Antibodies are Y-shaped glycoproteins composed of two heavy chains and two light chains, with variable regions (Fab) for antigen binding and constant regions (Fc) for effector functions . Their isotypes (e.g., IgG, IgA, IgM) determine their biological roles, such as IgG’s dominance in blood circulation and IgA’s mucosal protection .

Development Challenges:

  • Glycosylation: Affects antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement activation .

  • Complex Structures: Bispecific or trispecific antibodies require advanced manufacturing .

Clinical Applications of Antibodies

Therapeutic antibodies are critical in oncology, autoimmune diseases, and infectious diseases:

  • IgG mAbs (e.g., rituximab, trastuzumab) induce tumor cell killing via ADCC and CDC .

  • IgA mAbs: Emerging for mucosal cancer therapies .

  • Radioimmunotherapy: Combines antibodies with radioactive isotopes to target cancer cells .

Research Gaps and Considerations

If "SPBPB10D8.07c Antibody" is a novel compound:

  • Target Antigen: Requires identification (e.g., viral spike, tumor antigen).

  • Mechanism: Binding affinity, epitope specificity, and effector functions must be characterized .

  • Preclinical Testing: In vitro neutralization assays and in vivo efficacy in animal models (e.g., mice, nonhuman primates) .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPBPB10D8.07c antibody; Uncharacterized transporter SPBPB10D8.07c antibody
Target Names
SPBPB10D8.07c
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
Tellurite-resistance/dicarboxylate transporter (TDT) family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is SPBPB10D8.07c and what cellular functions does it participate in?

SPBPB10D8.07c is a protein-coding gene in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast). While specific information about this particular protein is limited in the provided search results, it follows the standard nomenclature pattern for S. pombe genes. Similar to other fission yeast proteins studied with antibodies, researchers should conduct preliminary characterization through bioinformatic analysis to determine predicted molecular weight, domains, and potential functions before antibody selection .

What validation methods should I use to confirm SPBPB10D8.07c antibody specificity?

Proper antibody validation is essential for generating reliable research data. For SPBPB10D8.07c antibody, implement multiple validation approaches:

  • Genetic validation: Test antibody reactivity in wild-type vs. knockout/knockdown strains

  • Recombinant expression: Compare detection in cells overexpressing the target protein

  • Orthogonal validation: Correlate antibody results with other detection methods (e.g., MS/MS)

  • Independent antibody validation: Compare results using antibodies targeting different epitopes

These approaches align with established antibody validation frameworks and address specificity concerns similarly to those described for other research antibodies .

How do I optimize Western blot conditions for SPBPB10D8.07c antibody?

Optimizing Western blot conditions requires systematic testing of multiple parameters:

ParameterRecommended Testing RangeNotes
Antibody dilution1:500 to 1:5000Begin with manufacturer recommendation, then optimize
Blocking agent5% milk, 5% BSA, commercial blockersBSA often preferred for phospho-specific antibodies
Incubation time1-16 hours (primary), 1-2 hours (secondary)Longer incubations at 4°C may improve signal-to-noise
Washing bufferTBST, PBST with 0.05-0.1% Tween-20More stringent washing for high background
Detection methodChemiluminescence, fluorescenceFluorescence offers better quantitative linearity

Create a standardized protocol after optimization to ensure reproducibility. When troubleshooting, change only one parameter at a time to identify the source of issues .

How can I distinguish between specific and non-specific binding when SPBPB10D8.07c antibody shows multiple bands?

Multiple bands in Western blots can indicate splice variants, post-translational modifications, degradation products, or non-specific binding. To distinguish between these possibilities:

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with excess immunizing peptide - specific bands should disappear

  • Molecular weight analysis: Compare observed vs. predicted molecular weights

  • Subcellular fractionation: Different cellular compartments may contain different forms of the protein

  • IP-MS analysis: Immunoprecipitate the protein and analyze by mass spectrometry to identify cross-reactive proteins

  • Deglycosylation/dephosphorylation: Treat samples to remove post-translational modifications

This methodical approach is similar to validation efforts described for other antibodies like anti-Shb, where distinguishing specific from non-specific binding required multiple complementary techniques .

How do application-specific properties of antibodies affect SPBPB10D8.07c detection in different experimental contexts?

Antibodies may perform differently across applications based on epitope accessibility and conformation:

ApplicationEpitope RequirementsOptimization Considerations
Western BlottingLinear epitopes preferredDenaturing conditions expose internal epitopes
ImmunoprecipitationConformational epitopes preferredNative conditions maintain protein structure
ImmunofluorescenceApplication-dependentFixation method affects epitope accessibility
Flow CytometrySurface-accessible epitopesLive vs. fixed/permeabilized cells
ChIPDNA-accessible epitopesCrosslinking can mask epitopes

As demonstrated with Shb antibodies, a single antibody may work well for Western blotting but fail in immunoprecipitation due to these differences in epitope accessibility . Test the SPBPB10D8.07c antibody in your specific application before proceeding with full experiments.

What strategies can I use to immunoprecipitate low-abundance SPBPB10D8.07c protein from S. pombe lysates?

Immunoprecipitating low-abundance proteins requires optimization:

  • Increase starting material: Scale up culture volume to increase protein quantity

  • Optimize lysis conditions: Test different buffers (RIPA, NP-40, Triton X-100) with protease/phosphatase inhibitors

  • Cross-linking approach: Consider cross-linking antibody to beads to reduce background

  • Pre-clearing lysates: Remove non-specific binding proteins with control IgG

  • Extended incubation: Increase antibody-lysate incubation time (overnight at 4°C)

  • Sensitive detection: Use silver staining or fluorescent Western blotting for detection

For challenging targets like SPBPB10D8.07c, consider using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to increase success probability, as demonstrated with other difficult-to-detect proteins .

How do I select the optimal SPBPB10D8.07c antibody among multiple commercial options?

Selecting the optimal antibody requires systematic evaluation:

  • Epitope information: Prefer antibodies with disclosed epitope sequences

  • Validation data: Review manufacturer validation data critically

  • Literature citations: Check publications using the antibody

  • Host species compatibility: Consider downstream application compatibility

  • Clone type for monoclonals: Different clones may recognize different epitopes

  • Independent validation: Test multiple antibodies side-by-side

Similar to approaches for selecting antibodies against other proteins, conduct your own validation using positive and negative controls regardless of manufacturer claims . Document antibody information meticulously, including catalog numbers and lot numbers, to ensure reproducibility.

How can I identify and resolve contradictory results when using SPBPB10D8.07c antibodies from different sources?

Contradictory results from different antibodies require systematic investigation:

  • Epitope differences: Map the epitopes recognized by each antibody

  • Sample preparation variations: Standardize lysis, denaturation, and processing

  • Post-translational modifications: Different antibodies may detect different modified forms

  • Cross-reactivity: Evaluate specificity using knockout/knockdown controls

  • Conformational sensitivity: Some antibodies may detect only specific protein conformations

When analyzing contradictory data, similar to studies of other proteins, consider that each antibody provides partial information about the target. Integrating results from multiple antibodies often provides more complete understanding of protein biology .

What are the best practices for storing and handling SPBPB10D8.07c antibody to maintain long-term activity?

Proper antibody storage and handling are critical for reproducible results:

Storage ConditionRecommendationNotes
Short-term (1-2 weeks)4°CAdd sodium azide (0.05%) to prevent microbial growth
Long-term-20°C to -80°CAliquot to avoid freeze-thaw cycles
Freeze-thaw cyclesMinimize (<5)Each cycle can reduce activity by 10-20%
Working dilutionsStore at 4°CUse within 1-2 weeks
Shipping/transportOn ice or frozenAvoid prolonged exposure to room temperature

Similar to recommendations for other antibodies like the anti-5-Methylcytosine monoclonal antibody, add carrier proteins (0.1-1% BSA) for dilute antibody solutions to prevent adsorption to tube walls and maintain stability .

How can I develop a quantitative ELISA for SPBPB10D8.07c protein using available antibodies?

Developing a quantitative ELISA requires:

  • Antibody pair selection: Test different capture/detection antibody combinations recognizing non-overlapping epitopes

  • Standard curve generation: Use purified recombinant SPBPB10D8.07c protein

  • Optimization steps:

    • Coating buffer composition and pH

    • Blocking agent selection

    • Sample dilution buffers

    • Antibody concentrations

    • Incubation times and temperatures

  • Validation:

    • Linearity assessment across concentration range

    • Spike-recovery experiments

    • Intra-assay and inter-assay variability determination

This approach is analogous to ELISA development for other targets, focusing on specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility through systematic optimization .

What considerations are important when using SPBPB10D8.07c antibody for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments?

ChIP experiments require specific optimization for transcription factors or chromatin-associated proteins:

  • Fixation optimization: Test different formaldehyde concentrations (0.5-2%) and incubation times

  • Sonication parameters: Optimize to achieve 200-500 bp DNA fragments

  • Antibody qualification: Verify that the antibody can recognize fixed/denatured protein

  • Controls:

    • Input samples (pre-immunoprecipitation)

    • IgG negative controls

    • Positive controls targeting known abundant factors (e.g., histones)

  • Quantification: Use qPCR for targeted regions or sequencing for genome-wide analysis

When adapting SPBPB10D8.07c antibody for ChIP, ensure it recognizes epitopes accessible in the chromatin context, similar to considerations for other nuclear proteins .

How does epitope masking affect SPBPB10D8.07c detection in different experimental contexts?

Epitope masking can occur through multiple mechanisms:

  • Protein-protein interactions: Binding partners may obscure the epitope

  • Post-translational modifications: Phosphorylation, glycosylation, etc. near the epitope

  • Conformational changes: Different cellular conditions alter protein folding

  • Fixation artifacts: Chemical fixatives can modify epitopes

To address epitope masking:

  • Test multiple antibodies targeting different regions

  • Apply epitope retrieval techniques for fixed samples

  • Use denaturing conditions to expose hidden epitopes

  • Consider native vs. reducing conditions in Western blots

Understanding epitope accessibility is crucial for accurate interpretation of negative results, as demonstrated in studies of other antibodies that work in some applications but not others .

How can I utilize SPBPB10D8.07c antibody in proximity labeling approaches to identify interaction partners?

Proximity labeling techniques can identify protein interactions in native cellular contexts:

  • BioID approach:

    • Generate SPBPB10D8.07c-BirA* fusion construct

    • Express in S. pombe cells and supply biotin

    • Purify biotinylated proteins using streptavidin

    • Identify by mass spectrometry

  • APEX2 approach:

    • Generate SPBPB10D8.07c-APEX2 fusion

    • Treat cells with hydrogen peroxide and biotin-phenol

    • Purify biotinylated proteins

    • Analyze interaction network

  • Validation of interactions:

    • Use SPBPB10D8.07c antibody in co-immunoprecipitation

    • Perform reverse co-IP with antibodies against identified partners

    • Conduct functional studies of interactions

These approaches complement traditional antibody-based co-IP methods by identifying transient or weak interactions in their native cellular context .

What are the key considerations for using SPBPB10D8.07c antibody in super-resolution microscopy?

Super-resolution microscopy requires specific antibody characteristics:

  • Specificity: Higher resolution magnifies specificity issues

  • Signal-to-noise ratio: Clean background is essential

  • Fluorophore selection:

    • Photo-switchable dyes for STORM/PALM

    • Photo-stable dyes for STED

    • Appropriate spectral separation for multi-color imaging

  • Secondary antibody considerations: F(ab')2 fragments may improve resolution

  • Sample preparation: Optimization of fixation, permeabilization, and blocking

For co-localization studies with SPBPB10D8.07c, carefully select antibody pairs raised in different host species to avoid cross-reactivity, and validate antibody performance at the higher resolution offered by these techniques .

How can I develop a protocol for multiplexed detection of SPBPB10D8.07c alongside other S. pombe proteins?

Multiplexed detection protocols require careful optimization:

  • Antibody compatibility:

    • Select antibodies from different host species

    • Ensure no cross-reactivity between secondary antibodies

    • Validate each antibody individually before multiplexing

  • Detection strategies:

    • Sequential immunostaining with stripping between rounds

    • Spectrally distinct fluorophores for simultaneous detection

    • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) using metal-conjugated antibodies

  • Signal amplification options:

    • Tyramide signal amplification

    • Polymer-based detection systems

    • Quantum dots for improved signal and stability

This approach allows for comprehensive protein network analysis in S. pombe, similar to multiplexed detection methods developed for other model organisms .

How do I quantitatively analyze SPBPB10D8.07c expression levels across different experimental conditions?

Quantitative analysis requires standardized approaches:

  • Western blot densitometry:

    • Use appropriate loading controls (e.g., actin, GAPDH)

    • Ensure signal is in linear detection range

    • Normalize to total protein (Ponceau, REVERT, etc.)

    • Use technical and biological replicates

  • Flow cytometry quantification:

    • Use calibration beads for standardization

    • Report median fluorescence intensity (MFI)

    • Include fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls

  • Statistical analysis:

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests

    • Consider batch effects in analysis

    • Report variability (standard deviation or standard error)

Proper quantification, similar to approaches used with other antibodies, ensures reliable comparisons across experimental conditions .

What approaches can resolve discrepancies between transcriptomic and proteomic data for SPBPB10D8.07c?

Discrepancies between RNA and protein levels are common and may reflect biological regulation:

  • Post-transcriptional regulation:

    • Assess mRNA stability

    • Analyze microRNA regulation

    • Examine alternative splicing

  • Translational control:

    • Polysome profiling

    • Ribosome profiling

    • Analysis of translation efficiency

  • Protein stability:

    • Pulse-chase experiments

    • Proteasome inhibition

    • Half-life determination

  • Technical considerations:

    • Antibody epitope accessibility

    • Subcellular localization affecting extraction

    • Dynamic range limitations of detection methods

Integration of multiple data types, as shown in studies of other proteins, provides more complete understanding of gene expression regulation .

How can I distinguish between specific SPBPB10D8.07c variants or post-translational modifications using available antibodies?

Distinguishing protein variants requires specialized approaches:

  • Modification-specific antibodies:

    • Phospho-specific antibodies

    • Acetylation-specific antibodies

    • Ubiquitination-specific antibodies

  • Biochemical approaches:

    • Phosphatase treatment

    • Deglycosylation enzymes

    • Ubiquitin isopeptidase treatment

  • Separation techniques:

    • Phos-tag gels for phosphorylated proteins

    • 2D gel electrophoresis

    • Ion exchange chromatography

  • Mass spectrometry validation:

    • Identification of specific modifications

    • Quantification of modification stoichiometry

    • Mapping of modification sites

These complementary approaches, similar to those used for studying post-translational modifications of other proteins, allow comprehensive characterization of SPBPB10D8.07c variants .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.