Antibody identifiers typically follow standardized formats reflecting either:
Research project codes (e.g., Abs-9 against S. aureus SpA5 )
Database accession numbers (e.g., SAbDab entries tracking structural features )
The "SPAPJ696.02" format does not align with established naming systems in major antibody databases:
| Database | Identifier Format Example | Coverage Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| SAbDab | 1FDL (PDB-based) | Structural metadata |
| AbDb | 1N8Z_H (chain-specific) | Sequence-structure mapping |
| NCBI Protein | XP_123456789.1 | Sequence accession |
| Parameter | Value | Methodology Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Affinity (KD) | 1.959 × 10⁻⁹ M | Biolayer interferometry |
| Protective Efficacy | 100% survival in murine models | In vivo challenge assays |
| Epitope Resolution | 36-aa α-helix (N847-S857) | Alphafold2/molecular docking |
The evaluation of Schistosoma japonicum antigens demonstrates rigorous validation workflows applicable to novel antibodies :
Target Expression Profiling
Temporal expression analysis (e.g., SjSP-216 in juvenile worms)
Serological Sensitivity
| Antigen | Seroconversion Time (Weeks) | Sensitivity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| SjSP-13 | 3 | 100 |
| SjSP-216 | 3 | 100 |
Cross-Reactivity Testing
Database Queries
Commercial Reagent Verification
Nomenclature Clarification
Confirm identifier format with originating institution/lab