YIL077C Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Target Protein: YIL077C

YIL077C is a nuclear-encoded protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae implicated in abiotic stress tolerance. It belongs to a broader family of proteins associated with environmental stress resistance, particularly in plants and yeast . The protein’s functional role includes:

  • Stress Adaptation: Enhances cellular tolerance to stressors like oxidative damage, osmotic pressure, and temperature fluctuations .

  • Biotechnological Relevance: Engineered variants of YIL077C homologs have been used to confer stress resistance in transgenic plants .

Mechanistic Role in Stress Response

YIL077C homologs are linked to abiotic stress tolerance through pathways involving:

  • Multidrug Resistance Transporters: YIL077C shares functional similarities with MFS-MDR (Major Facilitator Superfamily-Multidrug Resistance) transporters, which expel cytotoxic compounds .

  • Genetic Engineering: Overexpression of YIL077C homologs in plants (e.g., E. coli-derived variants) improves resistance to quinidine, cisplatin, and environmental stressors .

Applications in Biotechnology

  • Plant Stress Tolerance: Used to validate transgenic plants engineered with YIL077C homologs for drought or salinity resistance .

  • Yeast Model Studies: Facilitates functional genomics research by quantifying YIL077C expression under stress conditions .

Limitations and Future Directions

  • Species Specificity: Limited to Saccharomyces cerevisiae and closely related species .

  • Therapeutic Potential: Unclear applicability in mammalian systems due to evolutionary divergence in stress-response pathways.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
YIL077C antibody; PUP1 protein homolog antibody
Target Names
YIL077C
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: sce:YIL077C

STRING: 4932.YIL077C

Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is YIL077C and why are antibodies against it important for research?

YIL077C is a yeast gene encoding a protein involved in cellular metabolism and stress response pathways. Antibodies targeting the YIL077C protein are valuable research tools that enable detection, quantification, and functional analysis of this protein in experimental systems. These antibodies help researchers investigate protein expression patterns, subcellular localization, and potential interactions with other proteins, providing crucial insights into fundamental cellular processes . Methodologically, these antibodies can be applied in multiple techniques including Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence microscopy, offering versatile approaches to study YIL077C's biological functions.

What types of YIL077C antibodies are available for research applications?

Researchers can access several types of YIL077C antibodies, each optimized for specific experimental applications:

  • Monoclonal antibodies: Derived from single B cell clones, these offer high specificity for particular epitopes on the YIL077C protein, allowing for consistent reproducibility across experiments .

  • Polyclonal antibodies: Produced by multiple B cell lineages, these recognize various epitopes on YIL077C, potentially providing stronger signals but with greater batch-to-batch variation.

  • Recombinant antibodies: Generated through molecular engineering techniques similar to those described for therapeutic antibodies, offering precisely defined binding characteristics and reduced variability .

The choice between these formats depends on experimental requirements, with monoclonals preferred for highly specific epitope recognition and polyclonals for stronger detection signals across multiple epitopes.

How is antibody specificity for YIL077C validated?

Validation of YIL077C antibody specificity employs multiple complementary approaches:

  • Western blot analysis: Confirming the antibody recognizes a protein of the expected molecular weight in samples expressing YIL077C.

  • Knockout/knockdown controls: Testing antibody reactivity in samples where YIL077C expression has been genetically eliminated or reduced.

  • Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubating the antibody with purified YIL077C protein or peptide should eliminate signal in subsequent experiments.

  • Recombinant protein expression: Testing antibody against purified recombinant YIL077C protein.

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Evaluating potential binding to related proteins to ensure specificity.

Methodologically, researchers should employ multiple validation approaches rather than relying on a single technique, as each method addresses different aspects of antibody specificity .

What are the optimal conditions for using YIL077C antibodies in Western blotting?

Optimizing Western blot protocols for YIL077C antibodies requires careful attention to several key parameters:

ParameterRecommended ConditionsNotes
Sample preparationDenaturing (SDS-PAGE)Most YIL077C antibodies recognize linear epitopes
Protein amount20-50 μg total proteinMay vary based on expression level
Transfer methodWet transferFor efficient transfer of higher molecular weight proteins
Membrane typePVDF (0.45 μm)Better protein retention than nitrocellulose
Blocking solution5% non-fat milk in TBSTBSA alternative for phospho-specific antibodies
Primary antibody dilution1:500 - 1:2000Optimize for each antibody lot
Incubation timeOvernight at 4°CImproves signal-to-noise ratio
Detection methodECL or fluorescenceChoose based on sensitivity needs

Methodologically, researchers should always include positive and negative controls to validate antibody performance and optimize dilution ratios through titration experiments . The specific detection system should be selected based on the required sensitivity, with chemiluminescence offering higher sensitivity for low-abundance proteins.

How can YIL077C antibodies be effectively used in immunoprecipitation experiments?

Successful immunoprecipitation (IP) with YIL077C antibodies depends on preserving protein conformation and optimizing several experimental parameters:

  • Cell lysis buffer selection: Use non-denaturing buffers (e.g., RIPA or NP-40 based) with protease inhibitors to maintain native protein structure.

  • Pre-clearing samples: Remove non-specifically binding proteins by pre-incubation with protein A/G beads.

  • Antibody immobilization: Pre-couple antibodies to protein A/G beads before sample addition for better efficiency.

  • Incubation conditions: Extended incubation (4-16 hours) at 4°C with gentle rotation maximizes protein capture.

  • Washing stringency: Balance between removing non-specific binding while preserving specific interactions.

For co-immunoprecipitation experiments investigating YIL077C protein interactions, lower detergent concentrations and physiological salt conditions help preserve protein-protein complexes. Methodologically, researchers should verify IP efficiency by immunoblotting a small fraction (5-10%) of the input sample alongside the IP product .

How can YIL077C antibodies be applied in studying protein-protein interactions?

Investigating YIL077C protein interactions using antibody-based approaches involves several sophisticated methodologies:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): YIL077C antibodies can pull down protein complexes from cell lysates, allowing identification of interacting partners. This approach requires careful buffer optimization to maintain native interactions.

  • Proximity ligation assay (PLA): This technique uses oligonucleotide-conjugated secondary antibodies that, when in close proximity, generate amplifiable DNA signals. PLA provides spatial resolution of protein interactions in situ with single-molecule sensitivity.

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): If YIL077C has DNA-binding properties or associates with chromatin-bound proteins, ChIP using YIL077C antibodies can identify genomic binding sites.

  • Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC): Though not directly using antibodies, this complementary approach can validate interactions identified through antibody-based methods.

Methodologically, researchers must carefully validate interactions through multiple techniques and appropriate controls, including isotype controls, knockout/knockdown systems, and reciprocal co-IP experiments to confirm the specificity of detected interactions .

What approaches are recommended for epitope mapping of YIL077C antibodies?

Epitope mapping determines the specific binding region of YIL077C antibodies, providing crucial information for experimental design and interpretation:

  • Peptide array analysis: Overlapping peptides spanning the YIL077C sequence are synthesized on membranes or microarrays and probed with the antibody to identify binding regions.

  • Deletion/truncation mutants: Testing antibody binding to truncated YIL077C protein variants helps narrow down the recognized region.

  • Alanine scanning mutagenesis: Systematic replacement of amino acids with alanine identifies critical residues for antibody binding.

  • Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS): This advanced technique identifies regions of the protein protected from exchange when bound to the antibody.

  • X-ray crystallography: The definitive method for determining antibody-antigen interactions at atomic resolution, though technically demanding.

Methodologically, researchers should begin with broader approaches (peptide arrays, truncation mutants) to identify the general epitope region before employing more precise techniques. Knowledge of the epitope helps predict whether the antibody will recognize denatured vs. native protein and its potential for functional blocking .

How can YIL077C antibodies be utilized in high-throughput or automated research platforms?

Incorporating YIL077C antibodies into high-throughput and automated platforms requires optimization of several parameters:

  • Antibody stability and performance: Evaluate antibody stability under automated handling conditions, including repeated freeze-thaw cycles and extended storage in liquid handlers.

  • Miniaturization: Adjust antibody concentrations and incubation parameters for reduced reaction volumes in microplate formats.

  • Automation compatibility: Ensure antibody formulations are compatible with liquid handling systems (avoiding aggregation or adhesion issues).

  • Signal detection optimization: Calibrate detection systems for consistent quantification across large sample sets.

  • Quality control measures: Implement position controls and normalization standards to account for plate effects and systematic biases.

For high-content imaging applications, optimization of antibody dilution, incubation time, and washing protocols is essential to maximize signal-to-noise ratio while maintaining throughput. Researchers should validate automated protocols against manual methods to ensure comparable sensitivity and specificity before scaling to full high-throughput implementation .

What are common causes of non-specific binding with YIL077C antibodies and how can they be addressed?

Non-specific binding presents a significant challenge in YIL077C antibody applications, with several potential causes and solutions:

IssuePossible CausesSolutions
High background signalInsufficient blockingOptimize blocking conditions; try different blocking agents (milk, BSA, normal serum)
Multiple bands in Western blotCross-reactivity with related proteinsIncrease antibody dilution; use more stringent washing conditions
Post-translational modificationsConfirm with different antibody clones recognizing distinct epitopes
Protein degradationAdd appropriate protease inhibitors; optimize sample preparation
Unexpected signal in negative controlsFc receptor bindingUse F(ab')₂ fragments or add normal IgG to block Fc receptors
Endogenous peroxidase/phosphatase activityInclude appropriate enzyme inhibitors in protocols
Secondary antibody cross-reactivityTest secondary antibody alone; use isotype-specific secondaries

Methodologically, researchers should systematically optimize each parameter while maintaining appropriate controls. Comparing results across multiple techniques can help distinguish true signals from artifacts. Additionally, including knockout/knockdown controls provides the strongest validation of antibody specificity .

How should contradictory results between different YIL077C antibody-based assays be reconciled?

When different antibody-based techniques yield apparently contradictory results regarding YIL077C, researchers should consider several methodological approaches to resolve these discrepancies:

  • Epitope accessibility differences: Different techniques (Western blot vs. immunofluorescence) expose different protein conformations. Compare results from antibodies recognizing distinct epitopes.

  • Technique-specific artifacts: Each method has inherent limitations. For example, fixation methods in immunohistochemistry may mask or create artificial epitopes.

  • Antibody validation status: Verify antibody specificity in the context of each specific application through appropriate controls.

  • Sample preparation differences: Protein extraction methods, fixation protocols, and buffer conditions significantly impact epitope presentation.

  • Complementary non-antibody techniques: Employ orthogonal methods (mass spectrometry, genetic approaches) to independently verify findings.

How can post-translational modifications of YIL077C affect antibody recognition?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact YIL077C antibody binding, with important implications for data interpretation:

  • Modification-induced epitope masking: Phosphorylation, glycosylation, or other PTMs may directly block antibody binding sites, resulting in false-negative results.

  • Conformational changes: PTMs distant from the epitope may induce structural changes that alter antibody accessibility.

  • Modified epitope recognition: Some antibodies specifically recognize modified forms of YIL077C (e.g., phospho-specific antibodies).

  • Molecular weight shifts: PTMs can alter protein migration in gels, resulting in bands at unexpected molecular weights.

To address these challenges, researchers should:

  • Use multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes

  • Employ modification-specific antibodies when studying particular PTMs

  • Apply enzymes (phosphatases, glycosidases) to selectively remove modifications

  • Compare results across different cell states/treatments known to affect modification status

Methodologically, a comprehensive approach combining these strategies provides the most complete understanding of how YIL077C modifications influence antibody recognition and biological function .

How can YIL077C antibodies be adapted for super-resolution microscopy techniques?

Adapting YIL077C antibodies for super-resolution microscopy requires special considerations to maximize spatial resolution and signal quality:

  • Antibody labeling strategies:

    • Direct conjugation with photoswitchable fluorophores for STORM/PALM

    • Small fluorophore conjugates (Alexa Fluor 647, Atto 488) for optimal photophysical properties

    • Nanobody or Fab fragment derivatives for reduced linkage error due to smaller size

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Enhanced fixation protocols to minimize epitope loss while preserving ultrastructure

    • Optimized permeabilization to ensure antibody access while maintaining structural integrity

    • Dense labeling protocols to satisfy the Nyquist criterion for structural resolution

  • Imaging parameters:

    • Buffer systems containing oxygen scavengers and reducing agents for improved fluorophore photostability

    • Optimal antibody concentrations to achieve sufficient labeling density while minimizing background

Methodologically, researchers should validate super-resolution findings against conventional microscopy techniques and conduct careful controls to distinguish specific from non-specific labeling. Quantitative analysis of labeling efficiency and clustering is essential for meaningful biological interpretation .

What are the considerations for developing recombinant YIL077C antibody fragments for research applications?

Developing recombinant YIL077C antibody fragments offers several advantages for specialized research applications, with important methodological considerations:

  • Format selection based on application:

    • scFv (single-chain variable fragments): Smaller size for tissue penetration and reduced immunogenicity

    • Fab fragments: Better stability than scFv while maintaining smaller size than full IgG

    • Nanobodies (VHH): Extremely small size with high stability and penetration capabilities

  • Expression system optimization:

    • Bacterial systems (E. coli): Cost-effective but limited by folding efficiency for some formats

    • Mammalian cell expression: Better glycosylation and folding but higher production costs

    • Yeast or insect cell systems: Compromise between bacterial and mammalian systems

  • Purification and quality control:

    • Affinity tags (His, FLAG) for simplified purification

    • Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates

    • Thermal stability analysis to ensure proper folding

    • Binding kinetics characterization using surface plasmon resonance

  • Functional modifications:

    • Site-specific conjugation points for reporters or functional groups

    • Stability engineering to enhance shelf-life and performance

    • Affinity maturation if higher binding strength is required

Methodologically, researchers must balance between maintaining the desired binding properties of the parent antibody while optimizing the fragment for specific applications. Thorough validation of binding specificity and performance in the intended application is essential .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.